The Szenario-Kids: Psychometric properties of a novel,participation-oriented language assessment as determined in children and youth without communication deficits

Abstract

Background: Creating a holistic picture of children and youth who suffer from acquired aphasia or another (developmental) language disorders is very difficult due to missing diagnostic instruments covering participation. Szenario-Kids is a new diagnostic instrument to measure multimodal communication abilities in everyday life situations of children and youth aged 6 to 16 years. Aims: We aimed to examine feasibility and psychometric properties of the model-based Szenario-Kids in the healthy population, to build the basis for later test evaluation in the language-impaired patient group. Method: Szenario-Kids was administered to n = 57 children and youth without communication deficits (mean age 9.16 years; German as native language). The diagnostic instrument was presented twice within two weeks, complemented by standardized diagnostic instruments to cover all communication modalities and enable correlation of performance between tests. Results: Data analysis showed good practicability, satisfying parallelism of test versions A and B (p = .098-.845), acceptable to excellent reliability (Cronbach's α = .781-.920) and high interrater reliability (ICC = .733-.960), very strong test-retest correlation (r = .736-.893) and moderate to strong concurrent validity (r = -.475-.611; p ≤ .01). Conclusions: The analysis of feasibility and psychometric properties revealed promising results for the group without communication deficits. Neurolinguistic underpinnings can be explained within our Multimodal Communication Model (MCM). Thus, the evaluation of Szenario-Kids in language-impaired children and youth is a next step.

Keywords

multimodal treatment school age population (developmental) language disorders social participation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abel

Weiller

Huber

, et al. (2015) Therapy-induced brain reorganization patterns in aphasia. Brain 138(4): 1097–1112.

Adams

(2001) Clinical diagnostic and intervention studies of children with semantic–pragmatic language disorder. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. 36(3): 289–305.

Adams

Lockton

Freed

, et al. (2012) The social communication intervention project: A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of speech and language therapy for school-age children who have pragmatic and social communication problems with or without autism spectrum disorder. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 47(3): 233–244.

Adolfsson

Granlund

Bjorck-Akesson

, et al. (2010) Exploring changes over time in habilitation professionals’ perceptions and applications of the international classification of functioning, disability and health, version for children and youth (ICF-CY). Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 42(7): 670–678.

Anderson

(1998) Assessing executive functions in children: Biological, psychological, and developmental considerations. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 8(3): 319–349.

Anderson

Catroppa

(2006) Advances in postacute rehabilitation after childhood-acquired brain injury: A focus on cognitive, behavioral, and social domains. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 85(9): 767–778.

Bedell

(2009) Further validation of the child and adolescent scale of participation (CASP). Developmental Neurorehabilitation 12(5): 342–351.

Bishop

DVM

(1998) Development of the children's communication checklist (CCC): A method for assessing qualitative aspects of communicative impairment in children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 39(6): 879–891.

Blomert

Kean

Koster

, et al. (1994) Amsterdam—Nijmegen Everyday Language Test: Construction, reliability and validity. Aphasiology 8(4): 381–407.

10.

Buck

VanLear

(2002) Verbal and nonverbal communication: Distinguishing symbolic, spontaneous, and pseudo-spontaneous nonverbal behavior. Journal of Communication 52(3): 522–541.

11.

Capone

McGregor

(2004) Gesture development. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 47(1): 173–186.

12.

Chomsky

(2005) Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36(1): 1–22.

13.

Cook

Goldin-Meadow

(2006) The role of gesture in learning: Do children use their hands to change their minds? Journal of Cognition and Development 7(2): 211–232.

14.

Crais

Watson

Baranek

(2009) Use of gesture development in profiling children’s prelinguistic communication skills. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 18(1): 95–108.

15.

Damico

Wilson

Simmons-Mackie

, et al. (2008) Overcoming unintelligibility in aphasia: The impact of non-verbal interactive strategies. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 22(10–11): 775–782.

16.

Daumüller

Goldenberg

(2010) Therapy to improve gestural expression in aphasia: A controlled clinical trial. Clinical Rehabilitation 24(1): 55–65.

17.

Dell

(1986) A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review 93(3): 283–321.

18.

DeRuiter

(2000) The production of gesture and speech. In: McNeill

(ed.) Language and Gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.248–311.

19.

Diamond

(2013) Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology 64: 135–168.

20.

Farias

Davis

Harrington

(2006) Drawing: Its contribution to naming in aphasia. Brain and Language 97(1): 53–63.

21.

Goldenberg

Hartmann

Schlott

(2003) Defective pantomime of object use in left brain damage: Apraxia or asymbolia? Neuropsychologia 41(12): 1565–1573.

22.

Henry

Messer

Nash

(2012) Executive functioning in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 53(1): 37–45.

23.

Im-Bolter

Johnson

Pascual-Leone

(2006) Processing limitations in children with specific language impairment: The role of executive function. Child Development 77(6): 1822–1841.

24.

Isquith

Gioia

Espy

(2004) Executive function in preschool children: Examination through everyday behavior. Developmental Neuropsychology 26(1): 403–422.

25.

King

Law

King

, et al. (2007) Measuring children's participation in recreation and leisure activities: Construct validation of the CAPE and PAC. Child: Care, Health and Development 33(1): 28–39.

26.

Law

Garrett

Nye

(2005) Speech and language therapy interventions for children with primary speech and language delay or disorder. Campbell Systematic Reviews 1(1): 1–85.

27.

Lehto

Juujärvi

Kooistra

, et al. (2003) Dimensions of executive functioning: Evidence from children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 21(1): 59–80.

28.

Levelt

WJM

(1989) Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge: MIT Press.

29.

Levelt

WJM

(2003) Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker. In: Brown

Hagoort

(eds) The Neurocognition of Language. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 82–122.

30.

Lindsay

Strand

(2016) Children with language impairment: Prevalence, associated difficulties, and ethnic disproportionality in an English population. Frontiers in Education 1: 2.

31.

McConachie

Colver

Forsyth

, et al. (2006) Participation of disabled children: How should it be characterised and measured? Disability and Rehabilitation 28(18): 1157–1164.

32.

McLeod

Threats

(2008) The ICF-CY and children with communication disabilities. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 10(1–2): 92–109.

33.

Moll

Landerl

(2014) SLRT-II: Weiterentwicklung des Salzburger Lese- und Rechtschreibtests. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

34.

Morton

(1969) Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review 76(2): 165–178.

35.

Nobis-Bosch

Bruehl

Krzok

, et al. (2020) Szenario-Test: Testung verbaler und non-verbaler Aspekte aphasischer Kommunikation. Köln: ProLog.

36.

Patterson

(1988) Acquired disorders of spelling. In: Denes

Semenza

Bisiacchi

(eds) Perspectives on Cognitive Neuropsychology. London: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 213–229.

37.

Petermann

(2012) SET 5-10: Sprachstandserhebungstest für Kinder im Alter zwischen 5 und 10 Jahren. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

38.

Plum

Nobis-Bosch

Krzok

, et al. (2015) Szenario-Kids. Sprache · Stimme · Gehör 39(03): 134–139.

39.

Plum

Nobis-Bosch

Krzok

, et al. (2016) Möchtest du mit mir ins Schwimmbad gehen? Erfassung kommunikativ-pragmatischer Kompetenzen bei kindlicher Aphasie mit dem Szenario-Kids. Forum Logopadie 30(5): 22–25.

40.

Sacchett

(2002) Drawing in aphasia: Moving towards the interactive. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 57(4): 263–277.

41.

Schoneberger

(2010) Three myths from the language acquisition literature. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior 26(1): 107–131.

42.

Spitzer

Binkofski

Willmes

, et al. (2019) Executive functions in aphasia: A novel aphasia screening for cognitive flexibility in everyday communication. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 30(9): 1701–1719.

43.

Steinert

(2011) ADST: Allgemeiner Deutscher Sprachtest Göttingen: Hogrefe.

44.

Tourville

Guenther

(2011) The DIVA model: A neural theory of speech acquisition and production. Language and Cognitive Processes 26(7): 952–981.

45.

van der Meulen

van de Sandt-Koenderman

WME

Duivenvoorden

, et al. (2010) Measuring verbal and non-verbal communication in aphasia: Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the Scenario Test International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 45(4): 424–435.

46.

van Nispen

van de Sandt-Koenderman

WME

Krahmer

(2017) Production and comprehension of pantomimes used to depict objects. Frontiers in Psychology 8: 1095.

47.

van Sommers

(1989) A system for drawing and drawing-related neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology 6(2): 117–164.

48.

WHO (2007) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Children and Youth Version; ICF-CY. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.47 MB