This study describes the experience of childhood speech impairment (speech sound disorder) from the perspective of two young men and their mothers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the four participants, with questions framed around the International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF; WHO, 2001) to gain a holistic understanding of life with speech impairment. Phenomenological analysis of the interviews revealed that the experience of speech impairment was associated with three key themes: (1) knowing, (2) having, and (3) doing. A core theme of ‘battles’ was common to all three themes (i.e. the battle for knowledge, the battle of having speech and associated difficulties, and the battle to do something to minimize the impact of the difficulties); however, the nature of the battles was different for participants, and was related to other life factors. This qualitative research provides valuable insights into the experiences of those living with speech impairment, and shows the importance of considering such information alongside quantitative research when making decisions in clinical practice.
AndersonTKFelsenfeldS (2003) A thematic analysis of late recovery from stuttering. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology12: 243–53.
2.
ArkkilaERäsänenPRoineRPSintonenHVilkmanE (2008) Health-related quality of life of adults with childhood diagnosis of specific language impairment. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica60: 233–40.
3.
BrintonBFujikiMRobinsonLA (2005) Life on a tricycle: A case study of language impairment from 4 to 19. Topics in Language Disorders25: 338–52.
4.
CanaryHE (2008) Negotiating dis/ability in families: Constructions and contradictions. Journal of Applied Communication Research36: 437–58.
5.
CarrollC (2010) ‘It’s not everyday that parents get a chance to talk like this’: Exploring parents’ perceptions and expectations of speech-language pathology services for children with intellectual disability. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology12: 352–61.
6.
CraisERPoston RoyVFreeK (2006) Parents’ and professionals’ perceptions of the implementation of family-centered practices in child assessments. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology15: 365–77.
7.
CreamAOnslowMPackmanALlewellynG (2003) Protection from harm: The experience of adults after therapy with prolonged speech. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders38: 379–95.
8.
Crichton-SmithI (2002) Communicating in the real world: Accounts from people who stammer. Journal of Fluency Disorders27: 333–52.
9.
DamicoJSSimmons-MackieN (2003) Qualitative research and speech-language pathology: A tutorial for the clinical realm. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology12: 131–43.
10.
FelsenfeldSBroenPAMcGueM (1992) A 28-year follow-up of adults with a history of moderate phonological disorder: Linguistic and personality results. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research35: 1114–25.
11.
FelsenfeldSBroenPAMcGueM (1994) A 28-year follow up of adults with a history of moderate phonological disorder: Educational and occupational results. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research37: 1341–53.
12.
FelsenfeldSMcGueMBroenPA (1995) Familial aggregation of phonological disorders: Results from a 28-year follow-up. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research38: 1091–1107.
13.
GlogowskaMCampbellR (2000) Investigating parental views of involvement in pre-school speech and language therapy. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders35: 391–405.
14.
GoldbartJMarshallJ (2004) ‘Pushes and pulls’: On the parents of children who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication20: 194–208.
15.
HaberLRHaberRN (1982) Does silent reading involve articulation? Evidence from tongue twisters. American Journal of Psychology95: 409–19.
16.
HearneAPackmanAOnslowMQuineS (2008) Stuttering and its treatment in adolescence: The perceptions of people who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders33: 81–98.
17.
KathardH (2006) On becoming someone: Self-identity as able. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology8: 79–91.
18.
KovarskyD (2008) Representing voices from the life-world in evidence based practice. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 8(S1): 47–57.
19.
LawJBoyleJHarrisFHarknessANyeC (2000) Prevalence and natural history of primary speech and language delay: Findings from a systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders35: 165–88.
20.
Lindamood-Bell Learning Processes (2011) The Lindamood Phoneme Sequencing® Program for Reading, Spelling and Speech (LiPS®). Retrieved from: http://www.lindamoodbell.com/programs/lips.aspx (December2011).
21.
LyonsRO’MalleyMPO’ConnorPMonaghanU (2010) It’s just so lovely to hear him talking: Exploring the early-intervention expectations and experiences of parents. Child Language Teaching and Therapy26: 61–76.
22.
MarshHWShavelsonR (1985) Self-concept: Its multifaceted hierarchical structure. Educational Psychologist20: 10761–23.
23.
McAllisterLMcCormackJMcLeodSHarrisonLJ (2011) Expectations and experiences of accessing and participating in services for childhood speech impairment. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology13: 251–67.
24.
McLeodSHarrisonLJ (2009) Epidemiology of speech and language impairment in a nationally representative sample of 4- to 5-year-old children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research52: 1213–29.
25.
McCormackJMcLeodSMcAllisterLHarrisonLJ (2009) A systematic review of the association between childhood speech impairment and participation across the lifespan. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology11: 155–70.
26.
McCormackJMcLeodSMcAllisterLHarrisonLJ (2010) My speech problem, your listening problem, and my frustration: The experience of living with childhood speech impairment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools41: 379–92.
27.
McLeodS (2004) Speech pathologists’ application of the ICF to children with speech impairment. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology6: 75–81.
28.
MerrickRRoulstoneS (2011) Children’s views of communication and speech-language pathology. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology13: 281–90.
MinichielloVSullivanGGreenwoodKAxfordR (1999) Handbook of research methods in health sciences. Sydney: Addison Wesley.
31.
MironC (2010) The parent experience: When a child is diagnosed with childhood apraxia of speech. Communication Disorders Quarterly. DOI: 10.1177/152574011038413110.1177/1525740110384131.
32.
OwenRHayettLRoulstoneS (2004) Children’s views of speech and language therapy in school: Consulting children with communication difficulties. Child Language Teaching and Therapy20: 55–73.
33.
ParadiceRAdewusiA (2002) It’s a continuous fight isn’t it?: Parents views of the educational provision for children with speech and language difficulties. Child Language Teaching and Therapy18: 257–88.
34.
PattonMQ (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd edition.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
PlexicoLManningWHDiLolloA (2005) A phenomenological understanding of successful stuttering management. Journal of Fluency Disorders30: 1–22.
36.
ScarinciNWorrallLHicksonL (2009) The ICF and third-party disability: Its application to spouses of older people with hearing impairment. Disability and Rehabilitation31: 2088–2100.
37.
van ManenM (1990) Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London, ON: State University of New York Press.
38.
Watts PappasNMcLeodS (eds) (2009) Working with families in speech-language pathology. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.
39.
World Health Organization (2001) International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: WHO.
