Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Over the past decades, singlehood has become prevalent globally. In India, the same trend has been observed in recent years. Many singles are delaying marriage or choosing never to get married even though marriage is considered important in Indian society. This article explores how singlehood is experienced among Indian singles aged 30 years and older (N = 153) and their quality of life. Using a mixed-method approach, it was found that a difference exists in the quality of life of the participants based on their gender and living arrangements. Thematic analysis revealed that our participants opt to remain unmarried due to a range of personal and cultural factors. The advantages of staying single include a sense of freedom to explore one’s interests and reduced emotional and financial responsibilities. However, there are notable disadvantages of remaining single for our participants, such as a Lack of intimacy, Apprehension related to health and financial security, Safety issues, and Perceived discrimination in the workplace. We suggest that the findings of this study can be used as a foundation for designing psychological interventions that address the needs of single adults in traditional social contexts.

Keywords

Gender living arrangements quality of life singlehood in India subjective experiences

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adamczyk

(2016). An investigation of loneliness and perceived social support among single and partnered young adults. Current Psychology, 35(4), 674–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9337-7

Adamczyk

Segrin

(2015). Perceived social support and mental health among single vs. partnered Polish young adults. Current Psychology, 34(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9242-5

Adhikari

Lutz

(2023). Rural/Urban fertility differentials in the Global South: Is female education the key driver of declining birth rates? IIASA Working Paper. https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/18729

Agarwal

Sharma

Mittal

Negi

Choudhury

Pant

(2024, May 9–11). Trouble faced by the LGBTQ community and prediction of the suicidal rate of LGBTQ community using support vector model. 2024 International Conference on Communication, Computer Sciences and Engineering (IC3SE), Gautam Buddha Nagar, India, IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10593341

Albay

A. P.

(2022, April). Single and satisfied: Factors that promote positive life outcomes among single young adults. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360232634_Single_and_Satisfied_Factors_that_Promote_Positive_Life_Outcomes_among_Single_Young_Adults#fullTextFileContent

Alfano

(2017). Daughters, dowries, deliveries: The effect of marital payments on fertility choices in India. Journal of Development Economics, 125, 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2016.11.004

Amato

P. R.

(2004). Tension between institutional and individual views of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 959–965. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00065.x

Apostolou

(2015). Past, present, and why people struggle to establish and maintain intimate relationships. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 9(4), 257–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000052

Apostolou

(2017). Why people stay single: An evolutionary perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.034

10.

Apostolou

Alexopoulos

Christoforou

(2023). The price of being single: An explorative study of the disadvantages of singlehood. Personality and Individual Differences, 208, Article 112208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112208

11.

Apostolou

Sullman

Birkás

Błachnio

Bushina

Calvo

Costello

Dujlovic

Hill

Lajunen

T. J.

Lisun

Manrique-Millones

Manrique-Pino

Meskó

Nechtelberger

Ohtsubo

Ollhoff

C. K.

Przepiórka

Putz

Á.

Font-Mayolas

(2023). Mating performance and singlehood across 14 nations. Evolutionary Psychology: An International Journal of Evolutionary Approaches to Psychology and Behavior, 21(1), Article 14747049221150169. https://doi.org/10.1177/14747049221150169

12.

Arias Valencia

M. M.

(2022). Principles, scope, and limitations of the methodological triangulation. Investigación y Educación en Enfermería, 40(2), Article e03. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v40n2e03

13.

Bag

(2024, December 19–21). Dowry, violence and divorce [Paper Presentation]. 19th Annual Conference on Economic Growth and Development, New Delhi, India. https://www.isid.ac.in/∼acegd/acegd2024/papers/ParimalBag.pdf

14.

Band-Winterstein

Manchik-Rimon

(2014). The experience of being an old never-married single: A life course perspective. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 78(4), 379–401. https://doi.org/10.2190/AG.78.4.d

15.

Baumeister

R. F.

Catanese

K. R.

Vohs

K. D.

(2001). Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(3), 242–273. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0503_5

16.

Baxter

(2005). To marry or not to marry: Marital status and the household division of labor. Journal of Family Issues, 26(3), 300–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X04270473

17.

Beckmeyer

J. J.

Jamison

T. B.

(2024). Contextualizing singlehood among young adults: Exploring the meanings and perceived reasons for being single. Family Relations, 73(3), 1607–1624. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12975

18.

Bhagat

R. B.

(2016). The practice of early marriages among females in India: Persistence and change [Working Paper No. 10]. International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/R-Bhagat/publication/294860617_The_Practice_of_Early_Marriages_among_Females_in_India_Persistence_and_Change/links/56c4574f08aea564e304a84f/The-Practice-of-Early-Marriages-among-Females-in-India-Persistence-and-Change.pdf

19.

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

20.

Brough

(1953). The early Brahmanical system of Gotra and Pravara. Cambridge University Press.

21.

Byrne

Carr

(2005). Caught in the cultural lag: The stigma of singlehood. Psychological Inquiry, 16(2–3), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli162&3_02

22.

Çelik

(2018). Unmarried women with closed “windows of opportunity”: Professional women’s reasons for not getting married. Women's Studies International Forum, 66, 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2017.11.012

23.

Chadda

R. K.

Deb

K. S.

(2013). Indian family systems, collectivistic society and psychotherapy. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 55(Suppl 2), S299–S309. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.105555

24.

Chakraborty

(2022). Challenges before the institution of marriage in the era of globalisation. Indian Journal of Law and Justice, 13(1), 65–77.

25.

Chasteen

A. L.

(1994). “The world around me”: The environment and single women. Sex Roles, 31(5-6), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01544591

26.

Cherlin

A. J.

(2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 848–861. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00058.x

27.

Chiplunkar

Weaver

(2023). Marriage markets and the rise of dowry in India. Journal of Development Economics, 164, Article 103115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2023.103115

28.

Creswell

J. W.

Plano Clark

V. L.

(2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

29.

Davies

(1995). A closer look at gender and distress among the never married. Women & Health, 23(2), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1300/J013v23n02_02

30.

De Jong-Gierveld

Aalberts

(1980). Singlehood: A creative or a lonely experience? Alternative Lifestyles, 3, 350–368.

31.

De Paulo

B. M.

Morris

W. L.

(2006). The unrecognized stereotyping and discrimination against singles. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 251–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00446.x

32.

Dhamodharan

(2020). Honor Killing: Social, psychological and cultural perspectives. In Deb

Subhalakshmi

(Eds.), Delivering justice (pp. 53–64). Routledge India.

33.

Dhawan

A. G.

(2020). Correlation of Vedic matchmaking and its real-time psychological effect on 19 Indian couple: A survey. International Journal of Scientific Research, 9(9), 34–35. https://www.worldwidejournals.com/international-journal-of-scientific-research-(IJSR)/recent_issues_pdf/2020/September/correlation-of-vedic-matchmaking-and-its-realtime-psychological-effect-on-19-indian-couple-a-survey_September_2020_1598865857_4039297.pdf

34.

Diener

Oishi

Lucas

R. E.

(2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 403–425. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056

35.

Dixon

R. B.

(1971). Explaining cross-cultural variations in age at marriage and proportions never marrying. Population Studies, 25(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.1971.10405799

36.

Dua

(2012). Essay on the recent trends in the Hindu marriage Retrieved December 20, 2024. from. https://www.shareyouressays.com/essays/essay-on-recent-trends-in-the-hindu-marriage/86735

37.

Dubler

A. R.

(2003). In the shadow of marriage: Single women and the legal construction of the family and the state. The Yale Law Journal, 112(7), 1641–1715. https://doi.org/10.2307/3657498

38.

Edin

Kefalas

M. J.

Reed

J. M.

(2004). A peek inside the black box: What marriage means for poor unmarried parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 1007–1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00072.x

39.

EUROSTAT (2023). Population and social conditions. Statistical office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_pjan/default/table?lang=en

40.

Forsyth

C. J.

Johnson

E. L.

(1995). A sociological view of the never married. International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 25(2), 91–104.

41.

Frankenbach

Weber

Loschelder

D. D.

Kilger

Friese

(2022). Sex drive: Theoretical conceptualization and meta-analytic review of gender differences. Psychological Bulletin, 148(9-10), 621–661. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000366

42.

Frazier

Arikian

Benson

Losoff

Maurer

(1996). Desire for marriage and life satisfaction among unmarried heterosexual adults. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13(2), 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407596132004

43.

Gandhi

(2016). Living single: Being a single woman in India. In India exclusion report 2015 (pp. 165–188). Yoda Press. https://surl.li/jrisef

44.

Gardner

C. B.

(1988). Access information: Public lies and private peril. Social Problems, 35, 384–397.

45.

Gardner

C. B.

(1990). Safe conduct: Women, crime, and self in public places. Social Problems, 37(3), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.2307/800745

46.

Gilbert

S. P.

Sifers

S. K.

(2011). Bouncing back from a breakup: Attachment, time perspective, mental health, and romantic loss. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 25(4), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/87568225.2011.605693

47.

Girme

Y. U.

Park

MacDonald

(2023). Coping or thriving? Reviewing intrapersonal, interpersonal, and societal factors associated with well-being in singlehood from a within-group perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 18(5), 1097–1120. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221136119

48.

Girme

Y. U.

Sibley

C. G.

Hadden

B. W.

Schmitt

M. T.

Hunger

J. M.

(2022). Unsupported and stigmatized? The association between relationship status and well-being is mediated by social support and social discrimination. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(2), 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211030102

49.

Glenn

N. D.

(1975). The contribution of marriage to the psychological well-being of males and females. Journal of Marriage and Family, 37(3), 594. https://doi.org/10.2307/350523

50.

Goswami

(2012). An investigation into the pattern of delayed marriage in India. [Working Paper No. 275]. The Institute for Social and Economic Change. https://www.isec.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WP-275-Baishali_delayed-marriage-15-sep.pdf

51.

Greitemeyer

(2009). Stereotypes of singles: Are singles what we think? European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(3), 368–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.542

52.

Grunow

Schulz

Blossfeld

(2012). What determines change in the division of housework over the course of marriage? International Sociology, 27(3), 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580911423056

53.

Gupta

Agrawal

(2021). Ahamkara: A study on the Indian model of self and identity. International Social Science Journal, 71(239-240), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/issj.12262

54.

Hatch

(2017). Saying “I Don’t” to matrimony: An investigation of why long-term heterosexual cohabitors choose not to marry. Journal of Family Issues, 38(12), 1651–1674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X15576200

55.

Heitzman

Worden

R. L.

(1995, September 1). Marriage. India: A country study. Retrieved December 20, 2024, from. https://countrystudies.us/india/86.htm

56.

Hemalatha

Banu

(2018). Perceptions of young adults towards live-in relationship. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(9), 2221–2226. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.709.274

57.

Hertel

Schütz

DePaulo

B. M.

Morris

W. L.

Stucke

T. S.

(2007). She's single, so what? How are singles perceived compared with people who are married? Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 19(2), 139–158.

58.

Himawan

K. K.

Bambling

Edirippulige

(2018). The Asian single profiles: Discovering many faces of never married adults in Asia. Journal of Family Issues, 39(14), 3667–3689. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X18789205

59.

Hlynsson

J. I.

Lindner

Barri

Carlbring

(2024). Exploring cutoff points and measurement invariance of the Brunnsviken brief quality of life inventory. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1305682. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1305682

60.

J. H.

(2015). The problem group? Psychological wellbeing of unmarried people living alone in the Republic of Korea. Demographic Research, 32, 1299–1328. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2015.32.47

61.

Wang

(2024). Social institutions and low birth rates [Working paper]. Singapore Management University, School of Economics. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/2770

62.

Hoan

MacDonald

(2024). “Sisters are doin’ it for themselves”: Gender differences in singles’ well-being. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 16(6), 610–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506241287960

63.

Hsu

T.-L.

Barrett

A. E.

(2020). The association between marital status and psychological well-being: Variation across negative and positive dimensions. Journal of Family Issues, 41(11), 2179–2202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X20910184

64.

Igarashi

Takai

Yoshida

(2005). Gender differences in social network development via mobile phone text messages: A longitudinal study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(5), 691–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407505056492

65.

Iwasawa

(2004). Partnership transition in contemporary Japan: Prevalence of childless non-cohabiting couples. The Japanese Journal of Population, 2(1), 76–92. https://www.ipss.go.jp/webj-ad/WebJournal.files/population/2004_3/iwasawa2004mar.pdf

66.

Jatav

M. K.

(2020). Spatial structure of marriage circles among Hindus in Uttar Pradesh: A case study of Mathura district. Asiatic Society for Social Science Research, 2(2), 59–64. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kiran_Jatav2/publication/367009455_Spatial_Structure_of_Marriage_Circles_Among_Hindus_in_Uttar_Pradesh_A_Case_Study_of_Mathura_District/links/63bdd4b8097c7832caa6ea9e/Spatial-Structure-of-Marriage-Circles-Among-Hindus-in-Uttar-Pradesh-A-Case-Study-of-Mathura-District.pdf

67.

Jeyaseelan

Kumar

Jeyaseelan

Shankar

Yadav

B. K.

Bangdiwala

S. I.

(2015). Dowry demand and harassment: Prevalence and risk factors in India. Journal of Biosocial Science, 47(6), 727–745. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932014000571

68.

Johnston

M. W.

Eklund

S. J.

(1984). Life-adjustment of the never-married: A review with implications for counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, 63(4), 230–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1984.tb02808.x

69.

Jones

G. W.

(2005). The “flight from marriage” in South-East and East Asia. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 36(1), 93–119. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.36.1.93

70.

Jordan

A. H.

Zitek

E. M.

(2012). Marital status bias in perceptions of employees. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 34(5), 474–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2012.711687

71.

Kaiser

C. R.

Kashy

D. A.

(2005). The contextual nature and function of singlism. Psychological Inquiry, 16(2–3), 122–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/20447273

72.

Kalia

(2021, November 19). How the Indian system keeps ‘single’ women dependent on others. The Swaddle. https://www.theswaddle.com/how-the-indian-system-keeps-single-women-dependent-on-others

73.

Kanth

Krishnan

Sen

(2024). Premarital romance, dating, and arranged marriages in India: The intersection of tradition and globalization. In Chandra

Blair

S. L.

(Eds.), Indian families: Contemporary family structures and dynamics (pp. 149–178). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1530-353520240000026008

74.

Karve

(1965). Kinship Organization in India. Asia Publishing House.

75.

Kaur

Singh

(2013). Changing patterns of marriage in Indian society. Indian Journal of Economics and Development, 9(3), 261–267. https://doi.org/10.5958/j.2322-0430.9.3.010

76.

Keith

(2003). Resources, family ties, and well-being of never-married men and women. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 42(2), 51–75. https://doi.org/10.1300/J083v42n02_05

77.

Veena

(2020). Perception of marriage and live-in relationship among young adults. Infokara Research, 9(2), 391–398. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dr-N-9/publication/385827989_Perception_of_Marriage_and_Live-in_Relationship_among_Young_Adults/links/6736f038a78ba469f061882e/Perception-of-Marriage-and-Live-in-Relationship-among-Young-Adults.pdf

78.

Kislev

(2018). Happiness, post-materialist values, and the unmarried. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(8), 2243–2265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9921-7

79.

Kislev

(2019). Happy Singlehood: The rising acceptance and celebration of solo living. University of California Press.

80.

Kislev

(2023). Singles in the workplace: Benefits and challenges 1. In Chowkhani

Wynne

(Eds.), Singular selves: An introduction to singles studies (175-189). Routledge India.

81.

Krueger

Heckhausen

Hundertmark

(1995). Perceiving middle-aged adults: Effects of stereotype-congruent and incongruent information. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 2, 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/50B.2.P82

82.

Kuttappan

Tiwana

D. K.

(2025). The future of same-sex marriage in India – An analysis with other countries. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, Article 101237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101237

83.

Lamb

(2018). Being single in India: Gendered identities, class mobilities, and personhoods in flux. Ethos, 46(1), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/etho.12193

84.

Lamb

(2022). Being single in India: Stories of gender, exclusion, and possibility. University of California Press.

85.

Lauer

Yodanis

(2010). The deinstitutionalization of marriage revisited: A new institutional approach to marriage. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2(1), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00039.x

86.

Lesthaeghe

(2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 36(2), 211–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00328.x

87.

Liao

McMunn

Mejía

S. T.

Brunner

E. J.

(2018). Gendered trajectories of support from close relationships from middle to late life. Ageing and Society, 38(4), 746–765. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X16001264

88.

Lindner

Frykheden

Forsström

Andersson

Ljótsson

Hedman

Andersson

Carlbring

(2016). The Brunnsviken Brief Quality of Life Scale (BBQ): Development and psychometric evaluation. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 45(3), 182–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2016.1143526

89.

Long

C. R.

Averill

J. R.

(2003). Solitude: An exploration of benefits of being alone. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 33(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00204

90.

Magardechian

L. S.

(2017). A closer look at #singlism and the experiences of Armenian American women pursuing higher education. ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/openview/5bf5ce5ffb4309dc3c97f36b84c6e960/1?pqorigsite=gscholar&cbl=18750

91.

Manning

W. D.

Joyner

Hemez

Cupka

(2019). Measuring cohabitation in US national surveys. Demography, 56(4), 1195–1218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-019-00796-0

92.

Mastekaasa

(1993). Marital status and subjective well-being: A changing relationship? Social Indicators Research, 29, 249–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01079515

93.

Morris

W. L.

Sinclair

DePaulo

B. M.

(2007). No shelter for singles: The perceived legitimacy of marital status discrimination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10(4), 457–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430207081535

94.

Mortelmans

Claessens

Thielemans

(2023). Defining and measuring singlehood in family studies. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 15(3), 485–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12520

95.

Narayan

C. L.

Narayan

Deepanshu

(2021). Live-in relationships in India—Legal and psychological implications. Journal of Psychosexual Health, 3(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2631831820974585

96.

National Statistical Office (2022). Youth in India: Situation and needs study . Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India. https://www.mospi.gov.in/sites/default/files/publication_reports/Youth_in_India_2022.pdf?download=1

97.

Nicolaisen

Thorsen

(2014). Loneliness among men and women—a five-year follow-up study. Aging & Mental Health, 18(2), 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2013.821457

98.

Ochnik

Mandal

(2016). Do single women feel more physically attractive than single men? Body appearance self-esteem predictors in never-married single men and women. Abstracts Supplement: Appearance Matters, 7.

99.

Ochnik

Slonim

(2020). Satisfaction with singlehood in never-married singles: The role of gender and culture. The Open Psychology Journal, 13(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874350102013010017

100.

Oishi

(2010). Culture and well-being: Conceptual and methodological issues. In Diener

Helliwell

J. F.

Kahneman

(Eds.), International differences in well-being (pp. 34–69). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732739.003.0003

101.

Oliffe

J. L.

Kelly

M. T.

Gonzalez Montaner

Seidler

Z. E.

Kealy

Ogrodniczuk

J. S.

Rice

S. M.

(2022). Mapping men’s mental health help-seeking after an intimate partner relationship break-up. Qualitative Health Research, 32(10), 1464–1476. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323221110974

102.

Oman

(2021). Well-being, values, culture and Society. Understanding well-being data: Improving social and cultural Policy, practice and research (pp. 229–263). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72937-0_6

103.

Prabhakar

(2011). Causes for remaining single: A comparative study. Journal of Psychosocial Research, 6(2), 203.

104.

Read

D. W.

(2018). Kinship systems. In Callan

(Ed.), The international encyclopaedia of anthropology. John Wiley & Sons.

105.

Rhoades

G. K.

Kamp Dush

C. M.

Atkins

D. C.

Stanley

S. M.

Markman

H. J.

(2011). Breaking up is hard to do: The impact of unmarried relationship dissolution on mental health and life satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(3), 366–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023627

106.

Saardchom

Lemaire

(2005). Causes of increasing ages at marriage: An international regression Study. Marriage & Family Review, 37(3), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v37n03_05

107.

Samajdar

S. S.

Joshi

S. R.

Chakraborty

Das

(2023). Gotra & genetics-The science behind the Vedic thoughts and its application in modern day Indian society. International Journal of Clinical Case Studies, 2(2), 1–4. https://www.clinicsearchonline.org/uploads/articles/17339025491685787608IJCCS-SC-13-GALLEY_PROOF.pdf

108.

Samanta

(2021). Living solo at midlife: Can the pandemic de-stigmatize living alone in India? Journal of Aging Studies, 56, Article 100907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2020.100907

109.

Sarkisian

Gerstel

(2016). Does singlehood isolate or integrate? Examining the link between marital status and ties to kin, friends, and neighbors. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(3), 361–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407515597564

110.

Schmitt

D. P.

Alcalay

Allik

Ault

Austers

Bennett

K. L.

Bianchi

Boholst

Cunen

M. A. B.

Braeckman

Brainerd

E. G.

Jr. Caral

L. G. A.

Caron

Casullo

M. M.

Cunningham

Daibo

De Backer

De Souza

Diaz-Loving

International Sexuality Description Project . (2003). Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: Tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.85

111.

Sengupta

(2013). Social factors influencing the choices of the Indian Hindu married women in marriage. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Houston). https://uh-ir.tdl.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/4cf6a5a6-6eb9-46f6-8ed0-3b2cb9f20bf1/content

112.

Shaji

(2022, November 28). A woman being single is actively discouraged in India — Legally and socially. The News Minute. https://www.thenewsminute.com/features/woman-being-single-actively-discouraged-india-legally-and-socially-170371

113.

Sharma

D. C.

(2023). Marriage equality eludes same-sex couples in India. Lancet (London, England), 402(10412), 1513. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02394-2. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673623023942

114.

Sharma

Pandit

Pathak

Sharma

(2013). Hinduism, marriage and mental illness. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 55(Suppl 2), S243–S249. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.105544

115.

Sharma

(2021). Rights of LGBTQ in India and the struggle for societal acceptance. International Journal of Management and Humanities, 4(3), 18–32.

116.

Sharp

E. A.

Ganong

(2011). “I’am loser, I’m not married, let’s just all look at me”: Eversingle women’s perceptions of their social environment. Journal of Family Issues, 32(7), 956–980. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x10392537

117.

Singh

Shekhar

Shri

(2023). Patterns in age at first marriage and its determinants in India: A historical perspective of last 30 years (1992–2021). SSM - Population Health, 22, Article 101363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101363

118.

Smock

P. J.

(2004). The wax and wane of marriage: Prospects for marriage in the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 966–973. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00066.x

119.

Srinivasan

James

K. S.

(2015). The golden cage: Stability of the institution of marriage in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(13), 38–45.

120.

Srinivasan

Bedi

A. S.

(2007). Domestic violence and dowry: Evidence from a South Indian village. World Development, 35(5), 857–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.08.005

121.

Stephenson

K. R.

Meston

C. M.

(2013). The conditional importance of sex: Exploring the association between sexual well-being and life satisfaction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 41(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2013.811450

122.

Stephenson

K. R.

Pickworth

Jones

P. S.

(2021). Gender differences in the association between sexual satisfaction and quality of life. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 39(2), 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2021.2004309

123.

Stevenson

Wolfers

(2007). Marriage and divorce: Changes and their driving forces. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.2.27

124.

Stutzer

Frey

B. S.

(2006). Does marriage make people happy, or do happy people get married? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(2), 326–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2005.11.043

125.

V. P.

Gesselman

A. N.

Perry

B. L.

Fisher

H. E.

Garcia

J. R.

(2017). Stress of singlehood: Marital status, domain-specific stress, and anxiety in a national US sample. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 36(6), 461–485. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2017.36.6.461

126.

Tan

C. S.

Cheng

S. M.

Nakayama

George

(2021). Antecedents of the attitudes toward singlehood among young adults in Malaysia, Japan, and India. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 756090. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.756090

127.

Taylor

(2024). Examining outcomes of arranged marriages in China and India: A critical analysis (publication no. 30997396) [Doctoral dissertation, Regent University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

128.

The Economic Times (2022, July 15). Proportion of unmarried youth rising, finds Govt. survey. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/india/proportion-of-unmarried-youth-rising-finds-govt-survey/articleshow/92878668.cms?from=mdr

129.

Times of India , (2021, September 24). What's marriage after 30 in India like. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/relationships/love-sex/whats-marriage-after-30-in-india-like/photostory/86456585.cms

130.

Træen

Kvalem

I. L.

(2022). Satisfaction with singlehood and sexual activity. Sexuality & Culture, 26(5), 1621–1638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-022-09961-x

131.

Utasi

Á.

(2003). Independent, never married people in their thirties: Remaining single. Demográfia English Edition, 48(5), 122–143.

132.

Vanita

(2009). Same-Sex weddings, Hindu traditions and modern India. Feminist Review, 91(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2008.45

133.

Vespa

(2017). The changing economics and demographics of young adulthood: 1975–2016. Current population reports, report No. P20-579. U.S. Census Bureau.

134.

Waite

L. J.

Joyner

(2001). Emotional satisfaction and physical pleasure in sexual unions: Time horizon, sexual behavior, and sexual exclusivity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(1), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00247.x

135.

Walby

(1989). Theorising patriarchy. Sociology, 23(2), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038589023002004

136.

Wang

Brad

Stone

(2022, September 22). New Census Data: Key Takeaways on Divorce, Marriage, and Fertility in the U.S. Institute for Family Studies. https://ifstudies.org/blog/new-census-data-key-takeaways-on-divorce-marriage-and-fertility-in-the-us

137.

Watkins

N. K.

Beckmeyer

J. J.

(2023). Perceived efficacy in initiating romantic relationships and single emerging adults’ well-being. Emerging Adulthood. https://doi.org/10.1177_21676968231182755

138.

Yodanis

(2020). The institution of marriage. In Treas

Drobnič

(Eds.), Dividing the domestic (pp. 175–191). Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804773744-012

139.

Yong

J. C.

N. P.

Jonason

P. K.

Tan

Y. W.

(2019). East Asian low marriage and birth rates: The role of life history strategy, culture, and social status affordance. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.01.009

Singlehood in Indian context: A mixed-method investigation of psychological impact and perspectives on reasons,advantages and disadvantages of remaining single

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References