Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2024-12
Wuhan residents perceptions of prejudice and discrimination and the social categorization processes during and after the COVID-19 lockdown: A qualitative study
Although studies have focused on intergroup biases (e.g., discrimination) during the COVID-19 pandemic, little is known about the underlying mechanisms driving intergroup bias, specifically social categorization. In-depth interviews were conducted among 32 residents of Wuhan, P.R. China, during and after the initial COVID-19 lockdown (Jan-July, 2020). Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was applied to describe perceived prejudice and discrimination and the intergroup interaction processes. Results indicated that: (1) Wuhan residents’ interpretations of perceived prejudice and discrimination evolved over time, especially regarding views of the pandemic prevention measures; (2) intergroup contact, emotional factors and cognitive factors influenced individuals’ perceptions of prejudice and discrimination; (3) social categorization and integration processes underwent changes across different stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in Wuhan, encompassing the lockdown and reopening; (4) the group identity of recovered COVID-19 patients was easily solidified; (5) in the group integration process, emphasizing common attributes between groups, individualized media coverage and positive aspects of intergroup interactions weakened intergroup boundaries and promoted group integration. These results enrich existing knowledge about perceived discrimination and social categorization processes of a suddenly marginalized group through qualitative research methods.
AbramsD.LalotF.HoggM. A. (2021). Intergroup and intragroup dimensions of COVID-19: A social identity perspective on social fragmentation and unity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(2), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220983440
2.
AllportG. W.ClarkK.PettigrewT. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
3.
BrewerM. B.MillerN. (1984). Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In MillerN.BrewerM. B. (Eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 281–302). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-497780-8.50019-X
4.
BrownR.HewstoneM. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), An integrative theory of intergroup contact (Vol. 37, pp. 255–343). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(05)37005-5
CarvalhoL. D. F.PianowskiG.GonçalvesA. P. (2020). Personality differences and COVID-19: Are extroversion and conscientiousness personality traits associated with engagement with containment measures?Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 42(2), 179–184. https://doi.org/10.1590/2237-6089-2020-0029
7.
CruwysT.StevensM.GreenawayK. H. (2020). A social identity perspective on COVID-19: Health risk is affected by shared group membership. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(3), 584–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12391
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (2010). Intergroup bias. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 1084–1121). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
10.
DurrheimK.QuayleM.DixonJ. (2016). The struggle for the nature of “prejudice”: “Prejudice” expression as identity performance. Political Psychology, 37(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12310
11.
FangA. H.GuessA. M.HumphreysM. (2019). Can the government deter discrimination? Evidence from a randomized intervention in New York city. The Journal of Politics, 81(1), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1086/700107
12.
FiskeS. T. (2005). Social cognition and the normality of prejudgment. In DovidioJ. F.GlickP.BudmanL. A. (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 36–53). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470773963.ch3
13.
FlickU. (2018). Ethics in qualitative research. In FlickU. (Ed.), Designing qualitative research (pp. 68–77). Sage Publications, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529622737.n7
14.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F. (2000). The aversive form of racism. In StangorC. (Ed.), Stereotypes and prejudice: Essential readings (pp. 289–304). Psychology Press.
15.
GanY.MaJ.WuJ.ChenY.ZhuH.HallB. J. (2022). Immediate and delayed psychological effects of province-wide lockdown and personal quarantine during the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Psychological Medicine, 52(7), 1321–1332. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720003116
16.
GeeG. C.WalsemannK. M.BrondoloE. (2012). A life course perspective on how racism may be related to health inequities. American Journal of Public Health, 102(5), 967–974. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300666
17.
GiorgiA. P.GiorgiB. (2010). Phenomenological psychology. In The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 165–178). SAGE Publications Ltd.
18.
HasnainM.PashaM. F.GhaniI. (2020). Combined measures to control the COVID-19 pandemic in wuhan, Hubei, China: A narrative review. Journal of biosafety and biosecurity, 2(2), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobb.2020.10.001
19.
HoggM. A. (2007). Uncertainty–identity theory. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 69–126). Elsevier Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39002-8
20.
HopkinsN.GreenwoodR. M.BirchallM. (2007). Minority understandings of the dynamics to intergroup contact encounters: British muslims'(sometimes ambivalent) experiences of representing their group to others. South African Journal of Psychology, 37(4), 679–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/008124630703700402
21.
HopkinsN.Kahani-HopkinsV. (2006). Minority group members' theories of intergroup contact: A case study of British muslims' conceptualizations of Islamophobia and social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(Pt 2), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605X48583
22.
HopkinsN.Kahani-HopkinsV. (2009). Reconceptualizing extremism and moderation: From categories of analysis to categories of practice in the construction of collective identity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(Pt 1), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X284425
23.
ImranN.AfzalH.AamerI.HashmiA.ShabbirB.AsifA.FarooqS. (2020). Scarlett letter: A study based on experience of stigma by COVID-19 patients in quarantine. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 36(7), 1471–1477. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.7.3606
24.
KantamneniN. (2020). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on marginalized populations in the United States: A research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 119, Article 103439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103439
25.
KawakamiK.AmodioD. M.HugenbergK. (2017). Intergroup perception and cognition: An integrative framework for understanding the causes and consequences of social categorization. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 55, pp. 1–80). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2016.10.001
26.
KlineP.RoseE. K.WaltersC. R. (2022). Systemic discrimination among large U.S. Employers. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 137(4), 1963–2036. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjac024
27.
LeeS.AdairW. L.MannixE. A.KimJ. (2012). The relational versus collective “We” and intergroup allocation: The role of nested group categorization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(5), 1132–1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.04.008
28.
LiJ.YangZ.QiuH.WangY.JianL.JiJ.LiK. (2020). Anxiety and depression among general population in China at the peak of the COVID-19 epidemic. World Psychiatry: Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 19(2), 249–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20758
29.
LouN. M.NoelsK. A.KurlS.ZhangY. S. D.Young-LeslieH. (2023). COVID discrimination experience: Chinese Canadians’ social identities moderate the effect of personal and group discrimination on well-being. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 29(2), 132–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000519
30.
MacaranasA. R.ElTohamyA.HyunS.ChaeD. H.StevensC.ChenJ. A.LiuC. H. (2023). COVID-19-related direct and vicarious racial discrimination: Associations with psychological distress among U.S. college students. Journal of Affective Disorders, 325, 747–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2023.01.009
31.
PaoliniD.MaricchioloF.PacilliM. G.PagliaroS. (2020). COVID-19 lockdown in Italy: The role of social identification and social and political trust on well-being and distress. Current Psychology, 41(8), 5652–5659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01141-0
32.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-Analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 922–934. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.504
33.
PhilogèneG. (2012). Understanding social categories: An epistemological journey. In WileyS.PhilogèneG.RevensonT. A. (Eds.), Social categories in everyday experience (pp. 31–43). American Psychological Association.
34.
RosenthalL.EarnshawV. A.LewisT. T.ReidA. E.LewisJ. B.StaskoE. C.TobinJ. N.IckovicsJ. R. (2015). Changes in experiences with discrimination across pregnancy and postpartum: Age differences and consequences for mental health. American Journal of Public Health, 105(4), 686–693. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.301906
35.
SmithJ.FlowersP.LarkinM. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Sage.
36.
SunC.ZhaiZ. (2020). The efficacy of social distance and ventilation effectiveness in preventing COVID-19 transmission. Sustainable Cities and Society, 62, Article 102390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102390
37.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.
38.
TaylorS.LandryC. A.RachorG. S.PaluszekM. M.AsmundsonG. J. G. (2020). Fear and avoidance of health care workers: An important, underrecognized form of stigmatization during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 75, Article 102289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102289
39.
TetiM.SchatzE.LiebenbergL. (2020). Methods in the time of COVID-19: The vital role of qualitative inquiries. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19(51), Article 160940692092096. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920920962
ToprakkiranS.GordilsJ. (2021). The onset of COVID-19, common identity, and intergroup prejudice. The Journal of Social Psychology, 161(4), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2021.1918620
43.
TsoR. V.CowlingB. J. (2020). Importance of face masks for COVID-19: A call for effective public education. Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 71(16), 2195–2198. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa593
44.
TurnerJ. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In LawlerE. J. (Ed.), Advances ingroup processes (Vol. 2, pp. 77–122). JAI Press.
45.
YzerbytV.DemoulinS. (2010). Intergroup relations. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 1024–1083). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
46.
ZhouT.NguyenT. V. T.ZhongJ.LiuJ. (2020). A COVID-19 descriptive study of life after lockdown in Wuhan, China. Royal Society open science, 7(9), 200705. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200705
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
