We assessed whether people express more prejudice and discrimination toward mixed-weight couples (i.e., romantic partners with dissimilar body mass indexes [BMIs]) than matched-weight couples. In Study 1, people rated mixed-weight couples less favorably than matched-weight couples. In Study 2, people acted as matchmakers; they chose to pair potential relationship partners on the basis of similar BMI and body size. Mixed-weight couples were perceived as poorer matches than matched-weight couples. In Study 3, people offered advice to a person dating a mixed-weight or matched-weight partner. Men and women dating a mixed-weight, rather than matched-weight, partner were advised to go on less active, public, and expensive dates, display less physical affection, and delay introductions to close others. In Study 4, perceived relational inequity, prejudice toward mixed-status relationships, in general, and system justification motives moderated mixed-weight prejudice. Implications for couples are discussed.
AndreyevaT.PuhlR. M.BrownellK. D. (2008). Changes in perceived weight discrimination among Americans. Obesity, 16, 1129–1134. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/oby.2008.35
2.
BanksC. A.ArnoldP. (2001). Opinions towards sexual partners with a large age difference. Marriage and Family Review, 33, 5–18.
3.
BerscheidE.DionK.WalsterE.WilliamG. (1971). Physical attractiveness and dating choice: A test of the matching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 173–189. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(71)90065-5
4.
BillmannS. J.WareJ. C. (2002). Marital satisfaction of wives of untreated sleep apneic men. Sleep Medicine, 3, 55–59. doi:10.1016/S1389-9457(01)00118-6
5.
BowlegL. (2008). When Black+ lesbian+ woman≠ Black lesbian woman: The methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles, 59, 312–325. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9400-z
6.
BowringA. L.PeetersA.Freak-PoliR.LimM.GouillouM.HelalrdM. (2012). Measuring the accuracy of self-reported height and weight in a community-based sample of young people. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12, 1–8.
7.
BoyesA. D.LatnerJ. D. (2009). Weight stigma in existing romantic relationships. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 35, 282–293. doi:10.1080/00926230902851280
8.
BrownellK. D. (Ed.). (2005). Weight bias: Nature, consequences, and remedies. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
9.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980
10.
BurkeT. J.RandallA. K.CorkeryS. A.YoungV. J.ButlerE. A. (2012). “You’re going to eat that?” Relationship processes and conflict among mixed-weight couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 1109–1130. doi:10.1177/0265407512451199
11.
ByrneD.BlaylockB. (1963). Similarity and assumed similarity of attitudes between husbands and wives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 636–640.
12.
CarelsR. A.Musher-EizenmanD. R. (2010). Individual differences and weight bias: Do people with an anti-fat bias have a pro-thin bias?Body Image, 7, 143–148. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.11.005
13.
CarmaltJ. H.CawleyJ.JoynerK.SobalJ. (2008). Body weight and matching with a physically attractive romantic partner. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 1287–1296. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00566.x
14.
CarrD.FriedmanM. A. (2006). Body weight and the quality of interpersonal relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69, 127–149. doi:10.1177/019027250606900202
15.
ChenE. Y.BrownM. (2005). Obesity stigma in sexual relationships. Obesity Research, 13, 1393–1397. doi:10.1038/oby.2005.168
16.
CrandallC. S. (1994). Prejudice against fat people: Ideology and self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 882–894. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.882
17.
CrockerJ.MajorB.SteeleC. (1998). Social stigma. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vols. 1 and 2, 4th ed., pp. 504–553). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
18.
CrowJ. F.FelsensteinJ. (1968). The effect of assortative mating on the genetic composition of a population. Eugenics Quarterly, 15, 85–97.
19.
de OnisM.BlössnerM.BorghiE. (2010). Global prevalence and trends of overweight and obesity among preschool children. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 92, 1257–1264. doi:10.3945/ajcn.2010.29786
20.
FangC. Y.SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1998). Romance among the social status continuum: Interracial marriage and the ideologically asymmetry effect. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 290–305.
21.
FestingerL. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.
22.
FuH.GoldmanN. (1996). Incorporating health into models of marriage choice: Demographic and sociological perspectives. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 740–758. doi:10.2307/353733
23.
GainesS. O.JrLeaverJ. (2002). Interracial relationships. In GoodwinR.CramerD. (Eds.), Inappropriate relationships: The unconventional, the disapproved, and the forbidden (pp. 65–78). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
GallupG.JrNewportF. (1991). For the first time, more Americans approve of interracial marriage than disapprove. Gallup Poll Monthly, 311, 60–61.
25.
GarciaS. D.RiveraS. M. (1999). Perceptions of Hispanic and African-American couples at the friendship or engagement stage of a relationship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 65–86. doi:10.1177/0265407599161004
26.
GorberS. C.TremblayM.MoherD.GorberB. (2007). A comparison of direct vs. self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: A systematic review. Obesity Reviews, 8, 307–326. doi:10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00347.x
27.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B.Jr (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528. doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
28.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. International Society of Political Psychology, 25, 881–919. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
29.
JostJ. T.KayA. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509.
30.
KayA. C.JostJ. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823
31.
KlueverR. L.DaileyR. M. (2014). Weighty dynamics: Exploring couples’ perceptions of post-weight-loss interaction. Health Communication, 29, 193–204. doi:10.1080/10410236.2012.736467
32.
KurzbanR.WeedenJ. (2005). Do advertised preferences predict the behavior of speed daters?Personal Relationships, 14, 623–632. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3
33.
LatnerJ. D.O’BrienK. S.DursoL. E.BrinkmanL. A.MacDonaldT. (2008). Weight obesity stigma: The relative strength of different forms of bias. International Journal of Obesity, 32, 1145–1152. doi:10.1038/ijo.2008.53
34.
LehmillerJ. J. (2012) Perceived marginalization and its association with physical and psychological health. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 451–469. doi:10.1177/0265407511431187
35.
LehmillerJ. J.AgnewC. R. (2006). Marginalized relationships: The impact of social disapproval on romantic relationship commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 40–51. doi:10.1177/0146167205278710
36.
LewandowskiD. A.JacksonL. A. (2001). Perceptions of interracial couples: Prejudice at the dyadic level. Journal of Black Psychology, 27, 288–303. doi:10.1177/0095798401027003003
37.
Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967).
38.
MarkeyC. N.MarkeyP. M. (2006). Romantic relationships and body satisfaction among young women. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35, 271–279. doi:10.1007/s10964-005-9013-6
39.
MarkeyC.MarkeyP. (2011). Romantic partners, weight status, and weight concerns an examination using the actor-partner interdependence model. Journal of Health Psychology, 16, 217–225. doi:10.1177/1359105310375636
40.
MarkeyC. N.MarkeyP. M. (2013). Weight disparities between female same-sex romantic partners and weight concerns: Examining partner comparison. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 469–477. doi:10.1177/0361684313484128
41.
MeltzerA. L.McNultyJ. K. (2010). Body image and marital satisfaction: Evidence for the mediating role of sexual frequency and sexual satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 156–164. doi:10.1037/a0019063
42.
MeltzerA. L.McNultyJ. K.NovakS. A.ButlerE. A.KarneyB. R. (2011). Marriages are more satisfying when wives are thinner than their husbands. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 416–424. doi:10.1177/1948550610395781
43.
MillerS. C.OlsonM. A.FazioR. H. (2004). Perceived reactions to interracial romantic relationships: When race is used as a cue to status. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7, 354–369. doi:10.1177/1368430204046143
44.
NgM.FlemingT.RobinsonM.ThomsonB.GraetzN.MargonoC.…GuptaR. (2014). Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. The Lancet, 384, 766–781.
45.
PlinerP.ChaikenS.FlettG. L. (1990). Gender differences in concern with body weight and physical appearance over the life span. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 263–273. doi:10.1177/0146167290162007
46.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.LevinS. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271–320. doi:10.1080/10463280601055772
47.
PuhlR. M.HeuerC. A. (2009). The stigma of obesity: A review and update. Obesity, 17, 941–964.
48.
Purdie-VaughnsV.EibachR. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59, 377–391.
49.
RothJ.QiangX.MarbánS. L.RedeltH.LowellB. C. (2004). The obesity pandemic: Where have we been and where are we going?Obesity Research, 12, 88S–101S.
50.
SheetsV.AjmereK. (2005). Are romantic partners a source of college students’ weight concern?Eating Behaviors, 6, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2004.08.008
51.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
52.
SilventoinenK.KaprioJ.LahelmaE.VikenR. J.RoseR. J. (2003). Assortative mating by body height and BMI: Finnish twins and their spouses. American Journal of Human Biology, 15, 620–627.
53.
SoggS.GormanM. J. (2008). Interpersonal changes and challenges after weight-loss surgery. Primary Psychiatry, 15, 61–66.
54.
SpeakmanJ. R.DjafarianK.StewartJ.JacksonD. M. (2007). Assortative mating for obesity. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 86, 316–323.
55.
StunkardA. J.SørensenT.SchulsingerF. (1983). Use of the Danish Adoption Register for the study of obesity and thinness. In KetyS. (Ed.), The genetics of neurological and psychiatric disorders (pp. 115–129). New York, NY: Raven Press.
56.
WangY.BeydounM. A. (2007). The obesity epidemic in the United States—gender, age, socioeconomic, racial/ethnic, and geographic characteristics: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Epidemiologic Reviews, 29, 6–28. doi:10.1093/epirev/mxm007
57.
WhitleyB. E.Jr (1999). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 126.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
