This study investigates whether divorcees feel less worse-off when divorce is more prevalent around them. The 2013 Life Satisfaction Survey in Türkiye, which has approximately 196,000 observations and province-level representative data, is utilized. We used three province-level indicators about the prevalence of divorce to measure the impact of the social context on divorcees’ well-being. First, we replicate the previous findings that divorce is associated with lower happiness. Secondly, regardless of the measure used, living in a divorce-prevalent setting slightly mitigates the happiness disadvantage of divorcees. Thirdly, perceived social pressure plays a role in the lower happiness of divorcees regardless of the provincial divorce prevalence measures. Overall, the results show that the substantial psychological costs of divorce remain even after addressing the social dimensions of divorce with different measures.
AfifiT. D.DavisS.DenesA.MerrillA. (2013). Analyzing divorce from cultural and network approaches. Journal of Family Studies, 19(3), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.5172/jfs.2013.19.3.240
2.
AkoğluÖ. A.KüçükkaragözH. (2018). Boşanma nedenleri ve boşanma sonrasında karşilaşilan güçlüklere ilişkin bir araştirma: İzmir ili örneği. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 29(1), 153–172.
3.
ArgyleM. (1999). Causes and correlates of happiness. In KahnemanD.DienerE.SchwarzN. (Eds.), Well-Being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 353–373). Russell Sage Foundations.
4.
BirolS. Ş.TemelV.AydınE. (2017). Kadınların boşanma sonrası yaşamlarının psiko-sosyal açıdan incelenmesi. KMÜ Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 19(32), 47–54.
5.
BrackeP. F.ColmanE.SymoensS. A.Van PraagL. (2010). Divorce, divorce rates, and professional care seeking for mental health problems in europe: A cross-sectional population-based study. BMC Public Health, 10(1), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-224
6.
De GraafP. M.KalmijnM. (2006a). Change and stability in the social determinants of divorce: A comparison of marriage cohorts in The Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 22(5), 561–572. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcl010
7.
De GraafP. M.KalmijnM. (2006b). Divorce motives in a period of rising divorce: Evidence from a Dutch life-history survey. Journal of Family Issues, 27(4), 483–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x05283982
8.
DienerE.GohmC. L.SuhE.OishiS. (2000). Similarity of the relations between marital status and subjective well-being across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(4), 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022100031004001
9.
DienerE.InglehartR.TayL. (2013). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112(3), 497–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0076-y
10.
DienerE.OishiS.LucasR. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 403–425. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056
FulmerC. A.GelfandM. J.KruglanskiA. W.Kim-PrietoC.DienerE.PierroA.HigginsE. T. (2010). On “feeling right” in cultural contexts: How person-culture match affects self-esteem and subjective well-being. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1563–1569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610384742
16.
GlassJ.LevchakP. (2014). Red states, blue states, and divorce: Understanding the impact of conservative protestantism on regional variation in divorce rates. AJS; American journal of sociology, 119(4), 1002–1046. https://doi.org/10.1086/674703
17.
GöregenliM. (1997). Individualist-collectivist tendencies in a Turkish sample. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28(6), 787–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022197286009
18.
HofstedeG. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol. 5). Sage.
19.
HoxJ. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20.
HudsonN. W.AnusicI.LucasR. E.DonnellanM. B. (2020). Comparing the reliability and validity of global self-report measures of subjective well-being with experiential day reconstruction measures. Assessment, 27(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117744660
21.
ImamoğluE. O.SelcukE. (2017). Cultural and self-related considerations in relationship well-being. In CroninC.WeisfeldG. E.WeisfeldL. M. D. (Eds.), The psychology of marriage: An evolutionary and cross-cultural view (p. 89). Lexington Books.
22.
InglehartR.HaerpferC.MorenoA.WelzelC.KizilovaK.Diez-MedranoJ.LagosM.NorrisP.PonarinE.PuranenB. (2020). World values survey: All rounds – country-pooled datafile. JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat.
23.
InglehartR.WelzelC. (2010). The wvs cultural map of the World. World Values Survey.
24.
IshidaJ. (2003). The role of social norms in a model of marriage and divorce. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-2681(02)00135-x
25.
JohnsonD. R.WuJ. (2002). An empirical test of crisis, social selection, and role explanations of the relationship between marital disruption and psychological distress: A pooled time-series analysis of four-wave panel data. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(1), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00211.x
26.
KalmijnM. (2010). Country differences in the effects of divorce on well-being: The role of norms, support, and selectivity. European Sociological Review, 26(4), 475–490. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp035
27.
KalmijnM.de GraafP. M. (2000). Gescheiden vaders en hun kinderen: Een empirische analyse van voogdij en bezoekfrequentie [Divorced fathers and their children: An empirical analysis of custody and visiting frequency]. Bevolking en Gezin, 29(2), 59–84.
28.
KalmijnM.UunkW. (2007). Regional value differences in Europe and the social consequences of divorce: A test of the stigmatization hypothesis. Social Science Research, 36(2), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.06.001
29.
KalmijnM.van GroenouM. B. (2005). Differential effects of divorce on social Integration. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(4), 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407505054516
30.
LucasR. E. (2005). Time does not heal all wounds: A longitudinal study of reaction and adaptation to divorce. Psychological Science, 16(12), 945–950. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01642.x
31.
LucasR. E. (2018). Reevaluating the strengths and weaknesses of self-report measures of subjective well-being. In DienerS. O. E.TayL. (Eds.), Handbook of well-being (pp. 1–12). DEF Publishers.
32.
LyngstadT. H. (2011). Does community context have an important impact on divorce risk? A fixed-effects study of twenty Norwegian first-marriage cohorts. European Journal of Population, 27(1), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-010-9226-6
33.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
34.
OryB.HuijtsT. (2015). Widowhood and well-being in Europe: The role of national and regional context. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(3), 730–746. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12187
35.
Pollmann-SchultM. (2018). Single motherhood and life satisfaction in comparative perspective: Do institutional and cultural contexts explain the life satisfaction penalty for single mothers?Journal of Family Issues, 39(7), 2061–2084. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x17741178
36.
RussellL. T.ColemanM.GanongL. (2018). Conceptualizing family structure in a social determinants of health framework. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 10(4), 735–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12296
37.
SoonsJ. P.KalmijnM. (2009). Is marriage more than cohabitation? Well-being differences in 30 European countries. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(5), 1141–1157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00660.x
UgurZ. B. (2020). The spillover effect of divorce rates on marriage: Findings from Turkey. Journal of Humanity and Society (İnsan & Toplum Dergisi), 10(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.12658/m0325
41.
UğurZ. B. (2022). Boşanmanın mutluluğa bir etkisi var mı. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, 42(2), 365–386.
42.
UgurZ. B.AydınF. (2023). Are religious people happy or non-religious people unhappy in religious contexts?Social Psychological and Personality Science, 14(2), 156–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506221082334
43.
VaillantG. E. (2008). Aging well: Surprising guideposts to a happier life from the landmark study of adult development. Hachette UK.
44.
VerbakelE. (2012). Subjective well-being by partnership status and its dependence on the normative climate. European Journal of Population/Revue europeenne de demographie, 28(2), 205–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-012-9257-2
45.
WadsworthT. (2016). Marriage and subjective well-being: How and why context matters. Social Indicators Research, 126(3), 1025–1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0930-9
46.
WaiteL. J.BrowningD.DohertyW. J.GallagherM.LuoY.StanleyS. M. (2002). Does divorce make people happy. Findings from a study of unhappy marriages (Vol. 32, pp. 495–503). Institute for American Values.
47.
ZimmermannA. C.EasterlinR. A. (2006). Happily ever after? Cohabitation, marriage, divorce, and happiness in Germany. Population and Development Review, 32(3), 511–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2006.00135.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
