How dating apps fail sexual minorities: Hyperpersonal failure as a framework for understanding challenges in developing long-term relationships

Abstract

Online dating and dating apps are meant to help sexual minorities find romantic partners, but they have also presented challenges and obstacles. Based on 27 in-depth interviews with lesbian, gay, and bisexual dating app users living in Taiwan, this exploratory study proposes the concept of hyperpersonal failure as a holistic framework for understanding these challenges. This framework specifies four types of failure, each corresponding to one element in the original hyperpersonal communication model: the failure to present oneself (online daters as the sender), the failure to meet conversational expectations (the channel), the failure to develop positive impressions of the targets (online daters as the receiver), and the failure to obtain responses (the feedback). The study also discusses how the affordances of online environments contribute to hyperpersonal failure. Overall, the framework has the potential to shed light on online dating in general, extending beyond the experiences of sexual minorities.

Keywords

Affordance dating apps hyperpersonal communication model online dating romantic relationships

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altman

Taylor

D. A.

(1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Ang

M. W.

Tan

J. C. K.

Lou

(2021). Navigating sexual racism in the sexual field: Compensation for and disavowal of marginality by racial minority Grindr users in Singapore. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 26(3), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003

Antheunis

M. L.

Schouten

A. P.

Walther

J. B.

(2020). The hyperpersonal effect in online dating: Effects of text-based CMC vs. videoconferencing before meeting face-to-face. Media Psychology, 23(6), 820–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1648217

Baxter

L. A.

(1982). Strategies for ending relationships: Two studies. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 46(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318209374082

Chan

L. S.

(2018). Ambivalence in networked intimacy: Observations from gay men using mobile dating apps. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2566–2581. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817727156

Chan

L. S.

(2021). Looking for politically like-minded partners: Self-presentation and partner-vetting strategies on dating apps. Personal Relationships, 28(3), 703–720. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12375

Chan

L. S.

Wu-Ouyang

(2023). Sexting among men who have sex with men in Hong Kong and Taiwan: Roles of sensation-seeking, gay identity, and muscularity ideal. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 52(6), 2373–2384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02559-w

Conner

C. T.

(2019). The gay gayze: Expressions of inequality on Grindr. The Sociological Quarterly, 60(3), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2018.1533394

Corriero

E. F.

Tong

S. T.

(2016). Managing uncertainty in mobile dating applications: Goals, concerns of use, and information seeking in Grindr. Mobile Media & Communication, 4(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157915614872

10.

Dalessandro

(2018). Internet intimacy: Authenticity and longing in the relationships of millennial young adults. Sociological Perspectives, 61(4), 626–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121417753381

11.

Duguay

(2019). “There’s no one new around you”: Queer women’s experiences of scarcity in geospatial partner-seeking on Tinder. In The geographies of digital sexuality (pp. 93–114). Springer.

12.

Ellison

Heino

Gibbs

(2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 415–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00020.x

13.

Ellison

N. B.

Hancock

J. T.

Toma

C. L.

(2012). Profile as promise: A framework for conceptualizing veracity in online dating self-presentations. New Media & Society, 14(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811410395

14.

Evans

S. K.

Pearce

K. E.

Vitak

Treem

J. W.

(2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12180

15.

Filice

Parry

D. C.

Johnson

C. W.

(2021). Traditions in (re) negotiation: Geosocial networking apps and intimate relationships among men seeking men. Sexuality & Culture, 25(1), 189–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09765-x

16.

Finkel

E. J.

Eastwick

P. W.

Karney

B. R.

Reis

H. T.

Sprecher

(2012). Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(1), 3–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436522

17.

Fox

McEwan

(2017). Distinguishing technologies for social interaction: The perceived social affordances of communication channels scale. Communication Monographs, 84(3), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1332418

18.

Fullwood

Attrill-Smith

(2018). Up-dating: Ratings of perceived dating success are better online than offline. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0631

19.

Glaser

B. G.

Strauss

A. L.

(1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine de Gruyter.

20.

Heino

R. D.

Ellison

N. B.

Gibbs

J. L.

(2010). Relationshopping: Investigating the market metaphor in online dating. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(4), 427–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510361614

21.

Hollingsworth

(2019). Taiwan legalizes same-sex marriage in historic first for Asia. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2019/05/17/asia/taiwan-same-sex-marriage-intl/index.html

22.

Huang

S. A.

Hancock

Tong

S. T.

(2022). Folk theories of online dating: Exploring people’s beliefs about the online dating process and online dating algorithms. Social Media+ Society, 8(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221089561

23.

Kong

T. S. K.

Mahoney

Plummer

(2003). Queering the interview. In Holstein

J. A.

Gubrium

J. F.

(Eds.), Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns (pp. 91–110). Sage.

24.

LeFebvre

L. E.

(2018). Swiping me off my feet: Explicating relationship initiation on Tinder. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(9), 1205–1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517706419, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0265407517706419

25.

Lindlof

T. R.

Taylor

B. C.

(2017). Qualitative communication research methods. Sage.

26.

McGloin

Denes

(2018). Too hot to trust: Examining the relationship between attractiveness, trustworthiness, and desire to date in online dating. New Media & Society, 20(3), 919–936. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816675440

27.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

Saldaña

(2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.

28.

Miller

(2015). “They’re the modern-day gay bar”: Exploring the uses and gratifications of social networks for men who have sex with men. Computers in Human Behavior, 51(Part A), 476–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.023.

29.

Morris

(2022). The tinder swindler [film]. Raw TV.

30.

Paasonen

Jarrett

Light

(2019). NSFW: Sex, humor, and risk in social media. MIT Press.

31.

Reid

Golub

(2015). Vetting and letting: Cohabiting stepfamily formation processes in low-income Black families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(5), 1234–1249. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12217

32.

Reinharz

Chase

S. E.

(2003). Interviewing women. In Holstein

J. A.

Gubrium

J. F.

(Eds.), Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns (pp. 73–90). Sage.

33.

Rosenfeld

M. J.

Thomas

R. J.

(2012). Searching for a mate: The rise of the internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review, 77(4), 523–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412448050

34.

Sacks

Schegloff

E. A.

Jefferson

(1978). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. In Schenkein

(Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 7–55). Academic Press.

35.

Scott

G. G.

Fullwood

(2020). Does recent research evidence support the hyperpersonal model of online impression management? Current Opinion in Psychology, 36, 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.05.005.

36.

Sharabi

L. L.

(2023). The enduring effect of internet dating: Meeting online and the road to marriage. Communication Research, 51(3), 259–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502221127498 Advance online publication.

37.

Sharabi

L. L.

Dykstra-DeVette

T. A.

(2019). From first email to first date: Strategies for initiating relationships in online dating. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(11–12), 3389–3407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518822780

38.

Shield

A. D.

(2019). Immigrants on Grindr. Springer.

39.

Thai

(2020). Sexual racism is associated with lower self-esteem and life satisfaction in men who have sex with men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(1), 347–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-1456-z

40.

Thompson

(2018). “I can be your Tinder nightmare”: Harassment and misogyny in the online sexual marketplace. Feminism & Psychology, 28(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.025

41.

Timmermans

Hermans

A.-M.

Opree

S. J.

(2021). Gone with the wind: Exploring mobile daters’ ghosting experiences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(2), 783–801. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520970287

42.

Walther

J. B.

(1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023001001

43.

Walther

J. B.

(2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2538–2557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.002

44.

Walther

J. B.

Whitty

M. T.

(2021). Language, psychology, and new new media: The hyperpersonal model of mediated communication at twenty-five years. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(1), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20967703

45.

Yeo

T. E. D.

Fung

T. H.

(2018). “Mr Right Now”: Temporality of relationship formation on gay mobile dating apps. Mobile Media & Communication, 6(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157917718601