More and more individuals hunt for information on and reach out to potential romantic partners through mobile dating applications available on their smartphones. Although these emerging technologies offer social benefits, certain individuals become overly dependent on such applications and suffer from negative outcomes. Relatively little research in online dating to date has investigated what predicts problematic use of such social technologies. Building upon the cognitive-behavioral model of problematic Internet use and the social skill model, we examined the relationship between social anxiety, the problematic use of dating applications, and the possible moderating role of loneliness with an online survey (N= 269) conducted with a college student sample. The data did not provide support for serial mediation predicted by the social skills model (social anxiety influencing negative outcomes serially through preference for online social interaction (POSI) and compulsive use) but provided support for moderated serial mediation. Specifically, the serial mediation predicted by the social skills model was significant only among those high in loneliness, with the positive association between POSI and compulsive use being significant among those high in loneliness. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
BaumeisterR. F.DeWallC. N.CiaroccoN. J.TwengeJ. M. (2005). Social exclusion impairs self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 589–604. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.589
2.
BianchiA.PhillipsJ. G. (2005). Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 8, 39–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2005.8.39
3.
BlackwellC.BirnholtzJ.AbbottC. (2015). Seeing and being seen: Co-situation and impression formation using Grindr, a location-aware gay dating app. New Media and Society, 17, 1117–1136. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814521595
4.
CacioppoJ. T.FowlerJ. H.ChristakisN. A. (2010). Alone in the crowd: The structure and spread of loneliness in a large social network. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 977–991. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016076
5.
CarpenterC. J.McEwanB. (2016). The players of micro-dating: Individual and gender differences in goal orientations toward micro-dating apps. First Monday, 21, 387–403. doi:https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i5.6187
6.
CaplanS. E. (2003). Preference for online social interaction. Communication Research, 30, 625–648. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650203257842
7.
CaplanS. E. (2005). A social skill account of problematic Internet use. Journal of Communication, 55, 721–736. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb03019.x
8.
CaplanS. E. (2007). Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic Internet use. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 10, 234–242. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9963
CasaleS.CaplanS. E.FioravantiG. (2016). Positive metacognitions about Internet use: The mediating role in the relationship between emotional dysregulation and problematic use. Addictive Behaviors, 59, 84–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.03.014
11.
ChanL. S. (2017). Who uses dating apps? Exploring the relationships among trust, sensation-seeking, smartphone use, and the intent to use dating apps based on the integrative model. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 246–258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.053
12.
ChungJ. E. (2013). Social interaction in online support groups: Preference for online social interaction over offline social interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1408–1414. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.019
13.
DalyJ. A. (2011). Personality and interpersonal communication. In KnappM. L.DalyJ. A. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 131–168). New York, NY: SAGE.
14.
DavisR. A.FlettG. L.BesserA. (2002). Validation of a new scale for measuring problematic Internet use: Implications for pre-employment screening. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 5, 331–345. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/109493102760275581
15.
DuckS. (1986). Human relationships: An introduction to social psychology. London, UK: SAGE.
16.
DuguayS. (2016). Dressing up Tinderella: Interrogating authenticity claims on the mobile dating app Tinder. Information, Communication & Society, 3, 351–367. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1168471
17.
FioreA. T.DonathJ. S. (2004, April). Online personals: An overview. In CHI ‘04 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1395–1398). New York, NY: ACM. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/985921.986073.
18.
FoxJ.McEwanB. (2017). Distinguishing technologies for social interaction: The perceived social affordances of communication channels scale. Communication Monographs, 84, 298–318. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1332418
19.
FoxJ.WarberK. (2013). Romantic relationship development in the age of Facebook: An exploratory study of emerging adults’ perceptions, motives, and behaviors. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 3–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0288
20.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
21.
HarmanJ. P.HansenC. E.CochranM. E.LindseyC. R. (2005). Liar, liar: Internet faking but not frequency of use affects social skills, self-esteem, social anxiety, and aggression. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 8, 1–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089.cpb.2005.8.1
HayesA. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 1–22. doi:http://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.962683
24.
HeinoR. D.EllisonN. B.GibbsJ. L. (2010). Relationshopping: Investigating the market metaphor in online dating. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 427–447. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510361614
25.
KimJ.LaRoseR.PengW. (2009). Loneliness as the cause and the effect of problematic Internet use: The relationship between Internet use and psychological well-being. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 12, 451–455. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2008.0327
26.
LaRoseR.LinC. A.EastinM. S. (2003). Unregulated Internet usage: Addiction, habit, or deficient self-regulation?Media Psychology, 5, 225–253. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0503_01
27.
LeFebvreL. E. (2017). Swiping me off my feet: Explicating relationship initiation on Tinder. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35, 1205–1229. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517706419
28.
MascheroniG.VincentJ. (2016). Perpetual contact as a communicative affordance: Opportunities, constraints, and emotions. Mobile Media and Communication, 4, 310–326. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157916639347
OroszG.Tóth-KirályI.BőtheB.MelherD. (2016). Too many swipes for today: The development of the Problematic Tinder Use Scale (PTUS). Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 5, 518–523. doi:https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.5.2016.016
31.
ParkW. K. (2005). Mobile phone addiction. In LingR.PedersenP. E. (Eds.), Mobile communications: Re-negotiation of the social sphere (pp. 253–272). London, UK: Springer.
32.
PeplauL. A.PerlmanD. (1979). Blueprint for a social psychological theory of loneliness. In CookM.WilsonG. (Eds.), Love and attraction: Proceedings of an International Conference (pp. 101–110). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.-Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
35.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffN. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
RamirezA.SumnerE. M.FleurietC.ColeM. (2015). When online dating partners meet offline: The effect of modality switching on relational communication between online daters. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 99–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12101
38.
ReidD. J.ReidF. J. M. (2007). Text or talk? Social anxiety, loneliness, and divergent preferences for cell phone use. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 10, 424–435. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9936
39.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
RussellD.PeplauL. A.CutronaC. E. (1980). The revised UCLA loneliness scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472–480. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.472
41.
SchlenkerB. R.LearyM. R. (1982). Social anxiety and self-presentation: A conceptualization model. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 641–669. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.92.3.641
42.
SchrockA. R. (2015). Communication affordances of mobile media: Portability, availability, locatability, and multimediality. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1229–1246.
43.
SegrinC. (1990). A meta-analytic review of social skill deficits in depression. Communication Monographs, 57, 292–308. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759009376204
44.
SegrinC. (1993). Effects of dysphoria and loneliness on social perceptual skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77, 1315–1329. doi:https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1993.77.3f.1315
45.
ShawL. H.GantL. M. (2004). In defense of the Internet: The relationship between Internet communication and depression, loneliness, self-esteem, and perceived social support. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 5, 157–171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/109493102753770552
SpitzbergB. H.CanaryD. J. (1985). Loneliness and relationally competent communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 387–402. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407585024001
SteadH.BibbyP. A. (2017). Personality, fear of missing out and problematic internet use and their relationship to subjective well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 534–540. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.016
50.
StevensS. B.MorrisT. L. (2007). College dating and social anxiety: Using the Internet as a means of connecting to others. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 10, 680–688. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9970
51.
SumterS. R.VandenboschL.LigtenbergL. (2017). Love me Tinder: Untangling emerging adults’ motivations for using the dating application Tinder. Telematics and Informatics, 34, 67–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.04.009
52.
TimmermansE.De CaluweE. (2017). Development and validation of the Tinder motives scale (TMS). Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 341–350. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.028
53.
TokunagaR. S. (2015). Perspectives on Internet addiction, problematic Internet use, and deficient self-regulation: Contributions of communication research. In CohenE. L. (Ed.), Communication Yearbook39 (pp. 131–161). New York, NY: Routledge.
54.
TokunagaR. S.RainsS. A. (2010). An evaluation of two characterizations of the relationships between problematic Internet use, time spent using the Internet, and psychosocial problems. Human Communication Research, 36, 512–545. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01386.x
55.
TziallasE. (2015). Gamified eroticism: Gay male “social networking” applications and self-pornography. Sexuality and Culture, 19, 759–775. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-015-9288-z
56.
UzialL. (2016). Alone, unhappy, and demotivated: The impact of an alone mind-set on neurotic individuals’ willpower. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 818–827. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616657597
57.
VenteW. D.MajdandžićM.VonckenM. J.BeidelD. C.BögelsS. M. (2014). The SPAI-18, a brief version of the social phobia and anxiety inventory: Reliability and validity in clinically referred and non-referred samples. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 28, 140–147. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.05.003
58.
WardJ. (2017). What are you doing on Tinder? Impression management on a matchmaking mobile app. Information, Communication and Society, 11, 1644–1659. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1252412
59.
WeiserD. A.NiehuisS.FloraJ.Punyanunt-CarterN. M.AriasV. S.BairdH. R. (2018). Swiping right: Sociosexuality, intentions to engage in infidelity, and infidelity experiences on Tinder. Personality and Individual Differences, 133, 29–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.025
60.
ZichermannG.CunninghamC. (2011). Gamification by design: Implementing game mechanics in web and mobile apps. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
