Drawing on the literature on person-culture fit, we investigated how culture (assessed as national-level familism), personality (tapped by attachment styles) and their interactions predicted social network characteristics in 21 nations/areas (N = 2977). Multilevel mixed modeling showed that familism predicted smaller network size but greater density, tie strength, and multiplexity. Attachment avoidance predicted smaller network size, and lower density, tie strength, and multiplexity. Attachment anxiety was related to lower density and tie strength. Familism enhanced avoidance’s association with network size and reduced its association with density, tie strength, and multiplexity. Familism also enhanced anxiety’s association with network size, tie strength, and multiplexity. These findings contribute to theory building on attachment and culture, highlight the significance of culture by personality interaction for the understanding of social networks, and call attention to the importance of sampling multiple countries.
AdamsG. (2005). The cultural grounding of personal relationship: Enemyship in North American and West African worlds. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(6), 948–968. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.948
2.
AdamsG.PlautV. C. (2003). The cultural grounding of personal relationship: Friendship in North American and West African worlds. Personal Relationships, 10(3), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.00053
3.
AndersonC.SpataroS. E.FlynnF. J. (2008). Personality and organizational culture as determinants of influence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 702–710. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.702
4.
BowlbyJ. (1969). Attachment and loss: Attachment (Vol. 1). Hogarth.
5.
CamposB.PerezO. F. R.GuardinoC. (2016). Familism: A cultural value with implications for romantic relationship quality in US Latinos. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514562564
6.
CamposB.UllmanJ. B.AguileraA.Dunkel SchetterC. (2014). Familism and psychological health: The intervening role of closeness and social support. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20(2), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034094
7.
ClarkM. S.LemayE. P.JrGrahamS. M.PatakiS. P.FinkelE. J. (2010). Ways of giving benefits in marriage: Norm use, relationship satisfaction, and attachment-related variability. Psychological Science, 21(7), 944–951. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610373882
8.
CliftonA.WebsterG. D. (2017). An introduction to social network analysis for personality and social psychologists. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 442–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617709114
9.
CornwellB.LaumannE. O.SchummL. P. (2008). The social connectedness of older adults: A national profile. American Sociological Review, 73(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240807300201
10.
DiTommasoE.BrannenC.BurgessM. (2005). The universality of relationship characteristics: A cross-cultural comparison of different types of attachment and loneliness in Canadian and visiting Chinese students. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 33(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2005.33.1.57
11.
EcklesJ. E.StradleyE. G. (2012). A social network analysis of student retention using archival data. Social Psychology of Education, 15(2), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-011-9173-z
12.
ErezM.GatiE. (2004). A dynamic, multi‐level model of culture: From the micro level of the individual to the macro level of a global culture. Applied Psychology, 53(4), 583–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00190.x
13.
FelsherM.KokuE. (2018). Explaining HIV risk multiplexity: A social network analysis. AIDS and Behavior, 22(11), 3500–3507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-018-2120-7
FerrianiS.FontiF.CorradoR. (2013). The social and economic bases of network multiplexity: Exploring the emergence of multiplex ties. Strategic Organization, 11(1), 7–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127012461576
16.
FioriK. L.ConsedineN. S.MerzE. M. (2011). Attachment, social network size, and patterns of social exchange in later life. Research on Aging, 33(4), 465–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027511401038
17.
FraleyR.NiedenthalP. M.MarksM.BrumbaughC.VicaryA. (2006). Adult attachment and the perception of emotional expressions: Probing the hyperactivating strategies underlying anxious attachment. Journal of Personality, 74(4), 1163–1190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00406.x
18.
FraleyR. C.DavisK. E. (1997). Attachment formation and transfer in young adults’ close friendships and romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 4(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1997.tb00135.x
19.
FriedmanM.RholesW. S.SimpsonJ.BondM.Diaz-LovingR.ChanC. (2010). Attachment avoidance and the cultural fit hypothesis: A cross‐cultural investigation. Personal Relationships, 17(1), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01256.x
20.
GainesS. O.JrRiosD. I.BurielR. (1997). Familism and interpersonal resource exchange among Latinas/os. In Culture, values, ethnicity and relationship processes. Routledge.
21.
GelfandM. J.BhawukD. P. S.NishiiL. H.BechtoldD. J. (2004). Individualism and collectivism. In HouseR. J.HangesP. J.JavidanM.DorfmanP. W.GuptaV. (Eds.), Culture, leadership and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies (pp. 437–512). Sage.
22.
GerichJ.LehnerR. (2006). Collection of ego-centered network data with computer-assisted interviews. Methodology, 2(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.2.1.7
23.
GillathO.JohnsonD. K.SelcukE.TeelC. (2011). Comparing old and young adults as they cope with life transitions: The links between social network management skills and attachment style to depression. Clinical Gerontologist, 34(3), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2011.554345
GillathO.KarantzasG. C.SelcukE. (2017). A net of friends: Investigating friendship by integrating attachment theory and social network analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(11), 1546–1565. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217719731
26.
GillathO.KeeferL. (2016). Generalizing disposability: Residential mobility and the willingness to dissolve social ties. Personal Relationships, 23(2), 186–198.
27.
GranovetterM. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
HannemanR. A.RiddleM. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. University of California, Riverside.
30.
HazanC.ShaverP. R. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0501_1
31.
HegartyP.PrattoF. (2001). The effects of social category norms and stereotypes on explanations for intergroup differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 723–735. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.80.5.723
32.
HofstedeG.MinkovM. (2010). Long-versus short-term orientation: New perspectives. Asia Pacific Business Review, 16(4), 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381003637609
33.
HouseR. J.HangesP. J.JavidanM.DorfmanP. W.GuptaV. (Eds.), (2004). Culture, leadership and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies (pp. 437–512). Sage.
34.
KafetsiosK. (2022). Collective reactions to epidemic threat: Attachment and cultural orientations predict early COVID-19 infection and mortality rates and trajectories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(7), 1126–1137. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211053461
35.
KarantzasG. C.McCabeM. P.ColeS. F. (2012). Chronic illness and relationships. In NollerP.KarantzasG. C. (Eds.), Wiley-Blackwell handbook of couples and family relationships (pp. 406–420). Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
36.
KeelerA. R.SiegelJ. T.AlvaroE. M. (2014). Depression and help seeking among Mexican–Americans: The mediating role of familism. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 16(6), 1225–1231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-013-9824-6
37.
KimH. S.ShermanD. K.TaylorS. E. (2008). Culture and social support. American Psychologist, 63(6), 518–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X
38.
Kristof‐BrownA. L.ZimmermanR. D.JohnsonE. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta‐analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x
39.
LeungA. K. Y.CohenD. (2011). Within-and between-culture variation: Individual differences and the cultural logics of honor, face, and dignity cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022151
LiL. M. W.AdamsG.KurtişT.HamamuraT. (2015). Beware of friends: The cultural psychology of relational mobility and cautious intimacy. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 18(2), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12091
42.
MairC. A. (2013). Family ties and health cross-nationally: The contextualizing role of familistic culture and public pension spending in Europe. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68(6), 984–996. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt085
43.
MarinA.HamptonK. N. (2007). Simplifying the personal network name generator alternatives to traditional multiple and single name generators. Field Methods, 19(2), 163–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x06298588
MarshallT. C. (2008). Cultural differences in intimacy: The influence of gender-role ideology and individualism—collectivism. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25(1), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407507086810
46.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2009). An attachment and behavioral systems perspective on social support. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509105518
47.
OishiS. (2010). The psychology of residential mobility: Implications for the self, social relationships, and well-being. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 5(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691609356781
48.
PietromonacoP. R.BarrettL. F. (2000). The internal working models concept: What do we really know about the self in relation to others?Review of General Psychology, 4(2), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1037//1089-2680.4.2.155
49.
Piña-WatsonB.OjedaL.CastellonN. E.DornheckerM. (2013). Familismo, ethnic identity, and bicultural stress as predictors of Mexican American adolescents’ positive psychological functioning. Journal of Latina/o Psychology, 1(4), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/lat0000006
50.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
51.
RealoA.AllikJ. (2009). On the relationship between social capital and individualism–collectivism. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(6), 871–886. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00226.x
52.
RealoA.AllikJ.GreenfieldB. (2008). Radius of trust: Social capital in relation to familism and institutional collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(4), 447–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022108318096
53.
RealoA.AllikJ.VadiM. (1997). The hierarchical structure of collectivism. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1997.2170
SchugJ.YukiM.MadduxW. W. (2010). Relational mobility explains between- and within-culture differences in self-disclosure to close friends. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1471–1478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610382786
56.
SpectorP. E.CooperC. L.SanchezJ. I.O'DriscollM.SparksK.BerninP.BüssingA.DeweP.HartP.LuL.MillerK.de MoraesL. F. R.OstrognayG. M.PagonM.PitariuH.PoelmansS.RadhakrishnanP.RussinovaV.SalamatovV.YuS. (2001). Do national levels of individualism and internal locus of control relate to well-being: An ecological level international study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(8), 815–832. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.118
57.
SteidelA. G. L.ContrerasJ. M. (2003). A new familism scale for use with Latino populations. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 25(3), 312–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986303256912
58.
StrandP. S. (2020). The security-seeking impulse and the unification of attachment and culture. Psychological Review, 127(5), 778–791. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000194
59.
StrausM. A. (2009). The national context effect: An empirical test of the validity of cross-national research using unrepresentative samples. Cross-Cultural Research, 43(3), 183–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397109335770
60.
SuhE.DienerE.OishiS.TriandisH. C. (1998). The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgments across cultures: Emotions versus norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 482–493. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.482
61.
ThayerS. M.UpdegraffK. A.DelgadoM. Y. (2008). Conflict resolution in Mexican American adolescents’ friendships: Links with culture, gender and friendship quality. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(7), 783–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-007-9253-8
62.
TriandisH.MarinG.BetacourtH.LisanskyJ.ChangB. (1982). Dimensions of fami- lism among Hispanic and mainstream navy recruits. In Technical report No. 14, Depart- ment of Psychology. University of Illinois.
63.
ValenzuelaA.DornbuschS. M. (1994). Familism and social capital in the academic achievement of Mexican origin and Anglo. Social Science Quarterly, 75(1), 18–36.
64.
Van de VijverF. J. R.LeungK. (2000). Methodological issues in psychological research on culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022100031001004
65.
VillarrealR.BlozisS. A.WidamanK. F. (2005). Factorial invariance of a pan-Hispanic familism scale. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 27(4), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986305281125
66.
VogelD. L.WeiM. (2005). Adult attachment and help-seeking intent: The mediating roles of psychological distress and perceived social support. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(3), 347–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.347
WeiM.RussellD. W.MallinckrodtB.VogelD. L. (2007). The experiences in close relationship scale (ECR)-short form: Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701268041
69.
WheelerL.ReisH. T.BondM. H. (1989). Collectivism-individualism in everyday social life: The middle kingdom and the melting pot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(1), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.1.79
70.
WildschutT.SedikidesC.RoutledgeC.ArndtJ.CordaroF. (2010). Nostalgia as a repository of social connectedness: The role of attachment-related avoidance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(4), 573–586. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017597
71.
WilkinsonR. B. (2010). Best friend attachment versus peer attachment in the prediction of adolescent psychological adjustment. Journal of Adolescence, 33(5), 709–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.10.013
YetimU. (2003). The impacts of individualism/collectivism, self-esteem, and feeling of mastery on life satisfaction among the Turkish university students and academicians. Social Indicators Research, 61(3), 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021911504113
74.
YooJ.MiyamotoY. (2018). Cultural fit of emotions and health implications: A psychosocial resources model. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(2), Article e12372. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12372
75.
YukiM.SchugJ. (2012). Relational mobility: A socioecological approach to personal relationships. In GillathO.AdamsG. E.KunkelA. D. (Eds.), Relationship science: Integrating evolutionary, neuroscience, and sociocultural approaches (pp. 137–151). American Psychological Association.
76.
ZoharD.Tenne-GazitO. (2008). Transformational leadership and group interaction as climate antecedents: A social network analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 744–757. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.744
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
