Today, Social Network Sites (SNSs) offer a wide variety of functions for initiating and maintaining personal relationships (i.e. sharing private information, messaging, commenting, liking or viewing others profiles). According to the uses and gratifications approach, individuals chose how they use media in order to satisfy given needs. Regarding personal relationships, attachment style is associated with distinct needs and behaviors. Thus, SNS use should differ with distinct attachment styles. This review aims to answer the question, how attachment style is related to SNS usage pattern and provide a comprehensive overview, by identifying and integrating associations with different facets of SNS use. Results were based on a systematic review of 17 studies. Measures of SNS use could be attributed to the facets of three categories: (1) Quantitative use (i.e. time spent on SNSs, number of friends/followers), (2) qualitative use (social use, parasocial use, self-presentation, monitoring) and (3) SNS motive (anxiety reduction, avoiding closeness). Especially insecure attached individuals strive to satisfy attachment needs through SNS use. While anxious individuals aim to reduce anxiety i.e. by seeking feedback via online social interaction, avoidant users can feel connected browsing others’ profiles without facing the threat of closeness. Insecure attachment was associated with negative outcomes related to SNS use, such as addictive behaviors. Limitations and implications of the findings are discussed.
AinsworthM. D. S. (1964). Patterns of attachment behavior shown by the infant in interaction with his mother. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 10(1), 51–58.
2.
AntheunisM. L.SchoutenA. P.KrahmerE. (2016). The Role of social networking sites in early adolescents’ social lives. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 36(3), 348–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614564060
3.
BaekY. M.ChoY.KimH. (2014). Attachment style and its influence on the activities, motives, and consequences of SNS Use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(4), 522–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.966362
4.
BartholomewK. (1990). Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7(2), 147–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407590072001
5.
BartholomewK.HorowitzL. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226–244. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.61.2.226
6.
BifulcoA.MoranP. M.BallC.BernazzaniO. (2002). Adult attachment style. I: Its relationship to clinical depression. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 37(2), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s127-002-8215-0
7.
BilledoC. J.KerkhofP.FinkenauerC. (2015). The use of social networking sites for relationship maintenance in long-distance and geographically close romantic relationships. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 18(3), 152–157. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0469
8.
BippusA. M.RollinE. (2003). Attachment style differences in relational maintenance and conflict behaviors: Friends’ perceptions. Communication Reports, 16(2), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934210309384494
9.
BlackwellD.LeamanC.TramposchR.OsborneC.LissM. (2017). Extraversion, neuroticism, attachment style and fear of missing out as predictors of social media use and addiction. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 69–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.039
10.
BowlbyJ. (1969). Attachment and loss, Vol. 1: Attachment. Basic Books.
BoydD. M.EllisonN. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
13.
BrennanK. A.ClarkC. L.ShaverP. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). Guilford.
ChangC. (2019). Ambivalent Facebook users: Anxious attachment style and goal cognition. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(8), 2528–2548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518791310
16.
ChenA. (2019). From attachment to addiction: The mediating role of need satisfaction on social networking sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.034
17.
ChenL.HuN.ShuC.ChenX. (2019). Adult attachment and self-disclosure on social networking site: A content analysis of Sina Weibo. Personality and Individual Differences, 138, 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.09.028
Del GiudiceM. (2011). Sex differences in romantic attachment: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210392789
21.
DemircioğluZ. I.Göncü KöseA. (2018). Effects of attachment styles, dark triad, rejection sensitivity, and relationship satisfaction on social media addiction: A mediated model. Current Psychology, 10(3), e2778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9956-x
22.
EmeryL. F.MuiseA.DixE. L.LeB. (2014). Can you tell that I’m in a relationship? Attachment and relationship visibility on Facebook. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(11), 1466–1479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214549944
23.
FeeneyJ. A.NollerP. (1990). Attachment style as a predictor of adult romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(2), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.281
24.
FeeneyJ. A.NollerP. (1992). Attachment style and romantic love: Relationship dissolution. Australian Journal of Psychology, 44(2), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049539208260145
25.
FlynnS.NooneC.SarmaK. M. (2018). An exploration of the link between adult attachment and problematic Facebook use. BMC Psychology, 6(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-018-0245-0
26.
FosterJ. D.KernisM. H.GoldmanB. M. (2007). Linking adult attachment to self-esteem stability. Self and Identity, 6(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860600832139
27.
FoxJ.VendemiaM. A. (2016). Selective self-presentation and social comparison through photographs on social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 19(10), 593–600. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0248
28.
FoxJ.WarberK. M. (2014). Social networking sites in romantic relationships: Attachment, uncertainty, and partner surveillance on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 17(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0667
29.
FraleyR. C.HudsonN. W.HeffernanM. E.SegalN. (2015). Are adult attachment styles categorical or dimensional? A taxometric analysis of general and relationship-specific attachment orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(2), 354–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000027
30.
FraleyR. C.RoismanG. I. (2019). The development of adult attachment styles: Four lessons. Current Opinion in Psychology, 25, 26–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.02.008
31.
HartJ.NaillingE.BizerG. Y.CollinsC. K. (2015). Attachment theory as a framework for explaining engagement with Facebook. Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.016
32.
HazanC.ShaverP. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511
Jenkins-GuarnieriM. A.WrightS. L.HudiburghL. M. (2012). The relationships among attachment style, personality traits, interpersonal competency, and Facebook use. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 33(6), 294–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2012.08.001
35.
KaplanA. M.HaenleinM. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
36.
KatzE.FoulkesD. (1962). On the use of the mass media as “escape”: Clarification of a concept. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26(3), 377. https://doi.org/10.1086/267111
37.
LiberatiA.AltmanD. G.TetzlaffJ.MulrowC.GøtzscheP. C.IoannidisJ. P. A.ClarkeM.DevereauxP. J.KleijnenJ.MoherD. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
38.
MarshallT. C.BejanyanK.Di CastroG.LeeR. A. (2013). Attachment styles as predictors of Facebook-related jealousy and surveillance in romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 20(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01393.x
39.
MikulincerM. (1998). Attachment working models and the sense of trust: An exploration of interaction goals and affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1209–1224. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1209
40.
MikulincerM.OrbachI.IavnieliD. (1998). Adult attachment style and affect regulation: Strategic variations in subjective self-other similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 436–448.
41.
MonacisL.PaloV. deGriffithsM. D.SinatraM. (2017). Exploring individual differences in online addictions: The role of identity and attachment. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 15(4), 853–868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9768-5
42.
MuiseA.ChristofidesE.DesmaraisS. (2009). More information than you ever wanted: Does Facebook bring out the green-eyed monster of jealousy?Cyberpsychology & Behavior: The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society, 12(4), 441–444. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2008.0263
43.
MuiseA. M. Y.ChristofidesE.DesmaraisS. (2014). “Creeping” or just information seeking? Gender differences in partner monitoring in response to jealousy on Facebook. Personal Relationships, 21(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12014
44.
NoftleE. E.ShaverP. R. (2006). Attachment dimensions and the big five personality traits: Associations and comparative ability to predict relationship quality. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(2), 179–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2004.11.003
45.
ObarJ. A.WildmanS. (2015). Social media definition and the governance challenge: An introduction to the special issue. Telecommunications Policy, 39(9), 745–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2015.07.014
46.
OldmeadowJ. A.QuinnS.KowertR. (2013). Attachment style, social skills, and Facebook use amongst adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1142–1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.006
ReedL. A.TolmanR. M.WardL. M.SafyerP. (2016). Keeping tabs: Attachment anxiety and electronic intrusion in high school dating relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.019
51.
RobertsJ. E.GotlibI. H.KasselJ. D. (1996). Adult attachment security and symptoms of depression: The mediating roles of dysfunctional attitudes and low self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(2), 310–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.2.310
52.
RubinA. M. (2009). Uses and gratifications perspective on media effects. In OliverM. B.BryantJ. (Eds.), Communication series. Communication theory and methodology. Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 165–184). Routledge.
53.
ShaverP. R.BrennanK. A. (1992). Attachment styles and the “big five” personality traits: Their connections with each other and with romantic relationship outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(5), 536–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292185003
54.
ShaverP. R.MikulincerM.ChunD. S. (2008). Adult attachment theory, emotion regulation, and prosocial behavior. In VandekerckhoveM.von ScheveC.IsmerS.JungS.KronastS. (Eds.), Regulating emotions (pp. 121–145). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444301786.ch5
55.
ShaverP. R.SchachnerD. A.MikulincerM. (2005). Attachment style, excessive reassurance seeking, relationship processes, and depression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(3), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271709
56.
SierauS.HerzbergP. Y. (2012). Conflict resolution as a dyadic mediator: Considering the partner perspective on conflict resolution. European Journal of Personality, 26(3), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.828
57.
SigersonL.ChengC. (2018). Scales for measuring user engagement with social network sites: A systematic review of psychometric properties. Computers in Human Behavior, 83, 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.023
58.
TwengeJ. M. (2013). Does online social media lead to social connection or social disconnection?Journal of College and Character, 14(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1515/jcc-2013-0003
59.
TwengeJ. M.JoinerT. E.RogersM. L.MartinG. N. (2018). Increases in depressive symptoms, suicide-related outcomes, and suicide rates among U.S. Adolescents after 2010 and links to increased new media screen time. Clinical Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702617723376
60.
TwengeJ. M.MartinG. N.CampbellW. K. (2018). Decreases in psychological well-being among American adolescents after 2012 and links to screen time during the rise of smartphone technology. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 18(6), 765–780. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000403
61.
TwengeJ. M.SpitzbergB. H. (2020). Declines in non-digital social interaction among Americans, 2003–2017. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 50(6), 363–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12665
62.
WorsleyJ. D.MansfieldR.CorcoranR. (2018). Attachment anxiety and problematic social media use: The mediating role of well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 21(9), 563–568. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0555
63.
YenJ.-Y.YenC.-F.ChenC.-S.WangP.-W.ChangY.-H.KoC.-H. (2012). Social anxiety in online and real-life interaction and their associated factors. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0015
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
