Social media use,perceived social support,and well-being: Evidence from two waves of surveys peri- and post-COVID-19 lockdown

Abstract

Numerous studies have suggested that active social media use can promote well-being by enhancing perceived social support. However, the relationship between social media use and perceived social support remains inconsistent across studies. This study explores possible mechanisms underlying the relationship between active social media use, perceived social support, and well-being during and after a COVID-19 lockdown. Using online surveys with Chinese participants during (N = 1,131) and after (N = 407) the lockdown period, our findings support a sequential mediation model. Specifically, active social media use was positively associated with perceived online network responsiveness, which in turn, predicted augmented perceived social support. Ultimately, increased social support was linked to reduced loneliness and increased life satisfaction. These findings were consistent both during and after the lockdown, indicating that social media has the potential to complement offline social interactions and effectively fulfill individuals’ social needs.

Keywords

Social media well-being perceived social support perceived online network responsiveness COVID-19 lockdown

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andalibi

Haimson

O. L.

Choudhury

M. D.

Forte

(2018). Social support, reciprocity, and anonymity in responses to sexual abuse disclosures on social media. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 25(5), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3234942

Baym

N. K.

(2015). Personal connections in the digital age. John Wiley & Sons.

Beyens

Pouwels

J. L.

van Driel

I. I.

Keijsers

Valkenburg

P. M.

(2020). The effect of social media on well-being differs from adolescent to adolescent. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 10763. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67727-7

Blight

M. G.

Jagiello

Ruppel

E. K.

(2015). “Same stuff different day:” A mixed-method study of support seeking on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 366–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.029

Burke

Kraut

R. E.

(2014). Growing closer on Facebook: Changes in tie strength through social network site use. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 4187–4196). Association for Computing Machinery.

Carpenter

J. M.

Green

M. C.

LaFlam

(2018). Just between us: Exclusive communications in online social networks. The Journal of Social Psychology, 158(4), 405–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1431603

Carr

C. T.

Wohn

D. Y.

Hayes

R. A.

(2016). As social support: Relational closeness, automaticity, and interpreting social support from paralinguistic digital affordances in social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 385–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.087

Chen

L. H.

(2012). Gratitude and adolescent athletes’ well-being: The multiple mediating roles of perceived social support from coaches and teammates. Social Indicators Research, 114(2), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0145-2

Cheng

Mendolia

Paloyo

A. R.

Savage

D. A.

Tani

(2021). Working parents, financial insecurity, and childcare: Mental health in the time of COVID-19 in the UK. Review of Economics of the Household, 19(1), 123–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-020-09538-3

10.

Chu

P. S.

Saucier

D. A.

Hafner

(2010). Meta-analysis of the relationships between social support and well-being in children and adolescents. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29(6), 624–645. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2010.29.6.624

11.

Clark

J. L.

Algoe

S. B.

Green

M. C.

(2018). Social network sites and well-being: The role of social connection. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(1), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417730833

12.

Cohen

Janicki-Deverts

Turner

R. B.

Doyle

W. J.

(2015). Does hugging provide stress-buffering social support? A study of susceptibility to upper respiratory infection and illness. Psychological Science, 26(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614559284

13.

Cutrona

C. E.

Suhr

J. A.

(1992). Controllability of stressful events and satisfaction with spouse support behaviors. Communication Research, 19(2), 154–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019002002

14.

Diener

Emmons

R. A.

Larsen

R. J.

Griffin

(1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13

15.

Dienlin

Johannes

(2020). The impact of digital technology use on adolescent well-being. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 22(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.2/tdienlin

16.

Dienlin

Masur

P. K.

Trepte

(2017). Reinforcement or displacement? The reciprocity of FtF, IM, and SNS communication and their effects on loneliness and life satisfaction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(2), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12183

17.

Hall

J. A.

(2018). When is social media use social interaction? Defining mediated social interaction. New Media & Society, 20(1), 162–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816660782

18.

Hamm

M. P.

Newton

A. S.

Chisholm

Shulhan

Milne

Sundar

Ennis

Scott

S. D.

Hartling

(2015). Prevalence and effect of cyberbullying on children and young people: A scoping review of social media studies. JAMA Pediatrics, 169(8), 770–777. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0944

19.

Hayes

R. A.

Carr

C. T.

Wohn

D. Y.

(2016). One click, many meanings: Interpreting paralinguistic digital affordances in social media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(1), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1127248

20.

Haythornthwaite

(2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication & Society, 8(2), 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180500146185

21.

Hughes

M. E.

Waite

L. J.

Hawkley

L. C.

Cacioppo

J. T.

(2004). A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: Results from two population-based studies. Research on Aging, 26(6), 655–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027504268574

22.

Kaul

Lakey

(2003). Where is the support in perceived support? The role of generic relationship satisfaction and enacted support in perceived support’s relation to low distress. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.22.1.59.22761

23.

Kline

R. B.

(2006). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.

24.

Kramer

A. D. I.

Guillory

J. E.

Hancock

J. T.

(2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(24), 8788–8790. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320040111

25.

Kross

Verduyn

Sheppes

Costello

C. K.

Jonides

Ybarra

(2021). Social media and well-being: Pitfalls, progress, and next steps. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.10.005

26.

Chen

Popiel

(2015). What happens on Facebook stays on Facebook? The implications of Facebook interaction for perceived, receiving, and giving social support. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.066

27.

Lin

Liu

Niu

Longobardi

(2020). Active social network sites use and loneliness: The mediating role of social support and self-esteem. Current Psychology, 41(3), 1279–1286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00658-8

28.

Lisitsa

Benjamin

K. S.

Chun

S. K.

Skalisky

Hammond

L. E.

Mezulis

A. H.

(2020). Loneliness among young adults during COVID-19 pandemic: The mediational roles of social media use and social support seeking. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 39(8), 708–726. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2020.39.8.708

29.

Liu

Baumeister

R. F.

Yang

C. C.

(2019). Retracted: Digital communication media use and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 24(5), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz013

30.

Hampton

K. N.

(2016). Beyond the power of networks: Differentiating network structure from social media affordances for perceived social support. New Media & Society, 19(6), 861–879. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815621514

31.

Manago

A. M.

Taylor

Greenfield

P. M.

(2012). Me and my 400 friends: The anatomy of college students’ Facebook networks, their communication patterns, and well-being. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026338

32.

Marwick

A. E.

Boyd

(2010). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313

33.

Pan

Liu

Wang

Guo

Hao

Wang

Huang

Lin

Wei

(2020). Association of public health interventions with the epidemiology of the COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan, China. Jama, 323(19), 1915–1923. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.6130

34.

Procidano

M. E.

Heller

(1983). Measures of perceived social support from friends and from family: Three validation studies. American Journal of Community Psychology, 11(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00898416

35.

Rains

S. A.

Peterson

E. B.

Wright

K. B.

(2015). Communicating social support in computer-mediated contexts: A meta-analytic review of content analyses examining support messages shared online among individuals coping with illness. Communication Monographs, 82(4), 403–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1019530

36.

Reis

H. T.

Clark

M. S.

Holmes

J. G.

(2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 211–236). Psychology Press.

37.

Rozzell

Piercy

C. W.

Carr

C. T.

King

Lane

B. L.

Tornes

Johnson

A. J.

Wright

K. B.

(2014). Notification pending: Online social support from close and nonclose relational ties via Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 272–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.06.006

38.

Ryan

R. M.

Deci

E. L.

(2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141

39.

Siedlecki

K. L.

Salthouse

T. A.

Oishi

Jeswani

(2014). The relationship between social support and subjective well-being across age. Social Indicators Research, 117(2), 561–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0361-4

40.

Steinfield

DiMicco

J. M.

Ellison

N. B.

Lampe

(2009). Bowling online: Social networking and social capital within the organization. Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Communities and technologies (pp. 245–254). ACM Press.

41.

Suk

Zhang

Yue

Wang

Dong

Yang

Lian

(2023). When the personal becomes political: Unpacking the dynamics of sexual violence and gender justice discourses across four social media platforms. Communication Research, 50(5), 610–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502231154146

42.

Utz

Breuer

(2017). The relationship between use of social network sites, online social support, and well-being: Results from a six-wave longitudinal study. Journal of Media Psychology, 29(3), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000222

43.

Valkenburg

P. M.

Peter

(2007). Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.267

44.

Verduyn

Gugushvili

Massar

Täht

Kross

(2020). Social comparison on social networking sites. Current Opinion in Psychology, 36, 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.002

45.

Verduyn

Ybarra

Résibois

Jonides

Kross

(2017). Do social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well-being? A critical review. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 274–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12033

46.

Walsh

R. M.

Forest

A. L.

Orehek

(2020). Self-disclosure on social media: The role of perceived network responsiveness. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106162

47.

Walther

J. B.

(1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction. Communication Research, 19(1), 52–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019001003

48.

Whittaker

Kowalski

R. M.

(2014). Cyberbullying via social media. Journal of School Violence, 14(1), 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.949377

49.

Williams

R. H.

(2004). The cultural contexts of collective action: Constraints, opportunities, and the symbolic life of social movements. In Snow

D. A.

Soule

S. A.

Kriesi

(Eds.), The blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 91–115). Blackwell.

50.

Wohn

D. Y.

Carr

C. T.

Hayes

R. A.

(2016). How affective is a “like”?: The effect of paralinguistic digital affordances on perceived social support. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(9), 562–566. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0162

51.

World Health Organization (2020). WHO timeline -COVID-19. https://www.who.int/news/item/27-04-2020-who-timeline---covid-19

52.

Xiao

Dong

(2020). Collective actions among Wuhan residents during the outbreak of COVID-19. Global Journal of Media Studies, 7(1), 152–168.

53.

Yue

Lee

D. S.

Xiao

Zhang

(2021) Social media use, psychological well-being and physical health during lockdown. Information, Communication & Society, 26(7), 1452–1469. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2021.2013917

54.

Yue

Yang

J. Z.

(2022). Compassionate goals, prosocial emotions, and prosocial behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 32(3), 476–489. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2507

55.

Yue

Zhang

Xiao

(2022). Passive social media use and psychological well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of social comparison and emotion regulation. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 107050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107050

56.

Zhang

(2017). The stress-buffering effect of self-disclosure on Facebook: An examination of stressful life events, social support, and mental health among college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 527–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.043

57.

Zhang

Bazarova

N. N.

Reddy

(2021a). Distress disclosure across social media platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic: Untangling the effects of platforms, affordances, and audiences. The 2021 ACM CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–15). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445134

58.

Zhang

Alvina

Héron

Safin

Détienne

Lecolinet

(2021b). Touch without touching: Overcoming social distancing in semi-intimate relationships with SansTouch. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on human Factors in computing systems (pp. 1–13).

59.

Zimet

G. D.

Dahlem

N. W.

Zimet

S. G.

Farley

G. K.

(1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.60 MB