The aim of this study was to examine workers’ psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic as a function of their individual coping, dyadic coping, and work-family conflict. We also tested the moderating role of gender and culture in these associations. To achieve this aim, we run HLM analyses on data from 1521 workers cohabiting with a partner, coming from six countries (Italy, Spain, Malta, Cyprus, Greece, and Russia) characterized by various degrees of country-level individualism/collectivism. Across all six countries, findings highlighted that work-family conflict as well as the individual coping strategy social support seeking were associated with higher psychological distress for workers, while the individual coping strategy positive attitude and common dyadic coping were found to be protective against workers’ psychological distress. This latter association, moreover, was stronger in more individualistic countries.
Adams-PrasslA.BonevaT.GolinM.RauhC. (2020). Inequality in the impact of the coronavirus shock: Evidence from real time surveys. Journal of Public Economics, 189(2020), 104245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104245.
2.
AllenT. D.FrenchK. A.DumaniS.ShockleyK. M. (2020). A cross-national meta-analytic examination of predictors and outcomes associated with work–family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(6), 539–576. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000442
3.
AmazueL. O.OnyishiI. E. (2016). Stress coping strategies, perceived organizational support and marital status as predictors of work–life balance among Nigerian Bank Employees. Social Indicators Research, 128(1), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1023-5
4.
BaboreA.LombardiL.VicecontiM. L.PignataroS.MarinoV.CrudeleM.CandeloriC.BramantiS. M.TrumelloC. (2020). Psychological effects of the COVID-2019 pandemic: Perceived stress and coping strategies among healthcare professionals. Psychiatry Research, 293(2020), 113366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113366.
5.
BirzeA.RegehrC.ParadisE.LeBlancV.EinsteinG. (2021). Perceived organizational support and emotional labour among police communicators: What can organizational context tell us about posttraumatic stress?International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 95(2), 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-021-01708-9
6.
BodenmannG. (1995). A systemic-transactional view of stress and coping in couples. Swiss Journal of Psychology/Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 54(1), 34–49.
BodenmannG.MeuwlyN.GermannJ.NussbeckF. W.HeinrichsM.BradburyT. N. (2015). Effects of stress on the social support provided by men and women in intimate relationships. Psychological Science, 26(10), 1584–1594. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615594616
9.
BurlesonB. R. (2003). The experience and effects of emotional support: What the study of culture and gender differences can tell us about close relationships, emotion, and interpersonal communication. Personal Relationships, 10(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.00033
10.
CeramiC.SantiG. C.GalandraC.DodichA.CappaS. F.VecchiT.CrespiC. (2020). Covid-19 outbreak in Italy: Are we ready for the psychosocial and the economic crisis? Baseline findings from the PsyCovid study. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 556. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00556.
11.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
12.
ChenP. Y.CooperC. L. (Eds.). (2014). Wellbeing: A complete reference guide, volume III, work and wellbeing. Wiley Blackwell.
13.
ChiangF. F.BirtchT. A.KwanH. K. (2010). The moderating roles of job control and work-life balance practices on employee stress in the hotel and catering industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.04.005
14.
ChunC. A.MoosR. H.CronkiteR. C. (2006). Culture: A fundamental context for the stress and coping paradigm. In WongP. T. P.WongL. C. J. (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural perspectives on stress and coping. International and cultural psychology (pp. 29–53). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-26238-5_2
15.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
16.
CohenS.KamarckT.MermelsteinR. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 386–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404
17.
DeweP. J.O’DriscollM. P.CooperC. (2010). Coping with work stress: A review and critique (1st ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
18.
DionK. K.DionK. L. (1993). Individualistic and collectivistic perspectives on gender and the cultural context of love and intimacy. Journal of Social Issues, 49(3), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb01168.x
19.
DonB. P.MickelsonK. D.BarbeeA. P. (2013). Indirect support seeking and perceptions of spousal support: An examination of a reciprocal relationship. Personal Relationships, 20(4), 655–668. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12006
20.
DonatoS.PaganiA. F.PariseM.BertoniA.IafrateR. (2018). Through thick and thin: Perceived partner responses to negative and positive events. In BertoniA.DonatoS.MolgoraS. (Eds.), When “we” are stressed: A dyadic approach to coping with stressful events (pp. 41–64). Nova Publisher.
21.
DonatoS.PariseM. (2015). Introduction to the special section on the bright side of the couple relationship: Pro-relationship processes in response to positive and negative events. Family Science, 6(1), 94–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/19424620.2015.1081900
22.
DonatoS.PariseM.PaganiA. F.LanzM.RegaliaC.RosnatiR.IafrateR. (2021). Together against COVID-19 concerns: The role of the dyadic coping process for partners’ psychological well-being during the pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 578395. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.578395.
EvansP.BartoloméF. (1984). The changing pictures of the relationship between career and family. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030050103
25.
FalconierM. K.JacksonJ. B.HilpertP.BodenmannG. (2015). Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 42(2015), 28-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.07.002.
26.
FalconierM. K.KuhnR. (2019). Dyadic coping in couples: A conceptual integration and a review of the empirical literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 571. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00571.
27.
FalconierM. K.NussbeckF.BodenmannG. (2013). Dyadic coping in Latino couples: Validity of the Spanish version of the dyadic coping inventory. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 26(4), 446–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2012.699045
28.
FallahchaiR.FallahiM.RandallA. K. (2019). A dyadic approach to understanding associations between job stress, marital quality, and dyadic coping for dual-career couples in Iran. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 487. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00487.
29.
FengZ.SavaniK. (2020). Covid-19 created a gender gap in perceived work productivity and job satisfaction: Implications for dual-career parents working from home. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 35(7/8), 719–736. https://doi.org/10.1108/gm-07-2020-0202
30.
FoàC.TonarelliA.CaricatiL.FruggeriL. (2015). COPE-NVI-25: Validazione italiana della versione ridotta della coping orientation to the problems experienced (COPE-NVI) [COPE-NVI-25: Italian validation of the brief version of coping orientation to the problems experienced (COPE-NVI)]. Psicologia della Salute, 2, 123-140. https://doi.org/10.3280/PDS2015-002007.
31.
GrandeyA.CordeiroB.CrouterA. (2005). A longitudinal and multi-source test of the work–family conflict and job satisfaction relationship. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(3), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905X26769
32.
GudykunstW. B.MatsumotoY.Ting-ToomeyS.NishidaT.KimK.HeymanS. (1996). The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures. Human Communication Research, 22(4), 510–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00377.x
33.
HaarJ. M.RussoM.SuñeA.Ollier-MalaterreA. (2014). Outcomes of work–life balance on job satisfaction, life satisfaction and mental health: A study across seven cultures. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(3), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.08.010
34.
HammerL. B.KossekE. E.ZimmermanK.DanielsR. (2007). Clarifying the construct of family- supportive supervisory behaviors (FSSB): A multilevel perspective. Research in Occupational Stress and Well Being, 6, 165–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1479-3555(06)06005-7
35.
HarringtonD. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis. Oxford University Press.
36.
HaymanJ. (2005). Psychometric assessment of an instrument designed to measure work life balance. Research and Practice in Human Resource Management, 13(1), 85–91.
37.
HillR. (1949). Families under stress: Adjustment to the crises of war separation and return. Harper.
38.
HilpertP.RandallA. K.SorokowskiP.AtkinsD. C.SorokowskaA.AhmadiK.AghraibehA. M.AryeeteyR.BertoniA.BettacheK.BłażejewskaM.BodenmannG.BordersJ.BortoliniT. S.ButovskayaM.CastroF. N.CetinkayaH.CunhaD.DavidO. A.YooG. (2016). The associations of dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction vary between and within nations: A 35-nation study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1106. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01106.
39.
HofstedeG. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
42.
IafrateR.DonatoS. (2012). Coping in a relational context: The case of dyadic coping. In MolinelliB.GrimaldoV. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of coping: New research (pp. 111–132). Nova Science Publisher.
43.
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3
44.
KelleyH. H.BerscheidE.ChristensenA.HarveyJ. H.HustonT. L.LevingerG.McClintockE.PeplauL. A.PetersonD. R. (1983). Close relationships. Freeman.
45.
KhanN.PalepuA.DodekP.SalmonA.LeitchH.RuzyckiS.TownsonA.LacailleD. (2021). Cross-sectional survey on physician burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic in Vancouver, Canada: The role of gender, ethnicity and sexual orientation. BMJ Open, 11(5), Article e050380. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050380
46.
KimH. S.ShermanD. K.KoD.TaylorS. E. (2006). Pursuit of comfort and pursuit of harmony: Culture, relationships, and social support seeking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(12), 1595–1607. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206291991
47.
KopelmanR. E.GreenhausJ. H.ConnollyT. F. (1983). A model of work, family, and interrole conflict: A construct validation study. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32(2), 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(83)90147-2
48.
KrentzM.KosE.GreenA.Garcia-AlonsoJ. (2020, May). Easing the COVID-19 burden on working parents. Italy - IT.
49.
LandivarL. C.RuppannerL.ScarboroughW. J.CollinsC. (2020). Early signs indicate that COVID-19 is exacerbating gender inequality in the labor force. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic Word, 6, Article 237802312094799. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023120947997
50.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. Springer.
51.
LeeH.MasonD. (2014). Cultural and gender differences in coping strategies between Caucasian American and Korean American Older People. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 29(4), 429–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-014-9241-x
52.
LimV. K.TeoT. S.ZhaoX. (2013). Psychological costs of support seeking and choice of communication channel. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(2), 132–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2010.518248
53.
LinW.ChenL. H.LiT. (2016). Are “we” good? A longitudinal study of we-talk and stress coping in dual-earner couples. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(2), 757–772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9621-0
54.
LuongG.ArredondoC. M.CharlesS. T. (2020). Cultural differences in coping with interpersonal tensions lead to divergent shorter- and longer-term affective consequences. Cognition and Emotion, 34(7), 1499–1508. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2020.1752153
55.
ManziC.KocY.Benet-MartínezV.ReverberiE. (2021). Identity integration matters: The case of parents working from home during the COVID-19 health emergency. Self and Identity, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2021.2004217.
56.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
57.
MazzucchelliS.DonatoS.BosoniL. (2020). L’intreccio invisibile tra le relazioni familiari e lavorative. In ManziC.MazzucchelliS. (Eds.), Famiglia e lavoro: Intrecci possibili (pp. 75–98). Vita e Pensiero.
58.
MeierC.BodenmannG.MorgeliH.JeneweinJ. (2011). Dyadic coping, quality of life, and psychological distress among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients and their partners. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 6, 583-595. https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S24508.
59.
MolgoraS.AcquatiC.FenaroliV.SaitaE. (2019). Dyadic coping and marital adjustment during pregnancy: A cross-sectional study on Italian couples expecting their first child. International Journal of Psychology, 54(2), 277–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12476
60.
MolgoraS.FenaroliV.SaitaE.AcquatiC. (2018). Becoming parents: Examining the role of dyadic coping on the individual and relational adjustment of future mothers and their partners. In BertoniA.DonatoS.MolgoraS. (Eds.), When “we” are stressed: A dyadic approach to coping with stressful events (pp. 65–85). Nova Science Publisher.
61.
Ollier-MalaterreA.FoucreaultA. (2017). Cross-national work-life research: Cultural and structural impacts for individuals and organizations. Journal of Management, 43(1), 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316655873
62.
PaganiA. F.DonatoS.PariseM.BertoniA.IafrateR.SchoebiD. (2019). Explicit stress communication facilitates perceived responsiveness in dyadic coping. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 401. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00401.
63.
PappL. M.WittN. L. (2010). Romantic partners’ individual coping strategies and dyadic coping: Implications for relationship functioning. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(5), 551–559. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020836
64.
PietromonacoP. R.OverallN. C. (2021). Applying relationship science to evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic may impact couples’ relationships. American Psychologist, 76(3), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000714
65.
RapelliG.LopezG.DonatoS.PaganiA. F.PariseM.BertoniA.IafrateR. (2020). A postcard from Italy: Challenges and psychosocial re-sources of partners living with and without a chronic disease during COVID-19 epidemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 3559. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.567522.
66.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
67.
RusuP. P.HilpertP.BodenmannG. (2016). Dyadic coping in an Eastern European context: Validity and measurement invariance of the Romanian version of the dyadic coping inventory. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling Development, 49(4), 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175616664009
68.
SagoneE.De CaroliM. E. (2014). A correlational study on dispositional resilience, psychological well-being, and coping strategies in university students. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(7), 463–471. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-2-7-5
69.
SchwartzS. H.BilskyW. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 550–562. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.550
70.
SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford University Press.
71.
SirgyM. J.LeeD.-J.ParkS.JoshanlooM.KimM. (2020). Work–family spillover and subjective well-being: The moderating role of coping strategies. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(8), 2909–2929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00205-8
72.
SnyderK.StadlerG.CampbellS. B.BolgerN. (2015). Preference for self-reliance in close relationships. European Health Psychologist, 17(2015), 372.
73.
StaffH. R.DidymusF. F.BackhouseS. H. (2017). The antecedents and outcomes of dyadic coping in close personal relationships: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Anxiety Stress and Coping, 30(5), 498–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2017.1329931
74.
Statista. (2021, June 8). Working mode in companies during COVID-19 in Russia 2020, by size.
75.
TamresL. K.JanickiD.HelgesonV. S. (2002). Sex differences in coping behavior: A meta-analytic review and an examination of relative coping. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(1), 2–30. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0601_1
UeharaE. S. (1995). Reciprocity reconsidered: Gouldner’s ‘moral norm of reciprocity’ and social support. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12(4), 483–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407595124001
78.
van der LippeT.LippényiZ. (2020). Beyond formal access: Organizational context, working from home, and work–family conflict of men and women in European workplaces. Social Indicators Research, 151(2), 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1993-1
79.
WangS. W.LauA. S. (2015). Mutual and non-mutual social support: Cultural differences in the psychological, behavioral, and biological effects of support seeking. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(7), 916–929. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115592967
80.
WeitenW.LloydM. A. (2008). Psychology applied to modern life (9th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
81.
YerkesM. A.AndréS. C. H.BesamuscaJ. W.KruyenP. M.RemeryC. L. H. S.van der ZwanR.BeckersD. G. J.GeurtsS. A. E. (2020). ‘Intelligent’ lockdown, intelligent effects? Results from a survey on gender (in)equality in paid work, the division of childcare and household work, and quality of life among parents in The Netherlands during the Covid-19 lockdown. Plos One, 15(11), e0242249. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242249
82.
YouJ.ShenH.ZhangH.ShumY. K. (2020). Tendency of support seeking and psychological outcomes in a dating relationship: Roles of relationship qualities across cultures. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 11(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/aap0000163
83.
ZhangS. X.WangY.RauchA.WeiF. (2020). Unprecedented disruption of lives and work: Health, distress and life satisfaction of working adults in China one month into the COVID-19 outbreak. Psychiatry Research, 288(2020), 112958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112958.
84.
ZhengC.KashiK.FanD.MolineuxJ.Shan EeM. (2015). Impact of individual coping strategies and organisational work–life balance programmes on Australian employee well-being. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(5), 501–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1020447
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
