Boys’ beliefs about prosocial behavior toward other boys may be negatively affected by masculine norm adherence, and there is evidence that early adolescence is a time when boys feel heightened levels of pressure from multiple sources (e.g., friends, family, and self) to adhere to masculine norms like emotional restriction (e.g., appearing stoic and uncaring). However, the relation between boys’ masculinity and their prosocial behavior beliefs is likely further affected by boys’ social competency. Generally, boys’ social competency is positively associated with prosocial behavior, but this is not the case for “tough” boys (boys who adhere to many traditionally masculine norms). We expected that analyzing the relation between early adolescent boys’ pressure to adhere to masculine norms and boys’ unique social profiles (created using adherence to masculine norms and aspects of social competency) would further illuminate boys’ patterns of prosocial behavior beliefs toward other boys. A latent profile analysis estimated profiles of masculinity and social competence among 260 early adolescent boys (59% White, Mage = 11.45 years old, Rangeage = 10–12) in the southwestern U.S. Three profiles emerged which we labeled socially precarious (50%), socially self-confident (41%), and socially avoidant (9%). R3Step and BCH procedures indicated that higher levels of felt pressure from all three sources resulted in a significantly higher likelihood of being in the socially precarious profile compared to the socially self-confident profile and that boys in the socially self-confident profile had significantly higher mean levels of prosocial behavior beliefs toward other boys (M = 3.22) compared to boys in the socially precarious profile (M = 3.01). Overall, this study encourages the socialization of social competency while simultaneously discouraging the perpetuation of certain masculine norms among adolescent boys.
ArndorferC. L.StormshakE. A. (2008). Same-sex versus other-sex best friendship in early adolescence: Longitudinal predictors of antisocial behavior throughout adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(9), 1059–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9311-x
2.
AsparouhovT.MuthénB. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Using the BCH method in Mplus to estimate a distal outcome model and an arbitrary secondary model. Mplus Web Notes, 21(2), 1–22.
BakkZ.VermuntJ. K. (2016). Robustness of stepwise latent class modeling with continuous distal outcomes. Structural Equation Modeling, 23(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.955104
5.
BolckA.CroonM.HagenaarsJ. (2004). Estimating latent structure models with categorical variables: One-step versus three-step estimators. Political Analysis, 12(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mph001
6.
BrannonR. (1976). The male sex role: Our culture’s blueprint for manhood and what it’s done for us lately. In DavidD.BrannonR. (Eds.), The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role (pp. 1–48). Addison-Wesley.
7.
BronfenbrennerU.MorrisP. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In DamonW.LernerR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 793–828). Wiley.
8.
CarloG.RandallB. A. (2002). The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014033032440
9.
CarverP. R.YungerJ. L.PerryD. G. (2003). Gender identity and adjustment in middle childhood. Sex Roles, 49(3–4), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024423012063
10.
ChuJ. Y.PorcheM. V.TolmanD. L. (2005). The Adolescent Masculinity Ideology in Relationships Scale: Development and validation of a new measure for boys. Men and Masculinities, 8(1), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X03257453
11.
ConnellR. (2005). Masculinities. University of California Press.
12.
CroonM. (2014). Using predicted latent scores in general latent structure models. In Latent variable and latent structure models (pp. 207–236). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410602961-16
13.
De VisserR. O. (2009). “I’m not a very manly man” Qualitative insights into young men’s masculine subjectivity. Men and Masculinities, 11(3), 367–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X07313357
14.
DeLayD.HanishL. D.ZhangL.MartinC. L. (2016). Assessing the impact of homophobic name calling on early adolescent mental health: A longitudinal social network analysis of competing peer influence effects. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(5), 955–969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0598-8
15.
EganS. K.PerryD. G. (2001). Gender identity: A multidimensional analysis with implications for psychosocial adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 37(4), 451–463. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-I649.37.4.45I
16.
Gómez-OrtizO.RomeraE. M.Ortega-RuizR. (2017). Multidimensionalidad de la competencia social: Medición del constructo y su relación con los roles del bullying. Revista de Psicodidactica, 22(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1387/RevPsicodidact.15702
17.
HagenaarsJ. A.McCutcheonA. L. (Eds.). (2002). Applied latent class analysis. Cambridge University Press.
18.
HillJ. P.LynchM. E. (1983). The intensification of gender-related role expectations during early adolescence. In Girls at puberty (pp. 201–228). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0354-9_10
19.
HineB.LemanP. J. (2013). The developing relationship between gender and pro-social behaviour. Gender and Development, 78–108. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315870878
KornbluhM.NealJ. W. (2016). Examining the many dimensions of children’s popularity: Interactions between aggression, prosocial behaviors, and gender. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(1), 62–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407514562562
23.
KosciwJ. G.ClarkC. M.TruongN. L.ZongroneA. D. (2019). The 2019 National School Climate Survey: The experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer youth in our nation’s schools.
24.
LanzaS. T.CollinsL. M.LemmonD. R.SchaferJ. L. (2007). PROC LCA: A SAS procedure for latent class analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(4), 671–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575602
25.
LevantR.SmalleyK.AupontM.HouseA.RichmondK.NoronhaD. (2007). Initial Validation of the Male Role Norms Inventory-Revised (MRNI-R). The Journal of Men’s Studies, 15(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.1501.83
26.
LiangC. T. H.SalcedoJ.MillerH. A. (2011). Perceived racism, masculinity ideologies, and gender role conflict among Latino men. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 12(3), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020479
27.
LibenL. S.BiglerR. S. (2002). The developmental course of gender differentiation: Conceptualizing, measuring, and evaluating constructs and pathways. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67(2), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5834.t01-1-00190
28.
MacPheeD.PrendergastS. (2019). Room for improvement: Girls’ and boys’ home environments are still gendered. Sex Roles, 80(5–6), 332–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0936-2
29.
MartinC. L.AndrewsN. C. Z.EnglandD. E.ZosulsK.RubleD. N. (2016). A dual identity approach for conceptualizing and measuring children’s gender identity. Child Development, 88(1), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12568
30.
MartinC. L.FabesR. A. (2001). The stability and consequences of young children’s same-sex peer interactions. Developmental Psychology, 37(3), 431–446. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.37.3.431
31.
MartinC. L.HalversonC. F. (1981). A schematic processing model of sex typing and stereotyping in children. Child Development, 52(4), 1119–1134. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129498
32.
MayeuxL.KleiserM. (2020). A gender prototypicality theory of adolescent peer popularity. Adolescent Research Review, 5(3), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-019-00123-z
33.
MchaleS. M.KimJ. Y.DottererA. M.BoothA.CrouterA. C.BoothA. (2009). The development of gendered interests and personality qualities from middle childhood through adolescence: A biosocial analysis. Child Development, 80(2), 482–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01273.x
34.
McHaleS. M.UpdegraffK. A.Helms-EriksonH.CrouterA. C. (2001). Sibling influences on gender development in middle childhood and early adolescence: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 37(1), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.37.1.115
35.
MesmanJ.GroeneveldM. G. (2018). Gendered parenting in early childhood: Subtle but unmistakable if you know where to look. Child Development Perspectives, 12(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12250
NielsonM. G.MartinC. L.RogersL. O.MillerC. F.JohnsonS. LBerendzenH. M. (2022). Exploring young men’s experience of resistance to masculine gender norms. Emerging Adulthood, online preprint.
38.
NielsonM. G.SchroederK. M.MartinC. L.CookR. E. (2020). Investigating the relation between gender typicality and pressure to conform to gender norms. Sex Roles, 83(9–10), 523–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01136-y
39.
NylundK. L.AsparouhovT.MuthénB. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(4), 535–569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396
40.
Padilla-WalkerL. M.CarloG. (Eds.). (2015). Prosocial development: A multidimensional approach. Oxford University Press.
41.
Padilla-WalkerL. M.DyerW. J.YorgasonJ. B.FraserA. M.CoyneS. M. (2015). Adolescents’ prosocial behavior toward family, friends, and strangers: A person-centered approach. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25(1), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12102
PoteatV. P.EspelageD. L. (2007). Predicting psychosocial consequences of homophobic victimization in middle school students. Journal of Early Adolescence, 27, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431606294839
RodkinP. C.FarmerT. W.PearlR.Van AckerR. (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology, 36(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.36.1.14
46.
RodkinP. C.RyanA. M.JamisonR.WilsonT. (2013). Social goals, social behavior, and social status in middle childhood. Developmental Psychology, 49(6), 1139–1150. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029389
47.
RogersA. A.DeLayD.MartinC. L. (2017). Traditional masculinity during the middle school transition: Associations with depressive symptoms and academic engagement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(4), 709–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0545-8
48.
RogersL. O.WayN. (2016). “I have goals to prove all those people wrong and not fit into any one of those boxes”: Paths of resistance to stereotypes among black adolescent males. Journal of Adolescent Research, 31(3), 263–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558415600071
RyanA. M.ShimS. S. (2006). Social achievement goals: The nature and consequences of different orientations toward social competence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(9), 1246–1263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206289345
51.
SchwingA. E.WongY. J.FannM. D. (2013). Development and validation of the African American men’s gendered racism stress inventory. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 14(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028272
52.
SinnoS. M.KillenM. (2009). Moms at work and dads at home: Children’s evaluations of parental roles. Applied Developmental Science, 13(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888690802606735
53.
SmilerA. P. (2014). Resistance is futile? Examining boys who actively challenge masculinity. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 15(3), 256–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037286
54.
SolebelloN.ElliottS. (2011). “We want them to be as heterosexual as possible”: Fathers talk about their teen children’s sexuality. Gender & Society, 25(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243211403926
55.
SpurkD.HirschiA.WangM.ValeroD.KauffeldS. (2020). Latent profile analysis: A review and “how to” guide of its application within vocational behavior research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 120, 103445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103445.
56.
TakagishiH.FujiiT.KoizumiM.SchugJ.NakamuraF.KameshimaS. (2015). The development of the effect of peer monitoring on generosity differs among elementary school-age boys and girls. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(895). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00895.
57.
ThorneB. (1993). Gender play: Girls and boys in school. Rutgers University Press.
58.
ToomeyR. B.CardN. A.CasperD. M. (2014). Peers’ perceptions of gender nonconformity: Associations with overt and relational peer victimization and aggression in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 34(4), 463–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431613495446
59.
VandelloJ. A.BossonJ. K. (2013). Hard won and easily lost: A review and synthesis of theory and research on precarious manhood. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029826I
60.
VermuntJ. K. (2010). Latent class modeling with covariates: Two improved three-step approaches. Political Analysis, 18(4), 459–469. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpq025
61.
WayN. (2011). Deep secrets: Boys’ friendships and the crisis of connection. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/674714
62.
WilbournM. P.KeeD. W. (2010). Henry the nurse is a doctor too: Implicitly examining children’s gender stereotypes for male and female occupational roles. Sex Roles, 62(9), 670–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9773-7
63.
WilsonT. M.ZhengC.LemoineK. A.MartinC. P.TangY. (2016). Achievement goals during middle childhood: Individual differences in motivation and social adjustment. The Journal of Experimental Education, 84(4), 723–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2015.1094648
64.
WongY. J.OwenJ.TranK. K.CollinsD. L.HigginsC. E. (2012). Asian American male college students’ perceptions of people’s stereotypes about Asian American men. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 13(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022800
65.
ZosulsK. M.FieldR. D.MartinC. L.AndrewsN. C. Z.EnglandD. E. (2014). Gender-Based relationship efficacy: Children’s self-perceptions in intergroup contexts. Child Development, 85(4), 1663–1676. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12209
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
