Parental involvement has been associated with increased adolescent prosocial behaviors, but we know little about the peer and school-level explanatory mechanisms behind these associations. The current study aimed to examine the intervening roles of deviant peer affiliation and school connectedness in links between parental involvement and prosocial behaviors among U.S. Latino/a adolescents. Participants included 306 U.S. Latino/a adolescents (Mage = 15.50 years, SD = .42 years, 46% girls, 81.0% U.S. Mexican) from communities in the Northern Great Plains, who reported on parental involvement, deviant peer affiliation, school connectedness, and prosocial behaviors. Path analyses showed that parental involvement was directly and indirectly related to prosocial behaviors via both deviant peer affiliation and school connectedness. Parental involvement was related to lesser deviant peer affiliation, which was in turn related to greater school connectedness, which was further related to higher prosocial behaviors. The discussion focuses on the importance of studying the interplay of parent, peer, and school factors in understanding prosocial behaviors among U.S. Latino/a youth.
AckardD. M.Neumark-SztainerD.StoryM.PerryC. (2006). Parent–child connectedness and behavioral and emotional health among adolescents. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 30, 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.013
2.
AndersonS.SabatelliR.KosuticI. (2007). Families, urban neighborhood youth centers, and peers as contexts for development. Family Relations, 56, 346–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00464.x
3.
BarberB.StolzH.OlsenJ.CollinsW.BurchinalM. (2005). Parental support, psychological control, and behavioral control: Assessing relevance across time, culture, and method: V. Assessing relevance across culture: Cross-national replications. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 70, 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5834.2005.00369.x
4.
BargerM. M.KimE. M.KuncelN. R.PomerantzE. M. (2019). The relation between parents’ involvement in children’s schooling and children’s adjustment: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 145, 855–890. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000201
5.
BarrJ.Higgins-D’AlessandroA. (2007). Adolescent empathy and prosocial behavior in the multidimensional context of school culture. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 168, 231–250. https://doi.org/10.3200/gntp.168.3.231-250
6.
BattistichV.SchapsE.WilsonN. (2004). Effects of an elementary school intervention on students’ “connectedness” to school and social adjustment during middle school. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 24, 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jopp.0000018048.38517.cd
BaumrindD. (1991). Parenting styles and adolescent development. In Brooks-GunnJ.LernerR.PetersenA. C. (Eds.), The encyclopedia of adolescence (pp. 746–758). Garland.
9.
BellR. Q. (1968). A reinterpretation of the direction of effects in studies of socialization. Psychological Review, 75, 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025583
BrownB.BakkenJ. (2011). Parenting and peer relationships: Reinvigorating research on family-peer linkages in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00720.x
BurtS.McGueM.IaconoW. (2009). Nonshared environmental mediation of the association between deviant peer affiliation and adolescent externalizing behaviors over time: Results from a cross-lagged monozygotic twin differences design. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1752–1760. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016687
14.
Calderón-TenaC. O.KnightG. P.CarloG. (2011). The socialization of prosocial behavioral tendencies among Mexican American adolescents: The role of familism values. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 17, 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021825
15.
CarloG. (2014). The development and correlates of prosocial moral behaviors. In KillenM.SmetanaJ. G. (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 208–234). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203581957.ch10
16.
CarloG.de GuzmanM. R. T. (2009). Theories and research on prosocial competencies among U.S. Latinos/as. In VillarruelF. A.CarloG.GrauJ. M.AzmitiaM.CabreraN. J.ChahinT. J. (Eds.), Handbook of U.S. Latino psychology: Developmental and community-based perspectives (pp. 191–211). Sage.
17.
CarloG.KnightG.McGinleyM.ZamboangaB.JarvisL. (2010). The multidimensionality of prosocial behaviors and evidence of measurement equivalence in Mexican American and European American early adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20, 334–358. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00637.x
18.
CarloG.McGinleyM.HayesR.BatenhorstC.WilkinsonJ. (2007). Parenting styles or practices? Parenting, sympathy, and prosocial behaviors among adolescents. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 168, 147–176. https://doi.org/10.3200/GNTP.168.2.147-176
19.
CarloG.MestreM.McGinleyM.Tur-PorcarA.SamperP.OpalD. (2014). The protective role of prosocial behaviors on antisocial behaviors: The mediating effects of deviant peer affiliation. Journal of Adolescence, 37, 359–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.02.009
20.
CarloG.MestreM.SamperP.TurA.ArmentaB. (2011). The longitudinal relations among dimensions of parenting styles, sympathy, prosocial moral reasoning, and prosocial behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 116–124. http://doi.org/10.1177/0165025410375921
21.
CarloG.Padilla-WalkerL.DayR. (2011). A test of the economic strain model on adolescents’ prosocial behaviors. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 842–848. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00742.x
22.
CarloG.RandallB. A. (2002). The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014033032440
23.
CarloG.WhiteR.StreitC.KnightG. P.ZeidersK. H. (2018). Longitudinal relations among parenting styles, prosocial behaviors, and academic outcomes in US Mexican adolescents. Child Development, 89, 577–592. http://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12761
24.
CarloG.RaffaelliM.LaibleD. J.MeyerK. A. (1999). Why are females less aggressive than males? Personality and parenting mediators of aggression. Sex Roles, 40, 711–729. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018856601513
25.
CatalanoR.OesterleS.FlemingC.HawkinsJ. (2004). The importance of bonding to school for healthy development: Findings from the social development research group. Journal of School Health, 74, 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08281.x
26.
CrawfordL.NovakK. (2008). Parent–child relations and peer associations as mediators of the family structure–substance use relationship. Journal of Family Issues, 29, 155–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x07304461
27.
DavisA. N.CarloG.StreitC.SchwartzS. J.UngerJ. B.Baezconde-GarbanatiL.SzapocznikJ. (2018). Longitudinal associations between maternal involvement, cultural orientations, and prosocial behaviors among recent immigrant Latino adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 460–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0792-3
28.
DeGarmoD.MartinezC. (2006). A culturally informed model of academic well-being for Latino youth: The importance of discriminatory experiences and social support. Family Relations, 55, 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00401.x
29.
DishionT. J.BullockB.GranicI. (2002). Pragmatism in modeling peer influence: Dynamics, outcomes, and change processes. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 969–981. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579402004169
30.
DishionT. J.McMahonR. J. (1998). Parental monitoring and the prevention of child and adolescent problem behavior: A conceptual and empirical formulation. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 1, 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021800432380
31.
DishionT. J.NelsonS. E.BullockB. M. (2004). Premature adolescent autonomy: Parent disengagement and deviant peer process in the amplification of problem behavior. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.06.005
32.
DishionT. J.PattersonG. R.StoolmillerM.SkinnerM. L. (1991). Family, school, and behavioral antecedents to early adolescent involvement with antisocial peers. Developmental Psychology, 27, 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.1.172
33.
EisenbergN.FabesR. A.SpinradT. L. (2006). Prosocial development. In DamonW.LernerR. M.(Series Eds.)EisenbergN. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 646–718). John Wiley.
34.
EpsteinJ. (2001). School, family, and community partnerships. Westview.
35.
EspinozaG.Gillen-O’NeelC.GonzalesN.FuligniA. (2013). Friend affiliations and school adjustment among Mexican-American adolescents: The moderating role of peer and parent support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1969–1981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-0023-5
36.
FabesR. A.CarloG.KupanoffK.LaibleD. (1999). Early adolescence and prosocial/moral behavior I: The role of individual processes. Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431699019002001
37.
FoscoG.StormshakE.DishionT.WinterC. (2012). Family relationships and parental monitoring during middle school as predictors of early adolescent problem behavior. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 41, 202–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2012.651989
38.
GilliganC. (1982). In a different voice. Harvard University Press.
39.
GrolnickW. S.SlowiaczekM. L. (1994). Parents’ involvement in children’s schooling: A multidimensional conceptualization and motivational model. Child Development, 65, 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00747.x
40.
HastingsP. D.UtendaleW. T.SullivanC. (2007). The socialization of prosocial development. In GrusecJ. E.HastingsP. D.GrusecJ. E.HastingsP. D. (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 638–664). Guilford.
41.
HernándezM. M.Bámaca-ColbertM. Y. (2016). A behavioral process model of familism. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8, 463–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12166
42.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070-5519909540118
JaureguizarJ.IbabeI.StrausM. (2013). Violent and prosocial behavior by adolescents toward parents and teachers in a community sample. Psychology in the Schools, 50, 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21685
45.
JessorR.TurbinM.CostaF. (1998). Risk and protection in successful outcomes among disadvantaged adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 2, 194–208. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532480xads0204_3
46.
JeynesW. (2003). A meta-analysis: The effects of parental involvement on minority children’s academic achievement. Education & Urban Society, 35, 202–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124502239392
47.
JeynesW. (2017). A meta-analysis: The relationship between parental involvement and Latino student outcomes. Education & Urban Society, 49, 1–28. http://doi.org/10.1177/0013124516630596
48.
JeynesW. H. (2007). The relationship between parental involvement and urban secondary school student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Urban education, 42, 82–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085906293818
49.
KerrM. H.BeckK.ShattuckT. D.KattarC.UriburuD. (2003). Family involvement, problem and prosocial behavior outcomes of Latino youth. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27(Suppl1), S55–S65. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.27.1.s1.6
KnightG. P.CarloG.MahrerN. E.DavisA. N. (2016). The socialization of culturally related values and prosocial tendencies among Mexican-American adolescents. Child Development, 87, 1758–1771. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12634
52.
KnightG. P.HillN. E. (1998). Measurement equivalence in research involving minority adolescents. In McLoydV. C.&SteinbergL. (Eds.), Studying minority adolescents: Conceptual, methodological, and theoretical issues. (pp. 183–210). Lawrence Erlbaum.
53.
KochanskaG.KoenigJ. L.BarryR. A.KimS.YoonJ. E. (2010). Children’s conscience during toddler and preschool years, moral self, and a competent, adaptive developmental trajectory. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1320–1332. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020381
54.
LairdR. D.CrissM. M.PettitG. S.DodgeK. A.BatesJ. E. (2008). Parents’ monitoring knowledge attenuates the link between antisocial friends and adolescent delinquent behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-007-9178-4
55.
LairdR. D.ZeringueM. M. (2019). Parental knowledge and child disclosure as they relate to prosocial and antisocial behaviors. In LaibleD.Padilla-WalkerL. M.CarloG. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of parenting and moral development (pp. 319–338). Oxford University Press.
56.
MacKinnonD. P.LockwoodC. M.HoffmanJ. M.WestS. G.SheetsV. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83
57.
MappK. L.JohnsonV. R.StricklandC. S.MezaC. (2008). High school family centers: Transformative spaces linking schools and families in support of student learning. Marriage & Family Review, 43, 338–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494920802073205
58.
MastenA. (2018). Resilience theory and research on children and families: Past, present, and promise. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 10(1), 12–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12255
59.
McNeelyC.NonnemakerJ.BlumR. (2002). Promoting school connectedness: Evidence from the national longitudinal study of adolescent health. Journal of School Health, 72, 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2002.tb06533.x
60.
MoodyJ.BearmanP.S. (1998). Shaping school climate: school context. Adolescent social networks, and attachment to school. Unpublished manuscript.
Padilla-WalkerL. MCarloGChristensenK. JYorgasonJ. B. (2012). Bidirectional relations between authoritative parenting and adolescents’ prosocial behaviors. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22, 400–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2012.00807.x
63.
Padilla-WalkerL. MChristensenK. J. (2011). Empathy and self-regulation as mediators between parenting and adolescents’ prosocial behavior toward strangers, friends, and family. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(3), 545–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00695.x
64.
PastorelliC.LansfordJ.Luengo KanacriB.MaloneP.Di GiuntaL.BacchiniD.BombiA. SZelliA.MirandaM. C.BornsteinM. H.TapanyaS. Uribe T. L. M.AlampayL. P.Al-HassanS. MChangL.Deater-DeckardKDodgeK. AOburuPSkinnerA. TSorbringE. (2015). Positive parenting and children’s prosocial behavior in eight countries. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(7), 824–834. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12477
65.
PrelowH.BowmanM.WeaverS. (2007). Predictors of psychosocial well-being in urban African American and European American youth: The role of ecological factors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 543–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9038-5
66.
RaffaelliM.CarloG.CarranzaM.Gonzalez-KrugerG. (2005). Understanding Latino children and adolescents in the mainstream: Placing culture at the center of developmental models. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2005(109), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.134
67.
RudasillK.NiehausK.CrockettL.RakesC. (2013). Changes in school connectedness and deviant peer affiliation among sixth-grade students from high-poverty neighborhoods. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 34, 896–922. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431613511330
68.
SchaeferE. S. (1965). Children’s reports of parental behavior: An inventory. Child Development, 36, 413–424. https://doi.org/10.2307/1126465
69.
ShochetI.DaddsM.HamD.MontagueR. (2006). School connectedness is an underemphasized parameter in adolescent mental health: Results of a community prediction study. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 35, 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3502_1
70.
SimmonsR. G.Carlton-FordS. L.BlythD. A. (1987). Predicting how a child will cope with the transition to junior high school. In LernerR. M.FochT. T. (Eds.), Child psychology. Biological-psychosocial interactions in early adolescence (pp. 325–375). Lawrence Erlbaum.
71.
Simons-MortonB.ChenR. (2009). Peer and parent influences on school engagement among early adolescents. Youth & Society, 41, 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118x09334861
72.
Simons-MortonB.CrumpA. (2003). Association of parental involvement and social competence with school adjustment and engagement among sixth graders. Journal of School Health, 73, 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2003.tb03586.x
73.
Simons-MortonB.HartosJ.HaynieD. (2004). Prospective analysis of peer and parent influences on minor aggression among early adolescents. Health Education & Behavior, 31, 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198103258850
WangM.DishionT. (2012). The trajectories of adolescents’ perceptions of school climate, deviant peer affiliation, and behavioral problems during the middle school years. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22, 40–53. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00763.x
76.
WangM.EcclesJ. (2012). Social support matters: Longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of school engagement from middle to high school. Child Development, 83, 877–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01745.x
77.
ZaffJMooreK.PapilloA.WilliamsS. (2003). Implications of extracurricular activity participation during adolescence on positive outcomes. Journal of Adolescent Research, 18, 599–630. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558403254779
