Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-4
The severity of bullying messages predicts increased levels of targets’ depression and general anxiety as a function of targets’ inferences of a bully’s goals
Being the recipient of severe bullying messages for a period of time is a meaningful predictor of subsequent mental health issues. Employing Goal Understanding Theory, we test an explanation for this association. Specifically, we hypothesize and generally confirm that targets’ adverse emotional reaction and hurt from bullying messages serially mediate the positive association between message severity and depression and general anxiety, depending on the goal understanding of targets (i.e., inferences of upward-mobility, personal-attack, and highlight-differences goals motivating a bully). That is, the mediation of message severity on mental health via emotional reaction and then hurt is present at high (not low) levels of goal inferences. Implications of the communicative processes connecting severe bullying with mental health are discussed.
ArseneaultL.BowesL.ShakoorS. (2010). Bullying victimization in youths and mental health problems: “Much ado about nothing”?Psychological Medicine, 40, 717–729. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291709991383
2.
BakadorovaO.RaufelderD. (2019). The relationship of school self-concept, goal orientations and achievement during adolescence. Self and Identity. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2019.1581082
3.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1037//1089-2680.5.4.323
4.
BebbingtonP. E.BhugraD.BrughaT.SingletonN.FarrellM.JenkinsR.LewisG.MeltzerH. (2004). Psychosis, victimisation and childhood disadvantage: Evidence from the second British National Survey of Psychiatric Morbidity. British Journal of Psychiatry, 185, 220–226.
5.
BeckA. T.EpsteinN.BrownG. K.SteerR. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 893–897.
6.
BeckA. T.SteerR. A.BrownG. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck depression inventory-II. Psychological Corporation.
7.
BettsL. R.GkimitzoudisA.SpenserK. A.BaguleyT. (2017). Examining the roles young people fulfill in five types of cyber bullying. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34, 1080–1098. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407516668585
8.
BowerG. H.BlackJ. B.TurnerT. J. (1979). Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 177–220.
9.
BradburyS. L.DubowE. F.DomoffS. E. (2018). How do adolescents learn cyber-victimization coping skills? An examination of parent and peer coping socialization. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0812-y
10.
CamodecaM.CaravitaS. C. S.CoppolaG. (2015). Bullying in preschool: The associations between participant roles, social competence, and social preference. Aggressive Behavior, 41, 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21541
11.
CampbellM. L. C.MorrisonA. P. (2007). The relationship between bullying, psychotic-like experiences and appraisals in 14–16-year olds. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 45, 1579–1591.
CookC. R.WilliamsK. R.GuerraN. G.KimT. E.SadekS. (2010). Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Quarterly, 25, 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020149
14.
CraigW. M.PeplerD. J. (2007). Understanding bullying: From research to practice. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 48, 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/cp2007010
15.
CupachW. R. (1994). Social predicaments. In CupachW. R.SpitzbergB. H. (Eds.), The dark side of interpersonal communication (pp. 159–180). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16.
EinarsenS.SkogstadA.RørvikE.LandeÅ. B.NielsenM. B. (2018). Climate for conflict management, exposure to workplace bullying and work engagement: A moderated mediation analysis. The International Journal of Human Resources Management, 29, 549–570.
17.
ElledgeL. C.SmithD. E.KilpatrickC. T.McClainC. M.MooreT. M. (2019). The associations between bullying victimization and internalizing distress, suicidality, and substance use in Jamaican adolescents: The moderating role of parental involvement. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36, 2202–2220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518786804
18.
FarisR. (2012). Aggression, exclusivity, and status attainment in interpersonal networks. Social Forces, 90, 1207–1235. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sos074
19.
FarisR.FelmleeD. (2011). Status struggles: Network centrality and gender segregation in same- and cross-gender aggression. American Sociological Review, 76, 48–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122410396196
20.
FolkesV. S. (1982). Communicating the causes of social rejection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 235–252.
21.
GiniG.CarliG.PozzoliT. (2009). Social support, peer victimisation, and somatic complaints: A mediational analysis. Journal of Pediatrics and Child Health, 45, 358–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2009.01501.x
22.
GreenJ. G.OblathR.FelixE. D.FurlongM. J.HoltM. K.SharkeyJ. D. (2018). Initial evidence for the validity of the California Bullying Victimization Scale (CBVS-R) as a retrospective measure for adults. Psychological Assessment, 30, 1444–1453. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000592
23.
GreenM. C.StrangeJ. J.BrockT. C. (Eds.) (2002). Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24.
GreeneJ. O. (Ed.). (1997). Message production: Advances in communication theory. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25.
HagerA. D.LeadbeaterB. J. (2016). The longitudinal effects of peer victimization on physical health from adolescence to young adulthood. Journal of Adolescent Health, 58, 330–336.
26.
HardtJ.RutterM. (2004). Validity of adult retrospective reports of adverse childhood experiences: Review of the evidence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 260–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00218.x
27.
HayesA. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. The Guilford Press.
28.
JonesC. L.JensenJ. D.ScherrC. L.BrownN. R.ChristyK.WeaverJ. (2015). The health belief model as an explanatory framework in communication research: Exploring parallel, serial, and moderated mediation. Health Communication, 30, 566–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041o0236.2013.873363
29.
JonesS. E.SavageM. W. (2018). Examining cyberbullying bystander behavior. In WestR.BeckC. S. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of communication and bullying. Taylor & Francis/Routledge.
30.
KellermannK. (1992). Communication: Inherently strategic and primarily automatic. Communication Monographs, 59, 288–300.
31.
KensingerE. A. (2007). Negative emotion enhances memory accuracy: Behavioral and neuroimaging evidence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 213–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00506.x
32.
KowalskiR. M.GiumettiG. W.SchroederA. N.LattannerM. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1073–1137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618
33.
KowalskiR. M.TothA.MorganM. (2018). Bullying and cyberbullying in adulthood and the workplace. The Journal of Social Psychology, 158, 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2017.1302402
34.
LangP. J.BradleyM. M.CuthbertB. N. (1997). Motivated attention: Affect, activation, and action. In LangP.SimonsR. F.BalbanM. (Eds.), Attention and orienting: Sensory and motivational processes (pp. 97–136). Erlbaum.
35.
LangP. J.KozakM. J.MillerG. A.LevinD. N.McLeanA. (1980). Emotional imagery: Conceptual structure and pattern of somatovisceral response. Psychophysiology, 17, 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1980.tb00133.x
McDougallP.VaillancourtT. (2015). Long-term adult outcomes of peer victimization in childhood and adolescence: Pathways to adjustment and maladjustment. American Psychologist, 70, 300–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039174
38.
OlweusD. (1994). Bullying at school: Basic facts and effects of a school-based intervention program. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 1171–1190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1994.tb01229.x
39.
Palomares, N. A. (2008). Toward a theory of goal detection in social interaction: Effects of contextual ambiguity and tactical functionality on goal inferences and inference certainty. Communication Research, 35, 109–148. http://doi.org/10.1177/0093650207309364
40.
Palomares, N. A. (2014). The goal construct in interpersonal communication. In BergerC. R. (Ed.), Interpersonal Communication (pp. 77–99). Walter de Gruyter.
41.
PalomaresN. A.DermanD. (2019). Topic avoidance, goal understanding, and relational perceptions: Experimental evidence. Communication Research, 46, 735–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216644649
42.
PalomaresN. A.WingateV. S. (2020). Victims’ goal understanding, uncertainty reduction, and perceptions in cyberbullying: Theoretical evidence from three experiments. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25, 253–273. http://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaa005
43.
ReijntjesA.KamphiusJ. H.PrinzieP.TelchM. J. (2010). Peer victimization and internalizing problems in children: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34, 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.07.009
44.
RiversI. (2001). Retrospective reports of school bullying: Stability of recall and its implications for research. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19, 129–142.
45.
RobinsonM. D.CloreG. (2002). Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 934–960. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.128.6.934
46.
SchenkA. M.FremouwM. J.KeelanC. M. (2013). Characteristics of college cyberbullies. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2320–2327.
47.
SchreierA.WolkeD.ThomasK.HorwoodJ.HollisC.GunnellD.LewisG.ThompsonA.ZammitS.DuffyL.SalviG.HarrisonG. (2009). Prospective study of peer victimization in childhood and psychotic symptoms in a nonclinical population at age 12 years. Archives of General Psychiatry, 66, 527–536. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.23
48.
SmithP. K. (2019). Research on cyberbullying: Strengths and limitations. In VandeboschH.GreenL. (Eds.), Narratives in research and interventions on cyberbullying among young people (pp. 9–27). Springer.
SticcaF.PerrenS. (2013). Is cyberbullying worse than traditional bullying? Examining the differential roles of medium, publicity, and anonymity for the perceived severity of bullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 739–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9867-3
51.
TaylorS. E.CrockerJ. (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing. In HigginsE. T.HermanC. P.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 1., pp. 89–134). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52.
Troop-GordonW. (2017). Peer victimization in adolescence: The nature, progression, and consequences of being bullied within a developmental context. Journal of Adolescence, 55, 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.12.012
53.
TroyA. S.ShallcrossA. J.MaussI. B. (2013). A person-by-situation approach to emotion regulation: Cognitive reappraisal can either help or hurt, depending on the context. Psychological Science, 24, 2505–2514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613496434
54.
van DamD.van der VenE.VelthorstE.SeltenJ.MorganC.De HaanL. (2012). Childhood bullying and the association with psychosis in non-clinical and clinical samples: A review and meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 42, 2463–2474. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291712000360
55.
VangelistiA. L.YoungS. L.Carpenter-TheuneK. E.AlexanderA. L. (2005). Why does it hurt? The perceived causes of hurt feelings. Communication Research, 32, 443–477.
56.
VarjasK.TalleyJ.MeyersP. L.CuttsH. (2010). High school students’ perceptions of motivations for cyberbullying: An exploratory study. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 11, 269–273.
57.
VolkA. A.VeenstraR.EspelageD. L. (2017). So you want to study bullying? Recommendations to enhance the validity, transparency, and compatibility of bullying research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 36, 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.07.003
58.
WatsonD. (2000). Mood and temperament. Guilford Press.
59.
WilsonS. R. (2002). Seeking and resisting compliance: Why people say what they do when trying to influence others. SAGE.
60.
ZychI.TtofiM. M.LlorentV. J.FarringtonD. P.RibeaudD.EisnerM. P. (2018). A longitudinal study on stability and transitions among bullying roles. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13195
