Accuracy and bias in perceptions of relationship authenticity

Abstract

Impressions regarding the attributes of romantic partners play an important role in shaping attributions for relationship-relevant behaviors, but these perceptions are a mix of fact and fiction. In the light of recent work demonstrating the importance of authenticity in relationships, the present study examined these accuracy and bias in perceptions of authenticity among dating and married couples. Ratings of self- and perceived-partner authenticity were obtained from 107 heterosexual couples and subjected to Truth-and-Bias analysis using Bayesian Structural Equations Modeling (SEM). Analyses revealed that perceptions of partners’ willingness to increase intimacy were both accurate and subject to assumed-similarity bias, whereas perceptions of partners’ aversion to deception showed no evidence of accuracy but were strongly influenced by assumed-similarity.

Keywords

accuracy authenticity bias interpersonal perception relationships truth and bias

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barrett-Lennard

G. T.

(1998). Carl Rogers’ helping system: Journey and substance. London, UK: SAGE.

Cohen

Tyler

(2016). Examining perceived distance and personal authenticity as mediators of the effects of ghost-tweeting on parasocial interaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19, 342–246.

De La Ronde

Swann

W. B.

(1998). Partner verification: Restoring shattered images of our intimates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 374–382.

Faul

Erdfelder

Buchner

Lang

A.-G.

(2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160.

Fletcher

Kerr

(2010). Through the eyes of love: Reality and illusion in intimate relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 627–658. doi:10.1037/a0019792

Gange

Lydon

(2004). Bias and accuracy in close relationships: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 322–338.

Gill

(2015). Bayesian methods: A social and behavioral sciences approach (3rd ed.). New York, NY: CRC Press.

Kenny

(1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Kenny

. (1996). Models of non-independence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 279–294.

10.

Kenny

Acitelli

(2001). Accuracy and bias in the perception of the partner in a close relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 439–448.

11.

Kernis

(2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 1–26.

12.

Kernis

Goldman

(2006). A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. In Zanna

M. P.

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 284–357). New York, NY: Academic Press.

13.

Lopez

Rice

(2006). Perliminary development and validation of a measure of relationship authenticity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 362–371.

14.

Murray

Derrick

Leder

Holmes

(2008). Balancing connectedness and self-protection goals in close relationships: A levels-of-processing perspective on risk regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 429–459.

15.

Murray

Holmes

(1997). A leap of faith? Positive illusions in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 586–604.

16.

Murray

Holmes

Griffin

(1996a). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 79–98.

17.

Murray

Holmes

Griffin

(1996b). The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind, but prescient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1155–1180.

18.

Muthén

. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

19.

Overall

Fletcher

Kenny

(2012). When bias and insecurity promote accuracy: Mean-level bias and tracking accuracy in couples conflict discussions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 642–655.

20.

Overall

Fletcher

Simpson

Fillo

(2015). Attachment insecurity, biased perceptions of romantic partners’ negative emptions, and hostile relationship behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 730–749.

21.

Sheldon

Ryan

Rawsthorne

Ilardi

(1997). Trait self and trues self: Cross-role variation in the Big-Five personality traits and its relations with psychological authenticity and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1380–1393.

22.

Swann

W. B.

De La Ronde

Hixon

J. G.

(1994). Authenticity and positivity strivings in marriage and courtship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 857–869.

23.

Tou

Baker

Hadden

Lin

(2015). The real me: Authenticity, interpersonal goals, and conflict tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 189–194.

24.

West

Kenny

(2011). Truth and bias model of judgment. Psychological Review, 118, 357–378.

25.

Wickham

(2013). Authenticity in romantic partners. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 878–887.

26.

Wickham

Reed

Williamson

(2015). Establishing the psychometric properties of the self and perceived-partner Authenticity in Relationships Scale-Short Form (AIRS-SF): Measurement invariance, reliability, and incremental validity. Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 62–67.

27.

Wickham

Warren

Reed

Matsumoto

(2018). Attachment and perceived authenticity across relationship domains: A latent variable decomposition of the ECR-RS. Journal of Research in Personality, 77, 126–132.

28.

Wickham

Williamson

Beard

Kobayashi

Hirst

(2016). Authenticity attenuates the negative effects of interpersonal conflict on daily well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 60, 56–62.

29.

Wood

Linley

P. A.

Maltby

Baliousis

Joseph

(2008). The authentic personality: A theoretical and empirical conceptualization and the development of the Authenticity Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55, 385.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.46 MB