Competition for mates is a primary social psychological conflict. One may acquire a mate by promoting oneself by highlighting features that the opposite sex has evolved to desire in mates. One may also attack competitors, in an attempt to reduce their perceived mate value. The effectiveness judgment of 24 separate self-promotion and competitor derogation tactics were studied in two samples of Norwegian undergraduates (n = 270 and n = 350) using a Sex of Actor by Mating Context (short-term and long-term) factorial design. Analyses of covariates (controlling for sociosexuality, sex of participant, and relationship status) replicate the original findings of Schmitt and Buss ((1996) Strategic self-promotion and competitor derogation: Sex and context effects on the perceived effectiveness of mate attraction tactics, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1185–1204) in one of the world’s most gender-egalitarian culture. This suggests that sexual strategies theory predicts mate acquisition behavior cross-culturally.
ArcherJ. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291–322.
2.
Bleske-RechekA.BussD. M. (2006). Sexual strategies pursued and mate attraction tactics deployed. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1299–1311.
3.
BushmanB. J.HuesmannR. (2010). Aggression. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 833–863). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
4.
BussD. M. (1987). Love acts: The evolutionary biology of love. In SternbergR. J.BarnesM. F. (Eds.), The psychology of love (pp. 100–118). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5.
BussD. M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 616–628.
6.
BussD. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.
7.
BussD. M. (1991). Conflict in married couples: Personality predictors of anger and upset. Journal of Personality, 59, 663–703.
8.
BussD. M. (2003). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating (revised ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
9.
BussD. M. (2013). Sexual jealousy. Psychological Topics, 22, 155–182.
10.
BussD. M.AbbottM.AngleitnerA.AsherianA.BiaggioA., and 45 coauthors. (1990). International preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 5–47.
11.
BussD. M.DeddenL. A. (1990). Derogation of competitors. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 395–422.
12.
BussD. M.DuntleyJ. D. (2008). Adaptations for exploitation. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 12, 53–62.
13.
BussD. M.LarsenR. J.WestenD.SemmelrothJ. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3, 251–255.
14.
BussD. M.SchmittD. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.
15.
BussD. M.ShackelfordT. K. (2008). Attractive women want it all: Good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 134–146.
16.
CampbellA. (2008). The morning after the night before: Affective reactions to one-night stands among mated and unmated women and men. Human Nature, 19, 157–173.
17.
ClarkM. S.LemayE. P.Jr. (2010). Close relationships. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 898–940). Hoboken, NJ: John wiley & Sons.
18.
ClarkR. D.HatfieldE. (1989). Gender differences in receptivity to sexual offers. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 2, 39–55.
19.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hilldale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
20.
ConleyT. D. (2011). Perceived proposer personality characteristics and gender differences in acceptance of casual sex offers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 309–329.
21.
DalyM.WilsonM.WeghorstS. J. (1982). Male sexual jealousy. Ethology and Sociobiology, 3, 11–27.
22.
DarwinC. (1871). The decent of man and selection in relation to sex. London, England: Murray.
23.
EaglyA. H.WoodW. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior. American Psychologist, 54, 408–423.
24.
EastwickP. W.FinkelE. J. (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 245–264.
25.
EastwickP. W.LuchiesL. B.FinkelE. J.HuntL. L. (2014). The predictive validity of ideal partner preferences: A review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 623–665.
26.
FernandesH. B. F.KennairL. E. O.HutzC. S.NatividadeJ. C.KrugerD. J. (Manuscript submitted for publication). Are negative post-coital emotions dysfunctional? Relationships with sexual strategies, reputations, and mate quality in three nations.
27.
FisherM.CoxA.GordonF. (2009). Self-promotion versus competitor derogation: The influence of sex and romantic relationship status on intrasexual competition strategy selection. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 287–308.
28.
FrederickD. A.HaseltonM. G. (2007). Why is muscularity sexy? Tests of the fitness indicator hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1167–1183.
29.
GalperinA.HaseltonM. G.FrederickD. A.PooreJ.von HippelW.BussD. M.GonzagaG. C. (2013). Sexual regret: Evidence for evolved sex differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1145–1161.
30.
GangestadS. W.BussD. M. (1993). Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 89–96.
31.
GangestadS. W.HaseltonM. G.BussD. M. (2006). Evolutionary foundations of cultural variation: Evoked culture and mate preferences. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 75–95.
32.
GangestadS. W.ScheydG. J. (2005). The evolution of human physical attractiveness. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 523–548.
33.
GangestadS. W.ThornhillR. (1997). Human sexual selection and developmental stability. In SimpsonJ. A.KenrickD. T. (Eds.), Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 169–195). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34.
GoetzC. D.EastonJ. A.BussD. M. (2013). Women’s perceptions of sexual exploitability cues and their link to sexual attractiveness. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 999–1008.
35.
GoetzC. D.EastonJ. A.LewisD. M. G.BussD. M. (2012). Sexual exploitability: Observable cues and their link to sexual attraction. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 417–426.
36.
GreerA. E.BussD. M. (1994). Tactics for promoting sexual encounters. Journal of Sex Research, 31, 185–201.
37.
GrøntvedtT. V.KennairL. E. O. (2013). Age preferences in a gender egalitarian society. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 7, 239–249.
38.
HaseltonM. G. (2003). The sexual overperception bias: Evidence of a systematic bias in men from a survey of naturally occuring events. Journal of Reseach in Personality, 37, 34–47.
39.
HaseltonM. G.BussD. M. (2001). Emotional reactions following first-time sexual intercourse: The affective shift hypothesis. Personal Relationships, 8, 357–369.
40.
HaseltonM. G.GalperinA. (2013). Error management in relationships. In SimpsonJ. A.CampbellL. (Eds.), Handbook of close relationships (pp. 234–254). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
41.
HausmannR.TysonL. D.ZahidiS. (2011). The global gender gap report 2011. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
IoannidisJ. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med, 2, e124. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
44.
KennairL. E. O.BendixenM. (2012). Sociosexuality as predictor of sexual harassment and coercion in female and male high school students. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 479–490.
45.
KennairL. E. O.NordeideJ.AndreassenS.StrønenJ.PallesenS. (2011). Sex differences in jealousy: A study from Norway. Nordic Psychology, 61, 20–34.
46.
KennairL. E. O.SchmittD. P.FjeldavliY. L.HarlemS. K. (2009). Sex differences in sexual desires and attitudes in Norwegian samples. Interpersona, 3, 1–32.
47.
KenrickD. T.KeefeR. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 75–91.
48.
LiN. P.YongJ. C.TovW.SngO.FletcherG. J. O.ValentineK. A.,…BallietD. (2013). Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 757–776.
49.
LippaR. A. (2010). Sex differences in personality traits and gender-related occupational preferences across 53 nations: Testing evolutionary and social-environmental theories. Achieves of Sexual Behavior, 39, 619–636.
50.
NisbettR. E.WilsonT. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal report on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.
51.
OkamiP.ShackelfordT. K. (2001). Human sex differences in sexual psychology and behavior. Annual Review of Sex Research, 12, 186–241.
52.
PenkeL.AsendorpfJ. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1113–1135.
53.
RudmanL. A.FetterolfJ. C.SanchezD. T. (2013). What motivates the sexual double standard? More support for male versus female control theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 250–263.
54.
SchmittD. P. (2002). A meta-analysis of sex differences in romantic attraction: Do rating contexts moderate tactic effectiveness judgments?British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 387–402.
55.
SchmittD. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 247–311.
56.
SchmittD. P. (2012). When the difference is in the details: A critique of Zentner and Mitura (2012) “Stepping out of the Caveman's Shadow: Nations’ gender gap predicts degree of sex differentiation in mate preferences”. Evolutionary Psychology, 10, 720–726.
57.
SchmittD. P., 118 Members of the International Sexuality Description Project. (2003). Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: Tests from 2 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands. Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 85–104.
58.
SchmittD. P.BussD. M. (1996). Strategic self-promotion and competitor derogation: Sex and context effects on the perceived effectiveness of mate attraction tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1185–1204.
59.
SchmittD. P.JonasonP. K.ByerleyG. J.FloresS. D.IllbeckB. E.O’LearyK. N.QudratA. (2012). A reexamination of sex differences in sexuality: New studies reveal old truths. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 135–139.
60.
SchmittD. P.ShackelfordT. K.DuntleyJ.TookeW.BussD. M.FisherM. L.,…VaseyP. (2002). Is there an early-30's peak in female sexual desire? Cross-sectional evidence from the United States and Canada. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 11, 1–18.
61.
ShackelfordT. K.SchmittD. P.BussD. M. (2005). Universal dimensions of human mate preferenes. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 447–458.
62.
SimpsonJ. A.GangestadS. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870–883.
63.
SimpsonJ. A.GangestadS. W. (1992). Sociosexuality and romantic partner choice. Journal of Personality, 60, 31–51.
64.
SurbeyM. K.ConohanC. D. (2000). Willingness to engage in casual sex: The role of parental qualities and perceived risk of aggression. Human Nature, 11, 367–386.
65.
SymonsD. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
66.
ThornhillR.GangestadS. W. (2008). The evolutionary biology of human female sexuality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
67.
TriversR. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In CampbellB. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871-1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
68.
WoodW.EaglyA. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origin of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699–727.
69.
WoodW.EaglyA. H. (2007). Social structural origins of sex differences in human mating. In GangestadS. W.SimpsonJ. A. (Eds.), The evolution of mind: Fundamental questions and controversies (pp. 383–391). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
