This article explores the potential relevance of chaos theory in understanding development and change in romantic relationships. Chaos theory implies that relationship development may not be linear, that relationships may quickly and spontaneously shift to different states and relational patterns, and that predicting their future state may be problematic. Furthermore, chaos theory generates several methodological and statistical issues for relationship studies. The application of chaos theory may increase the understanding of relation- ships as it stimulates a renewed emphasis on relationships as process, a moving from concern with predictability to emerging patterns, seeing variability as normal, and the recognition of the need for multiple perspectives and methods in studying relational development.
Acitelli, L. K. (1995). Disciplines at parallel play. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 589-596.
2.
Acitelli, L. K. , & Duck, S. (1987). Intimacy as the proverbial elephant. In D. Perlman & S. Duck (Eds.), Intimate relationships: Development, dynamics, and deterioration (pp. 297-308). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Almeida, D. M. , Wethington, E., & Chandler, A. L. (1999). Daily transmission of tensions between marital dyads and parent-child dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 49-61.
4.
Baker, G. L. , & Gollub, J. P. (1990). Chaotic dynamics: An introduction. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Baron, R. M. , Amazeen, P. G., & Beek, P. J. (1994). Local and global dynamics of social relations. In R. R. Vallacher & A. Nowak (Eds.), Dynamical systems in social psychology (pp. 111-138). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6.
Barton, S. (1994). Chaos, self-organization, and psychology. American Psychologist, 49, 5-14.
7.
Baxter, L. A. (1994). A dialogic approach to relationship maintenance. In D. J. Canary & L. Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 233-254). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
8.
Baxter, L. A. , & Bullis, C. (1986). Turning points in developing romantic relationships. Human Communication Research, 12, 469-493.
9.
Baxter, L. A. , & Montgomery, B. M. (1997). Rethinking communication in personal relationships from a dialectic perspective. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (2nd ed., pp. 325-349). New York: Wiley.
10.
Belsky, J. , & Kelly, J. (1994). The transition to parenthood: How a first child changes a marriage. London: Vermilion.
11.
Berscheid, E. (1986). Mea culpas and lamentations: Sir Francis, Sir Isaac and the `slow progress of soft psychology'. In R. Gilmour & S. W. Duck (Eds.), The emerging field of personal relationships (pp. 267-286). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
Buder, E. H. (1996). Dynamics of speech processes in dyadic interaction. In J. A. Watt & C. A. VanLear (Eds.), Dynamic patterns in communication processes (pp. 301-325). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Bullis, C. , Clark, C., & Stine, R. (1993). From passion to commitment: Turning points in romantic relationships. In P. Kalbfieisch (Ed.), Interpersonal communication: Evolving interpersonal relationships (pp. 213-236). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
Burleson, B. R. , & Denton, W. H. (1997). The relationship between communication skills and marital satisfaction: Some moderating effects. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 884-902.
15.
Cambel, A. B. (1993). Applied chaos theory: A paradigm for complexity. Boston: Academic Press.
16.
Doherty, W. J. (1986). Quanta, quarks, and families: Implications of quantum physics for family research. Family Process, 25, 249-263.
17.
Duck, S. W. (1982). A topography of relationship disengagement and dissolution. In S. W. Duck (Ed.), Personal relationships, 4: Dissolving personal relationships (pp. 1-30). New York: Academic Press.
18.
Duck, S. W. (1994). Meaningful relationships: Talking, sense, and relating. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Duck, S. W. , & Wood, J. T. (1995). Confronting relationship challenges (Understanding relationship processes 5). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
Duke, M. P. (1994). Chaos theory and psychology: Seven propositions. Genetic, Social, & General Psychology Monographs, 120, 267-286.
21.
Erwin, H. R. (1996). The application of topological models to social system dynamics. In W. Sullis & A. Combs (Eds.), Nonlinear dynamics in human behavior (pp. 207-232). New York: World Scientific.
22.
Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Viking Penguin.
23.
Goldstein, J. (1996). Causality and emergence in chaos and complexity theories. In W. Sullis & A. Combs (Eds.), Nonlinear dynamics in human behavior (pp. 161-190). New York: World Scientific.
24.
Gottman, J. M. (1991). Chaos and regulated change in families: A metaphor for the study of transitions. In P. A. Cowan & E. M. Hetherington (Eds.), Family transitions (pp. 247-272). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25.
Gottman, J. M. (1994). Why marriages succeed or fail. New York: Simon & Schuster.
26.
Gottman, J. M. , & Levenson, R. W. (1985). A valid measure for obtaining self-report of affect. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 151-160.
27.
Gottman, J. , Swanson, C., & Murray, J. (1999). The mathematics of marital conflict: Dynamic mathematical nonlinear modeling of newlywed marital interaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 3-19.
28.
Graham, E. E. (1997). Turning points and commitment in post-divorce relationships. Communication Monographs, 64, 350-368.
29.
Gragnani, A. , Rinaldi, S., & Feichtinger, G. (1997). Cyclic dynamics in romantic relationships. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 7, 2611-2619.
30.
Heaton, T. B. , & Call, V. R. A. (1995). Modeling family dynamics with event history techniques. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 1078-1090.
31.
Heiby, E. M. (1995). Chaos theory, nonlinear dynamical models, and psychological assessment. Psychological Assessment, 7, 5-9.
32.
Honeycutt, J. M. , Woods, B. L., & Fontenot, K. (1993). The endorsement of communication conflict rules as a function of engagement, marriage and marital ideology. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 285-304.
33.
Johnson, E. M. , & Huston, T. L. (1998). The perils of love, or why wives adapt to husbands during the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60,195-204.
34.
Jones, F. J. (1995). The structure of Petrarch's Canzoniere. Cambridge, UK: Brewer.
35.
Kauffman, S. A. (1991). Antichaos and adaptation. Scientific American, 265, 78-84.
36.
Kincanon, E. , & Powel, W. (1995). Chaotic analysis in psychology and psychoanalysis. The Journal of Psychology, 129, 495-505.
37.
Knapp, M. L. (1984). Interpersonal communication and human relationships. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
38.
Kupper, Z. , & Hoffmann, H. (1996). Logical attractors: A Boolean approach to the dynamics of psychosis. In W. Sullis & A. Combs (Eds.), Nonlinear dynamics in human behavior (pp. 296-315). New York: World Scientific.
39.
LeMay, P. , Dauwalder, J-P., Pomini, V., & Bersier, M. (1996). Quality of life: A dynamic perspective. In W. Sullis & A. Combs (Eds.), Nonlinear dynamics in human behavior (pp. 276-295). New York: World Scientific.
40.
Levine, R. L. , & Fitzgerald, H. E. (1992). Analysis of dynamic psychological systems (Vols. 1 & 2). New York: Plenum Press.
41.
Levinger, G. (1980). Toward the analysis of close relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 510-544.
42.
Lloyd, S. A. , Cate, R. M., & Henton, J. M. (1984). Predicting premarital relationship stability: A methodological refinement. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 71-76.
43.
Lorenz, E. (1979). On the prevalence of aperiodicity in simple systems. In J. Mgrmela & J. Marsden (Eds.), Global analysis (pp. 53-75). New York: Springer.
44.
Masheter, C. (1997). Healthy and unhealthy friendship and hostility between ex-spouses. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 463-475.
45.
McCubbin, H. I. , McCubbin, M. A., & Thompson, A. I. (1993). Resiliency in families: The role of family schema and appraisal in family adaptation to crises. In T. H. Brubaker (Ed.), Family relations: Challenges for the future (pp. 153-177). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46.
Nowak, A. , & Lewenstein, M. (1994). Dynamical systems: A tool for social psychology? In R. R. Vallacher & A. Nowak (Eds.), Dynamical systems in social psychology (pp. 17-53). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
47.
Nowak, A. , & Vallacher, R. R. (1998). Dynamical social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.
48.
Parry, A. (1996). Love is a strange attractor: Therapy at the edge of chaos. In W. Sullis & A. Combs (Eds.), Nonlinear dynamics in human behavior (pp. 235-255). New York: World Scientific.
49.
Rinaldi, S. (1998). Laura and Petrarch: An intriguing case of cyclical love dynamics. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 58, 1205-1221.
50.
Robinson, L. C. , & Blanton, P. W. (1993). Marital strengths in enduring marriages. Family Relations, 42, 38-45.
51.
Roloff, M. E. , & Colvin, D. H. (1994). When partners transgress: Maintaining violated relationships. In D. J. Canary & L. Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 23-43). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
52.
Scheier, C. , & Tschacher, W. (1996). Appropriate algorithms for nonlinear time series. In W. Sulils & A. Combs (Eds.), Nonlinear dynamics in human behavior (pp. 27-43). New York: World Scientific.
53.
Shimonoff, S. B. (1980). Communication rules: Theory and research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
54.
Stamp, G. (1994). The appropriation of the parental role through communication during the transition to parenthood. Communication Monographs, 61, 89-112.
55.
Surra, C. A. , & Hughes, D. K. (1997). Commitment processes in accounts of the development of premarital relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 5-21.
56.
Tesser, A. , & Achee, J. (1994). Aggression, love, conformity, and other social psychological catastrophes. In R. R. Vallacher & A. Nowak (Eds.), Dynamical systems in social psychology (pp. 95-109). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
57.
Thelen, E. (1990). Dynamical systems and the generation of individual differences. In J. Colombo & J. Fagen (Eds.), Individual differences in infancy: Reliability, stability, prediction (pp. 19-43). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
58.
Thelen, E. , & Ulrich, B. D. (1991). Hidden skills: A dynamic systems analysis of treadmill stepping during the first year. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Serial No. 223, Vol. 56.
59.
Trickett, E. J. , & Buchanan, R. M. (1997). The role of personal relationships in transitions: Contributions of an ecological perspective. In S. W. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (2nd ed., pp. 575-593). New York: Wiley.
60.
VanLear, C. A. (1996). Communication process approaches and models: Patterns, cycles, and dynamic coordination. In J. H. Watt & C. A. VanLear (Eds.), Dynamic patterns in communication processes (pp. 35-70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61.
Veroff, J. , Young, A. M., & Coon, H. M. (1997). The early years of marriage. In S. W. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (2nd ed., pp. 431-450). New York: Wiley.
62.
Ward, M. (1995). Butterflies and bifurcations: Can chaos theory contribute to our understanding of family systems?Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 629-638.
63.
Watt, J. H. , & VanLear, C. A. (1995). Dynamic patterns in communication processes. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64.
Wood, J. T. (1982). Communication and relational culture: Bases for the study of human relationships. Communication Quarterly, 30,75-85.
65.
Wood, J. T. (1995). Relational communication: Continuity and change in personal relationships. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
66.
Wynne, L. C. (1984). The epigenesis of relational systems: A model for understanding family development. Family Process, 23, 297-318.
67.
Yerby, J. , Buerkel-Rothfuss, N., & Bochner, A. P. (1995). Understanding family communication. Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
68.
Young, T. R. (1991). Chaos theory and symbolic interaction theory: Poetics for the postmodern sociologist. Symbolic Interaction, 14, 321-334.
