The current study sought to examine the perceived centrality or importance of six basic contradictions in the turning points of relationship development for heterosexual romantic pairs. A modified Retrospective Interview Technique was employed to elicit respondent accounts of the turning points of their relationship. For our sample of 100 males and females, drawn from 50 heterosexual romantic couples, the contradictions of Autonomy-Connection and Openness-Closedness were attributed greatest importance across a wide range of turning-point event types. The perceived importance of three other contradictions (Inclusion-Seclusion, Revelation-Concealment, and Predictability-Novelty) was localized in particular turning-point events. The contradiction of Conventionality-Uniqueness was lowest in perceived importance across turning point types.
Altman, I. , Vinsel, A., & Brown, B. (1981). Dialectic conceptions in social psychology: An application to social penetration and privacy regulation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 107-160.
2.
Baxter, L. A. (1990). Dialectical contradictions in relationship development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 69-88.
3.
Baxter, L. A. (1993). The social side of personal relationships: A dialectical analysis. In S. Duck (Ed.), Social context and relationships (pp. 139-165). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4.
Baxter, L. A. , & Bullis, C. (1986). Turning points in developing romantic relationships. Human Communication Research, 12, 469-493.
5.
Baxter, L. A. , Mazanec, M., Nicholson, J., Pittman, G., Smith, K., & West, L. (1997). Everyday loyalties and betrayals in personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 655-678.
6.
Baxter, L.A. , & Montgomery, B.M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York: Guilford Press.
7.
Baxter, L. A. , & Montgomery, B. M. (1998). A guide to dialectical approaches to studying personal relationships. In B. M. Montgomery & L. A. Baxter (Eds.), Dialectical approaches to studying personal relationships (pp. 1-16). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
Baxter, L. A. , & Simon, E. P. (1993). Relationship maintenance strategies and dialectical contradiction in personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 225-242.
9.
Baxter, L. A. , & Widenmann, W. (1993). Revealing and not revealing the status of romantic relationships to social networks. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 321-338.
10.
Bochner, A. P. (1984). The functions of communication in interpersonal bonding. In C. Arnold & J. Bowers (Eds.), Handbook of rhetorical and communication theory (pp. 544-621). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
11.
Bolton, C. D. (1961). Mate selection as the development of a relationship. Marriage and Family Living, 23, 234-240.
12.
Bullis, C. , Clark, C., & Sline, R. (1993). From passion to commitment: Turning points in romantic relationships. In P. Kalbfleisch (Ed.), Interpersonal communication: Evolving interpersonal relationships (pp. 213-236). Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
13.
Cate, R. M. , & Lloyd, S. A. (1992). Courtship. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
Conville, R. L. (1983). Second-order development in interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 9, 195-207.
15.
Conville, R. L. (1988). Relational transitions: An inquiry into their structure and function. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 423-437.
16.
Conville, R. L. (1991). Relational transitions: The evolution of personal relationships. New York: Praeger.
17.
Conville, R. L. (1998). Telling stories: Dialectics of relational transition. In B. M. Montgomery & L. A. Baxter (Eds.), Dialectical approaches to studying personal relationships (pp. 17-40). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18.
Cornforth, M. (1968). Materialism and the dialectical method. New York: International Publishers.
19.
Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20.
Goldsmith, D. (1990). A dialectic perspective on the expression of autonomy and connection in romantic relationships. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 54, 537-556.
21.
Graham, E. E. (1997). Turning points and commitment in post-divorce relationships. Communication Monographs, 64, 350-368.
22.
Huston, T. L. , Surra, C. A., Fitzgerald, N. M., & Cate, R. M. (1981). From courtship to marriage: Mate selection as an interpersonal process. In S. Duck & R. Gilmour (Eds.), Personal relationships 2: Developing personal relationships (pp. 53-90). New York: Academic Press.
23.
Lloyd, S. A. , & Cate, R. M. (1985). Attributions associated with significant turning points in premarital relationship development and dissolution. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 419-436.
24.
Montgomery, B. M. , & Baxter, L. A. (Eds.). (1998). Dialectical approaches to studying personal relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25.
Norusis, M. J./SPSS (1993). SPSS for Windows: Advanced statistics release 6.0. Chicago: SPSS.
26.
Rawlins, W. K. (1983a). Negotiating close friendships: The dialectic of conjunctive freedoms. Human Communication Research, 9, 255-266.
27.
Rawlins, W. K. (1983b). Openness as problematic in ongoing friendships: Two conversational dilemmas. Communication Monographs, 50, 1-13.
28.
Rawlins, W. K. (1989). A dialectical analysis of the tensions, functions and strategic challenges of communication in young adult friendships. Communication Yearbook, 12, 157-189.
29.
Rawlins, W. K. (1992). Friendship matters: Communication, dialectics, and the life course. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
30.
Surra, C. A. (1985). Courtship types: Variations in interdependence between partners and social networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 357-375.
31.
Surra, C. A. (1987). Reasons for changes in commitment: Variations by courtship style. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 17-33.
32.
Surra, C. A. (1990). Research and theory on mate selection and premarital relationships in the 1980s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 844-865.
33.
Surra, C. A. , Arizzi, P., & Asmussen, L. A. (1988). The association between reasons for commitment and the development and outcome of marital relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 47-63.
34.
Surra, C. A. , & Hughes, D. K. (1997). Commitment processes in accounts of the development of premarital relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 5-21.
35.
Werner, C. M. , & Baxter, L. A. (1994). Temporal qualities of relationships: Organismic, transactional, and dialectical views. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of inter-personal communication (2nd ed., pp. 323-379). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
