Digital inclusion: Lived experiences of students with visual impairment accessibility to web-based information in higher education institutions of Ethiopia

Abstract

This study sought to explore the web-based information accessibility experiences of students with visual impairment (SVIs) enrolled in two senior universities in Ethiopia. To achieve this, the study used a descriptive phenomenological design. A total of 11 undergraduate fourth-year SVIs, 5 from Haramaya University and 6 from Addis Ababa University, were purposively chosen for the study. Using semi-structured interviews and Colaizzi’s method of data analysis, four overarching themes were generated inductively: web capability experience, social connection, venue of academic achievement, and disabling web environment. Accordingly, the study came with variations in the capability to access web-based information among SVIs observed due to differences in foreknowledge on basic computers and exposure to web interfaces. Routine use of social media, technical, and material support, and follow-up improves the SVIs’ website browsing ability, resulting in a sense of academic agency, social competence, and persistent ingenuity to academic success. However, complex web designs, incompatible assistive technologies (ATs), inaccessible document formats, poor infrastructure, and undifferentiated information flux on the website create a disabling web environment for SVIs, promoting inequality in web-based information access and hence academic achievement. Thus, findings from this inquiry necessitate universities to work to make web designs accessible and compatible with ATs, provide technical and material support to SVIs based on the severity of their impairment, improve infrastructure, and encourage them to regularly practice website use for academic purposes.

Keywords

Accessibility Colaizzi’s analysis strategy descriptive phenomenology university visual impairment web-based information

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adetoro

(2010). Reading interest and information needs of persons with visual impairment in Nigeria. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 76(1), 49–56.

Agangiba

M. A.

Nketiah

E. B.

Agangiba

W. A.

(2017, September). Web accessibility for the visually impaired: A case of higher education institutions’ websites in Ghana. In Xie

Popescu

Hancke

Fernández Manjón

(Eds.), International conference on web-based learning (pp. 147–153). Springer.

Ahmed

M. R.

Naveed

M. A.

(2021). Information accessibility for visually impaired students. Pakistan Journal of Information Management and Libraries, 22, 16–36.

Aikaterini

Papadopoulos

(2022). Facebook usage and quality of life of individuals with visual impairments. British Journal of Visual Impairment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/02646196221117644

Akcil

(2018). The use of mobile learning for visually impaired learners’ school in tolerance education contents. Quality & Quantity, 52(2), 969–982.

Alase

(2017). The interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA): A guide to a good qualitative research approach. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 5(2), 9–19.

Alim

(2021). Web accessibility of the top research-intensive universities in the UK. SAGE Open, 11(4), 21582440211056614.

Araluc

H. A.

(2002). Teaching English to blind and visually impaired young learners: The affective factor [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. https://www.proquest.com/openview/c0b0dc14da5aa569885602bc4346d9b5/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y

Awoke

Tekalign

Teshome, G

Lenjebo

T. L.

Dendir

Obsa

M. S.

Bekele

M. L.

(2022). Visual impairment in Ethiopia: Systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Visual Impairment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/02646196221145358

10.

Berget

MacFarlane

(2020). What is known about the impact of impairments on information-seeking and searching? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(5), 596–611.

11.

Berry

Depaepe

Driel

J. V.

(2016). Pedagogical content knowledge in teacher education. In Loughran

Hamilton

(Eds.), International handbook of teacher education (pp. 347–386). Springer.

12.

Best

J. W.

Khan

J. V.

(2006). Research in education. Pearson Education.

13.

Bevan

M. T.

(2014). A method of phenomenological interviewing. Qualitative Health Research, 24(1), 136–144.

14.

Bohman

(2005). Critical theory. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2005/entries/critical-theory/

15.

Bohman

Derrida

Fraser

Habermas

Hohendahl

P. U.

Huyssen

Strathausen

(2005). Globalizing critical theory. Rowman & Littlefield.

16.

Boussarhan

Daoudi

(2014). The accessibility of Moroccan public websites: Evaluation of three e-government websites. Electronic Journal of E-government, 12(1), 67.

17.

Brandes

Wagner

(2004). Analysis and visualization of social networks. In Jünger

Mutzel

(Eds.), Graph drawing software (pp. 321–340). Springer.

18.

Brinkley

Tabrizi

(2017, September). A desktop usability evaluation of the Facebook mobile interface using the jaws screen reader with blind users. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 61(1), 828–832.

19.

Brophy

Craven

(2007). Web accessibility. Library Trends, 55(4), 950–972.

20.

Cohen

Manion

Morrison

(2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). https://gtu.ge/Agro-Lib/RESEARCH%20METHOD%20COHEN%20ok.pdf

21.

Colaizzi

P. F.

(1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In Valle

R. S.

King

(Eds.), Existential phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 48–71). Plenum.

22.

Creswell

J. W.

(2007). Qualitative inquiry& research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE.

23.

Creswell

J. W.

(2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE.

24.

Degener

Koster-Dreese

(Eds.). (2021). Human rights and disabled persons: Essays and relevant human rights instruments. BRILL.

25.

Delele

G. M.

(2019). Web accessibility of the Ethiopian governmental websites [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Near East University, Nicosia.

26.

Devlin

R. F.

Pothier

(Eds.). (2006). Critical disability theory: Essays in philosophy, politics, policy, and law. UBC Press.

27.

Dobransky

Hargittai

(2006). The disability divide in internet access and use. Information, Communication & Society, 9(3), 313–334.

28.

Ethiopian Ministry of Technology. (2016). The national information and communication technology (ICT) Policy and Strategy.

29.

Flavián

Guinalíu

Gurrea

(2006). The role played by perceived usability, satisfaction, and consumer trust on website loyalty. Information and Management, 43(3), 1–14.

30.

Freund

Rich

(2005). Teaching students with learning problems in the inclusive classroom. Pearson Education.

31.

Goggin

(2015). Communication rights and disability online: Policy and technology after the World Summit on the Information Society. Information, Communication & Society, 18(3), 327–341.

32.

Hackett

Parmanto

(2005). A longitudinal evaluation of accessibility: Higher education websites. Internet Research, 15, 281–294.

33.

Helsper

E. J.

Van Deursen

A. J.

(2017). Do the rich get digitally richer? Quantity and quality of support for digital engagement. Information, Communication & Society, 20(5), 700–714.

34.

Henry

S. L.

Abou-Zahra

Brewer

(2014, April). The role of accessibility in a universal web. In Proceedings of the 11th web for all conference (pp. 1–4). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/78053066.pdf

35.

Hosking

D. L.

(2008, September). Critical disability theory. A Paper Presented at the 4th Biennial Disability Studies Conference, Lancaster, UK.

36.

Howitt

Cramer

(2020). Research methods in psychology. Pearson.

37.

Hytten

Bettez

S. C.

(2011). Understanding education for social justice. Educational Foundations, 25, 7–24.

38.

Kelly

S. M.

Smith

T. J.

(2008). The digital social interactions of students with visual impairments: Findings from two national surveys. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 102(9), 528–539.

39.

Koehler

M. J.

Mishra

(2005). Teachers learning technology by design. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 21(3), 94–102.

40.

Koopman

(2017). Phenomenology as a method in education research. In Koopman

(Ed.), Science education and curriculum in South Africa (pp. 1–24). Springer.

41.

Lee

M. H.

Tsai

C. C.

(2010). Exploring teachers’ perceived self-efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge with respect to educational use of the World Wide Web. Instructional Science, 38(1), 1–21.

42.

Leporini

Paternò

(2008). Applying web usability criteria for vision-impaired users: Does it improve task performance? Intl. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24(1), 17–47.

43.

Lewthwaite

(2014). Web accessibility standards and disability: Developing critical perspectives on accessibility. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36(16), 1375–1383.

44.

Lopez

K. A.

Willis

D. G.

(2004). Descriptive versus interpretive phenomenology: Their contributions to nursing knowledge. Qualitative Health Research, 14(5), 726–735.

45.

Mamo

(2016). Analysis of Ethiopia’s national ICT policy and strategy: Insights into policy issues and policy goals. Ethiopian Journal of Education and Sciences, 11(2). https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ejesc/article/view/153667

46.

McGrane

(2000). Is the web truly accessible to the disabled? http://www.cnet.com/4520-6022_1-105103-1.html?tag=feat.1

47.

Menzi-Çetin

Alemdağ

Tüzün

Yıldız

(2017). Evaluation of a university website’s usability for visually impaired students. Universal Access in the Information Society, 16(1), 151–160.

48.

Merleau-Ponty

(2010). Phenomenology of perception. Routledge.

49.

Meyer

Rose

D. H.

Gordon

(2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. https://www.cast.org/products-services/resources/2014/universal-design-learning-theory-practice-udl-meyer

50.

Ministry of Education. (2015). Guideline for establishing and managing inclusive education resource/support centers (RCs).

51.

Moore

(2000). The information needs of visually impaired people. In A review of research for the RNIB (pp. 1–63). https://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/40/library/moore-nick-rnib-report.pdf

52.

Okonji

Lhussier

Bailey

Cattan

(2015). Internet use: Perceptions and experiences of visually impaired older adults. Journal of Social Inclusion, 6(1), 120–145.

53.

Peña

E. V.

Stapleton

L. D.

Schaffer

L. M.

(2016). Critical perspectives on disability identity. New Directions for Student Services, 2016(154), 85–96.

54.

Permvattana

Armstrong

Murray

(2013). E-learning for the vision impaired: A holistic perspective. International Journal of Cyber Society and Education, 6(1), 15–30.

55.

Polkinghorne

D. E.

(1989). Phenomenological research methods. In Valle

R. S.

Halling

(Eds.), Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology (pp. 41–60). Springer.

56.

Presley

D’Andrea

F. M.

(2009). Assistive technology for students who are blind or visually impaired: An assessment guide. American Foundation for the Blind.

57.

Quainoo

M. A.

Serwornoo

M. Y. W.

Hammond

(2021). Facebook experiences of visually impaired students: A deconstruction of the challenges and benefits. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 41, 400–413.

58.

Rayini

(2017). Library and information services to visually impaired persons. Library Philosophy and Practice (E-journal), 1510. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4313&context=libphilprac#:~:text=Visually%20impaired%20user%20can%20load,by%20the%20computer%2C%20using%20a

59.

Reaume

(2014). Understanding critical disability studies. CMAJ, 186(16), 1248–1249.

60.

Richards

(2015). Chapter 2: Making qualitative data. In Richards

(Ed.), Handling qualitative data: A practical guide (3rd ed.) (pp 87–114). SAGE.

61.

Rose

D. H

(2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45–49.

62.

Rose

D. H.

Meyer

(2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

63.

Rouse

(1999). Making the WEB accessible. Computers in Libraries, 19(6), 49–53.

64.

Saleem

Shabana

T. S. Z.

Batcha

M. S.

(2013). Application and uses of Information Communication Technology (ICT) in academic libraries: An overview. International Journal of Library Science, 2(3), 49–52. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.library.20130203.01

65.

Schmetzke

(2002). Accessibility of Web-based information resources for people with disabilities. Library Hi Tech, 20, 135–136.

66.

Seale

(2013). E-learning and disability in higher education: Accessibility research and practice. Routledge.

67.

Seidman

(2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers College Press.

68.

Shneiderman

(2000). Universal usability. Communications of the ACM, 43(5), 84–91.

69.

Simui

Kasonde-Ngandu

Cheyeka

A. M.

Simwinga

Ndhlovu

(2018). Enablers and disablers to the academic success of students with visual impairment: A 10-year literature disclosure, 2007–2017. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 362(2), 163–174.

70.

Sitemorse. (2019). 2019 Q2/UK & IE universities. https://sitemorse.com/index/uk-ie-universities/2019-q2

71.

Sivak

(1996). The information that drivers use: Is it indeed 90% visual? Perception, 25(9), 1081–1089.

72.

Slatin

J. M.

Rush

(2003). Maximum accessibility: Making your website more usable for everyone. Addison-Wesley Professional.

73.

Smith

J. A.

(2011). Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis: A reply to the commentaries and further development of criteria. Health Psychology Review, 5(1), 55–61.

74.

Söderström

(2013). Digital differentiation in young people’s internet use—Eliminating or reproducing disability stereotypes. Future Internet, 5(2), 190–204.

75.

Spooner

(2014). “What page, miss?” Enhancing text accessibility with DAISY (Digital Accessible Information System). Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 108(3), 201–211.

76.

Stanley

O. E.

(2021). Information overload: Causes, symptoms, consequences and solutions. Asian Journal of Information Science and Technology, 11(2), 1–6.

77.

Stodola

J. T.

(2014). The concept of information and questions of users with visual disabilities: An epistemological approach. Journal of Documentation, 70, 782–800.

78.

Szpiro

S. F. A.

Hashash

Zhao

Azenkot

(2016, October). How people with low vision access computing devices: Understanding challenges and opportunities. In Proceedings of the 18th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on computers and accessibility (pp. 171–180). Near East University.

79.

Taylor

S. J.

(2011). Disability studies in higher education. New Directions for Higher Education, 2011(154), 93–98.

80.

Teddlie

Tashakkori

(2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. SAGE.

81.

Tuttle

Carter

E. W.

(2022). Examining high-tech assistive technology use of students with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 116(4), 473–484.

82.

University of California. (2020). Electronic accessibility. https://www.ucop.edu/electronicaccessibility/standards-and-best-practices/

83.

Uyar

Delele

G. M.

Iseri

E. I.

(2020). Web accessibility of the federal democratic Republic of Ethiopia governmental websites. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 20(6), 144–151.

84.

Van Puffelen

. (2009). ICT-related skills and needs of blind and visually impaired people. ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing, 93, 44–48.

85.

Williams

(2021). The meaning of “phenomenology”: Qualitative and philosophical phenomenological research methods. The Qualitative Report, 26(2), 366–385.

86.

World Wide Web Consortium. (2020). Introduction to web accessibility. https://www.w3.org/WAI/fundamentals/accessibility-intro/

87.

Xie

Babu

Joo

Fuller

(2015). Using digital libraries non-visually: Understanding the help-seeking situations of blind users. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 20(2), n2.

88.

Youngblood

S. A.

(2013). Communicating web accessibility to the novice developer: From user experience to application. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 27(2), 209–232.