Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The significant challenges faced by students with visual impairments in educational settings, particularly in accessing university education, are well documented. Limited access to essential learning materials often leads to poor academic performance and increased risk of dropout. On the contrary, providing educational resources in alternative formats is essential to improving accessibility. The effectiveness of engaging students with visual impairments with graphical materials for learning in science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics has been well supported, as well as the difficulties these students face in accessing accessible images/graphics. The present study aims to compare four different forms of accessible images regarding their effectiveness and usefulness for students with visual impairments, as well as the satisfaction of students with visual impairments with these forms of accessible educational materials. These four forms are (a) verbal description of pictures, (b) pictures printed on swell/microcapsule paper, (c) embossed pictures on paper with the Tiger embosser, and (d) audio-tactile pictures. The findings of the study highlight several useful conclusions for the design and production of accessible images.

Keywords

accessibility accessible images educational material university students visual impairments

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Art Beyond Sight. (2016). Verbal description and visual language: Constructing effective and memorable mental images. https://culturalaccesscollaborative.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/2016_ABS_Description_Tips.pdf

Bacalla

Barcelonia

Gisultura

Pacatang

Romarate

Cabanilla

A. J.

(2024). Challenges and opportunities of students with visual impairment in a State University: A multi-case study. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 5, 711–720.

Beyene

W. M.

Mekonnen

A. T.

Giannoumis

G. A.

(2020). Inclusion, access, and accessibility of educational resources in higher education institutions: Exploring the Ethiopian context. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 27(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1817580

Bong

W. K.

Chen

(2021). Increasing faculty’s competence in digital accessibility for inclusive education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(2), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1937344

Brahim

H. B.

Khribi

M. K.

Jemni

(2017). Towards accessible open educational resources: Overview and challenges. In Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology and Accessibility (pp. 1–6). ICTA. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTA.2017.8336068

Butler

Holloway

Marriott

Goncu

(2017). Understanding the graphical challenges faced by vision-impaired students in Australian Universities. Higher Education Research & Development, 36, 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1177001

Collins

Azmat

Rentschler

(2018). ‘Bringing everyone on the same journey’: Revisiting inclusion in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 44(8), 1475–1487. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1450852

Dean

Lee-Post

Hapke

(2017). Universal design for learning in teaching large lecture classes. Journal of Marketing Education, 39(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475316662104

Dogucu

Johnson

A. A.

Ott

(2023). Framework for accessible and inclusive teaching materials for statistics and data science courses. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, 31(2), 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/26939169.2023.2165988

10.

Firat

(2021). Experiences of students with visual impairments in higher education: Barriers and facilitators. British Journal of Special Education, 48(3), 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12365

11.

Helena Martins

Borges

M. L.

Gonçalves

. (2017). Attitudes towards inclusion in higher education in a Portuguese University. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(5), 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1377299

12.

Hughes

(2023). Pedagogies of lived experience: The perspectives of people with disabilities on their educational presentations about disability topics. Disability Studies Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://dsq-sds.org/index.php/dsq/article/view/8120/7871; https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v42i3-4.8120

13.

Ihekwoaba

E. C.

Okwor

R. N.

Uzowulu

O. O.

(2023). Access Provision for Students with Reading Disabilities (SRDs) in Nigerian University libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(2), 102622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102622

14.

Joyner

D. A.

Goel

A. K.

Isbell

(2016). The unexpected pedagogical benefits of making higher education accessible. In Proceedings of L@S 2016: Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (pp. 117–120). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2876034.2893383

15.

Kim

H. N.

(2024). Guidance for best practices in participatory design involving people with visual impairment. Ergonomics in Design, 32(2), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/10648046211058248

16.

Koutsouris

Stentiford

Norwich

(2022). A critical exploration of inclusion policies of elite UK universities. British Educational Research Journal, 48(5), 878–895. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3799

17.

Kumar

K. L.

Wideman

(2014). Accessible by design: Applying UDL principles in a first year undergraduate course. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 44(1), 125–147. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v44i1.183704

18.

Mack

(2022). Accessible communication and materials in higher education. In Proceedings of SSETS ’22: The 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Article 91, pp. 1–6). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3517428.3550408

19.

Mattheiss

Regal

Sellitsch

Tscheligi

(2017). User-centred design with visually impaired pupils: A case study of a game editor for orientation and mobility training. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 11, 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2016.11.001

20.

McPherson

Lister

Pearson

V. K.

Colwell

Gallen

A. M.

Collins

(2019). Embedding and sustaining inclusive practices in STEM. In INTED2019 Proceedings (pp. 2717–2722). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2019.0728

21.

Moriña

(2016). Inclusive education in higher education: Challenges and opportunities. European. Journal of Special Needs Education, 32(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2016.1254964

22.

Moriña

Carballo

Castellano-Beltran

(2024). A systematic review of the benefits and challenges of technologies for the learning of University students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 39(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434231175357

23.

National Center for Accessible Media. (n.d.). Guidelines for describing STEM images. https://www.wgbh.org/guidelines-for-describing-stem-images

24.

Nganji

J. T.

(2018). Supporting the information journey of students with disabilities through accessible learning materials. Information and Learning Science, 119, 721–732. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-07-2018-0062

25.

Ntakolia

Dimas

Iakovidis

D. K.

(2022). User-centered system design for assisted navigation of visually impaired individuals in Outdoor cultural environments. Universal Access in the Information Society, 21, 249–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-020-00764-1

26.

Ortiz-Escobar

L. M.

Chavarria

M. A.

Schönenberger

Hurst

Stein

M. A.

Mugeere

Rivas Velarde

(2023). Assessing the implementation of user-centred design standards on assistive technology for persons with visual impairments: A systematic review. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences, 4, Article 1238158. https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2023.1238158

27.

Pacheco

Yoong

Lips

(2020). Transition issues in higher education and digital technologies: The experiences of students with disabilities in New Zealand. Disability & Society, 36(2), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1735305

28.

Pearson

Koppi

(2006). A pragmatic and strategic approach to supporting staff in inclusive practices for online learning. In Markauskaite

Goodyear

Reimann

(Eds.), The 23rd Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education “Who’s Learning? Whose Technology?” (pp. 639–646). Sydney University Press.

29.

Peck

Bouilheres

Brown

Witney

(2018). Because access matters: An institutional case study. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 10(2), 194–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-04-2017-0045

30.

Rosenblum

L. P.

Cheng

Beal

C. R.

(2018). Teachers of students with visual impairments share experiences and advice for supporting students in understanding graphics. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 112, 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1811200505

31.

Ruslin

Mashuri

Rasak

M. S.

Alhabsyi

Syam

(2022). Semi-structured interview: A methodological reflection on the development of a qualitative research instrument in educational studies. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 12(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-1201052229

32.

Sanderson

N. C.

Kessel

Chen

(2022). What do faculty members know about universal design and digital accessibility? A qualitative study in computer science and engineering disciplines. Universal Access in the Information Society, 21(2), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10209-022-00875-x

33.

Stone

Kay

Reynolds

Brown

(2020). 3D printing and service learning: Accessible open educational resources for students with visual impairment. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 32(2), 336–346.

34.

Tahiri

(2023). The challenges experienced by visually impaired students in Moroccan Universities. The Journal of Quality in Education, 13(22), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.37870/joqie.v13i22.391

35.

Tipi

S. K.

(2023). How screen readers impact the academic works of college and graduate students with visual impairments. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 13(3), 416–434. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1201482

36.

Villouta

E. V.

Villarreal

E. T.

(2022). University access policies for persons with disabilities: Lessons from two Chilean Universities. International Journal of Educational Development, 91, 102577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102577

37.

Wall Emerson

Anderson

. (2018). What mathematical images are in a typical mathematics textbook? Implications for students with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 112, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1811200103

38.

Zebehazy

K. T.

Wilton

A. P.

(2021). Graphic reading performance of students with visual impairments and its implication for instruction and assessment. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 115(3), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X211016918

Accessibility in pictures,graphs,and maps for students with visual impairments: In-depth assessment

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References