Visual impairments (VIs) impose many barriers to people when it comes to information access, and educational processes may offer tools for people to overcome these barriers and, consequently, develop autonomy and an active sense of citizenship. In these processes, information and communication technologies (ICTs) improve accessibility. Our aim was to use ICT, especially social media, in pedagogical activities developed for students with VI (blindness and low vision). Focus group interviews about technology use showed us that these students are heavy users of WhatsApp, an instant messenger app. We then established an online discussion group, as a community of practice, using WhatsApp as a discussion environment. This online group helped Brazilian students with VI develop social skills and discuss health issues they considered important to them.
BradyE. L.ZhongY.MorrisM. R.BighamJ. P. (2013). Investigating the appropriateness of social network question asking as a resource for blind users. In Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 1225–1236). San Antonio, TX. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2441776.2441915
5.
BRASIL, Subsecretaria Nacional de Promoção dos Direitos da Pessoa com Deficiência, & Comitê de Ajudas Técnicas. (2009). Tecnologia Assistiva [Assistive Technology]. Brasília, Brazil: CORDE. Retrieved from http://www.galvaofilho.net/livro-tecnologia-assistiva_CAT.pdf
6.
BrowneK. (2005). Snowball sampling: Using social networks to research non-heterosexual women. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 47–60. doi:10.1080/1364557032000081663
7.
CamposJ. A. D. B.ZuanonÀ. C. C. (2004). Educação em saúde: aspectos relevantes apontados por adolescentes [Health education: Important aspects as cited by adolescents]. Ciência odontológica brasileira, 7, 55–60. Retrieved from http://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/488/409
8.
CastellsM.Fernandez-ArdevolM.QiuJ. L.SeyA. (2007). Mobile communication and society: A global perspective (ebook). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
9.
CollC. V. N.AmorimT. C.HallalP. C. (2012). Percepção de adolescentes e adultos referente à influência da mídia sobre o estilo de vida [The perception of adolescents and adults of how media influences lifestyles]. Revista Brasileira de Atividade Física & Saúde, 15, 105–110. Retrieved from https://periodicos.ufpel.edu.br/ojs2/index.php/RBAFS/article/view/705
Della LíberaB.JurbergC. (2017). Teenagers with visual impairment and new media: A world without barriers. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 35, 247–256. doi:10.1177/0264619617711732
DobranskyK.HargittaiE. (2006). The disability divide in internet access and use. Information, Communication & Society, 9, 313–334. doi:10.1080/13691180600751298
14.
DobranskyK.HargittaiE. (2016). Unrealized potential: Exploring the digital disability divide. Poetics, 58, 18–28. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2016.08.003
15.
EntmanR. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51–58.
16.
EshachH. (2007). Bridging in-school and out-of-school learning: Formal, non-formal, and informal education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16, 171–190. doi:10.1007/s10956-006-9027-1
17.
FitzpatrickK. R. (2013). Blogging through the music student teaching experience: Developing virtual communities of practice. Research Studies in Music Education, 36, 91–105. doi:10.1177/1321103X13509350
18.
FlickU. (2010). An introduction to qualitative research (4th ed.). London, England: SAGE. doi:978-1-84787-323-1
19.
FuglerudK. S.TjostheimI.GunnarssonB. R.TollefsenM. (2012). Use of social media by people with visual impairments: Usage levels, attitudes and barriers. In SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 565–572). Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2363927
GasparA. (2002). A educação formal e educação informal em ciências [Formal and non-formal education in science education]. In MassaraniL.deI.MoreiraC.BritoF. (Eds.), Ciência e Público: caminhos da divulgação científica no Brasil (p. 232). Rio de Janeiro: Casa da Ciência - Centro Cultural de Ciência e Tecnologia da UFRJ. Retrieved from http://www.museudavida.fiocruz.br/brasiliana/media/cienciaepublico.pdf
23.
GohnM. D. G. (2006). Educação não-formal, participação da sociedade civil e estruturas colegiadas nas escolas [Non-formal education, social participation and group structures at schools]. Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas Em Educação, 14, 27–38.
24.
GondimS. M. G. (2003). Grupos focais como técnica de investigação qualitativa: desafios metodológicos [Focus group as a technique for qualitative investigation: Methodological challenges]. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 12, 149–161. doi:10.1590/S0103-863X2002000300004
25.
GourlayL. (2009). Threshold practices: Becoming a student through academic literacies. London Review of Education, 7, 181–192. doi:10.1080/14748460903003626
26.
GourlayL. (2011). New lecturers and the myth of ‘communities of practice’. Studies in Continuing Education, 33, 67–77. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2010.515570
27.
GreenhowC.LewinC. (2016). Social media and education: Reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 41, 6–30. doi:10.1080/17439884.2015.1064954
28.
GudolleL. S.AntonelloC. S.FlachL. (2012). Aprendizagem situada, participação e legitimidade nas práticas de trabalho [Situated learning, participation and legitimacy in working practices]. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 13, 14–39. doi:10.1590/S1678-69712012000100002
29.
HouH. (2015). What makes an online community of practice work? A situated study of Chinese student teachers’ perceptions of online professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 46, 6–16. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.10.005
30.
HowlandJ. L.JonassenD.MarraR. M. (2012). Meaningful learning with technology (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
31.
KaplanA. M.HaenleinM. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53, 59–68. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
32.
LaveJ.WengerE. (2011). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (e-book, 24th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
33.
LimaF. J.LimaR. A. F.GuedesL. C. (2009). Em defesa da áudio-descrição: contribuições da Convenção sobre os Direitos da Pessoa com Deficiência [Defending audiodescription: Contributions from the convention of persons with disabilities]. Revista Brasileira de Tradução Visual, 1(1), 1–23. Retrieved from http://www.rbtv.associadosdainclusao.com.br/index.php/principal/article/viewArticle/10
34.
LonghurstR. (2010). Semi-structured interviews and focus groups. In CliffordN.FrenchS.ValentineG. (Eds.), Key methods in geography (2nd ed., pp. 103–115). London, England: SAGE.
35.
Lopes NetoA. A. (2005). Bullying: comportamento agressivo entre estudantes [Bullying: Aggressive behaviour among students]. Jornal de Pediatria, 81, 164–172. doi:10.1590/S0021-75572005000700006
36.
MarsickV. J.WatkinsK. E. (2001). Informal and incidental learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2, 25–34.
MatzatU.VrielingE. M. (2016). Self-regulated learning and social media – A ‘natural alliance’? Evidence on students’ self-regulation of learning, social media use, and student–teacher relationship. Learning, Media and Technology, 41, 73–99. doi:10.1080/17439884.2015.1064953
39.
McCombsM. E.ShawD. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176–187.
MortimerR. (2010). Recursos de informática para a pessoa com deficiência visual [Computational resources for people with visual impairments]. In SampaioM. W.HaddadM. A. O.FilhoH. A. C.SiaulysM. O. C. (Eds.), Baixa visão e cegueira: os caminhos para a reabilitação, a educação e a inclusão [Low vision and blindness: Paths to rehabilitation, education and inclusion] (pp. 221–231). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Cultura Médica/Guanabara Koogan.
42.
NunesE. V.DandoliniG.SouzaJ. A.de VanzinT. (2010). Mídias do conhecimento: um retrato da audiodescrição no Brasil [Knowledge media: A portrait of audiodescription in Brazil]. DataGamaZero, 11(6), 1–9.
43.
NunesE. V.MachadoF. O.VanzinT. (2011). Audiodescrição como tecnologia assistiva para o acesso ao conhecimento por pessoas cegas [Audiodescription as an assistive technology for blind people to access knowledge]. In UlbrichtV. R.VanzinT.VillaroucoV. (Eds.), Ambiente virtual de aprendizagem inclusivo [Inclusive virtual learning environment] (pp. 191–232). Florianópolis, Brazil: Pandion.
44.
OliverM. (1983). Social work with disabled people. Houndmills, UK: Macmillan Education.
45.
PawlowskiC. S.AndersenH. B.TroelsenJ.SchipperijnJ. (2016). Children’s physical activity behavior during school recess: A pilot study using GPS, accelerometer, participant observation, and go-along interview. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0148786. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148786
46.
QiuS.HuJ.RauterbergM. (2015). Mobile social media for the blind : Preliminary observations. In International Conference on Enabling Access for Persons with Visual Impairment (pp. 152–156). Athens. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272789786
47.
RobertsM.WantaW.DzwoT. H. (2002). Agenda setting and issue salience online. Communication Research, 29, 452–465. doi:10.1177/0093650202029004004
48.
SelwynN.StirlingE. (2016). Social media and education . . . now the dust has settled. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 1–5. doi:10.1080/17439884.2015.1115769
SmedemaS. M.McKenzieA. R. (2010). The relationship among frequency and type of internet use, perceived social support, and sense of well-being in individuals with visual impairments. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32, 317–325. doi:10.3109/09638280903095908
51.
SmithS. U.HayesS.SheaP. (2017). A critical review of the use of Wenger’s Community of Practice (CoP) theoretical framework in online and blended learning research, 2000-2014. Online Learning, 21, 209–237. doi.:10.24059/olj.v21i1.963
TandocE. C.LimZ. W.LingR. (2018). Defining ‘fake news’: A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6, 137–153. doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
54.
TjostheimI.SolheimI.FuglerudK. S. (2011, October). The importance of peers for visually impaired users of social media. In Proceedings of the 6th IASTED International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI, pp. 23–30). doi:10.2316/P.2011.747-015
55.
TrustT.HorrocksB. (2016). ‘I never feel alone in my classroom’: Teacher professional growth within a blended community of practice. Professional Development in Education, 43, 645–665. doi:10.1080/19415257.2016.1233507
VicenteM. R.LópezA. J. (2010). A multidimensional analysis of the disability digital divide: Some evidence for internet use. The Information Society, 26, 48–64. doi:10.1080/01615440903423245
WengerE. (2008). Communities of Practice: Learning, meaning and identity (e-book, 18th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
60.
WengerE. (2010). Communities of Practice and social learning systems. In BlackmoreC. (Ed.), Social learning systems and Communities of Practice (pp. 179–198). London, England: Springer. doi:10.1177/135050840072002
WeselyP. M. (2013). Investigating the community of practice of world language educators on Twitter. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 305–318. doi:10.1177/0022487113489032
63.
WibeckV.DahlgrenM. A.ObergG. (2007). Learning in focus groups: An analytical dimension for enhancing focus group research. Qualitative Research, 7, 249–267. doi:10.1177/1468794107076023
64.
WilkinsonS. (1998). Focus group methodology: A review. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1, 181–203. doi:10.1080/13645579.1998.10846874
65.
WolkeD.LereyaS. T. (2015). Long-term effects of bullying. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 100, 879–885. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2014-306667
66.
The World Health Organization Quality of Life Group. (1995). The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science & Medicine, 41, 1403–1409. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(95)00112-K
67.
WuS.AdamicL. (2014). Visually impaired users on an online social network. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2556288.2557415
