This article describes and evaluates a programme of assistive technology demonstration projects that aimed to identify the information and support needs, as well as preferences and priorities, of older people with sight loss. The programme involved a series of projects across five sites managed by a major provider of housing and care services to people with sight loss. Projects typically involved specially trained lead members of staff displaying, discussing and demonstrating daily living devices and encouraging service users to try out items of interest. Programme evaluation reveals that although participants with sight loss have limited knowledge of generic and low-vision devices, they are keen to find technological solutions to routine difficulties, and value devices of practical design and ease of use that promote safety and independence. Evaluation also indicates that participating support staff would benefit from increased levels of awareness, confidence and training to maximize and operationalize service users’ access to, and appropriate use of, assistive technology.
AlaszewskiA.CapelloR. (2006). Piloting Telecare in Kent County Council: The key lessons. Canterbury, UK: Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent.
Buildings Research Establishment (2004). Helping people with sight loss in their homes: Housing-related assistive technology. Research Findings No 4. London, UK: Thomas Pocklington Trust.
11.
CopolilloA. (2009). Low vision intervention: Decision-making for acquiring and integrating assistive technology. In SöderbackI. (Ed.), International Handbook of Occupational Therapy Interventions. New York, NY: Springer.
12.
CutlerS. J. (2005). Ageism and technology. Generations, 29(3), 67–72.
13.
Department of Health (2005). Building telecare in England. London, UK: Department of Health.
14.
Department of Health (2006). Our health, our care, our say. London, UK: Department of Health.
15.
Department of Health (2008a). Self care support for the workforce. London, UK: Department of Health.
16.
Department of Health (2008b). LAC (DH) (2008)1: Transforming adult social care. London, UK: Department of Health.
17.
Department of Health (2008c). Common core principles to support self care: A guide to support implementation. London, UK: Department of Health.
18.
Department of Health (2009). Research and development work relating to assistive technology 2008–09. London, UK: Department of Health.
19.
DoughtyK. (2004). Supporting independence: The emerging role of technology. Housing, Care & Support, 7(1), 11–17.
HansonJ. (2005). The housing and support needs of adults aged 18–55 with impaired vision: A good practice guide. London, UK: Bartlett School for Graduate Studies, University College London.
22.
HansonJ.JohnsonM.PercivalJ.ZakoR. (2002). The housing and support needs of older people with visual impairments. Occasional Paper 1. London, UK: Thomas Pocklington Trust.
PercivalJ.HansonJ. (2005). ‘I’m like a tree a million miles from the water’s edge’. Social care and inclusion of older people with visual impairment. British Journal of Social Work, 35, 189–205.
30.
Royal National Institute of Blind People (RNIB) (2009). Future sight loss UK (1): The economic impact of partial sight and blindness in the UK adult population. Report prepared for RNIB by Access Economics Pty Limited. London, UK: RNIB.
31.
RobertsS. (2009). The fictions, facts and future of older people and technology. London: International Longevity Centre, UK.
Royal Commission on Long Term Care (1999). With respect to old age: Long term care – rights and responsibilities. A Report by The Royal Commission on Long Term Care. London, UK: The Stationery Office.
TinkerA. (2004). Introducing assistive technology into the homes of older people: The REKI (Reading/King’s) research project. Housing, Care & Support, 7(3), 30–34.
37.
TinkerA.LansleyP. (2005). Introducing assistive technology into the existing homes of older people: Feasibility, acceptability, costs and outcomes. Journal of Telemedecine and Telecare, 11(Suppl 1), 1–3.
38.
WardG.AwangD. (2009). Improving outcomes for people with sight loss: Identifying the continuing professional development needs of occupational therapists. Occasional Paper 21. London, UK: Thomas Pocklington Trust.
