The role of probation in the Republic of Ireland is poorly understood and has attracted little critical attention. The guiding legislation is outdated and the Probation and Welfare Service does not generate the information required to evaluate its own performance. To become more accountable, and demonstrably effective, will require a determined effort both to meet rigorous quality standards in terms of research design and to overcome some of the problems of scale that beset small jurisdictions.
Atkinson, D. (2004) ‘The What Works debate: Keeping a human perspective’ , in The Probation Journal, 51 (3), pp. 248-252 .
2.
Baumer, E. , Wright, R. , Kristinsdottir, K. & Gunnlaugsson, H. (2002) ‘Crime, shame and recidivism: The case of Iceland’ , in British Journal of Criminology, 42 (1),pp. 40-59 .
3.
Bonta, J. , Wallace-Capretta, S. & Rooney, J. (2000) ‘A quasi-experimental evaluation of an intensive rehabilitative supervision programme’ , in Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 27 (3), pp. 312-319 .
4.
Campbell, S. (2003) The Feasibility of Conducting an RCT at HMP Grendon. Home Office On-line Report 03/03. London: Home Office .
5.
Comptroller and Auditor General (2004) Report on Value for Money - The Probation and Welfare Service. Dublin: Stationery Office .
6.
Cunningham, A. (2002) One Step Forward: Lessons Learned from a Randomised Study of Multi-Systemic Therapy in Canada. Ontario: Centre for Children and Families in the Justice System .
7.
Expert Group on the Probation and Welfare Service (1999) Final Report. Dublin: Stationery Office .
8.
Farrall, S. (2002) Rethinking What Works with Offenders. Cullompton: Willan Publishing .
9.
Farrington, D. (2003) Methodological quality standards for evaluative research’ , in Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587 (1), pp. 49-68 .
10.
Farrington, D. , Gottfredson, D. , Sherman, L. & Welsh, B. (2002) ‘The Maryland Scientific Methods Scale’, in L. Shermanet al. (eds) Evidence-based Crime Prevention. London: Routledge .
11.
Goldthorpe, J. (2000) ‘Social ethnography today: Problems and possibilities’, in J. Goldthorpe On Sociology: Numbers, Narratives and the Integration of Research and Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
12.
Heylin, G. (2001) Evaluating Prisons, Prisoners and Others. Studies in Public Policy No. 6. Trinity College Dublin: The Policy Institute .
13.
Kemshall, H. , Holt, P. , Bailey, R. & Boswell, G. (2004) ‘Beyond programmes: Organisational and cultural issues in the implementation of What Works’, in G. Mair (ed.) What Matters in Probation. Cullompton: Willan Publishing .
14.
Kilcommins, S. & O’Donnell, I. (2003) ‘Wiping the slate clean: Rehabilitating offenders and protecting the public’ , in Administration, 51 (3), pp. 73-89 .
15.
Kilcommins, S. , O’Donnell, I. , O’Sullivan, E. & Vaughan, B. (2004) Crime, Punishment and the Search for Order in Ireland. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration .
16.
Kyvsgaard, B. (2000) ‘Supervision of offenders: Can an old-fashioned service system be of any service in the case of present-day offenders?’ In Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Criminal Justice1, pp. 73-86 .
17.
Law Reform Commission (2004) Consultation Paper on the Court Poor Box. Dublin: LRC .
18.
Lipsey, M. (1995) ‘What do we learn from 400 research studies on the effectiveness of treatment with juvenile delinquents?’ In J. McGuire (ed.) What Works: Reducing Re-offending. Guidelines from Research and Practice. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons .
19.
Losel, F. (2001) ‘Evaluating the effectiveness of correctional programmes: Bridging the gap between research and practice.’ In G. Bernfeld, D. Farrington and A. Leschied (2001) Offender Rehabilitation in Practice. West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons .
20.
Mair, G. (ed.) (2004) What Matters in Probation. Cullompton: Willan Publishing .
21.
Matthews, R. & Pitts, J. (2000). Rehabilitation, Recidivism, and Realism: Evaluating Violence Reduction Programmes in Prison. In V. Jupp , P. Davies & P. Francis (eds) Doing Criminological Research. Wiltshire: Redwood Books .
22.
McGuire, J. (ed.) (2002) Offender Rehabilitation and Treatment. West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons .
23.
McIvor, G. (2004) ‘Getting personal: Developments in policy and practice in Scotland’, in G. Mair (ed.) What Matters in Probation. Cullompton: Willan Publishing
24.
McIvor, G. & Barry, M. (2000) Social Work and Criminal Justice: The Longer Term Impact of Supervision. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Central Research Unit .
25.
Merrington, S. & Stanley, S. (2004) ‘What Works? Revisiting the evidence in England and Wales’ , in The Probation Journal, 51 (1), pp. 7-20 .
26.
Miles, H. (2004) ‘The Parish Hall Enquiry: A community-based alternative to formal court processing in the Channel Island of Jersey’ , in The Probation Journal, 51 (2), pp. 133-143 .
27.
Miles, H. & Raynor, P. (2004) Community Sentences in Jersey: Risk, Needs and Rehabilitation. Report prepared for the Jersey Probation and Aftercare Service .
28.
National Crime Forum (1998) Report. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration .
29.
Newburn, T. & Sparks, R. (2004) Criminal Justice and Political Cultures: National and International Dimensions of Crime Control. Cullompton: Willan Publishing .
30.
O’Donnell, I. (2004) ‘Imprisonment and penal policy in Ireland’ , in The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43 (3), pp. 253-266 .
31.
O’Donnell, I. (2005) ‘Crime and justice in the Republic of Ireland’ , in European Journal of Criminology, 2 (1), pp. 99-131 .
32.
O’Donnell, I. & O’Sullivan, E. (2003) ‘The politics of intolerance - Irish style’ , in British Journal of Criminology, 43 (1), pp. 41-62 .
33.
O’Mahony, P. (1996) Criminal Chaos. Dublin: Round Hall Press .
34.
Petersilia, J. & Turner, S. (1993) Evaluating Intensive Supervision Probation and Parole: Results of a Nationwide Experiment. Research in Brief. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice .
35.
Phillips, G. (2002) An Empirical Study of the Intensive Probation Scheme in Cork. Unpublished report.
36.
Probation and Welfare Service (nd) Strategy Statement 2001-2003. Dublin: Stationery Office .
37.
Raynor, P. (2003) ‘Evidence based probation and its critics’ , in The Probation Journal, 50 (4), pp. 334-345 .
38.
Raynor, P. & Vanstone, M. (1997) Straight Thinking on Probation (STOP): The Mid-Glamorgan Experiment. Probation Studies Unit Report No.4. Oxford: Centre for Criminological Research .
39.
Raynor, P. , Kynch, J. , Roberts, C. & Merrington, S. (2000) Risk and Need Assessment in Probation Services: An Evaluation. Home Office Research Study No. 211. London: HMSO .
40.
Rex, S. (1999) ‘Desistance from offending: Experiences of probation’ , in The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 38 (4), pp. 366-383 .
41.
Shadish, W. , Cook, T. & Campbell, D. (2002) Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin .
42.
Sherman, L. , Farrington, D. , Welsh, B. & MacKenzie, D. (2002) Evidence-Based Crime Prevention. London: Routledge .
43.
Watson, F. (1994) ‘Success or failure? Outcomes of bailees at Hope House Hostel’ , in British Journal of Social Work, 23, pp. 597-616 .
