Party think tanks as adaptation to the challenge of party linkage: Lessons from Australia

Abstract

While parties in established democracies have shown increasing reluctance to forge exclusive ties to organisational mediators, they have not discarded these connections. This article considers one under-explored party organisational mediator, party think tanks. In an in-depth Australian study, this article examines the significance of party think tanks as mechanisms for party linkage. It proposes that such vehicles harness some of the strengths intrinsic to affiliated external organisations and party sub-groups in ways which are more responsive to the challenge of linkage confronting modern parties. The Australia case suggests that party think tanks are used to assist parties to connect to old and new interest constituencies in flexible ways while limiting parties’ exposure to electoral and political risk. The adoption of party think tanks speaks to the ongoing value parties place on organisational mediators, but on terms that they can better control.

Keywords

Australia linkage party think tank political parties state subventions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allern

(2010) Political Parties and Interest Groups in Norway. Colchester: ECPR Press.

Allern

Bale

(2012) Political parties and interest groups: Disentangling complex relationships. Party Politics 18(1): 7–25.

Allern

Verge

(2017) Still connecting with society? In: Scarrow

Webb

Poguntke

(eds) Organising Political Parties: Representation, Participation and Power. Oxford: OUP, pp.107–135.

Australian Charities Not-for-profits Commission [ACNC] (2016) Charities, elections and advocacy. Australian Government, April. Available at: https://www.acnc.gov.au/tools/guides/charities-elections-and-advocacy.

Baier

Bakvis

(2001) Think tanks and political parties: Competitors or collaborators? ISUMA 2(1): 107–103.

Baker

(1994) Liberals unveil new policy think tank. The Age, 7 October. (No longer available online.)

Bramble

Kuhn

(2009) Continuity or discontinuity in the recent history of the Australian Labor Party? Australian Journal of Political Science 44(2): 281–294.

Centre for Independent Studies (CIS) (2017) PreCIS, Annual Review. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Centre for Independent Studies.

Chifley Research Centre (2000) Constitution and Rules. Australian Securities and Investment Commission, pp.1–32.

10.

Commonwealth Electoral Act (CEA) (1918). Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2019C00103

11.

Dalton

Wattenberg

(2000) Unthinkable democracy: Political change in advanced industrial democracies. In: Dalton

Wattenberg

(eds) Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.3–18.

12.

Dalton

Farrell

McAllister

(2011) Political Parties and Democratic Linkage: How Parties Organize Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

13.

Day

(2000) Think tanks in Western Europe. In: McGann

Weaver

(eds) Think Tanks and Civil Societies: Catalysts for Ideas and Action. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp.103–138.

14.

Denham

Garnett

(2004) A ‘hollowed-out’ tradition? British think tanks in the twenty first century. In: Stone

Denham

(eds) Think Tank Traditions: Policy Research and the Politics of Ideas. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp.232–246.

15.

Fieschi

Gaffney

(2006) French think tanks in comparative perspective. In: Stone

Denham

(eds) Think Tank Traditions: Policy Research and the Politics of Ideas. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp.105–120.

16.

Fraussen

Halpin

(2017) Think tanks and strategic policy-making: The contribution of think tanks to policy advisory systems. Policy Sciences 50(1): 105–124.

17.

Fraussen

Halpin

(2018) Political parties and interest organizations at the crossroads: Perspectives on the transformation of political organizations. Political Studies Review 16(1): 25–37.

18.

Gauja

(2013) The Politics of Party Policy: From Members to Legislators. London: Palgrave MacMillan.

19.

Gauja

(2015) The individualisation of party politics: The impact of changing internal decision-making processes on policy development and citizen engagement. British Journal of Politics & International Relations 7(1): 89–105.

20.

Gauja

Miragliotta

Smith

(2016) Australian party organisations: The state of the field. In: Miragliotta

Gauja

Smith

(eds) Contemporary Australian Party Organisations. Clayton, VIC, Australia: Monash Press, pp.1–20.

21.

Green Institute (2008) Available at: www.greeninstitute.org.au/ (accessed 10 January 2018).

22.

Heaney

(2012) Bridging the gap between political parties and interest groups. In: Cigler

Loomis

(eds) Interest Group Politics. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, pp.194–218.

23.

Hewett

(2016) We’re not a fundraiser for Liberals: BCA’s Catherine Livingstone speaks out. AFR, 15 August. Available at: https://www.afr.com/opinion/business-under-attack-as-bcas-catherine-livingstone-speaks-out-postelection-20160814-gqs0ts

24.

Ignazi

Farrell

Römmele

(2005) The prevalence of linkage-by-reward. In: Römmele

Farrell

Ignazi

(eds) Political Parties and Political Systems: The Concept of Linkage Revisited. Westport, CN: Greenwood Publishing Group, pp.x, 181.

25.

Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) (2017) Annual Report. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: IPA.

26.

Karlhofer

(2006) The long shadow of corporatism: Scope and limits of think tank activities in Austria. German Policy Studies 3(2): 347–381.

27.

Katz

Mair

(1995) Changing models of party organization and party democracy: The emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics 1: 5–28.

28.

Katz

Mair

(2009) The cartel party thesis: A restatement. Perspectives on Politics 7(4): 753–766.

29.

Kelstrup

(2016) The Politics of Think Tanks in Europe. Abingdon; Oxon: Routledge.

30.

Langford

Brownsey

(1991) Introduction: Think tanks and modern governance. In: Langford

Brownsey

(eds) Think Tanks and Governance in the Asia-Pacific Region. Halifax, NS: IRPP, pp. 1–12.

31.

Lawson

(1988) When linkage fails. In: Lawson

Merkl

(eds) When Parties Fail: Emerging Alternative Organisations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp.3–38.

32.

Marsh

Miller

(2012) Democratic decline and democratic renewal: Political change in Britain, Australia and New Zealand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

33.

Marsh

Stone

(2004) Australian think tanks. In: Denham

Stone

(eds) Think Tank Traditions: Policy Research and the Politics of Ideas. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp.247–263.

34.

Menzies Research Centre (1998) Memorandum and Articles of Association. Australian Securities and Investment Commission, pp.1–22.

35.

Menzies Research Centre Limited (2017) Financial Report for the Year Ended 30 June 2017. Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

36.

Miragliotta

(2018) Institutional dynamics and party think tank development: Britain and Germany compared. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 56(2): 234–256.

37.

Mjelde

(2013) How and why parties respond to membership decline: The case of the SPD and the CDU. German Politics 22(3): 253–269.

38.

Nassmacher

(2010) The Funding of Party Competition: Political Finance in 25 Democracies. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

39.

Overacker

(1968) Australian Parties in a Changing Society: 1945-67. Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Canberra, ACT, Australia: Cheshire.

40.

Page Research Centre (2002) Constitution. Australian Security and Investment Commission, pp.1–32.

41.

Pattyn

Pittoors

Van Hecke

(2017) Who are the political parties’ ideas factories on policy analysis by political party think tanks. In: Brans

Geva-May

Howlett

(eds) Routledge Handbook of Comparative Policy Analysis. London; New York: Routledge, pp.245–260.

42.

Pautz

(2010a) Think tanks in the United Kingdom and Germany: Actors in the modernisation of social democracy. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 12(2): 274–294.

43.

Pautz

(2010b) The role of think tanks in the modernisation of the SPD. German Politics 19(2): 183–199.

44.

Pinto-Duschinsky

(1991a) German political foundations and their US counterparts. International Affairs 67(1): 33–63.

45.

Pinto-Duschinsky

(1991b) The party foundations and political finance in Germany. In: Seidle

(ed.) Comparative Issues in Party and Election Finance, Vol. 4. Toronto, ON, Canada: Dundurn Press, pp.179–242.

46.

Poguntke

(2002) Parties without firm social roots? Party Organisational Linkage. In: Luther

Muller-Rommel

(eds) Political Parties in the New Europe: Political and Analytical Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.54–56.

47.

Poguntke

(2006) Political parties and other organisations. In: Katz

Crotty

(eds) Handbook of Party Politics. London: SAGE, pp.396–406.

48.

Rasmussen

Lindeboom

(2013) Interest group–party linkage in the twenty-first century: Evidence from Denmark, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. European Journal of Political Research 52(2): 264–289.

49.

Richardson

(1995) The market for political activism: Interest groups as a challenge to political parties. West European Politics 18(1): 116–139.

50.

Roddan

(2016) Top lib calls for Menzies Research Centre to replace BCA. Australian, 13 October.

51.

Scarrow

(2000) Parties without members? Party organization in a changing electoral environment. In: Dalton

Wattenberg

(eds) Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford Univesity Press, pp.79–101.

52.

Scarrow

(2014) Beyond Party Members: Changing Approaches to Partisan Mobilization. Oxford: OUP.

53.

Scarrow

Gezgor

(2010) Declining memberships, changing members? European political party members in a new era. Party Politics 16(6): 823–843.

54.

Scott

(1999) Transnationalizing democracy promotion: The role of Western political foundations and think-tanks. Democratization 6(3): 146–170.

55.

Stone

(1996) From the margins of politics: The influence of think-tanks in Britain. West European Politics 19(4): 675–692.

56.

Stone

(2004) Introduction. In: Stone

Denham

(eds) Think Tank Traditions: Policy Research and the Politics of Ideas. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp.247–263.

57.

Stone

(2007) Recycling bins, garbage cans or think tanks? Three myths regarding policy analysis institutes. Public Administration 85(2): 259–278.

58.

t’Hart

Vromen

(2008) A new era for think tanks in public policy? International trends, Australian realities. Australian Journal of Public Administration 67(2): 135–148.

59.

Thunert

(2006) The development and significance of think tanks in Germany. German Policy Studies 3(2): 185–221.

60.

Van Biezen

(2004) Political parties as public utilities. Party Politics 10(6): 701–722.

61.

Van Biezen

Poguntke

(2014) The decline of membership-based politics. Party Politics 20: 205–216.

62.

Von Beyme

(1985) Political Parties in Western Democracies. Aldershot: Gower.

63.

Weaver

McGann

(2000) Think tanks and civil societies in a change of time. In: McGann

Weaver

(eds) Think Tanks and Civil Societies: Catalysts for Ideas and Action. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp.1–36.

64.

Webb

(2002) Introduction. In: Webb

Holliday

Farrell

(eds) Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.1–15.

65.

Weilemann

(2000) Experiences of a multi-dimension think tank: The Konrad-Adenauer-Stifung. In: McGann

Weaver

(eds) Think Tanks and Civil Societies: Catalysts for Ideas and Action. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp.169–186.

66.

Yishai

(2001) Bringing society back in: Post-cartel parties in Israel. Party Politics 7(6): 667–687.