This article discusses the findings of a pilot study that examined the adjustment experience of first-year students to university study. Based on a sample of 51 first-year students at one UK university, the article finds that while the majority of students considered that workloads, nature of assessment, level of independent reading, and learning were broadly in line with their expectations, they were less satisfied with the support provided in terms of contact time with tutors and feedback on performance. These results thus provide a mixed picture, whereby academic workload and content are in line with students’ expectations, but students do not fully comprehend what tutors want in assignments, despite knowing where to go for support.
AsheF (2012) Harnessing political theory to facilitate students’ engagement with graduate ‘employability’: A critical pyramid approach. Politics32(2): 129–137.
BlairAMcGintyS (2013) Feedback-dialogues: exploring the student perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education38(4): 466–476.
4.
BlairACurtisSMcGintyS (2013a) Is peer feedback an effective approach for creating a dialogue in politics?European Political Science12(1): 102–115.
5.
BlairACurtisSGoodwinMShieldsS (2013b) The significance of assignment feedback: From consumption to construction. European Political Science12(2): 231–244.
6.
BlairACurtisSGoodwinMShieldsS (2013c) What feedback to students want?Politics33(1): 66–79.
7.
BlairAWyburn-PowellAGoodwinMShieldsS (2014) Can dialogue help to improve feedback on examinations. Studies in Higher Education39(6): 1039–1054.
8.
BriggsARJClarkJHallI (2012) Building bridges: Understanding student transition to university. Quality in Higher Education18(1): 3–21.
9.
CarlessD (2006) Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education31(2): 219–233.
10.
CarlessD (2013) Sustainable feedback and the development of student self-evaluative capabilities. In: MerrySPriceMCarlessDTarasM (eds) Reconceptualising Feedback in Higher Education: Developing Dialogue with Students. London: Routledge, pp.117–126.
11.
ChristieHBarronPD’Annunzio-GreenN (2013) Direct entrants in transition: Becoming independent learners. Studies in Higher Education38(4): 623–637.
12.
ClarkA (2011) Embedding transferable skills in and enhancing student learning in a political science research methods module: Evidence from the United Kingdom. PS: Political Science and Politics44(1): 135–139.
13.
CookeRBewickBMBarkhamMBradleyMAudinK (2006) Measuring, monitoring and managing the psychological well-being of first-year university students. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling34(4): 505–517.
14.
CrampsA (2011) Developing first-year engagement with written feedback. Active Learning in Higher Education12(2): 113–124.
15.
DweckC (2000) Self-theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality and Development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
16.
GaleTParkerS (2014) Navigating change: A typology of student transition in higher education. Studies in Higher Education39(5): 734–753.
HaackK (2008) UN Studies and the curriculum as active learning tool. International Studies Perspectives9(4): 395–410.
19.
HigginsRHartleyPSkeltonA (2001) Getting the message across: The problem of communicating assessment feedback. Teaching in Higher Education6(2): 269–274.
20.
HigginsRHartleyPSkeltonA (2002) The conscientious consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment in student learning. Studies in Higher Education27(1): 53–64.
21.
HounsellD (2007) Towards more sustainable feedback to students. In: BoudDFalchikovN (eds) Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education. London: Routledge, pp.101–113.
22.
HounsellDHounsellJ (2007) Teaching-learning environments in contemporary mass higher education. BJEP: British Journal of Educational Psychology (Monograph Series II, Number 4 – Student Learning and University Teaching)1(1): 91–111.
23.
IvanicRClarkRRimmershawR (2000) What am I supposed to make of this? The messages conveyed to students by tutors’ written comments. In: LeaMRStiererB (eds) Student Writing in Higher Education: New Contexts. Buckingham: Open University Press, pp.47–66.
24.
KaunertC (2009) The European Union simulation: From problem-based learning (PBL) to student interest. European Political Science8(2): 254–265.
25.
KrauseK-LCoatesH (2008) Students’ engagement in first-year university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education33(5): 493–505.
26.
LeaM (2004) Academic literacies: A pedagogy for course design. Studies in Higher Education29(6): 739–756.
27.
LeaMStreetB (1998) Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education23(2): 157–172.
28.
LightfootS (2004) Can Blackboard help support Politics students. LATISS: Learning and Teaching in the Social Sciences1(3): 169–180.
29.
LizzioAWilsonK (2004) First-year students’ perceptions of capability. Studies in Higher Education29(1): 109–128.
30.
LizzioAWilsonK (2013) First-year students’ appraisal of assessment tasks: Implications for efficacy, engagement and performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education38(4): 389–406.
31.
McInnisCJamesR (1995) First Year on Campus: Diversity in the Initial Experiences of Australian Undergraduates. Canberra, ACT, Australia: AGPS.
32.
MerrySPriceMCarlessDTarasM (eds) (2013) Reconceptualising Feedback in Higher Education: Developing Dialogue with Students. London: Routledge.
33.
MycockA (2007) Where’s the real lecturer? the experiences of doctoral educators in the UK. European Political Science6(2): 208–218.
34.
NicolDJMacfarlane-DickD (2006) Formative assessment and self–regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education31(2): 199–218.
35.
OrsmondPMerrySReilingK (2005) Biology students’ utilization of tutors’ formative feedback: A qualitative interview study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education30(4): 369–386.
36.
PalmerMO’KanePOwensM (2009) Betwixt spaces: student accounts of turning point experiences in the first-year transition. Studies in Higher Education34(1): 37–54.
37.
PriceMHandleyKMillarJO’DonovanB (2010) Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect?Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education35(3): 277–289.
38.
QuinnJThomasLSlackKCaseyLThextonWNobleJ (2005) From Life Crisis to Lifelong Learning: Rethinking Working-Class ‘Drop-Out’ from Higher Education. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation [online]. Available at: https://www.jrf.org.uk/report/rethinking-working-class-drop-out-university (accessed 3 July 2015).
39.
RaymondCUsherwoodS (2013) Assessment in simulations. Journal of Political Science Education9(2): 157–167.
40.
ReasonRDTerenziniPTDomingoRJ (2006) First things first: Developing academic competence in the first year of college. Research in Higher Education47(2): 149–175.
41.
RyanMSaundersCRainsfordEThompsonE (2014) Improving research methods teaching and learning in politics and international relations: A ‘Reality Show’ approach. Politics34(1): 85–97.
42.
SadlerDR (2010) Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education35(5): 535–550.
43.
ScoullerKBonannoHSmithL and Krass I (2008) Student experience and tertiary expectations: Factors predicting academic literacy amongst first-year pharmacy students. Studies in Higher Education33(2): 167–178.
44.
StreetB (2004) Academic literacies and the ‘new orders’: Implications for research and practice in student writing in higher education. Learning and Teaching in the Social Sciences1(1): 9–20.
45.
Van der MeerJJansenETorenbeekM (2010) ‘It’s almost a mindset that teachers need to change’: First-year students’ need to be inducted into time management. Studies in Higher Education35(7): 777–791.
46.
VygotskyLS (1978) Mind and Society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
WeaverM (2006) Do students value feedback? Students perceptions of written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education28(5): 459–470.
48.
WilcoxPWinnSFyvie-GauldM (2005) ‘It was nothing to do with the university, it was just the people’: The role of social support in the first-year experience of higher education. Studies in Higher Education30(6): 707–722.
