Polypropylene (PP) foamed products have the advantages of heat and chemical resistance, but it is difficult to foam without modified PP. Traditionally, researchers have used chemical modification to increase the melt strength to improve the foaming properties of PP. In this article, we designed four kinds of screw combinations, and five regions are selected for sampling. The polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and isotactic polypropylene (iPP) were blended by one-step fiber forming method, and then we tested the rheological properties and foaming properties. It is found that the rheological properties of the in situ microfiber composite are significantly improved than the iPP, and the crystallization temperature is also increased. The foaming experiment of the composite showed that the foaming performance of the composite with in situ microfiber morphology was significantly improved compared with the pure iPP performance, and the foaming temperature window of iPP was widened from 3°C to more than 6°C.
VasileCSeymourRB. Handbook of polyolefins. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1993.
5.
BurtJG. The elements of expansion of thermoplastics: Part II. J Cell Plast1978; 14(6): 341–345.
6.
YangJLiP. Characterization of short glass fiber reinforced polypropylene foam composites with the effect of compatibilizers: A comparison. J Reinf Plast Comp2015; 34(7): 534–546.
HanD HJangJHKimHY. Manufacturing and foaming of high melt viscosity of polypropylene by using electron beam radiation technology. Polym Eng Sci2006; 46(4): 431–437.
9.
LiuCWeiDZhengA. Improving foamability of polypropylene by grafting modification. J Appl Polym Sci2006; 101(6): 4114–4123.
10.
Laguna-GutierrezEHooghtenRV. Understanding the foamability and mechanical properties of foamed polypropylene blends by using extensional rheology. J Appl Polym Sci2015; 132(33): 42430.
11.
TsujiHFukuiI. Enhanced thermal stability of poly (lactide)s in the melt by enantiomeric polymer blending. Polymer2003; 44(10): 2891–2896.
12.
SchreiberHPOlguinA. Aspects of dispersion and flow in thermoplastic‐elastomer blends. Polym Engi Sci1983; 23(3): 129–134.
13.
ScottC ERatnaginR. Visualization and microscopic modeling of phase inversion during compounding. Polym Engi Sci2001; 41(8): 1310–1321.
14.
FakirovSBhattacharyyaDLinRJT. Contribution of coalescence to microfibril formation in polymer blends during cold drawing. Macromol Sci2007; 46(1): 183–194.
15.
González-NúnezRDe KeeDFavisBD. The influence of coalescence on the morphology of the minor phase in melt-drawn polyamide-6/HDPE blends. Polymer1996; 37(21): 4689–4693.
16.
KissG. In situ composites: blends of isotropic polymers and thermotropic liquid crystalline polymers. Polym Engi Sci1987; 27(6): 410–423.
17.
ZhaoZYangQXiangZ. Effect of in situ poly (ethylene terephthalate) (PET) microfibrils on the morphological structure and crystallization behavior of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) under an intensive shear rate. Polym Adv Technol2015; 26(10): 1275–1284.
18.
YangLSuJYangQ. Effective in situ polyamide 6 microfibrils in isotactic polypropylene under microinjection molding: significant improvement of mechanical performance. J Mater Sci2016; 51(23): 10386–10399.
19.
SiXGuoLWangY. Preparation and study of polypropylene/polyethylene terephthalate composite fibres. Compos Sci Technol2008; 68(14): 2943–2947.
20.
ThangamathesvaranPMHuXTamKC. In situ composites: effect of elongational flow velocity on thermotropic liquid crystalline co-polyester fibrillation in thermoplastic/TLCP systems. Composites Sci Tech2001; 61(7):941–947.
21.
JurczukKGaleskiAMorawiec. Effect of poly (tetrafluoroethylene) nanofibers on foaming behavior of linear and branched polypropylenes. Polym J2017; 88: 171–182.
22.
RizviATabatabaeiABarzegariMR. In situ fibrillation of CO2-philic polymers: Sustainable route to polymer foams in a continuous process. Polymer2013; 54(17):4645–4652.
23.
RizviAParkCBFavisBD.Tuning viscoelastic and crystallization properties of polypropylene containing in-situ generated high aspect ratio polyethylene terephthalate fibrils. Polymer2015; 68: 83–91.
24.
ZhaoJZhaoQWangC. High thermal insulation and compressive strength polypropylene foams fabricated by high-pressure foam injection molding and mold opening of nano-fibrillar composites. Materials & Design2017; 131: 1–11.
25.
GuilongWGuoqunZLeiZ. Lightweight and tough nanocellular PP/PTFE nanocomposite foams with defect-free surfaces obtained using in situ nanofibrillation and nanocellular injection molding. Chem Eng J2018; 350: 1–11.
26.
HuangYHeYWangY. Studying the formation mechanism of in situ poly (butylene terephthalate) microfibrils prepared by one-step direct extrusion via orthogonal experimental design. Polym Eng Sci2018; 58(7): 1166–1173.
27.
XuH SLiZ MWangSJ.Rheological behavior of PET/HDPE in situ microfibrillar blends: Influence of microfibrils’ flexibility. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys2007; 45(10): 1205–1216.
28.
YamaguchiMFukudaKYokoharaT. Modification of Rheological Properties Under Elongational Flow by Addition of Polymeric Fine Fibers. Macromol Mater Eng2012; 297(7): 654–658.
29.
YokoharaTNobukawaSYamaguchiM.Rheological properties of polymer composites with flexible fine fibers. Journal of Rheology2011; 55(6): 1205–1218.
30.
JayanarayananKJoseTThomasS. Effect of draw ratio on the microstructure, thermal, tensile and dynamic rheological properties of insitu microfibrillar composites. Eur Polym J2009; 45(6): 1738–1747.
31.
JanssenJMHMeijerHEH. Droplet breakup mechanisms: Stepwise equilibrium versus transient dispersion. Journal of Rheology1993; 37(37): 597–608.
32.
PötschkePFornesTDPaulDR.Rheological behavior of multiwalled carbon nanotube/polycarbonate composites. Polymer2002; 43(11): 3247–3255.
33.
ChambonFWinterHH.Linear viscoelasticity at the gel point of a crosslinking PDMS with imbalanced stoichiometry. J Rheol1987; 31(8): 683–697.
34.
WinterHHMorganelliPChambonF.Stoichiometry effects on rheology of model polyurethanes at the gel point. Macromolecules1988; 21(2): 532–535.
