Grounded in the communicative ecology model of successful aging, this study examined how memorable messages about death, dying, and the afterlife (DDA) are associated with aging experiences. In a self-report survey, older adults (N = 300, Mage = 59.74 years) wrote a memorable message about DDA and reported on the message's motivational impact. They also reported on their affect about aging, aging efficacy, and successful aging. The memorable messages were coded into themes, and path modeling revealed that the themes of people (a) engaging in some activity after they die, (b) cherishing life, (c) leaving a legacy, and (d) experiencing eternal damnation were associated with memorable message motivational impact (MMMI). MMMI was indirectly associated with successful aging, via the serial mediators of positive affect about aging and aging efficacy. Positive affect about aging may be a crucial mediating mechanism that helps translate experiences with memorable messages into successful aging.
BernholdQ. S. (2022). Older adults’ recalled memorable messages about aging and their role in the communicative ecology model of successful aging. Communication Quarterly, 70(2), 132–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2021.2023602
3.
BernholdQ. S.BertramV.DevereuxS.BlueJ.JuliusK. (2024). Explicating the pathways among memorable message themes about religion and spirituality, positive role models for aging, and successful aging. Southern Communication Journal, 89(3–4), 178–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2024.2370766
4.
BernholdQ. S.BlueJ.DevereuxS.BertramV.JuliusK. (2025). Expanding the boundary conditions of the communicative ecology model of successful aging to include communication about religion. Communication Research, 52(4), 543–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502231165844
5.
BernholdQ. S.GilesH. (2019). Older adults’ recalled memorable messages about aging and their associations with successful aging. Human Communication Research, 45(4), 474–507. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqz011
6.
CarstensenL. L.FungH. H.CharlesS. T. (2003). Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion, 27(2), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024569803230
CoscoT. D.StephanB. C. M.BrayneC. (2013). Deathless models of aging and the importance of acknowledging the dying process. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 185(9), 751–752. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.121720
9.
CouplandJ. (2007). Gendered discourses on the ‘problem’ of ageing: Consumerized solutions. Discourse and Communication, 1(1), 37–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071984
10.
DeAndreaD. C.HolbertR. L. (2017). Increasing clarity where it is needed most: Articulating and evaluating theoretical contributions. Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(2), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1304163
11.
DeppC. A.JesteD. V. (2006). Definitions and predictors of successful aging: A comprehensive review of larger quantitative studies. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jgp.0000192501.03069.bc
12.
DroserV. A.SeurerL. (2022). “God doesn’t make mistakes”: Memorable messages, adjustment, and grief following family death. Health Communication, 37(4), 498–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1853328
13.
FowlerC.BernholdQ. (2023). Implications of older adults’ attributions for young adults’ attitudes to aging: A vignette study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 42(1), 31–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X221105096
14.
FowlerC.GasiorekJ.GilesH. (2015). The role of communication in aging well: Introducing the communicative ecology model of successful aging. Communication Monographs, 82(4), 431–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1024701
15.
FranklinC. S.CodyP. A.BallanM. (2010). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. In ThyerB. (Ed.), The handbook of social work research methods (2nd ed., pp. 355–374). Sage.
16.
GasiorekJ.FowlerC. (2020). Effects of “environmental chatter” about age and aging on middle-aged and older adults’ communication and perceptions of aging efficacy. Western Journal of Communication, 84(1), 98–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2019.1637930
17.
GasiorekJ.FowlerC. (2022). Associations between parents’ negative talk about aging and young adults’ negative affect and efficacy related to aging. Journal of Family Communication, 22(4), 374–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2022.2108428
18.
GasiorekJ.FowlerC.GilesH. (2015). What does successful aging sound like? Profiling communication about aging. Human Communication Research, 41(4), 577–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12060
19.
GasiorekJ.FowlerC.GilesH. (2016). Communication and successful aging. In NussbaumJ. F. (Ed.), Communication across the lifespan: ICA theme book (pp. 35–50). Peter Lang.
20.
GasiorekJ.FowlerC.GilesH. (2019). Communication and successful aging: Testing alternative conceptualizations of uncertainty. Communication Monographs, 86(2), 229–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/02637751.2018.1538561
21.
GettingsP. E.KuangK. (2022). Extending the communicative ecology model of successful aging using talk about careers and retirement. Communication Monographs, 89(4), 493–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2021.2025410
22.
GettingsP. E.KuangK. (2024). Examining the role of memorable messages in the process of communication about aging. Health Communication, 39(10), 2174–2185. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2258307
HolladayS. J. (2002). “Have fun while you can,” “You’re only as old as you feel,” and “Don’t ever get old”: An examination of memorable messages about aging. Journal of Communication, 52(4), 681–697. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02568.x
25.
KeeleyM. P. (2004). Final conversations: Survivors’ memorable messages concerning religious faith and spirituality. Health Communication, 16(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc1601_6
26.
KeeleyM. P. (2007). ‘Turning toward death together’: The functions of messages during final conversations in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24(2), 225–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407507075412
27.
KeeleyM. P.GenerousM. A.BaldwinP. K. (2014). Exploring children/adolescents’ final conversations with dying family members. Journal of Family Communication, 14(3), 208–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2014.908198
KuchenbeckerC. M.BevanJ. L. (2024). Let’s talk about death: Applying the disclosure decision-making model to death planning disclosure. Health Communication, 39(7), 1310–1319. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2212132
32.
LambS. (2014). Permanent personhood or meaningful decline? Toward a critical anthropology of successful aging. Journal of Aging Studies, 29, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2013.12.006
33.
MartinP.KellyN.KahanaB.KahanaE.WillcoxB. J.WillcoxD. C.PoonL. W. (2015). Defining successful aging: A tangible or elusive concept?The Gerontologist, 55(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu044
34.
MartinsonM.BerridgeC. (2015). Successful aging and its discontents: A systematic review of the social gerontology literature. The Gerontologist, 55(1), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu037
MwitaK. M. (2022). Factors influencing data saturation in qualitative studies. Research in Business and Social Science, 11(4), 414–420. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i4.1776
39.
NicholsT. (2010). Death and afterlife: A theological introduction. Brazos Press.
40.
PhelanE. A.AndersonL. A.LacroixA. Z.LarsonE. B. (2004). Older adults’ views of “successful aging”—How do they compare with researchers’ definitions?Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 52(2), 211–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52056.x
41.
PittsM. J. (2019). The language and social psychology of savoring: Advancing the communication savoring model. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38(2), 237–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X18821404
42.
RoseJ.JohnsonC. W. (2020). Contextualizing reliability and validity in qualitative research: Toward more rigorous and trustworthy qualitative social science in leisure research. Journal of Leisure Research, 51(4), 432–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2020.1722042
43.
RoweJ. W.KahnR. L. (1998). Successful aging: The MacArthur Foundation study. Pantheon.
44.
SalariS.ZhangW. (2006). Kin keepers and good providers: Influence of gender socialization on well-being among USA birth cohorts. Aging and Mental Health, 10(5), 485–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860600647975
45.
SoleimaniM. A.BahramiN.AllenK. A.AlimoradiZ. (2020). Death anxiety in patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 48, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101803
46.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage.
47.
TaoC. C.BucyE. P. (2007). Conceptualizing media stimuli in experimental research: Psychological versus attribute-based definitions. Human Communication Research, 33(4), 397–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00305.x
48.
ThorsonJ. A.PowellF. C. (1994). A revised death anxiety scale. In NeimeyerR. A. (Ed.), Death anxiety handbook: Research, instrumentation, and application (pp. 31–44). Taylor & Francis.
49.
VerseyH. S.NewtonN. J. (2013). Generativity and productive pursuits: Pathways to successful aging in late midlife African American and White women. Journal of Adult Development, 20(4), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-013-9170-x
50.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule—Expanded form. Unpublished manuscript.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
