The present study was grounded in the revised communicative ecology model of successful aging (CEMSA) and examined whether brief, passing remarks made by older adults about aging influence both young adults’ aging efficacy and their expectations regarding aging. Young adult participants (n = 322) were randomly assigned to read a single vignette. In the vignette an older adult invoked either a negative age-based reason, a non-age-based reason, or a positive age-based reason to account for behavior that could be taken to reflect age-related stereotypes pertaining to physical decline, cognitive decline, or aversion to technology. Analyzes revealed that participants who read the positive age-based accounts perceived the aging process to have been portrayed more favorably. Consequently, they reported higher levels of positive affect about aging which translated into their feeling more efficacious about managing their own aging, and into having more positive expectations regarding aging in general.
AgrenM. (1998). Life at 85 and 92: A qualitative longitudinal study of how the oldest old experience and adjust to the increasing uncertainty of existence. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 47(2), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.2190/QXB6-1RT8-TFQ2-D33B
2.
BaltesP. B. (1987). Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology, 23(5), 611–626. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.23.5.611
3.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
BernholdQ. S. (2022). Older adults’ recalled memorable messages about aging and their role in the communicative ecology model of successful aging. Communication Quarterly. Advance online. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2021.2023602
6.
BernholdQ. S.GasiorekJ. (2020). Older adults’ perceptions of their own and their romantic partners’ age-related communication and their associations with aging well, depressive symptoms, and alcohol use disorder symptoms. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(4), 1172–1192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519890413
7.
BernholdQ. S.GasiorekJ.GilesH. (2020). Communicative predictors of older adults’ successful aging, mental health, and alcohol use. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 90(2), 107–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415018784715
8.
BernholdQ. S.GilesH. (2018). Ethnic differences in grandparent-grandchild affectionate communication. Communication Reports, 31(3), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2018.1488984
9.
BernholdQ. S.GilesH. (2019). Older adults’ recalled memorable messages about aging and their associations with successful aging. Human Communication Research, 45(4), 474–507. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqz011
BredaA. I.WattsA. S. (2017). Expectations regarding aging, physical activity, and physical function in older adults. Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, 3, 233372141770235. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333721417702350
12.
EibachR. P.MockS. E.CourtneyE. A. (2010). Having a “senior moment”: Induced aging phenomenology, subjective age, and susceptibility to ageist stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(4), 643–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.002
13.
FischerR. S.NorbergA.LundmanB. (2008). Embracing opposites: Meanings of growing old as narrated by people aged 85. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 67(3), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.2190/AG.67.3.d
14.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
15.
FowlerC.GasiorekJ. (2020). Implications of metastereotypes for attitudes toward intergenerational contact. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 23(1), 48–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217744032
16.
FowlerC.GasiorekJ.GilesH. (2015). The role of communication in aging well: Introducing the communicative ecology model of successful aging. Communication Monographs, 82(4), 431–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1024701
17.
FowlerC.HarwoodJ. (2021). Does perceived normativity of intergenerational contact enhance the effects of imagined intergenerational contact?Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(7), 1151–1179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220934548
18.
GasiorekJ.FowlerC. (2020). Effects of “environmental chatter” about age and aging on middle-aged and older adults’ communication and perceptions of aging efficacy. Western Journal of Communication, 84(1), 98–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2019.1637930
19.
GasiorekJ.FowlerC.GilesH. (2015). What does successful aging sound like? Profiling communication about aging. Human Communication Research, 41(4), 577–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12060
20.
GasiorekJ.FowlerC.GilesH. (2016). Communication and successful aging. In NussbaumJ. F. (Ed.), Communication across the lifespan: ICA theme book (pp. 35–50). Peter Lang.
21.
GasiorekJ.FowlerC.GilesH. (2019). Communication and successful aging: Testing alternative conceptualizations of uncertainty. Communication Monographs, 86(2), 229–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/02637751.2018.1538561
22.
GettingsP. E.KuangK. (2022). Extending the communicative ecology model of successful aging using talk about careers and retirement. Communication Monographs. Advance online. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2021.2025410
23.
GilesH.GasiorekJ.DavisS.GilesJ. (2022). Communication for successful aging: Empowering individuals across the lifespan. Routledge.
24.
GilesH.WilliamsA. (1994). Patronizing the young: Forms and evaluations. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 39(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.2190/0LUC-NWMA-K5LX-NUVW
25.
HarwoodJ.GilesH. (1996). Reactions to older people being patronized: The roles of response strategies and attributed thoughts. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15(4), 395–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X960154001
26.
HayesA. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310360
27.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
28.
HeiderF. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. John Wiley & Sons.
29.
HolahanC. K.HolahanC. J. (1987). Self-efficacy, social support, and depression in aging: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Gerontology, 42(1), 65–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/42.1.65
30.
HolahanC. K.HolahanC. J.VelasquezK. E.NorthR. J. (2008). Longitudinal change in happiness during aging: The predictive role of positive expectancies. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 66(3), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.2190/AG.66.3.d
31.
HummertM. L. (2011). Age stereotypes and aging. In SchaieK. W.WillisS. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (7th ed., pp. 249–262). Academic Press.
32.
HummertM. L.GarstkaT. A.ShanerJ. L.StrahmS. (1994). Stereotypes of the elderly held by young, middle-aged, and elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology, 49(5), 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/49.5.P240
LevyB. R.SladeM. D.KunkelS. R.KaslS. V. (2002). Longevity increased by positive self-perceptions of aging. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.2.261
35.
LevyB. R.ZondermanA. B.SladeM. D.FerrucciL. (2009). Age stereotypes held earlier in life predict cardiovascular events in later life. Psychological Science, 20(3), 296–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02298.x
ManusovV.Koenig KellasJ.TreesA. (2004). Do unto others? Conversational moves and perceptions of attentiveness toward other face in accounting sequences between friends. Human Communication Research, 30(4), 514–539. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00743.x
38.
ManusovV. L. (2005). Attribution theories: Assessing causal and responsibility judgments in families. In BraithwaiteD. O.BaxterL. A. (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 181–196). Sage.
39.
MarianoJ.MarquesS.RamosM. R.GerardoF.Lage da CunhaC.GirenkoA.AlexanderssonJ.StreeB.LamannaM.LorenzattoM.MikkelsenL. P.Bundgard-JorgensenU.RegoS.de VriesH. (2021). Too old for technology? Stereotype threat and technology use by older adults. Behavior and Information Technology. Advance online. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1882577
40.
MenkinJ. A.RoblesT. F.GruenewaldT. L.TannerE. K.SeemanT. E. (2017). Positive expectations regarding aging linked to more new friends in later life. Journals of Gerontology. Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 72(5), 771–781. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv118
41.
MongeauP. A.HaleJ. L.AllesM. (1994). An experimental investigation of accounts and attributions following sexual infidelity. Communication Monographs, 61(4), 326–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759409376341
42.
NuevoR.WetherellJ. L.MontorioI.RuizM. A.CabreraI. (2009). Knowledge about aging and worry in older adults: Testing the mediating role of intolerance of uncertainty. Aging and Mental Health, 13(1), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860802591088
43.
NussbaumJ. F.CouplandJ. (eds) (2004). Handbook of communication and aging research (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
PriorK.Sargent-CoxK. A. (2014). Students’ expectations of ageing: An evaluation of the impact of imagined intergenerational contact and the mediating role of aging anxiety. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.06.001
46.
PruchnoR. A.Wilson-GendersonM.RoseM.CartwrightF. (2010). Successful aging: Early influences and contemporary characteristics. The Gerontologist, 50(6), 821–833. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnq041
47.
RyanE. B.Bieman-CoplandS.Kwong SeeS. T.EllisC. H.AnasA. P. (2002). Age excuses: Conversational management of memory failures in older adults. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57B(3), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/57.3.P256
48.
RyanE. B.GilesH.BartolucciG.HenwoodK. (1986). Psycholinguistic and social psychological components of communication by and with the elderly. Language & Communication, 6(1–2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(86)90002-9
49.
RyanE. B.MeredithS. D.MacleanM. J.OrangeJ. B. (1995). Changing the way we talk with elders: Promoting health using the communication enhancement model. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 41(2), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.2190/FP05-FM8V-0Y9F-53FX
50.
SarkisianC. A.HaysR. D.BerryS. H.MangioneC. M. (2001). Expectations regarding aging among older adults and physicians who care for older adults. Medical Care, 39(9), 1025–1036. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200109000-00012
51.
SarkisianC. A.SteersW. N.HaysR. D.MangioneC. M. (2005). Development of the 12-item expectations regarding aging survey. The Gerontologist, 45(2), 240–248. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/45.2.240
SochaT. J.PittsM. J. (2012). The positive side of interpersonal communication. Peter Lang.
54.
StewartT. L.ChipperfieldJ. G.PerryR. P.HammJ. M. (2016). Attributing heart attack and stroke to “old age”: Implications for subsequent health outcomes among older adults. Journal of Health Psychology, 21(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105314521477
55.
SwiftH. J.AbramsD.MarquesS.VauclairC. M.BrattC.LimaM. L. (2018). Ageism in the European region: Finding from the European social survey. In AyalonL.Tesch-RömerC. (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on ageism (pp. 441–459). Springer.
56.
TaoC. C.BucyE. P. (2007). Conceptualizing media stimuli in experimental research: Psychological versus attribute-based definitions. Human Communication Research, 33(4), 397–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00305.x
57.
VociA. (2006). The link between identification and in-group favouritism: Effects of threat to social identity and trust-related emotions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(2), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605X52245
58.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A. (1994). The PANAS-X. Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule—Expanded form. Unpublished manuscript.
59.
WestR. L.BagwellD. K.Dark-FreudemanA. (2008). Self-efficacy and memory aging: The impact of a memory intervention based on self-efficacy. Aging. Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 15(3), 302–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825580701440510
60.
WhatleyM. C.CastelA. D. (2020). Improving expectations regarding aging in younger adults: A classroom study. Educational Gerontology, 46(12), 785–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2020.1826088
61.
WhatleyM. C.SiegelA. L. M.SchwartzS. T.SilajK. M.CastelA. D. (2020). Younger and older adults’ mood and expectations regarding aging during COVID-19. Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, 6, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333731420960259
62.
WoszidloA.KunkelA. (2018). Social learning theory: An emphasis on modeling in parent-child relationships. In BraithwaiteD. O.SuterE. A.FloydK. (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 290–299). Routledge.
