Present-Future Self-Continuity and Intergenerational Communication as Predictors of Young Adults’ Evaluations of Older Adults and Attitudes Toward Aging

Abstract

This study examined how young adults’ perceived similarity to their future self at age 70 (present-future self-continuity) and experiences of environmental “chatter” about aging predicted their views of older adults, and their anxiety and efficacy related to aging. Experiencing nonaccommodation from older adults predicted greater anxiety, lower efficacy, and more negative views of older adults; greater present-future self-continuity predicted higher efficacy about aging. Young adults’ present-future self-continuity also moderated the effects of accommodation from older adults on these outcomes.

Keywords

intergenerational communication communication accommodation nonaccommodation communicative ecology model of successful aging aging

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bernhold

Q. S.

(2019). Older parents’ and middle-aged children's Communication as predictors of children's Successful aging. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38(3), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0261927X18815929.

Bernhold

Q. S.

Gasiorek

Giles

(2020). Communicative predictors of older adults’ successful aging, mental health, and alcohol use. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 90(2), 107–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415018784715.

Bernhold

Q. S.

Giles

(2019). Older adults’ recalled memorable messages about aging and their associations with successful aging. Human Communication Research, 45(4), 474–507. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqz011.

Bernhold

Q. S.

Giles

(2020). The role of grandchildren's Own age-related communication and accommodation from grandparents in predicting grandchildren's well-being. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 91(2), 149–181. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0091415019852775.

Brown

J. D.

(2012). Understanding the better than average effect: Motives (still) matter. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(2), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211432763.

Cross

Markus

(1991). Possible selves across the life span. Human Development, 34(4), 230–255. https://doi.org/10.1159/000277058.

Dragojevic

Gasiorek

Giles

(2016). Accommodative strategies as core of CAT. In Giles

(Ed.), Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal and social identities across contexts (pp. 39–59). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316226537.003 .

Fowler

Gasiorek

Giles

(2015). The role of communication in aging well: Introducing the communicative ecology model of successful aging. Communication Monographs, 82(4), 431–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1024701.

Frazier

L. D.

Hooker

Johnson

P. M.

Kaus

C. R.

(2000). Continuity and change in possible selves in later life: A 5-year longitudinal study. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22(3), 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2203_10.

10.

Gasiorek

(2016). The “dark side” of CAT: Nonaccommodation. In Giles

(Ed.), Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal and social identities across contexts (pp. 85–104). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316226537.005 .

11.

Gasiorek

Fowler

(2020). Effects of “environmental chatter” about age and aging on middle-aged and older adults’ communication and perceptions of aging efficacy. Western Journal of Communication, 84(1), 98–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2019.1637930.

12.

Gasiorek

Fowler

Giles

(2016). Communication and successful aging. In Nussbaum

(Ed.), Communication across the lifespan (pp. 35–50). Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-1701-5.

13.

Giles

Fortman

Honeycutt

Ota

(2003). Future selves and others: A lifespan and cross-cultural perspective. Communication Reports, 16(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934210309384486.

14.

Giles

Gasiorek

(2011). Intergenerational communication practices. In Schaie

K. W.

Willis

(Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (7^th ed., pp. 233–247). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-380882-0.00015-2.

15.

Harwood

(2000). “Sharp!” lurking incoherence in a television portrayal of an older adult. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19(1), 110–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X00019001006.

16.

Holladay

S. J.

(2002). “Have fun while you can,” “you’re only as old as you feel,” and “don’t ever get old!”: An examination of memorable messages about aging. Journal of Communication, 52(4), 681–697. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02568.x.

17.

Hummert

M. L.

(2010). Age group identities, stereotypes, and communication. In Giles

Reid

Harwood

(Eds.), The dynamics of intergroup communication (pp. 42–52). Peter Lang.

18.

Hummert

M. L.

(2012). Challenges and opportunities for communication between age groups. In Giles

(Ed.), Handbook of intergroup communication (pp. 223–236). Routledge.

19.

Hummert

M. L.

(2019). Intergenerational communication. In Harwood

Gasiorek

Pierson

NussBaum

J. F.

Gallois

(Eds.), Language, communication, and intergroup relations: A celebration of the scholarship of howard giles (pp. 130–161). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315142807.

20.

Kite

M. E.

Stockdale

G. D.

Whitley

B. E.

Johnson

B. T.

(2005). Attitudes toward younger and older adults: An updated meta-analytic review. Journal of Social Issues, 61(2), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00404.x.

21.

Lynch

S. M.

(2005). Measurement and prediction of aging anxiety. Research on Aging, 22(5), 533–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027500225004.

22.

McCann

R. M.

Ota

Giles

(2017). Aging and communication across cultures. In Chen

(Ed.), Intercultural communication (pp. 289–308). Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501510397-013.

23.

McLean

K. C.

(2008). Stories of the young and the old: Personal continuity and narrative identity. Developmental Psychology, 44(1), 254–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.254.

24.

Myers

Giles

Reid

S. A.

Nabi

R. L.

(2008). Law enforcement encounters: The effects of officer accommodativeness and crime severity on interpersonal attributions are mediated by intergroup sensitivity. Communication Studies, 59(4), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970802467361.

25.

Nikander

(2009). Doing change and continuity: Age identity and the micro–macro divide. Ageing & Society, 29(6), 863–881. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X09008873.

26.

Packer

D. J.

Chasteen

A. L.

(2006). Looking to the future: How possible aged selves influence prejudice toward older adults. Social Cognition, 24(3), 218–247. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2006.24.3.218.

27.

Ryff

C. D.

(1991). Possible selves in adulthood and old age: A tale of shifting horizons. Psychology and Aging, 6(2), 286. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.6.2.286.

28.

Tajfel

Turner

J. C.

(1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worchel

Austin

W. G.

(Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2^nd edition, pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.

29.

Troll

L. E.

Skaff

M. M.

(1997). Perceived continuity of self in very old age. Psychology and Aging, 12(1), 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.12.1.162.

30.

Vignoles

V. L.

Manzi

Regalia

Jemmolo

Scabini

(2008). Identity motives underlying desired and feared possible future selves. Journal of Personality, 76(5), 1165–1200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00518.x.

31.

Williams

Ota

Giles

Pierson

H. D.

Gallois

Lim

T.-S.

Ryan

E. B.

Somera

Maher

Cai

Harwood

(1997). Young people's Beliefs about intergenerational communication: An initial cross-cultural comparison. Communication Research, 24(4), 370–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365097024004003.