Reclaiming involves self-labeling with derogatory labels. This behavior can be processed differently depending on contextual factors: Type of label, user, and observer. Sexual minority and heterosexual participants saw a vignette depicting either a gay or a heterosexual man who self-labeled with a derogatory or a category label. Sexual minority participants perceived the act of self-labeling with a derogatory label by a gay man as less offensive than heterosexual participants did. Sexual minorities, more than heterosexual participants, perceived self-labeling as powerful.
AlmagroM.HannikainenI. R.VillanuevaN. (2022). Whose words hurt? Contextual determinants of offensive speech. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(6), 937–953. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F01461672211026128
2.
AustinJ. L. (1975). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
BianchiM.CarnaghiA.PiccoliV.StragàM.ZottiD. (2019). On the descriptive and expressive function of derogatory group labels: An experimental test. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38(5-6), 756–772. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0261927X19867739
5.
BossonJ. K.Prewitt-FreilinoJ. L.TaylorJ. N. (2005). Role rigidity: A problem of identity misclassification?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(4), 552–565. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.552
6.
BrontsemaR. (2004). A queer revolution: Reconceptualizing the debate over linguistic reclamation. Colorado Research in Linguistics, 17(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.25810/dky3-zq57
7.
CarnaghiA.MaassA. (2008). Gay or fag? On the consequences of derogatory labels. In KashimaY.FielderK.FreytagP. (Eds.), Stereotype dynamics: Language-based approaches to stereotype formation, maintenance, and transformation (pp. 117–134). Erlbaum.
8.
CervoneC.AugoustinosM.MaassA. (2021). The language of derogation and hate: Functions, consequences, and reappropriation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(1), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20967394
CroomA. M. (2018). Asian Slurs and stereotypes in the USA: A context-sensitive account of derogation and appropriation. Pragmatics and Society, 9(4), 495–517. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.14027.cro
14.
EdmondsonD. (2021). Word norms and measures of linguistic reclamation for LGBTQ+ slurs. Pragmatics & Cognition, 28(1), 193–221. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.00023.edm
15.
FasoliF.CarnaghiA.PaladinoM. P. (2015). Social acceptability of sexist derogatory and sexist objectifying slurs across contexts. Language Sciences, 52, 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.03.003
16.
FasoliF.HegartyP.CarnaghiA. (2019). Sounding gay, speaking as a “fag”: Auditory gaydar and the perception of reclaimed homophobic language. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38(5–6), 798–808. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X19852753
17.
GalinskyA. D.HugenbergK.GroomC.BodenhausenG. V. (2003). The reappropriation of stigmatizing labels: Implications for social identity. In PolzerJ. (Ed.), Identity issues in groups (pp. 221–256). Emerald Publishing.
18.
GalinskyA. D.WangC. S.WhitsonJ. A.AnicichE. M.HugenbergK.BodenhausenG. V. (2013). The reappropriation of stigmatizing labels: The reciprocal relationship between power and self-labeling. Psychological Science, 24(10), 2020–2029. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613482943
19.
GaucherD.HuntB.SinclairL. (2015). Can pejorative terms ever lead to positive social consequences? The case of SlutWalk. Language Sciences, 52, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.03.005
20.
GibsonJ. L.EpsteinL.MagarianG. P. (2020). Taming uncivil discourse. Political Psychology, 41, 383–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12626
21.
GilesH. (ed.). (2016). Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal relationships and social identities across contexts. Cambridge University Press.
22.
HedgerJ. A. (2013). Meaning and racial slurs: Derogatory epithets and the semantics/pragmatics interface. Language & Communication, 33(3), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2013.04.004
JayT.JanschewitzK. (2008). The pragmatics of swearing. Journal of Politeness Research Language, Behaviour, Culture, 4, 267–328. https://doi.org/10.1515/JPLR.2008.013
KennedyR. (2003). Nigger: The strange career of a troublesome word. Vintage Books.
27.
KleinmanS.EzzellM. B.FrostA. C. (2009). Reclaiming critical analysis: The social harms of ‘bitch.’. Sociological Analysis, 3(1), 46–68.
28.
MallettR. K.HuntsingerJ. R.SinclairS.SwimJ. K. (2008). Seeing through their eyes: When majority group members take collective action on behalf of an outgroup. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11(4), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430208095400
29.
O’DeaC. J.MillerS. S.AndresE. B.RayM. H.TillD. F.SaucierD. A. (2015). Out of bounds: Factors affecting the perceived offensiveness of racial slurs. Language Sciences, 52, 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.09.005
30.
O’DeaC. J.SaucierD. A. (2017). Negative emotions versus target descriptions: Examining perceptions of racial slurs as expressive and descriptive. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(6), 813–830. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216634193
31.
O’DeaC. J.SaucierD. A. (2020). Perceptions of racial slurs used by black individuals toward white individuals: Derogation or affiliation?Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(5-6), 678–700. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0261927X20904983
32.
PeruginiM.GallucciM.CostantiniG. (2018). A practical primer to power analysis for simple experimental designs. International Review of Social Psychology, 31(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.181
33.
RadkeH. R.KutlacaM.BeckerJ. C. (2022). Disadvantaged group members’ evaluations and support for allies: Investigating the role of communication style and group membership. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(6), 1437–1456. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211010932
SelvanathanH. P.LickelB.DasguptaN. (2020). An integrative framework on the impact of allies: How identity–based needs influence intergroup solidarity and social movements. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(6), 1344–1361. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2697
36.
WangC. S.WhitsonJ. A.AnicichE. M.KrayL. J.GalinskyA. D. (2017). Challenge your stigma: How to reframe and revalue negative stereotypes and slurs. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(1), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416676578
WhitsonJ.AnicichE. M.WangC. S.GalinskyA. D. (2017). Navigating stigma and group conflict: Group identification as a cause and consequence of self–labeling. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 10(2), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12094
39.
WilczyńskaB. (2022). “Being a Yid”: Jewish identity of Tottenham hotspur fans—analysis and interpretation. Qualitative Sociology Review, 18(3), 86–105. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.18.3.04
40.
ZoskyD. L.AlbertsR. (2016). What’s in a name? Exploring use of the word queer as a term of identification within the college-aged LGBT community. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 26(7-8), 597–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2016.1238803
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
