Reclaiming implies that homophobic labels used by gay individuals are perceived as less offensive and their use as empowering speakers. We examined whether listeners in Italy and Britain perceived homophobic labels as “reclaimed” when men’s voices implied their homosexuality. Gay and straight male speakers used neutral or homophobic labels referring to themselves or another. Homophobic labels were offensive when used by straight speakers and when labelling others. Gay speakers self-labelling with homophobic labels were not perceived as more powerful.
BrontsemaR. (2004). A queer revolution: Reconceptualizing the debate over linguistic reclamation. Colorado Research in Linguistics, 17, 9-17. doi:10.25810/dky3-zq57
2.
CarnaghiA.MaassA. (2007). In-group and out-group perspectives in the use of derogatory labels: Gay versus fag. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26, 142-156. doi:10.1177/0261927X07300077
3.
CarnaghiA.MaassA. (2008). Derogatory language in intergroup context: Are “gay” and “fag” synonymous. In KashimaY.FiedlerK.FreytagP. (Eds.), Stereotype dynamics: Language-based approaches to the formation, maintenance, and transformation of stereotypes (pp. 117-134). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
4.
CarnaghiA.MaassA.FasoliF. (2011). Enhancing masculinity by slandering homosexuals: The role of homophobic epithets in heterosexual gender identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1655-1665. doi:10.1177/0146167211424167
5.
CroomA. M. (2014). The semantics of slurs: A refutation of pure expressivism. Language Sciences, 41, 227-242. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2013.07.003
6.
FasoliF.MaassA. (2018). Voice and prejudice: The social costs of auditory gaydar. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 26, 98-110. doi:10.1080/15456870.2018.1432617
7.
FasoliF.MaassA.CarnaghiA. (2015). Labelling and discrimination: Do homophobic epithets undermine fair distribution of resources?British Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 383-393. doi:10.1111/bjso.12090
8.
FasoliF.MaassA.PaladinoM. P.SulpizioS. (2017). Gay- and lesbian-sounding auditory cues elicit stereotyping and discrimination. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 1261-1277. doi:10.1007/s10508-017-0962-0
9.
FasoliF.MaassA.SulpizioS. (2016). Communication of the “invisible”: Disclosing and inferring sexual orientation through visual and vocal cues. In GilesH.MaassA. (Eds.), Advances in intergroup communication (pp. 193-208). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
10.
FasoliF.PaladinoM. P.CarnaghiA.JettenJ.BastianB.BainP. G. (2016). Not “just words”: Exposure to homophobic epithets leads to dehumanizing and physical distancing from gay men. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 237-248. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2148
11.
GalinskyA. D.HugenbergK.GroomC.BodenhausenG. (2003). The reappropriation of stigmatizing labels: Implications for social identity. In NealeM.MannixE. A.PolzerJ. (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams (pp. 221-256). Greenwich, CT: Elsevier Science.
12.
GalinskyA. D.WangC. S.WhitsonJ. A.AnicichE. M.HugenbergK.BodenhausenG. V. (2013). The reappropriation of stigmatizing labels: The reciprocal relationship between power and self-labeling. Psychological Science, 24, 2020-2029. doi:10.1177/0956797613482943
13.
GowenC. W.BrittT. W. (2006). The interactive effects of homosexual speech and sexual orientation on the stigmatization of men: Evidence for expectancy violation theory. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 25, 437-456. doi:10.1177/0261927X06292769
14.
HedgerJ. A. (2013). Meaning and racial slurs: Derogatory epithets and the semantics/pragmatics interface. Language & Communication, 33, 205-213. doi:10.1016/j.langcom.2013.04.004
15.
HegartyP.MasseyS. (2006). Anti-homosexual prejudice as opposed to what? Queer theory and the social psychology of anti-gay attitudes. Journal of Homosexuality, 52, 47-71. doi:10.1300/J082v52n01_03
16.
HenryP. J.ButlerS. E.BrandtM. J. (2014). The influence of target group status on the perception of the offensiveness of group-based slurs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 185-192. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.03.012
17.
MoonD. (1995). Insult and inclusion: The term fag hag and gay male “community.”Social Forces, 74, 487-510. doi:10.2307/2580489
O’DeaC. J.MillerS. S.AndresE. B.RayM. H.TillD. F.SaucierD. A. (2015). Out of bounds: Factors affecting the perceived offensiveness of racial slurs. Language Sciences, 52, 155-164. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2014.09.005
20.
O’DeaC. J.SaucierD. A. (2017). Negative emotions versus target descriptions: Examining perceptions of racial slurs as expressive and descriptive. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 813-830. doi:10.1177/1368430216634193
SaucierD. A.TillD. F.MillerS. S.O’DeaC. J.AndresE. (2015). Slurs against masculinity: Masculine honor beliefs and men’s reactions to slurs. Language Sciences, 52, 108-120. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2014.09.006
24.
SimonL.GreenbergJ. (1996). Further progress in understanding the effects of derogatory ethnic labels: The role of preexisting attitudes toward the targeted group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1195-1204. doi:10.1177/01461672962212001
Van OudenhovenJ. P.De RaadB.Askevis-LeherpeuxF.BoskiP.BrunborgG. S.CarmonaC.. . . RammstedtB. (2008). Terms of abuse as expression and reinforcement of cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 174-185. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2008.02.001
27.
VandelloJ. A.BossonJ. K.CohenD.BurnafordR. M.WeaverJ. R. (2008). Precarious manhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1325-1339. doi:10.1037/a0012453
28.
WangC. S.WhitsonJ. A.AnicichE. M.KrayL. J.GalinskyA. D. (2017). Challenge your stigma: How to reframe and revalue negative stereotypes and slurs. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 75-80. doi:10.1177/0963721416676578
29.
WhitsonJ.AnicichE. M.WangC. S.GalinskyA. D. (2017). Navigating stigma and group conflict: Group identification as a cause and consequence of self-labeling. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 10, 88-106. doi:10.1111/ncmr.12094
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
