Bonding Through Language Imitation: Influence of Social Ostracism on Structural Priming

Abstract

This research investigated whether being excluded can increase language imitation and thus lead to a stronger structural priming effect. In Study 1, student participants recalling an experience of social exclusion showed a larger priming effect than those recalling an experience of social inclusion. Employing a larger, more diverse sample, Study 2 set out to conceptually replicate Study 1 by creating a concurrent experience of social exclusion through a computerized ball-toss game. It was found that excluded individuals demonstrated a stronger tendency to mimic the syntactic structure used by their interactional partner than included individuals. Taken together, these findings enrich an emergent stream of research that finds structural priming is not an independent cognitive process, but conditioned by various socio-cognitive factors.

Keywords

social ostracism exclusion language imitation structural priming communication accommodation theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrams

Weick

Thomas

Colbe

Franklin

K. M.

(2011). On-line ostracism affects children differently from adolescents and adults. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29(1), 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151010X494089

Afshari Saleh

(2020). Mock aggression: Navigating affiliation and disaffiliation in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(4), 481–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1833590

Althouse

A. D.

(2021). Post hoc power: Not empowering, just misleading. Journal of Surgical Research, 259, A3–A6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.10.049

Balcetis

E. E.

Dale

(2005). An exploration of social modulation of syntactic priming. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 184–189. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0kn388rj.

Baumeister

R. F.

Twenge

J. M.

Nuss

C. K.

(2002). Effects of social exclusion on cognitive processes: Anticipated aloneness reduces intelligent thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 817–827. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.817

Bernhold

Q. S.

Giles

(2020). Vocal accommodation and mimicry. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 44(1), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-019-00317-y

Bernhold

Q. S.

Giles

(2022). Emotional mimicry: A communication accommodation approach. Cognition and Emotion, 36(5), 799–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2022.2109599

Bidgood

Pine

Rowland

Sala

Freudenthal

Ambridge

B. E. N.

(2021). Verb argument structure overgeneralizations for the English intransitive and transitive constructions: Grammaticality judgments and production priming. Language and Cognition, 13(3), 397–437. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2021.8

Bock

J. K.

(1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18(3), 355–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6

10.

Branigan

H. P.

Pickering

M. J.

Cleland

A. A.

(1999). Syntactic priming in written production: Evidence for rapid decay. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6(4), 635–640. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212972

11.

Branigan

H. P.

Pickering

M. J.

Cleland

A. A.

(2000). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75(2), B13–B25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00081-5

12.

Brewer

M. B.

(2007). The importance of being we: Human nature and intergroup relations. American Psychologist, 62(8), 728–738. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.8.728

13.

Cesario

(2014). Priming, replication, and the hardest science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613513470

14.

Chun

Kaan

(2022). The effects of speaker accent on syntactic priming in second-language speakers. Second Language Research, 38(2), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0267658320926563

15.

Cohen Priva

Sanker

(2020). Natural leaders: Some interlocutors elicit greater convergence across conversations and across characteristics. Cognitive Science, 44(10), e12897. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12897

16.

de Klerk

Albiston

Bulgarelli

Southgate

Hamilton

(2020). Observing third-party ostracism enhances facial mimicry in 30-month-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 196, 104862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104862

17.

Dell

(1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93(3), 283–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283

18.

Eder

(2007). Cognitive sociology and the theory of communicative action: The role of communication and language in the making of the social bond. European Journal of Social Theory, 10(3), 389–408. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1368431007080702

19.

Giles

(Ed.). (2016). Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal relationships and social identities across contexts. Cambridge University Press.

20.

Giles

Scherer

K. R.

Taylor

D. M.

(1979). Speech markers in social interaction. In Scherer

K. R.

Giles

(Eds.), Social markers in speech (pp. 343–381). Cambridge University Press.

21.

Giles

Taylor

D. M.

Bourhis

(1973). Towards a theory of interpersonal accommodation through language: Some Canadian data. Language in Society, 2(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500000701

22.

Hanel

P. H.

Vione

K. C.

(2016). Do student samples provide an accurate estimate of the general public? PLoS One, 11(12), e0168354. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168354

23.

Hänze

Hesse

F. W.

(1993). Emotional influences on semantic priming. Cognition and Emotion, 7(2), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939308409184

24.

Henrich

Heine

S. J.

Norenzayan

(2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29. https://doi.org/10.1038/466029a

25.

Hess

Fischer

(2022). Emotional mimicry as social regulator: Theoretical considerations. Cognition and Emotion, 36(5), 785–793. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2022.2103522

26.

Heyselaar

Hagoort

Segaert

(2017). How social opinion influences syntactic processing-an investigation using virtual reality. PLoS One, 12(4), e0174405. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174405

27.

Hopkins

Z. L.

Branigan

H. P.

(2020). Children show selectively increased language imitation after experiencing ostracism. Developmental Psychology, 56(5), 897–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000915

28.

Hopkins

Z. L.

Yuill

Branigan

H. P.

(2021). Autistic children’s language imitation shows reduced sensitivity to ostracism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 52(5), 1929–1941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05041-5

29.

Hwang

Chun

(2018). Influence of social perception and social monitoring on structural priming. Cognitive Science, 42(S1), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12604

30.

Jaeger

T. F.

Snider

N. E.

(2013). Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime’s prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition, 127(1), 57–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.013

31.

Lakin

J. L.

Chartrand

T. L.

(2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychological Science, 14(4), 334–339. https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1467-9280.14481

32.

Lakin

J. L.

Chartrand

T. L.

Arkin

R. M.

(2008). I am too just like you: Nonconscious mimicry as an automatic behavioral response to social exclusion. Psychological Science, 19(8), 816–822. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9280.2008.02162.x

33.

Lee

Shrum

L. J.

(2017). The role of cultural communication norms in social exclusion effects. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2016.05.006

34.

Lewin

(1943). Psychology and the process of group living. The Journal of Social Psychology, 17(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1943.9712269

35.

Shen

(2022). A clearer sense of self: Relationship between bilingualism and overconfidence bias. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 43(7), 600–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1749644

36.

Lux

Schnepf

Jin

Formanowicz

(2021). Left out–feelings of social exclusion incite individuals with high conspiracy mentality to reject complex scientific messages. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(5-6), 627–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X211044789

37.

Mehrabian

(1970). The development and validation of measures of affiliative tendency and sensitivity to rejection. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(2), 417–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000226

38.

Nezlek

J. B.

Wesselmann

E. D.

Wheeler

Williams

K. D.

(2012). Ostracism in everyday life. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 16(2), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028029

39.

Nitschke

Serratrice

Kidd

(2014). The effect of linguistic nativeness on structural priming in comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(5), 525–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.766355

40.

Over

Carpenter

(2009). Priming third–party ostracism increases affiliative imitation in children. Developmental Science, 12(3), F1–F8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00820.x

41.

Over

Uskul

A. K.

(2016). Culture moderates children’s responses to ostracism situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(5), 710–724. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000050

42.

Riordan

M. A.

Kreuz

R. J.

Olney

A. M.

(2014). Alignment is a function of conversational dynamics. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(5), 465–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X13512306

43.

Slavich

G. M.

Way

B. M.

Eisenberger

N. I.

Taylor

S. E.

(2010). Neural sensitivity to social rejection is associated with inflammatory responses to social stress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(33), 14817–14822. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0261927X13512306

44.

Soliz

Giles

Gasiorek

(2021). Communication accommodation theory: Converging toward an understanding of communication adaptation in interpersonal relationships. In Braithewaite

Schrodt

(Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (3rd. ed., pp. 130–142). Routledge.

45.

Sommer

K. L.

Baumeister

R. F.

(2002). Self-evaluation, persistence, and performance following implicit rejection: The role of trait self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(7), 926–938. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F014616720202800706

46.

Song

Over

Carpenter

(2015). Children draw more affiliative pictures following priming with third-party ostracism. Developmental Psychology, 51(6), 831–840. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039176

47.

Stengelin

Golubovic

Toppe

Over

Haun

D. B.

(2021). Priming third-party ostracism does not lead to increased affiliation in three Serbian communities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 203, 105019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105019

48.

Street

R. L.

Jr. Giles

(1982). Speech accommodation theory: A social cognitive model of speech behavior. In Rolof

M. E.

Berger

C. R.

(Eds.), Social cognition and communication (pp. 193–226). Sage.

49.

Suffill

Kutasi

Pickering

M. J.

Branigan

H. P.

(2021). Lexical alignment is affected by addressee but not speaker nativeness. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 24(4), 746–757. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921000092

50.

Talhelm

Zhang

Oishi

Shimin

Duan

Lan

Kitayama

(2014). Large-scale psychological differences within China explained by rice versus wheat agriculture. Science (New York, N.Y.), 344(6184), 603–608. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246850

51.

Tang

Lahat

Crowley

M. J.

Schmidt

L. A.

(2019). Neurodevelopmental differences to social exclusion: An event-related neural oscillation study of children, adolescents, and adults. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 19(3), 520–532. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000456

52.

Watson

Clark

L. A.

Tellegen

(1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063

53.

Watson-Jones

R. E.

Legare

C. H.

Whitehouse

Clegg

J. M.

(2014). Task-specific effects of ostracism on imitative fidelity in early childhood. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(3), 204–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.01.004

54.

Watson-Jones

R. E.

Whitehouse

Legare

C. H.

(2016). In-group ostracism increases high-fidelity imitation in early childhood. Psychological Science, 27(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0956797615607205

55.

Weatherholtz

Campbell-Kibler

Jaeger

T. F.

(2014). Socially-mediated syntactic alignment. Language Variation and Change, 26(3), 387–420. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394514000155

56.

Wesselmann

E. D.

Cardoso

F. D.

Slater

Williams

K. D.

(2012). To be looked at as though air: Civil attention matters. Psychological Science, 23(2), 166–168. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0956797611427921

57.

Williams

K. D.

(2002). Ostracism: The power of silence. Guilford Press.

58.

Williams

K. D.

(2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 425–452. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085641

59.

Williams

K. D.

Cheung

C. K. T.

Choi

(2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 748–762. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.748

60.

Zhang

Y. B.

Pitts

(2019). Interpersonal accommodation. In Harwood

Gasiorek

Pierson

NussBaum

J. F.

Gallois

(Eds.), Language, communication, and intergroup relations: A celebration of the scholarship of Howard Giles (pp. 192–216). Routledge.

61.

Zhong

C. B.

Leonardelli

G. J.

(2008). Cold and lonely: Does social exclusion literally feel cold? Psychological Science, 19(9), 838–842. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9280.2008.02165.x

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB