Research on communication accommodation theory in online communication has documented convergence primarily in terms of lexical variables. This article presents the results of two studies that investigate convergence in structural variables in instant messaging (IM) conversations. Study 1 examines zero-history, intragroup dyads participating in a task-based IM conversation. Study 2 examines IM conversations between friends and contrasts social and task-based interactions. Results show interlocutors have a general tendency toward convergence on both the length and duration of individual contributions. Results also show differences reflecting relational (friends vs. strangers) and conversational (task vs. social) context that affect levels of convergence as the conversation continues.
BunzU.CampbellS. W. (2004). Politeness accommodation in electronic mail. Communication Research Reports, 21, 11-25.
2.
CrookC. W.BoothR. (1997). Building rapport in electronic mail using accommodation theory. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 62, 4-13.
3.
de SiqueiraA.HerringS. C. (2009). Temporal patterns in student-advisor instant messaging exchanges: Individual variation and accommodation. In Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1-10). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press.
4.
GarrettR. K.DanzigerJ. N. (2007). IM = interruption management? Instant messaging and disruption in the workplace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, Article 2. Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/garrett.html
5.
GilesH.OgayT. (2006). Communication accommodation theory. In WhaleyB. B.SamterW. (Eds.), Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars (pp. 293-310). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
HerringS. C. (1996). Two variants of an electronic message system. In HerringS. C. (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 81-106). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
7.
HesseB. W.WernerC. M.AltmanI. (1988). Temporal aspects of computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 4, 147-165.
8.
KalmanY. M.RafaeliS. (2011). Online pauses and silence: Chronemic expectancy violations in written computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 38, 54-69.
9.
KalmanY. M.RavidG.RabanD. R.RafaeliS. (2006). Pauses and response latencies: A chronemic analysis of asynchronous CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1-23.
10.
LeaM.SpearsR. (1992). Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing, 2, 321-341.
11.
LedbetterA. M. (2008). Chronemic cues and sex differences in relational e-mail: Perceiving immediacy and supportive message quality. Social Science Computer Review, 26, 466-482.
12.
LiuY.GintherD.ZelhartP. (2001). How do frequency and duration of messaging affect impression development in computer-mediated communication?Journal of Universal Computer Science, 7, 893-913.
13.
ScissorsL. E.GillA. J.GeraghtyK.GergleD. (2009). In CMC we trust: The role of similarity. In CHI 09: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 527-536). New York, NY: ACM.
14.
ScissorsL. E.GillA. J.GergleD. (2008). Linguistic mimicry and trust in text-based CMC. In CSCW 08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 277-280). New York, NY: ACM.
15.
ThomsonR. (2006). The effect of topic of discussion on gendered language in computer-mediated communication discussion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 25, 167-178.
16.
ThomsonR.MurachverT.GreenJ. (2001). Where is the gender in gendered language?Psychological Science, 12, 171-175.
17.
WangH.-C.FussellS. R. (2010). Groups in groups: Conversational similarity in online multicultural multiparty brainstorming. In CSCW 2010: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 351-360). New York, NY: ACM.
18.
WaltherJ. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2538-2557.
19.
WaltherJ. B.TidwellL. C. (1995).Nonverbal cues in computer-mediated communication, and the effect of chronemics on relational communication. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 5, 355-378.
20.
YaoM. Z.FlanaginA. J. (2006). A self-awareness approach to computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 518-544.
