Gender stereotypes have endured despite substantial change in gender roles. Previous work has assessed how gender stereotypes affect language production in particular interactional contexts. Here, we assessed communication biases where context was less specified: written texts to diffuse audiences. We used Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) to computationally quantify the similarity in meaning between gendered names and stereotype-linked terms in these communications. This revealed that female names were more similar in meaning to the proscriptive (undesirable) masculine terms, such as emotional.
BaayenR. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge University Press.
2.
BarrD. J.LevyR.ScheepersC.TilyH. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
3.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
4.
CrabbA. (2015). The wife drought. Ebury Australia.
EaglyA. H.NaterC.MillerD. I.KaufmannM.SczesnyS. (2020). Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. American Psychologist, 75(3), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000494
7.
EckesT. (2002). Paternalistic and envious gender stereotypes: Testing predictions from the stereotype content model. Sex Roles, 47(3), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021020920715
8.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
9.
GilesH.ReidS. A.HarwoodJ. (2010). Introducing the dynamics of intergroup communication. In GilesH.ReidS. A.HarwoodJ. (Eds.), The dynamics of intergroup communication (pp. 1–14). Peter Lang.
10.
HainesE. L.DeauxK.LofaroN. (2016). The times they are a-changing . . . or are they not? A comparison of gender stereotypes, 1983–2014. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(3), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316634081
11.
HoltgravesT. M.KashimaY. (2008). Language, meaning, and social cognition. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(1), 73–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307309605
12.
KashimaY.KashimaE.KiddE. (2014). Language and culture. In HoltgravesT. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 46–61). Oxford University Press.
13.
KoenigA. M.EaglyA. H.MitchellA. A.RistikariT. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 616–642. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023557
14.
LandauerT. K.FoltzP. W.DarrellL. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25(2–3), 259–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539809545028
15.
LandauerT. K.McNamaraD. S.DennisS.KintschW. (2007). Handbook of latent semantic analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
LeaperC.AyresM. M. (2007). A meta-analytic review of gender variations in adults’ language use: Talkativeness, affiliative speech, and assertive speech. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(4), 328–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307302221
17.
LewisM.LupyanG. (2020). Gender stereotypes are reflected in the distributional structure of 25 languages. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 1021–1028. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0918-6
18.
LonerganC. A.PalomaresN. A. (2020). Physically, biologically, and socially constructed notions of sex and gender in communication science. In FloyidK.WeberR. (Eds.), The handbook of communication science and biology (pp. 429–440). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351235587-37
19.
López-SáezM.MoralesJ. F.LisbonaA. (2008). Evolution of gender stereotypes in Spain: Traits and roles. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11(2), 609–617. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600004613
20.
MaassA.SalviD.ArcuriL.SeminG. (1989). Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 981–993. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.57.6.981
MichelJ. B.ShenY. K.AidenA. P.VeresA.GrayM. K.PickettJ. P.HoibergD.ClancyD.NorvigP.OrwantJ.PinkerS.NowakM. A.AidenE. L.Google BooksT. (2011). Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science, 331(6014), 176–182. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199644
23.
Moss-RacusinC. A.DovidioJ. F.BrescollV. L.GrahamM. J.HandelsmanJ. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(41), 16474–16479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109
24.
NewmanM. L.GroomC. J.HandelmanL. D.PennebakerJ. W. (2008). Gender differences in language use: An analysis of 14,000 text samples. Discourse Processes, 45(3), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530802073712
25.
PalomaresN. A. (2008). Explaining gender-based language use: Effects of gender identity salience on references to emotion and tentative language in intra- and intergroup contexts. Human Communication Research, 34, 263–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00321.x
26.
PalomaresN. A. (2009). Women are sort of more tentative than men, aren’t they?: How men and women use tentative language differently, similarly, and counterstereotypically as a function of gender salience. Communication Research, 36(4), 538–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209333034
27.
PalomaresN. A. (2012). Gender and intergroup communication. In GilesH. (Ed.), The handbook of intergroup communication (pp. 197–210). Routledge.
28.
PereiraF.GershmanS.RitterS.BotvinickM. (2016). A comparative evaluation of off-the-shelf distributed semantic representations for modelling behavioural data. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 33(3–4), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2016.1176907
29.
PhillipsN. D. (2018). YaRrr! The pirate’s guide to R. Bookdown.
30.
PrenticeD. A.CarranzaE. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(4), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00066
31.
R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.R-project.org/
32.
ReicherS. D.SpearsR.PostmesT. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology, 6(1), 161–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779443000049
SteffensM. C.ViladotM. A. (2015). Gender at work: A social psychological perspective. Peter Lang.
35.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
36.
TurnerJ. C.OakesP. J. (1986). The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25(3), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1986.tb00732.x
37.
TurnerJ. C.OakesP. J. (1997). The socially structured mind. In McGartyC.HaslamS. A. (Eds.), The message of social psychology: Perspectives on mind in society. (pp. 355–373). Blackwell.
38.
TurnerJ. C.ReynoldsK. J. (2011). Self-categorization theory. In KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T.van LangeP. (Eds.), Handbook of theories in social psychology (pp. 399–417). Sage.
39.
TwengeJ. M.CampbellW. K.GentileB. (2012). Male and female pronoun use in U.S. books reflects women’s status, 1900–2008. Sex Roles, 67(9), 488–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0194-7
WingateV. S.PalomaresN. A. (2018). Gender issues in intergroup communication. In GilesH.HarwoodJ. (Eds.), The Oxford enclyopedia of intergroup communication (pp. 468–486). Oxford University Press.
