Two studies investigated whether modern sexism predicts men’s use of gender-biased terms for women. When established norms suggest a preference for neutral terms (e.g., woman, female), men lower in sexism should avoid potentially biased terms (e.g., lady, girl). Adhering to such an established norm, however, may require conscious effort. In Study 1, men lower in modern sexism used fewer gender-biased terms in a written format than did men higher in modern sexism. Study 2 replicated this result using an oral format but only when men were not cognitively busy with another task. Cognitive busyness apparently interfered with low modern sexists’ efforts to use more neutral terms. Implications for other forms of gender-biased language, as well as for long-term change in the use of gender-biased language, are discussed.
Allen, I. L. (1990). Unkind words: Ethnic labeling from redskin to WASP. New York: Bergin & Garvey.
2.
American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
Aronson, E., Wilson, T., & Brewer, M. (1998). Experimentation in social psychology. In D. H. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 41-88). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
4.
Banaji, M. R., & Hardin, C. D. (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7, 136-141.
5.
Bessenoff, G. R., & Sherman, J. W. (2000). Automatic and controlled components of prejudice toward fat people. Social Cognition, 18, 329-353.
6.
Cronin, C., & Jreisat, S. (1995). Effects of modeling on the use of nonsexist language among high school freshpersons and seniors. Sex Roles, 33, 819-830.
7.
Devine, P. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
8.
Fiske, S. T., Xu, J., Cuddy, A. C., & Glick, P. (1999). (Dis)respecting versus (dis)liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 473-489.
9.
Förster, J., Higgins, E.T., & Werth, L. (2004). How threat from stereotype disconfirmation triggers self-defense. Social Cognition, 22, 54-74.
10.
Gilbert, D., & Osborne, R. (1989). Thinking backward: Some curable and incurable consequences of cognitive busyness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 940-949.
11.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461-512.
12.
Harrigan, J. A., & Lucic, K. S. (1988). Attitudes about gender bias in language: A reevaluation. Sex Roles, 19, 129-140.
13.
McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the modern racism scale. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.) Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 91-125). New York: Academic Press.
14.
McConnell, A. R., & Fazio, R. H. (1996). Women as men and people: Effects of gender-marked language. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1004-1013.
15.
McMinn, M. R., Lindsay, S.F., Hannum, L. E., & Troyer, P.K. (1990). Does sexist language reflect personal characteristics. Sex Roles, 23, 389-396.
16.
Monteith, M., Spicer, C., & Tooman, G. (1998). Consequences of stereotype suppression: Stereotypes on and not on the rebound. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 355-377.
17.
Monteith, M., Zuwerink, J., & Devine, P. G. (1994). Prejudice and prejudice reduction: Classic challenges, contemporary approaches. In P. G. Devine, D. L. Hamilton, & T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), Social cognition: Impact on social psychology (pp. 324-346). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
18.
Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle?Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247-259.
19.
National Council of Teachers of English. (2002). Guidelines for gender-fair use of language. Retrieved February 1, 2003, from http://www.ncte.org/about/over/positions/category/lang/107647.htm
20.
Prentice, D. A. (1994). Do language reforms change our way of thinking?Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 3-19.
21.
Rudman, L. A., Greenwald, A. G., & McGhee, D. E. (2001). Implicit self-concept and evaluative implicit gender stereotypes: Self and ingroup share desirable traits. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1164-1178.
22.
Ruscher, J. B., Santuzzi, A. M., & Hammer, E. Y. (2003). Shared impression formation in the cognitively interdependent dyad. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 411-425.
23.
Schnake, S. B., & Ruscher, J. B. (1998). Modern racism as a predictor of the linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17, 486-493.
24.
Stewart, T. L., van Knippenberg, A., Joly, J., Lippmann, M. W., Hermsen, B. J., & Harris, K. R. (2004). The influence of attitudes toward women on the relative individuation of women and men in the Netherlands. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 240-245.
25.
Swim, J. K., Aiken, K. J., Hall, W. S., Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199-214.
26.
Swim, J. K., Mallett, R., & Stangor, C. (2004). Understanding subtle sexism: Detection and use of sexist language. Sex Roles, 51, 117-128.
