Code-switching, the spontaneous switching from one language to another, shows unique structural and functional patterns in different bilingual communities. Though historically viewed as negative, it has been documented as an acceptable way of speaking in certain contexts, namely multilingual communities. We investigated the implications of code-switching on bilinguals’ language attitudes and identities in Toronto, a distinctly multilingual and multicultural metropolis. Twelve Cantonese–English bilinguals participated in a semi-structured interview discussing their code-switching and language attitudes. Interviews were then evaluated using a critical realist framework and analysed via first and second cycle coding. Code-switching elicited mixed emotions: It was a source of pride, but also a reminder of weak Cantonese language skills due to others’ metalinguistic comments and judgments. Participants’ code-switching indexed them as juksings, labelling them as Chinese individuals born and raised overseas, de-authenticating their Chinese group membership. Results are discussed with regard to ethnic identity and intra-group communication.
AppelR.MuyskenP. (1987). Language contact and bilingualism. London, UK: Edward Arnold. doi:10.5117/9053568573
2.
Benet-MartínezV.HaritatosJ. (2005). Bicultural identity integration (BII): Components, and psychosocial antecedents. Journal of Personality, 73, 1015-1050. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00337.x
3.
Benet-MartínezV.LeuJ.LeeF.MorrisM. W. (2002). Negotiating biculturalism: Cultural frame switching in biculturals with oppositional versus compatible cultural identities. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 492-516. doi:10.1177/0022022102033005005
4.
BourhisR. Y.SachdevI.EhalaM.GilesH. (2019). Assessing 40 years of group vitality research and future directions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38, 409-422. doi:10.1177/0261927X19868974
5.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2016). (Mis)conceptualising themes, thematic analysis, and other problems with Fugard and Potts’ (2015) sample-size tool for thematic analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19, 739-743. doi:10.1080/13645579.2016.1195588
6.
ChanI. (1989). The process of mother tongue maintenance among Chinese adolescent students (Doctoral dissertation, OISE, University of Toronto). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
7.
ChenK. H. Y. (2008). Positioning and repositioning: Linguistic practices and identity negotiation of overseas returning bilinguals in Hong Kong. Multilingua, 27, 57-75. doi:10.1515/MULTI.200S.004
8.
FinlayL. (2002). “Outing” the researcher: The provenance, process and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12, 531-545. doi:10.1177/104973202129120052
9.
FletcherA. J. (2017). Applying critical realism in qualitative research: Methodology meets method. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20, 181-194. doi:10.1080/13645579.2016.1144401
10.
FreynetN.ClémentR. (2019). Perceived accent discrimination: Psychosocial consequences and perceived legitimacy. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38, 496-513. doi:10.1177/0261927X19865775
11.
Gardner-ChlorosP.McEntee-AtalianisL.FinnisK. (2005). Language attitudes and use in a transplanted setting: Greek Cypriots in London. International Journal of Multilingualism, 2, 52-80. doi:10.1080/17501220508668376
12.
GibbonsJ. (1987). Code-mixing and code choice: A Hong Kong case study. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. doi:10.1017/S0272263100007944
GilesH.BourhisR. Y.TaylorD. M. (1977). Towards a theory of language in ethnic group relations. In GilesH. (Ed.), Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations (pp. 307-348). London, UK: Academic Press.
15.
GilesH.CouplandJ.CouplandN. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In GilesH.CouplandJ.CouplandN. (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation (pp. 1-68). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
GilesH.JohnsonP. (1981). The role of language in ethnic group relations. In TurnerJ. C.GilesH. (Eds.), Intergroup behaviour (pp. 199-243). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
17.
GrosjeanF. (1982). Life with two languages: An introduction to bilingualism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
GrosjeanF.MillerJ. L. (1994). Going in and out of languages: An example of bilingual flexibility. Psychological Science, 5, 201-206. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00501.x
19.
GudykunstW. B.Ting-ToomeyS. (1990). Ethnic identity, language, and communication breakdowns. In GilesH.RobinsonW. P. (Eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 309-327). Oxford, UK: Wiley.
20.
HellerM. (Ed.). (1988). Codeswitching: Anthropological and sociolinguistic perspectives. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110849615
21.
LawsonS.SachdevI. (2000). Codeswitching in Tunisia: Attitudinal and behavioural dimensions. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1343-1361. doi:10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00103-4
22.
ManE. Y. (1997). Language use and language behaviour of Hong Kong Chinese students in Toronto. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. The Humanities and Social Sciences, 59, 1876-A-1877-A.
23.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
MillerP. J.HoogstraL. (1992). Language as tool in the socialization and apprehension of cultural meanings. New Directions in Psychological Anthropology, 3, 83-101. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511621857.006
25.
MuyskenP. (2000). Bilingual speech: A typology of code-mixing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
PoplackS. (1980). Sometimes I’ll start a sentence in Spanish y termino en Español: Toward a typology of code-switching. Linguistics, 18, 581-618. doi:10.1515/ling.1980.18.7-8.581
SundarP. (2008). To “brown it up” or to “bring down the brown”: Identity and strategy in second-generation, South Asian-Canadian youth. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 17, 251-278. doi:10.1080/15313200802258166
32.
WeinreichU. (1953). Languages in contact: Findings and problems. New York, NY: de Gruyter.
