Verbal Person Centeredness in Interaction: Connecting Micro- and Macro-Level Operationalization

Abstract

Verbal person centeredness (VPC) is a long-dominant conceptualization of quality in supportive communication, but prior work provides limited guidance for researchers seeking to examine its impact in interaction. This study examined the extent to which overall VPC for an interaction is predicted by support providers’ specific behaviors. In a laboratory setting, pairs of friends (320 dyads) discussed a problem that one of them was currently experiencing. Transcripts of these interactions were coded by separate research teams for overall VPC of support provision and for the topic, function, and experiential focus of each discrete thought-unit produced by the support provider. Regression analyses showed that VPC was predicted by units representing specific, theoretically interpretable combinations of topical, functional, and experiential focus. The findings provide evidence of validity for procedures used to code VPC for supportive interactions while also displaying ways in which person centeredness is accomplished somewhat differently in interaction than in discrete messages.

Keywords

supportive communication verbal person centeredness behavioral coding comforting emotional support

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Applegate

J. L.

(1980). Adaptive communication in educational contexts: A study of teachers’ communicative strategies. Communication Education, 29, 158-170.

Baumeister

R. F.

Bratslavsky

Finkenauer

Vohs

K. D.

(2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370.

Burleson

B. R.

(1982). The development of comforting communication skills in childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 53, 1578-1588.

Burleson

B. R.

(2003). Emotional support skills. In Greene

J. O.

Burleson

B. R.

(Eds.), Handbook of communication and social interaction skills (pp. 551-594). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Burleson

B. R.

Caplan

S. E.

(1998). Cognitive complexity. In McCroskey

J. C.

Daly

J. A.

Martin

M. M.

Beatty

M. J.

(Eds.), Communication and personality: Trait perspectives (pp. 230-286). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Burleson

B. R.

Goldsmith

D. J.

(1997). How the comforting process works: Alleviating emotional distress through conversationally induced reappraisals. In Andersen

P. A.

Guerrero

L. K.

(Eds.), Handbook of communication and emotion: Research, theory, applications, and contexts (pp. 245-280). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Burleson

B. R.

Hanasono

L. K.

(2010). Explaining cultural and sex differences in responses to supportive communication: A dual-process approach. In Sullivan

K. T.

Davila

(Eds.), Support processes in intimate relationships (pp. 291-317). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Burleson

B. R.

Samter

(1985). Consistencies in theoretical and naive evaluations of comforting messages. Communication Monographs, 52, 103-123.

Clark

R. A.

Delia

J. G.

(1979). Topoi and rhetorical competence. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 65, 187-206.

10.

Feng

(2009). Testing an integrated model of advice-giving in supportive interactions. Human Communication Research, 35, 115-129.

11.

Goldsmith

D. J.

Dun

S. A.

(1997). Sex differences and similarities in the communication of social support. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 317-337.

12.

Goldsmith

D. J.

Fitch

(1997). The normative context of advice as social support. Human Communication Research, 23, 454-476.

13.

Guetzkow

(1950). Unitizing and categorizing problems in coding qualitative data. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 6, 47-58.

14.

Hersh

A. C.

(2011). Social support online: Testing the effects of highly person-centered messages in breast cancer support groups (Doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

15.

High

A. C.

Dillard

J. P.

(2012). A review and meta-analysis of person-centered messages and social support outcomes. Communication Studies, 63, 99-118.

16.

High

A. C.

Solomon

D. H.

(2014). Communication channel, sex, and the immediate and longitudinal outcomes of verbal person-centered support. Communication Monographs, 81, 439-468.

17.

High

A. C.

Solomon

D. H.

(2016). Explaining the durable effects of verbal person-centered supportive communication: Indirect effects or invisible support? Human Communication Research, 42, 200-220.

18.

Ito

T. A.

Larsen

J. T.

Smith

N. K.

Cacioppo

J. T.

(1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 887-900.

19.

Jones

S. M.

(2004). Putting the person into person-centered and immediate emotional support: Emotional change and perceived helper competence as outcomes of comforting in helping situations. Communication Research, 31, 338-360.

20.

Jones

S. M.

Bodie

G. D.

(2014). Supportive communication. In Berger

C. R.

(Ed.), Interpersonal communication (pp. 371-394). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.

21.

Jones

S. M.

Guerrero

L. A.

(2001). The effects of nonverbal immediacy and verbal person centeredness in the emotional support process. Human Communication Research, 27, 567-596.

22.

Jones

S. M.

Wirtz

(2006). How does the comforting process work? An empirical test of an appraisal-based model of comforting. Human Communication Research, 32, 217-243.

23.

MacGeorge

E. L.

Gillihan

S. J.

Samter

Clark

R. A.

(2003). Skill deficit or differential motivation? Accounting for sex differences in the provision of emotional support. Communication Research, 30, 272-303.

24.

MacGeorge

E. L.

Graves

A. R.

Feng

Gillihan

S. J.

Burleson

B. R.

(2004). The myth of gender cultures: Similarities outweigh differences in men’s and women’s provision of and responses to supportive communication. Sex Roles, 50, 143-175.

25.

MacGeorge

E. L.

Guntzviller

L. M.

Branch

Yakova

(2015). Advice in interaction: Quantity and placement of problem-solving behaviors. Communication Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0093650215607612

26.

MacGeorge

E. L.

Guntzviller

L. M.

Branch

Yakova

(2016). Paths of resistance: An interpretive analysis of trajectories associated with less satisfying advice interactions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 35, 548-568.

27.

MacGeorge

E. L.

Guntzviller

L. M.

Brisini

K. S.

Bailey

L. C.

Salmon

S. K.

Severen

. . . Cummings

R. D.

(2017). The influence of emotional support quality on advice evaluation and outcomes. Communication Quarterly, 65, 80-96.

28.

MacGeorge

E. L.

Wilkum

K. C.

(2012). Predicting comforting quality in the context of miscarriage. Communication Reports, 25, 62-74.

29.

Samp

J. A.

Solomon

D. H.

(1999). Communicative responses to problematic events in close relationships II: The influence of five facets of goals on message features. Communication Research, 26, 193-239.

30.

Samter

(1983). Effects of cognitive and motivational variables on comforting behavior in a quasi-natural context (Unpublished master’s thesis). Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.

31.

Samter

Burleson

B. R.

(1984). Cognitive and motivational influences on spontaneous comforting behavior. Human Communication Research, 11, 231-260.

32.

Samter

Ely

(1985, November). Children’s conflict management strategies: Assessments of individual and situational differences. Paper presented at the Central States Speech Association Convention, Indianapolis, IN.

33.

Samter

MacGeorge

E. L.

(2017). Coding comforting behavior for verbal person centeredness. In Van Lear

Canary

(Eds.), Researching interactive communication behavior: A sourcebook of methods and measures (pp. 107-128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

34.

Wilkum

MacGeorge

E. L.

(2010). Does God matter? Religious content and the evaluation of comforting messages in the context of bereavement. Communication Research, 37, 723-745.