Discovering the Fabric of Supportive Conversations: A Typology of Speaking Turns and Their Contingencies

Abstract

This study examines messages that problem disclosers and supportive listeners enact during conversations about everyday stressors. We coded 402 dyadic interactions between strangers, friends, and romantic couples using Stiles’s (1992) verbal response modes (VRM) and Burleson’s (1982) verbal person centeredness (PC) typology to explore whether (a) listener and discloser utterances coalesce into types of speaking turns, (b) listener turn types vary in person-centered quality, (c) listener turns relate to discloser responses, and (d) discloser responses relate to listener turns. Analyses revealed a typology for both listener and discloser turns: acknowledgment, advisement, question, elaboration, hedged disclosure, and reflection. The relative proportion of those types varied as a function of conversational role and relationship context, and these speech acts varied only minimally in PC. Configural frequency analyses revealed four greater-than-chance contingencies across data sets. The discussion highlights implications for a dyadic and dynamic understanding of supportive communication.

Keywords

comforting configural frequency analysis emotion regulation person centeredness social support supportive listening verbal response modes

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Applegate

J. L.

(1980). Person- and position-centered teacher communication in a day care center: A case study triangulating interview and naturalistic methods. In Denzin

N. K.

(Ed.), Studies in Symbolic Interaction (Vol. 3, pp. 59–96). JAI.

Austin

J. L.

(1975). How to do things with words (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Barbee

A. P.

Cunningham

M. R.

(1995). An experimental approach to social support communications: Interaction coping in close relationships. Annals of the International Communication Association, 18(1), 381–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1995.11678921

Bodie

G. D.

Vickery

A. J.

Cannava

Jones

S. M.

(2015). The role of “active listening” in informal helping conversations: Impact on perceptions of listener helpfulness, sensitivity, and supportiveness and discloser emotional improvement. Western Journal of Communication, 79(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2014.943429

Burleson

B. R.

(1982). The development of comforting communication skills in childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 53(6), 1578–1588. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130086

Burleson

B. R.

(2003). Emotional support skill. In Greene

J. O.

Burleson

B. R.

(Eds.), Handbook of communication and social interaction skills (pp. 551–594). Erlbaum.

Burleson

B. R.

Goldsmith

D. J.

(1998). How the comforting process works: Alleviating emotional distress through conversationally induced reappraisals. In Andersen

P. A.

Guerrero

L. K.

(Eds.), Handbook of communication and emotion: Research, theory, applications, and contexts (pp. 245–280). Academic Press.

Burleson

B. R.

Samter

(1985). Consistencies in theoretical and naive evaluations of comforting messages. Communication Monographs, 52, 103–123. https://doi:10.1080/03637758509376099

Cannava

Bodie

G. D.

(2017). Language use and style matching in supportive conversations between strangers and friends. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(4), 467–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407516641222

10.

Cappella

J. N.

(1991). Mutual adaptation and relativeity of measurement. In Montgomery

B. M.

Duck

(Eds.), Studying interpersonal interaction (pp. 103–117). Guilford.

11.

Elliott

Hill

C. E.

Stiles

W. B.

Friedlander

M. L.

Mahrer

Margison

F. R.

(1987). Primary therapist response modes: Comparison of six rating systems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(2), 218–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.55.2.218

12.

Engram

Vandergoot

(1978). Correlation between the Truax and Carkhuff scales for measurement of empathy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 25(4), 349–355. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.25.4.349

13.

Goates-Jones

M. K.

Hill

C. E.

Stahl

J. V.

Doschek

E. E.

(2009). Therapist response modes in the exploration stage: timing and effectiveness. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 22(2), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070903185256

14.

Gordon

Toukmanian

(2002). Is how it is said important? The association between quality of therapist interventions and client processing. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 2(2), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733140212331384867

15.

Grice

H. P.

(1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole

Morgan

J. N.

(Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3: Speech acts). Academic Press.

16.

Heine

J.-H.

Alexandrowicz

R. W.

Stemmler

(2016). confreq: Configural frequencies analysis using loglinear modeling. R package version 1.5.1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=confreq.

17.

High

A. C.

Dillard

J. P.

(2012). A review and meta-analysis of person-centered messages and social support outcomes. Communication Studies, 63(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.7080/10510974.2011.598208

18.

High

A. C.

Solomon

D. H.

(2014). Communication channel, sex, and the immediate and longitudinal outcomes of verbal person-centered support. Communication Monographs, 81(4), 439–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2014.933245

19.

High

A. C.

Solomon

D. H.

(2016). Explaining the durable effects of verbal person-centered supportive communication: Indirect effects or invisible support? Human Communication Research, 42(2), 200–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12077

20.

Holt-Lunstad

Smith

T. B.

Layton

(2010). Social relationships and mortality: A meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine, 7(7), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316

21.

Jefferson

(1988). On the sequential organization of troubles-talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems, 35(4), 418–441. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1988.35.4.03a00070

22.

Jones

S. M.

Bodie

G. D.

Youngvorst

Navarro

Danielson

(2018). Mapping the terrain of person-centered supportive conversations. Communication Monographs, 85(4), 467–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2018.1501503

23.

Jones

S. M.

Wirtz

J. G.

(2006). How does the comforting process work?: An empirical test of an appraisal-based model of comforting. Human Communication Research, 32, 217–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00274.x

24.

Koerner

A. F.

Cvancara

K. E.

(2002). The influence of comformity orientation on comunication patterns in family conversations. Journal of Family Communication, 2(3), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327698jfc0203_2

25.

Lienert

G. A.

Krauth

(1975). Configural frequency analysis as a statistical tool for defining types. Educational Psychology and Measurement, 35(2), 231–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447503500201

26.

Lorenzo-Seva

ten Berge

J. M. F.

(2006). Tucker’s Congruence Coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology, 2(2), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.2.2.57

27.

MacGeorge

E. L.

Guntzviller

L. M.

Branch

S. E.

Yakova

(2019). Advice in Interaction: Quantity and placement of problem-solving behaviors. Communication Research, 46(6), 811–837. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215607612

28.

Maechler

Rousseeuw

Struyf

Hubert

Hornik

(2016). Cluster: cluster analysis basics and extensions. R package version 2.0.4. https://svn.r-project.org/R-packages/trunk/cluster/

29.

Meeuwesen

Schaap

van der Staak

(1991). Verbal analysis of physician-patient communication. Social Science & Medicine, 32(10), 1143–1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(91)90091-P

30.

Pistrang

Barker

(2005). How partners talk in times of stress: A process analysis approach. In Revenson

T. A.

Kayser

Bodenmann

(Eds.), Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 97–119). American Psychological Association.

31.

Priem

J. S.

Solomon

D. H.

(2011). Relational uncertainty and cortisol responses to hurtful and supportive messages from a dating partner. Personal Relationships, 18(2), 198–223 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01353.x

32.

R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/

33.

Revelle

(2018). Psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research (Version 1.8.12). Northwestern University. https://cran.r-project.org/package=psych

34.

Samp

J. A.

Solomon

D. H.

(2005). Toward a theoretical account of goal characteristics in micro-Level Message Features. Communication Monographs, 72(1), 22–45. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0363775052000342517

35.

Samter

MacGeorge

E. L.

(2016). Coding comforting behavior from verbal person centeredness. In VanLear

C. A.

Canary

(Eds.), Researching interactive communication behavior. Sage.

36.

Searle

(1969). Speech acts. Cambridge University Press.

37.

Shiota

M. N.

Levenson

R. W.

(2012). Turn down the volume or change the channel? Emotional effects of detached versus positive reappraisal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(3), 416–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029208

38.

Stemmler

(2014). CFA and log-linear modeling. In Stemmler

(Ed.), Person-centered methods (pp. 25–50). Springer.

39.

Stiles

W. B.

(1992). Describing talk: A taxonomy of verbal response modes. Sage.

40.

von Eye

(1990). Introduction to Configural Frequency Analysis: The search for types and antitypes in cross-classifications. Cambridge University Press.

41.

von Eye

(2001). Configural frequency analysis – Version 2000: A program for 32-bit Windows operating systems. Methods of Psychological Research, 4(3), 129–139. https://www.dgps.de/fachgruppen/methoden/mpr-online/issue14/index.html

42.

Ward

J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(103), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.2307/2282967

43.

Weatherall

(2011). I don’t know as a prepositioned epistemic hedge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 44(4), 317–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2011.619310

44.

Burleson

B. R.

(2004). The association of experienced spousal support with marital satisfaction: Evaluating the moderating effects of sex, ethnic culture, and type of support. Journal of Family Communication, 4(2), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327698jfc0402_3

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.59 MB