Can good or bad mood influence how people process verbal information about others? Based on affect-cognition theories, this experiment predicted and found that the way a question is phrased has a greater influence on impressions than actual answers when judges are experiencing a negative rather than a neutral or positive mood. After an audiovisual mood induction, participants witnessed interview questions and responses by two target characters. The same level of extroversion was communicated, either by affirmative responses to questions about extraversion, or by negative responses to questions about introversion. Question format had a significant influence on impressions in negative mood but not in neutral or positive mood. The implications of these results for interpreting linguistic information in everyday social life are considered, and their relevance to contemporary affect-cognition theorizing is discussed.
BeukeboomC. J. (2003). How mood turns on language (Doctoral dissertation). Free University of Amsterdam, Netherlands.
2.
BeukeboomC. J.SeminG. R. (2006). How mood turns on language. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 553-566.
3.
BlessH.CloreG. L.SchwarzN.GolisanoV.RabeC.WolkM. (1996). Mood and the use of scripts: Does a happy mood really lead to mindlessness?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 665-679.
4.
BlessH.FiedlerK. (1995). Affective states and the influence of activated general knowledge. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 766-778.
5.
BlessH.FiedlerK. (2006). Mood and the regulation of information processing and behavior. In ForgasJ. P. (Ed.), Affect in social thinking and behavior (pp. 65-84). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
6.
BlessH.MackieD. M.SchwarzN. (1992). Mood effects on attitude judgments: Independent effects of mood before and after message elaboration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 585-595.
7.
BowerG. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129-148.
8.
ClarkM. S.IsenA. M. (1982). Toward understanding the relationship between feeling states and social behavior. In HastorfA. H.IsenA. M. (Eds.), Cognitive social psychology (pp. 73-108). New York, NY: Elsevier/North-Holland.
9.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1992). NEO PI-R professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
10.
EllisH. C.AshbrookP. W. (1988). Resource allocation model of the effects of depressed mood states on memory. In FiedlerK.ForgasJ. P. (Eds.), Affect, cognition and social behavior (pp. 25-43). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Hogrefe.
11.
FiedlerK. (1991). On the task, the measures and the mood in research on affect and social cognition. In ForgasJ. P. (Ed.), Emotion and social judgments (pp. 83-104). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
12.
FiedlerK.SchottM.MeiserT. (2011). What mediation analysis can (not) do. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1231-1236.
13.
ForgasJ. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117, 39-66.
14.
ForgasJ. P. (1998). Asking nicely? The effects of mood on responding to more or less polite requests. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 173-185.
15.
ForgasJ. P. (1999a). Feeling and speaking: Mood effects on verbal communication strategies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 850-863.
16.
ForgasJ. P. (1999b). On feeling good and being rude: Affective influences on language use and request formulations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 928-939.
17.
ForgasJ. P. (2007). When sad is better than happy: Negative affect can improve the quality and effectiveness of persuasive messages and social influence strategies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 513-528.
18.
ForgasJ. P. (2011a). Affective influences on self-disclosure: Mood effects on the intimacy and reciprocity of disclosing personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 449-461.
19.
ForgasJ. P. (2011b). Can negative affect eliminate the power of first impressions? Affective influences on primacy and recency effects in impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 425-429.
20.
ForgasJ. P.EastR. (2008). On being happy and gullible: Mood effects on skepticism and the detection of deception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1362-1367.
21.
ForgasJ. P.EichE. (2013). Affective influences on cognition: mood congruence, mood dependence, and mood effects on processing strategies. In HealyA. F.ProctorR. W. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Experimental psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 61-82). New York, NY: Wiley.
22.
ForgasJ. P.GoldenbergL.UnkelbachC. (2009). Can bad weather improve your memory? An unobtrusive field study of natural mood effects on real-life memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 254-257.
23.
ForgasJ. P.LahamS. M.VargasP. T. (2005). Mood effects on eyewitness memory: Affective influences on susceptibility to misinformation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 574-588.
24.
HassonU.GlucksbergS. (2006). Does understanding negation entail affirmation? An examination of negated metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 1015-1032.
25.
KaupB. (2001). Negation and its impact on the accessibility of text information. Memory & Cognition, 29, 960-967.
26.
KochA. S.ForgasJ. P. (2012). Feeling good and feeling truth: The interactive effects of mood and processing fluency on truth judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 481-485.
27.
KochA. S.ForgasJ. P.GoldenbergL. (2013). In the mood to break the rules: Happiness promotes language abstraction and transgression of conversation norms. In ForgasJ. P.VinczeO.LaszloJ. (Eds.), Social cognition and communication (pp. 83-100). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
28.
KochA. S.ForgasJ. P.MatovicD. (2013). Can negative mood improve your conversation? Affective influences on conforming to Grice’s communication norms. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 326-334.
29.
MacDonaldM. C.JustM. A. (1989). Changes in activation levels with negation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 633-642.
30.
MatovicD.ForgasJ. P. (2018). Mood effects on ingratiation: Affective influences on producing and responding to ingratiating messages. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 186-197.
31.
MatovicD.KochA. S.ForgasJ. P. (2014). Can negative mood improve language understanding? Affective influences on the ability to detect ambiguous communication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 44-49.
32.
MillerG. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
33.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731.
34.
SchwarzN. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In HigginsE. T.SorrentinoR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 527-561). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
35.
SedikidesC. (1995). Central and peripheral self-conceptions are differentially influenced by mood: Tests of the differential sensitivity hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 759-777.
36.
SeminG. R.RubiniM.FiedlerK. (1995). The answer is in the question: The effect of verb causality on locus of explanation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 834-841.
37.
SinclairR. C.MarkM. M.CloreG. L. (1994). Mood-related persuasion depends on (mis)attributions. Social Cognition, 12, 309-326.
38.
UnkelbachC.ForgasJ. P.DensonT. F. (2008). The turban effect: The influence of Muslim headgear and induced affect on aggressive responses in the shooter bias paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1409-1413.
39.
WorthL. T.MackieD. M. (1987). Cognitive mediation of positive affect in persuasion. Social Cognition, 5, 76-94.
40.
ZajoncR. B. (2000). Feeling and thinking: Closing the debate over the independence of affect. In ForgasJ. P. (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 31-58). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
