This study examines how listeners arrive at judgments of speech as irrelevant or off-topic (off-target). Older adults and college students evaluated a set of narratives ascribed to speakers differing in age and gender and presented as conversations or interviews.The results show that young and old adults bring different understandings of age and situation to the evaluation task. Older evaluators judged narratives more on-target than younger evaluators. Differences between evaluator age groups were also observed in the effects of speaker age and speech situation: Younger evaluators judged older speakers more on-target than younger speakers, but older evaluators did not; and younger evaluators judged speech in interviews more off-target than older evaluators did. However, both old and young evaluators judged female speakers more on-target than males. This study contributes to our understanding of the role of age stereotypes in evaluating speech, highlighting the listener’s role in constructing an interlocutor’s speech as off-target.
Akman, V., & Bazzanella, C. (2003). The complexity of context: Guest editors’ introduction. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 321-329.
2.
Arbuckle, T.Y., Nohara-LeClair, M., & Pushkar, D. ( 2000). Effect of off-target verbosity on communication efficiency in a referential communication task. Psychology and Aging , 15, 65-77.
3.
Arbuckle, T.Y., & Pushkar Gold, D. (1993). Aging, inhibition, and verbosity. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences , 48, P225-P232.
4.
Beaudreau, S., Storandt, M., & Strube, M. ( 2005). A comparison of narratives told by younger and older adults. Experimental Aging Research, 32, 105-117.
5.
Bieman-Copland, S., & Ryan, E.B. ( 2001). Social perceptions of failures in memory monitoring. Psychology and Aging, 16, 357-361.
6.
Biernat, M. ( 2003). Toward a broader view of social stereotyping. American Psychologist, 58, 1019-1027.
7.
Biernat, M., Ma, J.E., & Nario-Redmond, M.R. (2008). Standards to suspect and diagnose stereotypical traits. Social Cognition, 26, 288-313.
8.
Creber, C., & Giles, H. ( 1983). Social context and language attitudes: The role of formality-informality of the setting. Language Sciences, 5, 155-161.
9.
Ericsson, K.A., & Simon, H.A. ( 1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
10.
Giles, H., Coupland, N., & Coupland, J. ( 1991). Accomodation theory: Communication, context and consequence . In H. Giles, J. Coupland, & N. Coupland (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied linguistics (pp. 1-68). Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Giles, H., Coupland, N., Coupland, J., Williams, A., & Nussbaum, J. ( 1992). Intergenerational talk and communication with older people . International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 34, 271-297.
12.
Gold, D., Andres, D., Arbuckle, T., & Schwartzman, A. (1988). Measurement and correlates of verbosity in elderly people. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 43, P27-P33.
13.
Harwood, J. ( 2007). Understanding communication and aging: Developing knowledge and awareness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Heritage, J., & Greatbatch, D. (1991). On the institutional character of institutional talk: The case of news interviews. In D. Boden & D. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (pp. 71-90). Cambridge, UK: Polity.
15.
Horhota, M., & Blanchard-Fields, F. (2006). Do beliefs and attributional complexity influence age differences in the correspondence bias? Social Cognition, 24, 310-337.
16.
Hummert, M.L. ( 1990). Multiple stereotypes of elderly and young adults: A comparison of structure and evaluations. Psychology and Aging, 5, 182-193.
17.
Hummert, M. L. (1994). Physiognomic cues to age and the activation of stereotypes of the elderly in interaction. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 39, 5-19. Hummert, M. L. (1999). A social cognitive perspective on age stereotypes. In T. M. Hess & F. Blanchard-Fields (Eds.), Social cognition and aging (pp. 175-196). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
18.
Hummert, M.L. ( 2000). Maintaining competence in the face of resource limitations: The role of schema complexity in aging and communication. In U. Hecker, S. Dutke, & G. Sedek (Eds.), Generative mental processes and cognitive resources: Integrative research on adaptation and control (pp. 157-174). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
19.
Hummert, M.L., Garstka, T.A., Ryan, E.B., & Bonnesen, J.L. (2004). The role of age stereotypes in interpersonal communication. In J. F. Nussbaum & J. Coupland (Eds.), Handbook of communication and aging research (Vol. 2, pp. 91-114). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20.
Hummert, M.L., Garstka, T.A., & Shaner, J.L. ( 1997). Stereotyping of older adults: The role of target facial cues. Psychology and Aging, 12, 107-114.
21.
Hummert, M.L., Shaner, J.L., Garstka, T.A., & Henry, C. ( 1998). Communication with older adults: The influence of age stereotypes, context, and communicator age. Human Communication Research, 25, 124-151.
22.
Irvine, J.T. ( 2001). Formality and informality in communicative events. In A. Duranti (Ed.), Linguistic anthropology: A reader (pp. 189-207). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
23.
James, D., & Drakich, J. ( 1993). Understanding gender differences in amount of talk: A critical review of research. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction (pp. 281-312). New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
James, L.E., Burke, D.M., Austin, A., & Hulme, E. ( 1998). Production and perception of "verbosity" in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 13, 355-367.
25.
Kite, M.E., & Wagner, L.S. ( 2002). Attitudes toward older adults. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Ageism (pp. 129-162). Cambridge: MIT Press.
26.
Kwong See, S.T., & Heller, R.B. ( 2004). Judging older targets’ discourse: How do age stereotypes influence evaluations?Experimental Aging Research, 30, 63-73.
27.
Lambert, W.E., Hodgson, R.C., Gardner, R.C., & Fillenbaum, S. (1960). Evaluational reactions to spoken language. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , 60, 44-51.
28.
Leaper, C., & Ayres, M.M. ( 2007). A meta-analytic review of gender variations in adults’ language: Talkativeness, affiliative speech, and assertive speech. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 328-363.
29.
Martin, J.R., & Plum, G.A. ( 1997). Construing experience: Some story genres. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7, 299-308.
30.
McMullin, J. ( 1995). Theorizing age and gender relations. In S. Arber & J. Ginn (Eds.), Connecting gender and ageing: A sociological approach (pp. 30-41). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
31.
Mehl, M.R., Vazire, S., Ramírez-Esparza, N., Slatcher, R.B., & Pennebaker, J.W. (2007). Are women really more talkative than men? Science, 317, 82.
32.
Mulac, A. ( 1998). The gender-linked language effect: Do language differences really make a difference? In D. J. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication (pp. 101-154). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33.
Popp, D., Donovan, R.A., Crawford, M., Marsh, K.L., & Peele, M. ( 2003). Gender, race and speech style stereotypes. Sex Roles, 48, 317-325.
34.
Pushkar Gold, D., & Arbuckle, T.Y. (1995). A longitudinal study of off-target verbosity. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 50, P307-P315.
35.
Ruscher, J.B., & Hurley, M.M. ( 2000). Off-target verbosity evokes negative stereotypes of older adults. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19, 141-149.
36.
Ryan, E.B., Kwong See, S., Meneer, W.B., & Trovato, D. ( 1994). Age-based perceptions of conversational skills among younger and older adults. In M. L. Hummert , J. M. Wiemann, & J. F. Nussbaum (Eds.), Interpersonal communication in older adulthood: Interdisciplinary theory and research (pp. 15-39). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
Ryan, E.B., & Laurie, S. ( 1990). Evaluations of older and younger adult speakers: Influence of communication effectiveness and noise. Psychology and Aging , 5, 514-519.
38.
Schmidt, D.F., & Boland, S.M. ( 1986). Structure of perceptions of older adults: Evidence for multiple stereotypes. Psychology and Aging, 1, 255-260.
39.
Talbot, M. ( 2003). Gender stereotypes: Reproduction and challenge. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (pp. 468-486). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
40.
White, M.J., Vandiver, B.J., Becker, M.L., Overstreet, B.G., Temple, L.E., Hagan, K.L., et al. (1998). African American evaluations of Black English and standardAmerican English. Journal of Black Psychology , 24, 60-75.
41.
Zwaan, R.A. ( 1999). Five dimensions of narrative comprehension: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence (pp. 55-75). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
