The career choices of gifted students are significant both in terms of their potential contributions to society and their personal happiness and life satisfaction. The aim of this study was to identify themes of the turning points that influence gifted young people’s career decisions and to reveal which factors influence their vocational identity from a Narrative Identity Approach. Data were collected using open-ended questions from 17 (52.94% female, n = 9) gifted young people (age; M = 20.47, SD = 3.69). Data were analysed with reflexive thematic analysis, which identified five major themes (1) individual factors, (2) social factors, (3) giftedness, (4) career goals, and (5) exploration opportunities. Considering the first retrospective study examining gifted students’ vocational identity, career guidance might benefit from tailored interventions that account for their unique characteristics, goals, personal and social factors as well as maximizing exploration opportunities.
AkgülG. (2021). Teachers’ metaphors and views about gifted students and their education. Gifted Education International, 37(3), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429421988
2.
AndrewsJ. L.AhmedS. P.BlakemoreS. J. (2021). Navigating the social environment in adolescence: The role of social brain development. Biological Psychiatry, 89(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.09.012
3.
BircanM. A.KöksalÇ. (2020). Özel yetenekli öğrencilerin STEM tutumlarının ve STEM kariyer ilgilerinin incelenmesi. Turkish Journal of Primary Education, 5(1), 16–32.
4.
BozgeyikliH.DoğanH.IşıklarA. (2010). Üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin mesleki olgunluk düzeyleri ile algıladıkları sosyal destek düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1(28), 133–149.
5.
BranjeS.De MoorE. L.SpitzerJ.BechtA. I. (2021). Dynamics of identity development in adolescence: A decade in review. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 31(4), 908–927. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12678
ChenC. P.WongJ. (2013). Career counseling for gifted students. Australian Journal of Career Development, 22(3), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/10384162135079
8.
CrocettiE.RubiniM.MeeusW. (2008). Capturing the dynamics of identity formation in various ethnic groups: Development and validation of a three-dimensional model. Journal of Adolescence, 31(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.09.002
9.
CrossT. L. (2001). Gifted children and Erikson's theory of psychosocial development. Gifted Child Today, 24(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.4219/gct-2001-535
10.
CrossT. L.AndersonL.MammadovS.CrossJ. R. (2017). Social and emotional development of students with gifts and talents. In RobertsJ. L.InmanT. F.RobinsJ. H. (Eds.), Introduction to gifted education (pp. 95–118). Prufrock Press.
11.
CrossT. L.CrossJ. R. (2017). Social and emotional development of gifted students: Introducing the school- based psychosocial curriculum model. Gifted Child Today, 40(3), 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217517713784
12.
DuffyR. D.SedlacekW. E. (2007). The presence of and search for a calling: Connections to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70(3), 590–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.03.007
13.
EriksonE. H. (1968). Identity youth and crisis. (No. 7). WW Norton & company.
14.
FrazierA. D. (2021). Identity development and multipotentiality. In CrossT. L.CrossJ. R. (Eds.), Handbook for counselors serving students with gifts and talents: Development, relationships, school issues, and counseling needs/interventions (pp. 281–295). Routledge.
15.
KaraN. (2019). Impact of digital media on gifted students’ career choices. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 99–112.
LeungS. A.ConoleyC. W.ScheelM. J. (1994). The career and educational aspirations of gifted high school students: A retrospective study. Journal of Counseling and Development, 72(3), 298–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/J.1556-6676.1994.TB00938.X
18.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
19.
MareeJ. G. (2024). In search of career-life meaning: Enhancing the existential experience of a gifted learner. Gifted Education International. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294241254914
20.
MareeJ. G. (2024). Exploring innovative career counselling strategies for universal relevance and sustainability in the Anthropocene era. Australian Journal of Career Development, 33(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/10384162241236418
McLeanK. C.BreenA. V.FournierM. A. (2010). Constructing the self in early, middle, and late adolescent boys: Narrative identity, individuation, and well‐being. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(1), 166–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2009.00633.x
24.
MeeusW.Van De SchootR.KeijsersL.SchwartzS. J.BranjeS. (2010). On the progression and stability of adolescent identity formation: A five‐wave longitudinal study in early to middle and middle to late adolescence. Child Development, 81(5), 1565–1581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01492.x
25.
MillerK.CummingsG. (2009). Gifted and talented students' career aspirations and influences: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 6(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.2202/1548-923X.1667
26.
MishraA. (2023). The Pursuit of Eriksonian Fidelity in education for the gifted: A literature review exploring its interpersonal and Intrapersonal Determinants. SENG Journal: Exploring the Psychology of Giftedness, 2(2), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.25774/b34m-jq42
27.
MuellerC. E.WinsorD. L. (2018). Depression, suicide, and gifted- ness: Disentangling risk factors, protective factors, and implications for optimal growth. In PfeifferS. I. (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children (pp. 255–284). Springer.
ÖzdemirF.ErcanY. A.YiğitE. Ö. (2023). Perceptions of gifted people on the Concept of Citizenship. In Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, pp. 1–16.
30.
PerssonR. S. (2009). Intellectually gifted individuals' career choices and work satisfaction: A descriptive study. Gifted and Talented International, 24(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2009.11674857
31.
SampsonJ. P.ChasonA. K. (2008). Helping gifted and talented adolescents and young adults make informed and careful career choices. In PfeifferS. I. (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 327–346): Springer-Verlag.
32.
ShoffnerM. F.NewsomeD. W. (2001). Identity development of gifted female adolescents: The influence of career development, age, and life-role salience. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 12(4), 201–211.
33.
SmithC. K.WoodS. M. (2020). Supporting the career development of gifted students: New role and function for school psychologists. Psychology in the Schools, 57(10), 1558–1568. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22344
34.
Steenbergen-HuS.Olszewski-KubiliusP.CalvertE. (2020). The effectiveness of current interventions to reverse the underachievement of gifted students: Findings of a meta-analysis and systematic review. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(2), 132–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698622090860
35.
SürücüM.KontaşH.BacanlıF. (2015). Üstün yetenekli ilköğretim öğrencilerinin kariyer gelişimleri. Electronic Turkish Studies, 10(15), 801–820.
36.
Veldman-de JongeI.JenE. (2022). Choices gifted women made in education, personal life, and career: A qualitative study in The Netherlands. Gifted and Talented International, 37(2), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2022.2075293
37.
WatermanA. S. (2020). “Now what do I do?”: Toward a conceptual understanding of the effects of traumatic events on identity functioning. Journal of Adolescence, 79, 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.11.005
38.
WieslanderM.LöfgrenH. (2023). Turning points as a tool in narrative research: A tentative typology as exemplified by a case on police identity. Narrative Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.22021.wie
39.
YuE. J.KimK. H.KoS. Y.JangS. K. (2016). Explore vocational identity of science-gifted students by analyzing letters written to myself in the future. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 36(2), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.2.0253
