This study examined Cho’s dynamic system model of creative problem-solving ability in a sample of 112 gifted and non-gifted students. The cluster analysis and t-test results indicated that students should be categorized into high and low performance groups. Students who scored three points or more across all attributes also had a higher likelihood of possessing better mathematical creative problem-solving abilities. Furthermore, significant differences were found in the two groups’ scores on the Creative Problem Solving Attributes Inventory and Mathematical Creative Problem Solving Ability Test. The environment attribute was the only one on which the two groups did not differ significantly; this may be the result of education fever in Asian societies. Finally, the results of this study not only indicated that creativity does not rely on a single factor but that a well-balanced environment is imperative to nurturing creativity.
AmabileT. M. (1983a). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
2.
AmabileT. M. (1983b). The social psychology of creativity. Springer-Verlag.
3.
BaerJ. (2012). Domain specificity and the limits of creativity theory. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.002
4.
BotellaM.GlăveanuV. P.ZenasniF.StormeM.MyszkowskiN.WolffM.LubartT. (2013) How artists create: Creative process and multivariate factors. Learning and Individual Differences26: 161–170. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.02.008.
5.
ChenM. F. (1996) Physical and mental characteristics and assessment of gifted students. Collection of Education Materials21: 13–26.
6.
ChenY.HuangR.LuY.ZhangK. (2021). Education fever in China: Children’s academic performance and parents’ life satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(2), 927–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00258-0
7.
ChoS. (1999). Education of creativity in Confucian society [Keynote speech] (pp. 4–9). The 8th International Conference on Thinking.
8.
ChoS. (2003). Creative problem solving in science: Divergent, convergent, or both? In AnuruthwongU.PibooncholC. (Eds.), 7th asia-pacific conference on giftedness (pp. 169–174). October Printing.
9.
ChoS. (2007). Nurturing creative problem solving ability of the gifted in Confucian society. The Korean Society for the Gifted, 17(2), 394–412
10.
ChoS.HwangD. J. (2006). Math creative problem solving test for identification of the mathematically gifted. Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Educational Series: Research in Mathematical Educational, 10(1), 55–70.
11.
ChoS. H.NijenhuisJ. T.van VianenA. E.KimH. B.LeeK. H. (2010). The relationship between diverse components of intelligence and creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 44(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2010.tb01329.x
12.
ClarkB. (1992). Growing up gifted (4th ed.) Macmillan Publishing Company.
CsikszentmihalyiM.GetzelsJ. W. (1971). Discovery-oriented behavior and the originality of creative products: A study with artists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031106
15.
de VinkI. C.WillemsenR. H.LazonderA. W.KroesbergenE. H. (2022). Creativity in mathematics performance: The role of divergent and convergent thinking. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 484–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12459
16.
FirestienR. L.TreffingerD. J. (1989). Creative problem solving: Guidelines and resources for effective facilitation. G/C/T/Magazine, 35–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/107621758901200416
GangjiA. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of personal and environmental attributes initiative of thematical creativity in ethnic minority, high school students, as reflected in a dynamic system model of creative problem-solving ability (Doctoral thesis). John’s University. https://scholar.stjohns.edu/theses_dissertations/445/
19.
GuilfordJ. P. (1967). Convergent-production abilities: The nature of human intelligence (pp. 171–184). McGraw-Hill.
20.
HaensleyP. A.ReynoldsC. R. (1989). Creativity and intelligence. In GloverJ. A.RonningR. R.ReynoldsC. R. (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 111–132). Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5356-1
21.
HarrisA. M.WilliamsonR. L.CarterN. T. (2019). A conditional threshold hypothesis for creative achievement: On the interaction between intelligence and openness. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(3), 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000182
22.
HershR.John-SteinerV. (2017). The origin of insight in mathematics. In LeikinR.SriramanB. (Eds.), Creativity and giftedness. Advances in mathematics education. Springer.
23.
HongE.AquiY. (2004). Cognitive and motivational characteristics of adolescents gifted in mathematics: Comparisons among students with different types of giftedness. Gifted Children Quarterly, 48(3), 191–201.
24.
HoutzJ. C. (1994). Creative problem solving in the classroom: Contributions of four psychological approaches. In RuncoM. (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 40–76). Ablex Publishing Corporation.
25.
HuangP.PengS.ChenH.TsengL.HsuL. (2017) The relative influence of domain knowledge and domain-general divergent thinking on scientific creativity and mathematical creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity25: 1–9. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.06.001.
26.
IsaksenS. G.TreffingerD. J. (1987). Creative problem solving: Three components and six specific stages [instructional handout]. Center for Studies in Creativity.
27.
KattouM.KontoyianniK.Pitta-PantaziD.ChristouC. (2013) Connecting mathematical creativity to mathematical ability. ZDM Mathematics Education45: 167–181. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0467-1.
28.
KaufmanJ. C.GlăveanuV. P. (2019). A review of creativity theories: What questions are we trying to answer? In KaufmanJ. C.SternbergR. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 27–43). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.004
29.
KimH.ChoS.AhnD. (2003). Development of mathematical creative problem-solving ability test for identification of the gifted in math. Gifted Educational International, 18(2), 164–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142940301800206
30.
KimK. H. (2005). Can only intelligent people be creative? A meta-analysis. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(2–3), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2005-473
LinC.ChoS. (2010). Predicting creative problem solving in math from a dynamic system model of creative problem-solving ability. Creativity Research Journal, 23(3), 255–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.595986
33.
LubartT.MouchiroudC.TordjmanS.ZenasniF. (2003). Psychologie de la créativité [The psychology of creativity]. Armand Colin.
34.
MannE. (2006). Creativity: The essence of mathematics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(2), 230–236. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2006-264
35.
MumfordM. D.McIntoshT. (2017). Creative thinking processes: The past and the future. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(4), 317–322. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.197
36.
PiirtoJ. (2004). Understanding creativity. Great Potential Press.
37.
RenzulliJ. S.SmithL. H. (1979). A guidebook for developing individualized educational programs for gifted and talented students. Creative Learning Press.
38.
SchoeversE. M.KroesbergenE. H.KattouM. (2020). Mathematical creativity: A combination of domain-general creative and domain-specific mathematical skills. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(2), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.361
39.
SebastianJ.HuangH. (2016). Examining the relationship of a survey based measure of math creativity with math achievement: Cross-national evidence from PISA 2012. International Journal of Educational Research, 80(1), 74–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.08.010
SimontonD. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, person, developmental, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55(1), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.151
42.
SternbergR. J. (1988). A three-facet model of creativity. In SternbergR.J. (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 125–147). Cambridge University Press.
43.
SternbergR. J. (1997). The concept of intelligence and its role in lifelong learning and success. American Psychologist, 52(10), 1030–1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.10.1030
44.
SternbergR. J.LubartT. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in the culture of conformity. Free Press.
45.
SternbergR. J.O’HaraL. A. (2000). Intelligence and creativity. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 611–630). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807947.028
46.
TakayasuN. (2005) Educational system and parental education fever in contemporary Japan: Comparison with the case of South Korea. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy2: 35–49.
47.
TanP.SteinbachM.KumarV. (2005) Cluster Analysis: Basic Concepts and Algorithms. Introduction to Data Mining. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
48.
TeseoR. F. (2019). Analyses of attribute patterns of mathematical creative problem-solving ability in 6th grade students. Doctoral dissertation. St. John’s University.
49.
TorranceE. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 43–75). Cambridge University Press.
50.
TreffingerD. J. (1995). Creative problem solving: Overview and education implication. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02213375
UrbanK. (2003). Toward a componential model of creativity. In AmbroseD.CohenL. M.TannenbaumA. J. (Eds.), Creative intelligence: Toward theoretic integration (pp. 81–112). Hampton Press.
