Gifted students differ from their peers in many areas, and require additional effort and skills from their teachers in regular schools. Teachers in regular education play a critical role in the identification of gifted students and education. Therefore, considering their attitudes toward these students and gifted education in general will provide a deeper understanding of teachers’ needs regarding the quality of gifted education. The present study aims to examine teachers’ perceptions about gifted students through the use of metaphors and attitudes toward gifted education. Qualitative data were collected from 136 teachers utilizing two open-ended questions. Teachers used metaphors based on three categories: gifted education, the social value and various characteristics related to giftedness. The results were discussed in terms of practical implications, teachers’ training needs, educational strategies for gifted students and challenges endemic to the identification process in Turkey.
AkarİŞengil AkarŞ (2012) İlköğretim okullarında görev yapmakta olan öğretmenlerin üstün yetenek kavramı hakkındaki görüşleri [Primary school in-service teachers’ perceptions’ of giftedness]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi20(2): 423–436.
2.
AllenJK (2017) Exploring the role teacher perceptions play in the underrepresentation of culturally and linguistically diverse students in gifted programming. Gifted Child Today40(2): 77–86.
3.
BaudsonTGPreckelF (2013) Teachers’ implicit personality theories about the gifted: an experimental approach. School Psychology Quarterly28(1): 37–46.
4.
BaudsonTGPreckelF (2016) Teachers’ conceptions of gifted and average-ability students on achievement-relevant dimensions. Gifted Child Quarterly60(3): 212–225.
BrigandiCBSiegleDWeinerJM, et al. (2016) Gifted secondary school students: the perceived relationship between enrichment and goal valuation. Journal for the Education of the Gifted39(4): 263–287.
7.
ChalwellKCummingTM (2019) Radical subject acceleration for gifted students: one school’s response. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education28(2): 29–46.
8.
CraigCJ (2018) Metaphors of knowing, doing and being: capturing experience in teaching and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education69: 300–311.
9.
CrossTLCrossJR (2017) Social and emotional development of gifted students: introducing the school-based psychosocial curriculum model. Gifted Child Today40(3): 178–182.
10.
CrossTLCrossJRO’ReillyC (2018) Attitudes about gifted education among Irish educators. High Ability Studies29(2): 169–189.
11.
ÇapanBE (2010) Öğretmen adaylarının üstün yetenekli öğrencilere ilişkin metaforik algıları [Teacher candidates’ metaphoric perceptions of gifted students]. Journal of International Social Research3(12): 140–154.
12.
DavidH (2011) The importance of teachers’ attitude in nurturing and educating gifted children. Gifted and Talented International26(1–2): 71–80.
13.
FieldGB (2009) The effects of using Renzulli Learning on student achievement: an investigation of internet technology on reading fluency, comprehension, and social studies. International Journal of Emerging Technology4: 29–39.
14.
GallagherSSmithSRMerrotsyP (2011) Teachers’ perceptions of the socioemotional development of intellectually gifted primary aged students and their attitudes towards ability grouping and acceleration. Gifted and Talented International26(1–2): 11–24.
GirginD (2020) Özel yetenekli öğrencilerin desteklenmesi için gereken yeterlilikler: sınıf öğretmenlerinin görüşleri [Competencies required for supporting gifted students: classroom teachers’ views]. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences19(74): 895–915.
17.
GodorBP (2019) Gifted metaphors: exploring the metaphors of teachers in gifted education and their impact on teaching the gifted. Roeper Review41(1): 51–60.
18.
HodgeKAKempCR (2006) Recognition of giftedness in the early years of school: perspectives of teachers, parents, and children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted30(2): 164–204.
19.
JuriševičMŽerakU (2019) Attitudes towards gifted students and their education in the Slovenian context. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art12(4): 101–117.
20.
Kadioğlu AteşH (2018) Gifted children metaphor from the perspective of teachers and parents. Online Submission6(2): 30–42.
21.
KayaNG (2019) Determination of attitudes and opinions of classroom teachers about education of gifted students. Education and Science44(199): 239–256.
LassigC (2009) Teachers’ attitudes towards the gifted: the importance of professional development and school culture. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education18(2): 32–42.
24.
MaXGaoX (2017) Metaphors used by pre-service teachers of Chinese as an international language. Journal of Education for Teaching43(1): 71–83.
25.
MatheisSKronborgLSchmittM, et al. (2017) Threat or challenge? Teacher beliefs about gifted students and their relationship to teacher motivation. Gifted and Talented International32(2): 134–160.
26.
McCoachDBSiegleD (2003) Factors that differentiate underachieving gifted students from high-achieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly47(2): 144–154.
27.
McCoachDBSiegleD (2007) What predicts teachers’ attitudes toward the gifted?Gifted Child Quarterly51(3): 246–254.
28.
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [Ministry of National Education] (2013) Özel yetenekli bireyler strateji ve uygulama planı (2013–2017) [The strategy and action plan for gifted students (2013–2017)]. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429420946732
29.
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [Ministry of National Education] (2018) Oüzel Eğitim Hizmetleri Yönetmeliği [The Special Education Services Regulation]. Ankara: Özel Eğitim Rehberlik ve Danışma Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü.
30.
MirandaLCAraújoAMAlmeidaLS (2016) Identification of gifted students by teachers: reliability and validity of the cognitive abilities and learning scale. Revista de Investigación y Divulgación en Psicología y Logopedia3(2): 5, 14–18.
31.
MofieldEL (2020) Benefits and barriers to collaboration and co-teaching: examining perspectives of gifted education teachers and general education teachers. Gifted Child Today43(1): 20–33.
32.
MorelockMJ (1996) On the nature of giftedness and talent: imposing order on chaos. Roeper Review19(1): 4–12.
33.
MõttusRAllikJKonstabelK, et al. (2008) Beliefs about the relationship between personality and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences45: 457–462.
34.
NeihartMYeoSI (2018) Psychological issues unique to the gifted student. In: PfeifferSIShaunessy-DedrickEFoley-NicponM (eds) APA Handbooks in Psychology: APA Handbook of Giftedness and Talent. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 497–510.
35.
NguyenCD (2016) Metaphors as a window into identity: a study of teachers of English to young learners in Vietnam. System60: 66–78.
36.
ÖzsoyY (2014) Bilim ve sanat merkezi öğrenci, öğretmen ve velilerinin üstün yetenekli öğrenci kavramına ilişkin metaforları [Metaphors of science and art center students, teachers and parents regarding gifted students]. Üstün Yetenekliler Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi [Gifted Education and Research Journal]2(1): 74–87.
37.
Perković KrijanIJurčecLBorićE (2015) Primary school teachers’ attitudes toward gifted students. Croatian Journal of Education: Hrvatski Časopis Za Odgoj I Obrazovanje17(3): 681–724.
38.
PerssonRS (1998) Paragons of virtue: teachers’ conceptual understanding of high ability in an egalitarian school system. High Ability Studies9: 181–196.
39.
PeyserM (2005) Identifying and nurturing gifted children in Israel. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling27(2): 229–243.
40.
PfeifferSI (2002) Identifying gifted and talented students. Journal of Applied School Psychology19(1): 31–50.
41.
PfeifferSIPetscherYJarosewichT (2007) The gifted rating scales preschool/kindergarten form: an analysis of the standardization sample based on age, gender, and race. Roeper Review29(3): 206–211.
42.
PortešováŠBudíkováMKoutkováH (2011) Crucial determinants affecting the attitude of Czech educators toward education of extraordinarily gifted learners. The New Educational Review24(2): 305–326.
43.
ReisSMRenzulliJS (2010) Is there still a need for gifted education? An examination of current research. Learning and Individual Differences20(4): 308–317.
44.
ReisSMWestbergKLKulikowichJ, et al. (1993) Why Not let High-Ability Students Start School in January? The Curriculum Compacting Study. Research Monograph 93106. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut, National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
45.
SabanAKocbekerBNSabanA (2007) Prospective teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning revealed through metaphor analysis. Learning and Instruction17(2): 123–139.
46.
SchneiderDJ (1973) Implicit personality theory: a review. Psychological Bulletin79(5): 294–309.
47.
SiegleDMooreMMannRL, et al. (2010) Factors that influence in-service and pre-service teachers’ nominations of students for gifted and talented programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted33(3): 337–360.
48.
SiegleDWilsonHELittleCA (2013) A sample of gifted and talented educators’ attitudes about academic acceleration. Journal of Advanced Academics24(1): 27–51.
49.
Soto-AndradeJ (2020) Metaphors in mathematics education. In: LermanS (ed.) Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education, pp. 619–625.
50.
SzymanskiACroftLGodorB (2018) Determining attitudes toward ability: a new tool for new understanding. Journal of Advanced Academics29(1): 29–55.
51.
ŞahinFLeventF (2015) Examining the methods and strategies which classroom teachers use in the education of gifted students. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education5(3): 73–82.
52.
ŞimşekHYıldırımA (2011) Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
53.
TirriKATallent-RunnelsMKAdamsAM, et al. (2002) Cross-cultural predictors of teachers’ attitudes toward gifted education: Finland, Hong Kong, and the United States. Journal for the Education of the Gifted26(2): 112–131.
54.
Vatansever BayraktarHKadioğlu AteşHAfatN (2019) An analysis on the relationship between primary school teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and attitudes towards gifted education. Online Submission10(38): 1099–1124.
55.
YuenMChanSChanC, et al. (2018) Differentiation in key learning areas for gifted students in regular classes: a project for primary school teachers in Hong Kong. Gifted Education International34(1): 36–46.
56.
ZhangZ (2017) Gifted education in China. Cogent Education4(1): 1364881.
