The scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students (SRBCSS), which were developed by Renzulli and his colleagues, are considered the most widespread and the most important scales used in the identification of gifted and superior students. Recently, four new scales were added. The aim of this research was to examine the reliability and validity of the four new scales in the Saudi environment. The scales were administered in Riyadh city to 348 primary school children, and their validity was calculated in several ways: face validity, discriminative validity, construct validity, internal consistency, concurrent validity, and factorial validity. Reliability was calculated by Cronbach alpha and test-retest methods. Results showed that the scales have good psychometric characteristics, which render them suitable for use in the identification of the gifted in relevant scientific fields.
AdahmashyM (2007) The Guide for Students and Personnel in Special Education (1st ed.). Amman: Dar Elfelr Publisher.
2.
AlawalmaHAremawiSAserajA (2008) The relationship between creative characteristics according to Renzulli's scale and social and family problems among gifted students in the 7th grade. The Journal of Specific Education, Mansoura University, Egypt, 12: 145–164.
3.
AlfarahYAserajA (2008) The relationship between leadership characteristics according to Renzulli’s scale and the emotional and health problems among gifted students in the 9th grade. The Journal of Specific Education12: 165–182.
4.
American Educational Research Association (1999) Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
ArgulewiczE (1985) Review of scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students. In: MitchellJVJr (ed.) The Ninth Mental Measurements Yearbook Vol. 2. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, pp.1311–1312).
7.
ArgulewiczEElliottSStephenN (1981) Validity of the SRBCSS for Hispanic and Anglo gifted students. In: Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA, 19–31 August, pp. 21.
8.
BagozziR (1993) Assessing construct validity in personality research: Applications to measures of self-esteem. Journal of Research in Personality27: 49–87.
9.
BakheitS (2005) The Basics of Identifying Mentally Gifted Children in the Basic Education Stage (The Case of the Second Cycle Children in Al-Qabas Schools in Khartoum). Unpublished PhD dissertation, Khartoum University, the Sudan.
10.
BakheitS (2008) The effectiveness of teacher nominations in identifying gifted children. The Educational Journal22(88): 117–159.
11.
BaldwinA (2005) Identification concerns and promises for gifted students of diverse populations. Theory Into Practice44: 105–114.
12.
BrackenBBrownE (2006) Behavioral identification and assessment of gifted and talented students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment24(2): 112–122.
13.
BrodyL (2007) Review of the gifted and talented evaluation scales. In GeisingerKFSpiesR ACarlsonJFPlakeBS (eds) The Seventeenth Mental Measurements Yearbook. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, pp.343–345.
14.
ElliottSArgulewiczETurcoT (1986) Predictive validity of the Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students for gifted children in three sociocultural groups. Journal of Experimental Education55: 27–32.
15.
ElliottSBusseRGreshamF (1993) Behavior rating scales: Issues of use and development. School Psychology Review22: 313–321.
16.
GardnerH (1983) Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
17.
GardnerHHatchT (1989) Multiple intelligences go to school: Educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences. Educational Researcher18(8): 4–9.
18.
GilliamJCarpenterBChristensenJ (1996) Gifted and Talented Evaluation Scales. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
19.
GrayRMcCallumRBainS (2009) Language-reduced screening for giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted33(1): 38–64.
20.
GregoryR (2004) Psychological Testing: History, Principles, and Applications (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Group, Inc.
21.
HartyHAdkinsDSherwoodR (1984) Predictability of giftedness identification indices for two recognized approaches to elementary school gifted education. Journal of Educational Research77: 337–342.
22.
HeldsingerSHumphryS (2010) Using the method of pairwise comparison to obtain reliable teacher assessments. The Australian Educational Researcher37(2): 1–19.
23.
HogeRCudmoreL (1986) The use of teacher-judgment measures in the identification of gifted pupils. Teaching and Teacher Education2: 181–196.
24.
JarosewichTPfeifferSIMorrisJ (2002) Identifying gifted students using teacher rating scales: A review of existing instruments. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment20: 322–336.
KalantanA (1990) Bahrain high school teachers’ assessment: Characteristics of giftedness. In: Annual Convention of the National Association of the Gifted Children, Little Rock, AR, 7 November.
27.
KalantanA (1991) The Effects of Inservice Training on Bahraini Teachers: Perceptions of Giftedness. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
28.
LeeDPfeifferS (2006) The reliability and validity of a Korean-translated version of the gifted rating scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment24(3): 210–224.
29.
LeeMSiegleD (2008) A multilevel analysis of gifted KOREAN American students’ characteristics and school context effects on learning style preferences. Gifted and Talented International23(2): 25–38.
30.
LiHLeeDPfeifferSKamataAKumtepeARosadoJ (2009) Measurement invariance of the gifted rating scales-school form across five cultural groups. School Psychology Quarterly24(3): 186–198.
31.
LiHPfeifferSPetscherYKumtepeAMoG (2008) Validation of the gifted rating scales-school form in China. Gifted Child Quarterly52(2): 160–169.
32.
MaajeniOHeweidyM (1995) The differences between superior and normal students in the preparatory school in Bahrain on the Scale for Rating the Characteristics of Superior Students. The Educational Journal9(35): 105–142.
33.
MatthewsM (2007) Review of the scales for identifying gifted students. In: GeisingerKFSpiesRACarlsonJFPlakeBS (eds) The Seventeenth Mental Measurements Yearbook. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, pp.729–731.
NitkoABrookhartS (2007) Educational Assessment of Students. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
36.
PetersSGentryM (2010) Multigroup construct validity evidence of the ‘HOPE Scale’: Instrumentation to identify low-income elementary students for gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly54(4): 298–313.
37.
PfeifferSJarosewichT (2007) The Gifted Rating Scales-School Form: An analysis of the standardization sample based on age, gender, race, and diagnostic efficiency. Gifted Child Quarterly51(1): 39–50.
38.
PfeifferSPetscherY (2008) Identifying young gifted children using the Gifted Rating Scales-Preschool/Kindergarten Form. Gifted Child Quarterly52(1): 19–29.
39.
PfeifferSPetscherYJarosewichT (2007) The Gifted Rating Scales-Preschool/Kindergarten Form: An analysis of the standardization sample based on age, gender, and race. Roeper Review29(3): 206–211.
40.
PfeifferSPetscherYKumtepeA (2008) The Gifted Rating Scales-School Form: A validation study based on age, gender, and race. Roeper Review30(2): 140–146.
41.
RenzulliJ (1978) What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan60: 180–184, 261.
42.
RenzulliJ (1986) The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In: SternbergRJDavidsonJE (eds) Conceptions of Giftedness. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.53–92.
43.
RenzulliJHartmanR (1971a) Out of the classroom: Scale for rating behavioral characteristics of superior students. Exceptional Children38(3): 211–214.
44.
RenzulliJHartmanR (1971b) Out of the classroom: Scale for rating behavioral characteristics of superior students. Exceptional Children38(3): 243–248.
45.
RenzulliJHartmanR (2004) RENZULLI–HARTMAN Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students. Austin, TX: Creative Learning Press, Inc.
RenzulliJSiegleDReisSGavinMReedR (2009) An investigation of the reliability and factor structure of four new scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students. Journal of Advanced Academics21: 84–108.
48.
RenzulliJSmithLWhiteACallahanCHartmanR (1976) Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students. Austin, TX: Creative Learning Press, Inc.
49.
RenzulliJSmithLWhiteACallahanCHartmanRWestbergK (2002a) Scales for Rating the Behavior Characteristics of Superior Students (Revised Edition). Austin, TX: Creative Learning Press, Inc.
50.
RenzulliJSmithLWhiteACallahanCHartmanRWestbergK (2002b) Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students: Technical and Administration Manual (Revised Edition). Austin, TX: Creative Learning Press, Inc.
51.
RenzulliJWestbergK (1993) Teacher Judgment of Student Characteristics: A Version of the Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students. Austin, TX: Creative Learning Press, Inc.
52.
RosadoJPfeifferSPetscherY (2008) The reliability and validity of a Spanish-translated version of the gifted rating scales. Gifted and Talented International23(1): 105–114.
53.
RustJLoseB (1980) Screening for giftedness with the Slosson and the Scales for Rating Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students. Psychology in the Schools17: 446–451.
54.
SiegleDPowellT (2004) Exploring teacher biases when nominating students for gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly48: 21–29.
55.
SireciS (2007) On validity theory and test validation. Educational Researcher36(8): 477–481.
56.
SiuA (2010) The reliability and validity of a Chinese-translated version of the Gifted Rating Scale-Preschool/Kindergarten Form. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment28(3): 249–258.
57.
SmithE (1984) Identifying and nurturing giftedness in the creative learning environment of Ellerton Primary School. In: International Conference: Education for the Gifted ‘Ingenium 2000’, Stellenbosch, Republic of South Africa, 26–29June 1984.
58.
SrourN (1989) An analysis of teacher judgment in the identification of gifted Jordanian students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
59.
SubhiT (1997) Who is gifted? A computerized identification procedure. High Ability Students8: 189–211.
60.
SumidaM (2010) Identifying twice-exceptional children and three gifted styles in the Japanese primary science classroom. International Journal of Science Education32(15): 2097–2111.
61.
Van Tassel-BaskaJQuekCFengA (2006) The development and use of a structured teacher observation scale to assess differentiated best practice. Roeper Review29(2): 84–92.
62.
Van Tassel-BaskaJJohnsonDAveryL (2002) Using performance tasks in the identification of economically disadvantaged and minority gifted learners: Findings from Project STAR. Gifted Child Quarterly46: 110–123.
63.
WrightA (2009) An analysis of measures used for the assessment of ‘giftedness’ in intermediate and middle school children. Doctoral dissertation, Fairleigh Dickinson University, USA.
