The precise determination of the intracellular concentration of a drug is a major challenge in drug discovery. Microinjection is a very effective technique for the introduction of macromolecules into single cells. However, due to the large number of parameters that need to be adjusted and the complex physical mechanisms involved, there are currently no means by which the concentration of a microinjected intracellular compound could be theoretically estimated. In this paper, we present a method for the theoretical estimation of intracellular drug concentration, based on the framework of classical fluid mechanism theory — specifically, the modified Bernoulli equation. We introduce into Bernoulli’s classical equation the effect of friction due to the non-laminar regimes of the injected fluid. We also study the compatibility of our theoretical estimation model with variations in injection time and concentration of the compound inside the microinjection needle. Finally, microinjected calcium concentrations estimated with the theoretical model were compared with those determined experimentally in several cell types, by using a Fura-2-based Ca2+ imaging technique.
LuqueJBarrilJ (eds). Physico-chemical and computational approaches to drug discovery. Cambridge: RSC Publishing; 2012, 443 pp.
2.
Mulligan-KehoeMJTwomeyPERossoA. General concepts of molecular biology related to lung cancer. In: PassHIMitchellJB, et al. (eds). Lung cancer: Principles and practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996, pp. 1–54.
3.
NooriASelvaganapathyPRWilsonJ. Microinjection in a microfluidic format using flexible and compliant channels and electroosmotic dosage control. Lab Chip2009; 9: 3202–3211.
4.
ShikegawaKDowerWJ. Electroporation of eukaryotes and prokaryotes: a general approach to the introduction of macromolecules into cells. Biotechniques1988; 6: 742–751.
5.
ErgencAFOlgacN. New technology for cellular piercing: rotationally oscillating μ-injector, description and validation tests. Biomed Microdevices2007; 9: 885–891.
6.
AdamoAJensenKF. Microfluidic based single cell microinjection. Lab Chip2008; 8: 1258–1261.
7.
AnsorgeW. Improved system for capillary microinjection into living cells. Exp Cell Res1982; 140: 31–37.
8.
AnsorgeWPepperkokR. Performance of an automated system for capillary microinjection into living cells. J Biochem Biophys Methods1988; 16: 283–292.
9.
Karzar-JeddiMOlgacNFanTH. Dynamic response of micropipettes during piezo-assisted intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys2011; 84: 041908.
10.
WangWSunYZhangM, et al.A system for high-speed microinjection of adherent cells. Rev Sci Instrum2008; 79: 104302.
11.
MinaschekGBereiter-HahnJBertholdtG. Quantitation of the volume of liquid injected into cells by means of pressure. Exp Cell Res1989; 183: 434–442.
12.
HoffmannEKLambertIHPedersenSF. Physiology of cell volume regulation in vertebrates. Physiol Rev2009; 89: 193–277.
13.
LangF. Mechanisms and significance of cell volume regulation. J Am Coll Nutr2007; 26: 613S–623S.
14.
OrlovSNPlatonovaAAHametP, et al.Cell volume and monovalent ion transporters: their role in cell death machinery triggering and progression. Am J Physiol-Cell Physiol2013; 305: C361–C372.
15.
LeeGM. Measurement of volume injected into individual cells by quantitative fluorescence microscopy. J Cell Sci1989; 94: 443–447.
16.
HirvonenJVilkkoMRoinilaT, et al.Estimation of electrical cell-capillary admittance during injection with frequency response method. In: ChungMJ, et al. (eds). IFAC 17th World Congress, Seoul, Korea, 6–11 July 2008.
17.
AzarmaneshMDejamMAzizianP, et al.Passive microinjection within high-throughput microfluidics for controlled actuation of droplets and cells. Sci Rep2019; 9: 6723.
18.
AbateARHungTMaryP, et al.High-throughput injection with microfluidics using picoinjectors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2010; 107: 19163–19166.
19.
MashaguiSAbbaspourradAWeitzDA, et al.Droplets microfluids: a tool for biology, chemistry and nanotechnology. Trends Analyt Chem2016; 82: 118–125.
20.
VillarGHeronAJBayleyH. Formation of droplet networks that function in aqueous environments. Nat Nanotechnol2011; 6: 803–808.
21.
ProbsteinRF. Physicochemical hydrodynamics: an introduction. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 1994, 368 pp.
22.
KarniadakisGEBeskokA. Microflows. New York: Springer, 2002, 340 pp.
23.
ShermanFS. Viscous flow. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1990, 746 pp.
24.
TennekesHLumleyJL. A first course in turbulence. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1972, 316 pp.
25.
GarciaDPibarotPDumesnilJG, et al.Assessment of aortic valve stenosis severity. Circulation2000; 101: 765–771.
26.
ModelMAKhitrinAKBlankJL. Measurement of the absorption of concentrated dyes and their use for quantitative imaging of surface topography. J Microsc2008; 231: 156–167.
27.
KorchevYEGorelikJLabMJ, et al.Cell volume measurement using scanning ion conductance microscopy. Biophys J2000; 78: 451–457.
28.
GrynkiewiczGPoenieMTsienRY. A new generation of Ca2+ indicators with greatly improved fluorescence properties. J Biol Chem1985; 260: 3440–3450.
29.
KaoJPY. Practical aspects of measuring [Ca2+] with fluorescent indicators. Methods Cel Biol1994; 40: 155–181.
30.
HelmchenFImotoKSakmannB. Ca2+ buffering and action potential-evoked Ca2+ signaling in dendrites of pyramidal neurons. Biophys J1996; 70: 1069–1081.
31.
IatridouHFoukarakiEKuhnMA, et al.The development of a new family of intracellular calcium probes. Cell Calcium1994; 15: 190–198.
32.
NeumannSKovtunADietzelID, et al. The use of size-defined DNA-functionalized calcium phosphate nanoparticles to minimise intracellular calcium disturbance during transfection. Biomaterials2009; 30: 6794–6802.
33.
Brian HoustonJ.GaletinA.Progress towards prediction of human pharmacokinetic parameters from in vitro technologies. Drug Metab Rev2003; 35: 393–415.
34.
ModelMA. Imaging the cell’s third dimension. Micros Today2012; 20: 32–37.
RogerPPRickaertFHuezG, et al.Microinjection of catalytic subunit of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinases triggers acute morphological changes in thyroid epithelial cells. FEBS Lett1988; 232: 409–413.
37.
SunYNelsonBJ. Biological cell injection using an autonomous microrobotic system. Int J Robotics Res2002; 21: 861–868.
38.
PepperkokRZanettiMKingR, et al.Automatic microinjection system facilitates detection of growth inhibitory mRNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA1988; 85: 6748–6752.
