Abstract
This article offers a critical, intersectional reflection on disability advocacy, grounded in the lived experience of a disabled Black woman navigating ableist employment structures and institutional neglect within UK public sector governance. Written from the author's standpoint as a disabled Black woman based in the UK higher education and public policy sphere, it draws from personal archives and direct action including correspondence with state equality bodies to unpack the racialised, gendered, and bureaucratic dimensions of access failure. Adopting an autoethnographic approach rooted in Black feminist methodologies and disability justice frameworks, the article resists presenting personal experience as anecdotal. Instead, it positions such lived accounts as political evidence of how race, disability, gender, and structural power converge to produce compounded exclusions. Framed by feminist disability justice, epistemic injustice, and critiques of institutional performativity, the piece interrogates how diversity discourses can simultaneously acknowledge and neutralise dissent. It examines the emotional and material toll of being repeatedly unheard, the exhaustion of procedural compliance, and the persistent refusal to be co-opted by tokenistic narratives of inclusion. This is both a critique and a survival offering a call for collective reimagining of access not as a compliance task but as a political and ethical imperative. In doing so, the article contributes to wider debates on structural accountability, the sustainability of activist labour, and access as a demand forged through resistance rather than bestowed by institutions.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
