This article provides an understanding of childhood welfare from a radical perspective, showing how power within the special education system affects the discourse of ‘choice’ for parents. The analysis unmasks the disciplinary power operating within the special education system and explores the manner in which such power affects choice for parents. In turn, the analysis suggests that although disciplinary power offers little sites for resistance, the actions of some parents in the exercise of choice are seen as a growing challenge to that power. It remains to be seen just how resistant the system will become in the face of such opposition.
Bagley, C. , Woods, P.A. and Woods, G. (2001) ‘Implementation of School Choice Policy: Interpretation and Response by Parents of Students with Special Educational Needs’ , British Educational Research Journal27(3): 287-311 .
2.
Ball, S.J. (1990) ‘Introducing Monsieur Foucault’, pp. 1-8 in S.J. Ball (ed.) Foucault and Education: Disciplines and Knowledge. London: Routledge .
3.
Barnes, C. and Oliver, M. (1993) Disability: A Sociological Phenomenon Ignored by Sociologists [http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/Barnes/socphenomenon.pdf]. Accessed 20 May 2001.
4.
Billington, T. (1996) ‘Pathologising Children: Psychology in Education and Acts of Government’, pp. 37-54 in E. Burman , G. Aitken , P. Alldred , R. Allwood , T. Billington , B. Goldberg , A.G. Lopez , C. Heenan , D. Marks and S. Warner (eds) Psychology Discourse Practice: From Regulation to Resistance. Exeter: SRP Ltd.
5.
Billington, T. (2000) Separating, Losing and Excluding Children: Narratives of Difference. London: RoutledgeFalmer .
6.
Billington, T. (2002) ‘Children, Psychologists and Knowledge: a Discourse-analytic Narrative’ , Educational and Child Psychology19(3): 32-41 .
7.
Bines, H. (2000) ‘Inclusive Standards? Current Developments in Policy for Special Educational Needs in England and Wales’ , Oxford Review of Education26(1): 21-33 .
8.
Carabine, J. (2001) ‘Unmarried Motherhood 1830-1990: a Genealogical Analysis’, pp. 267-310 in M. Wetherell , S. Taylor and S.J. Yates (eds) Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis. London: SAGE .
9.
Charmaz, K. (1990) ‘“Discovering” Chronic Illness: Using Grounded Theory’ , Social Science and Medicine30(11): 1161-1172 .
10.
Charmaz, K. (1995) ‘Grounded Theory’, pp. 27-49 in J.A. Smith , R. Harre and L. Van Langenhove (eds) Rethinking Methods in Psychology. London: SAGE .
11.
Charmaz, K. (2000) ‘Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods’, pp. 509-535 in N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE .
12.
Covaleskie, J.F. (1993) Power Goes to School: Teachers, Students and Discipline. Northern Michigan University [http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/EPS/PESYearbook/93_docs/COVALESK.HTM]. Accessed 24 November 2003.
13.
DfE (1996) Education Act. London: HMSO .
14.
DfEE (1998) SEN: Excellence for All Children: Meeting Special Educational Needs. Suffolk: Department for Education and Employment .
15.
DfEE (2000) Educational Psychology Services (England): Current Role, Good Practice and Future Directions, Report of the Working Group. London: Department for Education and Employment .
16.
DfES (2001) Special Educational Needs: Code of Practice. London: Department for Education and Skills .
17.
DfES (2004) Removing Barriers to Achievement: The Government’s Strategy for SEN [http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/wholeschool/sen/strategy/]. Accessed 26 February 2004.
18.
Finch, J. (1984) Education as Social Policy. New York: Longman .
19.
Ford, J. , Mongon, D. and Whelan, M. (1982) Special Education and Social Control. London: Routledge .
20.
Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books .
21.
Foucault, M. (1988) ‘Social Security’, pp. 159-177 in L.D. Kritzman (ed.) Michel Foucault: Politics, Philosophy, Culture, Interviews and Other Writings, 1977-1984. New York: Routledge .
22.
Fraser, N. and Gordon, L. (1994) ‘A Genealogy of Dependency: Tracing a Keyword of the US Welfare State’ , Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society19(2): 309-336 .
23.
Hall, S. (1997) ‘The Work of Representation’, pp. 13-64 in S. Hall (ed.) Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: SAGE .
24.
Hall, S. (2001) ‘Foucault: Power, Knowledge and Discourse’, pp. 72-81 in M. Wetherell , S. Taylor and S.J. Yates (eds) Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader. London: SAGE .
25.
Kendall, G. and Wickham, G. (1999) Using Foucault’s Methods. London: SAGE .
26.
Kenway, J. (1990) ‘Education and the Right’s Discursive Politics: Private versus State Schooling’, pp. 167-206 in S.J. Ball (ed.) Foucault and Education: Disciplines and Knowledge. London: Routledge .
27.
Kitchen, R. (1998) ‘“Out of Place”, “Knowing One’s Place”: Space, Power and the Exclusion of Disabled People’ , Disability and Society13(3): 343-356 .
28.
Lee, T. (1996) The Search for Equity: The Funding of Additional Educational Needs Under LMS. Aldershot: Avebury .
29.
Lyotard, J.F. (1986) The Postmodern Condition. Manchester: Manchester University Press .
30.
McIntosh, P. (2002) ‘An Archi-Texture of Learning Disability Services: the Use of Michel Foucault’ , Disability and Society17(1): 65-79 .
31.
McKinlay, A. and Starkey, K. (1998) ‘Managing Foucault: Management and Organisation Theory’, pp. 1-13 in A. McKinlay and K. Starkey (eds) Foucault, Management and Organisation Theory: From Panopticon to Technologies of the Self. London: SAGE .
32.
Marshall, C. and Rossman, G.B. (1999) Designing Qualitative Research. London: SAGE .
33.
Marshall, J.D. (1990) ‘Foucault and Educational Research’, pp. 11-28 in S.J. Ball (ed.) Foucault and Education: Disciplines and Knowledge. London: Routledge .
34.
Moffatt, K. (1999) ‘Surveillance and Government of the Welfare Recipient’. pp. 219-245 in A.S. Chambon , A. Irving and L. Epstein (eds) Reading Foucault: For Social Work. New York: Columbia University Press .
35.
Nightingale, D. and Cromby, J. (1999) Social Constructionist Psychology: A Critical Analysis of Theory and Practice. Buckingham: Open University Press .
36.
Oliver, M. (1996) Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. London: Macmillan .
37.
Owens, M. (2000) ‘Parents of Children with Cerebral Palsy: Their Experiences and Perspectives of Conductive Education’, unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Wolverhampton.
38.
Paige-Smith, A. (1997) ‘The Rise and Impact of the Parental Lobby: Including Voluntary Groups and the Education of Children with Learning Difficulties or Disabilities’, pp. 41-54 in S. Wolfendale (ed.) Working with Parents of SEN Children after the Code of Practice. London: David Fulton .
39.
Parker, I. (1992) Discourse Dynamics: Critical Analysis for Social and Individual Psychology. London: Routledge .
40.
Rose, N. (1989) Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. London: Routledge .
41.
Rose, N. (1998) Inventing Ourselves: Psychology, Power and Personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
42.
Smith, J.A. (1995) ‘Semi-structured Interviewing and Qualitative Analysis’, pp. 9-26 in J.A. Smith , R. Harre and L. Van Langenhove (eds) Rethinking Methods in Psychology. London: SAGE .
43.
Taylor, S. (2001) ‘Locating and Conducting Discourse Analytic Work’, pp. 5-48 in M. Wetherell , S. Taylor and S.J. Yates (eds) Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis. London: SAGE .
44.
Willig, C. (1999) Applied Discourse Analysis. Buckingham: Open University Press .
