As subjects of the parental right to choose (DES, 1988), parents are called upon to fulfil certain duties and responsibilities when choosing a secondary school for their child, with the expectation that they might navigate the school system ‘successfully’ and become ‘better informed consumers’ (DCSF, 2008). To comply with these rules of citizenship parents are encouraged to make use of a variety of information on schools as part of a realistic and informed choice, one that is consummate with their role as consumer-citizens. Such ‘cognitive mapping’ is evident in school brochures and websites where choice is assembled on the basis of visual iconography and narrative terrains. This leads to a consideration of how choice is visually mediated and communicated through the circulation of symbols and the structure of narratives. To explain these phenomena, I analyse and compare the ways in which two all-girls faith secondary schools attempt to (further) define themselves, culturally, historically and pedagogically, in a crowded field of choice. I conclude the paper with a discussion of the benefits and insights generated through a visually orientated approach to the study of school choice.
BallSJ (1993) ‘Education Markets, Choice and Social Class: The Market as a Class Strategy in the UK and the USA’, British Journal of Sociology of Education14(1): 3–19.
2.
BallSJ (2006) Education Policy and Social Class: The Selected Works of Stephen J. Ball. Abingdon: Routledge.
3.
BallSJ (2008) The Education Debate. Bristol: Policy Press.
4.
BallSJVincentC (1998) ‘“I Heard it on the Grapevine”: “Hot” Knowledge and School Choice’, British Journal of Sociology of Education19(3): 377–400.
5.
BeckerHS (1975) ‘Photography and Sociology’, AfterimageNo 3, pp. 22–32.
6.
BroughtonV (1996) Too Close to Heaven: The Illustrated History of Gospel Music. London: Midnight Books.
7.
ClarkeJNewmanJSmithNVidlerEWestmarlandL (2007) Creating Citizen-Consumers: Changing Publics and Changing Public Services. London: SAGE.
8.
CopelandI (1994) ‘The Primary School Brochure: A Sample Analysis’, Educational Studies20(3): 387–398.
9.
Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) (2008) Duty to Provide Information, Advice and Assistance: Guidance for Local Authorities. Nottingham: DCSF Publications.
10.
Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) (2009) Children’s Services: Improvement Support for Local Authorities and Children’s Trusts. A National Prospectus 2009–10. Nottingham: DCSF Publications.
11.
Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (2005) Higher Standards, Better Schools for All. London: HMSO.
12.
Department of Education and Science (DES) (1988) Education Reform Act. London: HMSO.
13.
Department of Education and Science (DES) (1991) The Parent’s Charter: You and Your Child’s Education. London: HMSO.
14.
DunleavyP (1991) Democracy, Bureaucracy and Public Choice: Economic Explanations in Political Science. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
15.
DwyerP (1998) ‘Conditional Citizens? Welfare Rights and Responsibilities in the Late 1990s’, Critical Social Policy18(4): 493–517.
16.
EagletonT (2003) After Theory. New York: Basic Books.
17.
EagletonT (2007) Ideology: An Introduction. London: Verso.
18.
EdwardsE (ed.) (1992) Anthropology and Photography 1860–1920. New Haven: Yale University Press.
19.
EmmisonMSmithP (2000) Researching the Visual. London: SAGE.
20.
FinkJ (2008) ‘Inside a Hall of Mirrors: Residential Care and the Shifting Constructions of Childhood in Mid-Twentieth-Century Britain’, Pedagogica Historica44(3): 287–307.
21.
FisherM (2009) Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative?Winchester: Zero Books.
22.
GabrielYLangT (1995) The Unmanageable Consumer: Contemporary Consumption and its Fragmentation. London: SAGE.
23.
GewirtzSBallSJBoweR (1995) Markets, Choice and Equity in Education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
24.
GoffmanE (1979) Gender Advertisements. New York: Harper.
25.
GoldsteinB (2007) ‘All Photos Lie: Images as Data’, pp. 61–82 in StanczakG (ed.) Visual Research Methods: Image, Society and Representation. London: SAGE.
26.
GrosvenorID (2007) ‘From the “Eye of History” to “a Second Gaze”: The Visual Archive and the Marginalized in the History of Education’, History of Education36(4&5): 607–622.
27.
HuCSoongAKF (2007) ‘Beyond Electronic Brochures: An Analysis of Singapore Primary School Websites’, Educational Media International44(1): 33–42.
28.
MaguireMBallSJMacraeS (1999) ‘Promotion, Persuasion and Class-Taste: Marketing (in) the UK Post-Compulsory Sector’, British Journal of Sociology of Education20(3): 291–308.
29.
MargolisE (2000) ‘Class Pictures: Representations of Race, Gender and Ability in a Century of School Photography’, Education Policy Analysis Archives8(31): 7–38.
30.
MarquandD (2004) The Decline of the Public: The Hollowing Out of Citizenship. Cambridge: Polity Press.
NeedhamC (2003) Citizen-Consumers: New Labour’s Marketplace Democracy. London: The Catalyst Forum.
33.
OplatkaIHemsley-BrownJ (2004) ‘The Research on School Marketing: Current Issues and Future Directions’, Journal of Educational Administration42(3): 375–400.
34.
OriaACardiniAStamouEKolookithaMVertiganSBallSFlores-MorenoC (2007) ‘Urban Education, the Middle Classes and their Dilemmas of School Choice’, Journal of Education Policy22(1): 91–106.
35.
OsleyR (2008) ‘Millar’s Tale of “Backroom Deal” Stirs up Academy Row’, Camden New Journal, 30October, p. 2.
ReayD (2008) ‘Tony Blair, the Promotion of the “Active” Educational Citizen, and Middle-Class Hegemony’, Oxford Review of Education34(6): 639–650.
38.
ReayDBallSJ (1997) ‘“Spoilt for Choice”: The Working Classes and Educational Markets’, Oxford Review of Education23(1): 89–101.
39.
ReayDHollingworthSWilliamsKCrozierGJamiesonFJamesDBeedellP (2007) ‘“A Darker Shade of Pale?” Whiteness, the Middle Classes and Multi-Ethnic Inner City Schooling’, Sociology41(6): 1041–1060.
40.
ReayDCrozierGJamesDHollingworthSWilliamsKJamiesonFBeedellP (2008) ‘Re-Invigorating Democracy? White Middle Class Identities and Comprehensive Schooling’, The Sociological Review56(2): 238–255.
SnowCP (1964) Two Cultures: And a Second Look. An Expanded Version of the Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
SymesC (1998) ‘Education for Sale: A Semiotic Analysis of School Prospectuses and Other Forms of Educational Marketing’, Australian Journal of Education42(2): 133–152.
44.
ThalerRSusteinC (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
45.
TuckerS (2007) The Battle for Big School. London: Arrow Books.
WetherellMTaylorSYatesSJ (eds) (2005) Discourse Theory and Practice. London: SAGE.
48.
WilkinsA (2010) ‘Citizens and/or Consumers: Mutations in the Construction of Meanings and Practices of School Choice’, Journal of Education Policy25(2): 171–189.
49.
WilkinsA (2011a) ‘School Choice, Consumerism and the Ethical Strand in Talk’, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education32(3): 357–370.
50.
WilkinsA (2011b) ‘Community and School Choice: Geographies of Care and Responsibility’, Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology21(1): 1–13.
51.
ZizekS (2009) First as Tragedy, Then as Farce. London: Verso.
