This paper surveys literature relating to the Anglo-American model (shareholder theory) and stakeholder theory of corporate governance in the modern global business environment. Stakeholder theory emerged during the 1970–80s and suggested that corporations should look beyond the shareholder perspective of profit maximisation. Through a survey of the literature we examine why the traditional Anglo-American model of corporate governance had difficulties when dealing with certain unethical business practices of corporate boards. Overall, this study investigates whether an application of deontological and teleological ethical theories may illustrate how boards of directors could manage stakeholder issues and deal with problematic moral dilemmas and ethical decisions.
AikhafajiA.F. (1989). A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Governance: Managing in a Dynamic Environment. Westport CT: Quorum Books.
2.
BeerC. (2004). Prize Essay: Do Stakeholders have Intrinsic Moral Rights?Business Ethics: A European Review, 13(1), 65–70.
3.
BeuS.A.BuckleyM.R.HarveyG.M. (2003). Ethical Decision-Making: A Multidimensional Construct. Business Ethics: A European Review, 12(1), 88–110.
4.
BlairM.M. (1995). Ownership and Control – Rethinking Corporate Governance For The Twenty-Fist Century. The Brookings Institute Washington, D.C.
5.
BurnsR. (2000a). Enlightenment. In BurnsR.Raymond-PickardH. (eds), Philosophiesof History. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
6.
CadburyA. (1992). Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. Gee and Co. Ltd.London.
7.
CharkhamJ. (1989). Corporate Governance and the Market for Control of Companies. Bank of England Panel Paper 25, Bank of England: London.
8.
CharkhamJ. (1994). Keeping Good Company: A Study of Corporate Governance in Five Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
De GeorgeR.T. (1999). Business Ethics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentics-Hall.
10.
DillW. (1975). Public Participation in Corporation Planning: Strategic Management in a Kibitzer’s World. Long Range Planning, 34–35.
11.
DonaldsonT.PrestonL. (1995). The stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.
12.
EliasA.A.CavanaR.Y.JacksonL.S. (2000). Linking Stakeholder Literature and System Dynamics: Opportunities for Research, Proceedings of the International Conference on Systems Thinking in Management, Geelong, Australia, 174–179.
13.
EtzioniA. (1998). A Communitarian Note on Stakeholder Theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(4), 679–691.
14.
EvanW.M.FreemanR.E. (1993). A Stakeholder Theory of Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism. In BeauchampT.BowieN. (eds), Ethical Theory and Business. Prentice Hall.
15.
FeraN. (1997). Using Shareholder Value to Evaluate Strategic Choices. Management Accounting Journal. USA, 79, 47–54.
16.
FreemanR.E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 1–21.
17.
FreemanR.E. (1994). The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409–422.
18.
FreemanR.E. (1996). Understanding Stakeholder Capitalism. Financial Times (London Edition), 18July.
19.
FriedmanM. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. The New York Time Magazine, 30September.
20.
GibsonK. (2000). The Moral Basis of Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 26, 245–257.
21.
GoodpasterK. (1991). Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1(1), 63–8.
22.
Hample Committee (1998). On Corporate Governance: Final Report. Gee Publishing: London.
23.
HiggsD. (2003). Report on the Review of the Role of and Effectiveness of Non-Executive Directors. Gee and Co Publishing. London.
24.
HowellK.E.LetzaS. (2000). Virtue, Virtu, Categorical Imperative and the Civic Constitution: Defining Corporate Governance. The Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 11(1), 95–100.
25.
HSBC Bank (2004). International Local Bank: Moving Call Centres to India. The TimesNewspaper, London.
26.
HuttonW. (1995). The State We’re In. London: Cape.
27.
JensenM.C. (2001). Value Maximisation, Stakeholder Theory and the Corporate Objectives Function. The Monitor Group and Harvard Business School.
28.
JensenM.C.MecklingW.H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Management Incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 98(2), 225–235.
29.
KantI. (1987) Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals. Trans AbbotT.K.Prometheus.
30.
KapsteinM.WempeJ. (2002). The Balanced Company: A Theory of Corporate Integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
KayJ.SilberstonA. (1995). Corporate Governance. National Institute Economic Review, 84, 84–97.
32.
KeaseyK.ThompsonS.WrightM. (1997). Corporate Governance: Economic, Management, and Financial Issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
LogsdonJ.M.WoodD.J. (1997). Research in Stakeholder Theory. The Sloan Foundation Minigrant Project: USA.
34.
ManneH.G. (1965). Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control. Journal of Political Economy, 75, 110–126.
35.
MarcouxA.M. (2000). Balancing Act. In Des JardinsJ.R.McCallJ.J. (eds), Contemporary Issues in Business Ethics, 4th edition Wadsworth.
36.
MetcalfeC.E. (1998). The Stakeholder Corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(1), 30–35.
37.
MitchellR.AgleB.WoodD. (1997). Towards a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
38.
MasonR.MitroffI. (1982). Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions. New York: John Wiley and Son.
39.
MillsR. (1998). The Dynamics of Shareholder Value. Lechlade. Mars Business Associates.
40.
OmranM.AtrillP.PointonJ. 9200). Shareholders versus Stakeholders: Corporate Mission Statements and Investor Returns. Business Ethics: A European Review, 11(4), 318–326.
41.
PhillipsR.A. (2003). Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.San Francisco.
42.
PhillipsR.A. (1997). Stakeholder Theory and A Principle of Fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(1), 51–66.
43.
RowanJ.R. (2000). The Moral Foundation of Employee Rights. Journal of Business Ethics, 24, 355–361.
44.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2002). The USA Influence, Supplement. New York Stock Exchange and NASDAQ Proposed Listed Company Corporate Governance.
45.
SchollH.J. (2002). Applying Stakeholder Theory to E-Government: Benefits and Limits. University at Albany and SUNY Centre for Technology in Government.
46.
SherwinD. (1983). The Ethical Roots of Business System. Harvard Business Review, Nov–Dec1983.
47.
SingerP. (1993). A Companion to Ethics. Blackwell Publishers Oxford.
48.
SingerP. (1998). Practical Ethics. Cambridge University Press
49.
SmithA. (1985 Edition). The Wealth of Nations. Middlesex UK: Penguin.
50.
SmithR. (2003). Smith Committee Reports on Audit Committee Combined Codes Guidance for FRC. Financial Reporting Council, www.frc.org.uk/publication
51.
SternbergE. (1996). Stakeholder Theory Exposed. Corporate Governance Quarterly, 2, 1.
52.
SternbergE. (2000). Just Business: Business Ethics in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53.
SternbergE. (2004). Corporate Governance: Accountability in the Marketplace. The Institute of Economic Affairs, (IEA). London.
54.
SunX. (2002). Rethinking Corporate Governance: A Processual Approach. Ph D Thesis, Leeds Metropolitan University.
